Abstract
Objectives
With the evolution of technology in the field of thoracoscopy, three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic systems with 4 K resolution have recently come into use. This study aimed to determine perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy performed a year after the 4 K three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic system installation and compare them with those of the high-definition (HD) 3D endoscopic system.
Methods
We included patients who underwent complete VATS (cVATS) lobectomy for primary lung cancer using an HD3D endoscopic system (HD3D group, June 2015–September 2021, n = 251) or 4K3D endoscopic system (4K3D group, October 2021–September 2022, n = 47). The perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results
The operation time was significantly shorter in the 4K3D group (mean, 189.5 min) than in the HD3D group (208.5 min; p = 0.021), and the 4K3D group did not require conversion to thoracotomy or transfusion. The 4K3D group had less blood loss volume (4K3D group: mean, 24.0 mL vs. HD3D group: 43.3 mL; p = 0.105) and shorter chest drainage duration (4K3D group: mean, 2.3 days vs. HD3D group: 3.1 days; p = 0.115) and hospitalization period (4K3D group: mean, 7.9 days vs. HD3D group:10.0 days; p = 0.226) than the HD3D group, with no significant difference. No difference was observed in the incidence of ≥ Grade IIIa complications (p = 0.634).
Conclusion
The 4K3D endoscopic system significantly shortened the duration of cVATS lobectomy. It is useful for lung resection and may replace other endoscopy systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Swanson SJ, Batirel HF. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection for lung cancer. Surg Clin N Am. 2002;82:541–59.
Hytych V, Horazdovsky PR, Pracharova S, Taskova A, Konopa Z, et al. VATS lobectomy, history, indication, contraindication and general techniques. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2015;116:400–3.
Tsukamoto S, Kuchiba A, Moritani K, Shida D, Katayama H, Yorikane E, Kanemitsu Y. Laparoscopic surgery using 8 K ultra-high-definition technology: outcomes of a phase II study. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022;15:7–14.
Harada H, Kanaji S, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, et al. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4228–34.
Wahba R, Datta R, Bußhoff J, Bruns T, Hedergott A, Gietzelt C, et al. 3D versus 4K display system—influence of “state-of-the-art”—display technique on surgical performance (IDOSP-study) in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized cross-over trial. Ann Surg. 2020;272:709–14.
Singla V, Bhattacharjee HK, Gupta E, Singh D, Mishra AK, Kumar D. Performance of three-dimensional and ultra-high-definition (4K) technology in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18:167–75.
Bagan P, De Dominicis F, Hernigou J, Dakhil B, Zaimi R, Pricopi C, et al. Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:820–3.
Yang CL, Wang W, Mo LL, Zhang L, Peng GL, Yu ZW, et al. Short-term outcome of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for benign pulmonary diseases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1297–302.
Dong S, Yang XN, Zhong WZ, Nie Q, Liao RQ, Lin JT, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional visualization in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Thorac Cancer. 2016;7:530–4.
Yang C, Mo L, Ma Y, Peng G, Ren Y, Wang W, et al. A comparative analysis of lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy via three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus two-dimensional resection. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:1798–805.
Mimura T, Yamashita Y, Hirai Y, Nishina M, Kagimoto A, Miyamoto T, et al. Efficacy of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy using the three-dimensional endoscopic system for lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68:357–62.
Mimura T, Kagimoto A, Miyamoto T, Nakashima C, Nishina M, Hirai Y, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a three-dimensional thoracoscopic system as an educational tool for surgical trainees in general thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69:511–5.
Goddard PR, Nicholson EM, Laszlo G, Watt I. Computed tomography in pulmonary emphysema. Clin Radiol. 1982;33:379–87.
Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:39–51.
Record of proceedings of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Information and Communications Council. Accessed Sep 14, 2023. https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000420557.pdf (written in Japanese)
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.
Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. WHO classification. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;2015(10):1243–60.
Kum CK, Goh P, Alexander DJ, Moochala S. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging for laparoscopic suturing. Br J Surg. 1997;84:35.
McDougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, Elashry OM, Clayman RV. Comparison of three dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol. 1996;10:371–4.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for the English language review.
Funding
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, KAKENHI (Grant Number: JP20K17749).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kagimoto, A., Ishida, M. & Mimura, T. Utility of 4 K three-dimensional endoscopic system in performing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: initial results of the first year after installation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-02004-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-02004-8