Abstract
In the realm of the digital economy, platform-based Internet companies leverage characteristics such as “cross-side effects” and “emerging technologies” to gain a competitive edge. However, simultaneously, they encounter challenges linked to inadequate risk management and insufficient focus on social responsibility. However, the discussions surrounding these matters have primarily been confined to case studies, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to social responsibility risks. This research addresses this gap by establishing a database of corporate social responsibility risks for Internet platform companies and employs a qualitative comparative analysis method to dissect these social responsibility risks. The study unveils that Internet platform companies can navigate low social responsibility risks through three distinct pathways: the “resource-experience combining type,” the “long-term shareholder-orientation type,” and the “novel innovative advantage type.” It delves into the questions of what Internet platform companies should do and how they should approach corporate social responsibility in varying contexts. Furthermore, it identifies novel strategies within the domain of platform organizations and the platform economy, thus expanding the conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility driving mechanisms. This research offers valuable guidance for government policy development directed at fostering the sustainable growth of Internet platforms. Additionally, it provides platform companies with insights into optimizing their approaches to manage social responsibility risks in alignment with their unique characteristics. Ultimately, it serves as a robust theoretical guide and practical illustration for addressing these pivotal issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Aghion, P., & Griffith, R. (2008). Competition and growth: Reconciling theory and evidence. MIT Press.
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00315.x
Awawdeh, A. E., Ananzeh, M., El-khateeb, A. I., & Aljumah, A. (2022). Role of green financing and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in technological innovation and corporate environmental performance: A COVID-19 perspective. China Finance Review International, 12(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-03-2021-0048
Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00419.x
Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27745504
Berends, H., Boersma, K., & Weggeman, M. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703569001
Birnbaum, P. H. (1984). The choice of strategic alternatives under increasing regulation in high technology companies. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 489–510. https://doi.org/10.5465/256041
Bontis, N., Booker, L. D., & Serenko, A. (2007). The mediating effect of organizational reputation on customer loyalty and service recommendation in the banking industry. Management Decision, 45(9), 1426. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710828681
Brunk, K. H., & de Boer, C. (2020). How do consumers reconcile positive and negative CSR-related information to form an ethical brand perception? A mixed method inquiry: JBE. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3973-4
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Chen, D., Wei, X., & Wang, H. (2022). Controlling shareholder’s ownership, control rights and related-party transactions – Analysis of regulatory effects based on board characteristics. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(4), 1577–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00801-w
Chiu, S.-C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37, 1558–1585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347958
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organisational learning: Dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028835
DavidKetchen, J. J., Thomas, J. B., & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1278–1313. https://doi.org/10.5465/256812
Evans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20, 325.
Feng, L., Lin, F., & Xu, J. (2011). Nature of property rights, ownership concentration, and social responsibility fulfillment. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 33(09), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2011.09.014
Feng, X., Wen, W., & Jin, Y. (2020). Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 264(10), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.2020.10.006
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Håkanson, L. (2010). The firm as an epistemic community: the knowledge-based view revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq052
Handrich, L. (2000). Charles C. Ragin: Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press 2000, 352 S., $20.-. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-000-0128-9
Hörisch, J. (2018). ‘Think big’ or ‘small is beautiful’? An empirical analysis of characteristics and determinants of success of sustainable crowdfunding projects. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10, 111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.090982
Hörisch, J., Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Implementation of sustainability management and company size: a knowledge-based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1844
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Jiang, G., Liu, F., Liu, W., Liu, S., Chen, Y., & Xu, D. (2021). Effects of information quality on information adoption on social media review platforms: Moderating role of perceived risk. Data Science and Management, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.004
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
Lage, O., Saiz-Santos, M., & Zarzuelo, J. M. (2022). Decentralized platform economy: Emerging blockchain-based decentralized platform business models. Electronic Markets, 32(3), 1707–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00586-4
Lam, M.L.-L. (2009). Beyond credibility of doing business in China: Strategies for improving corporate citizenship of foreign multinational enterprises in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9803-3
Li, Q., & Feng, B. (2015). Do companies quietly disclose environmental information? A study of the relationship between environmental investment and environmental informationDisclosure Quality under the Pressure of Competition. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, No.211(04). (141–148+160).
Liu, H., Wei, J., & Wu, l. (2016). Can corporate social responsibility inhibit earnings management?-a quasi-experiment of the mandatory disclosure of corporate social responsibility report. China Soft Science, 304(04), 95–107.
Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 321–344.
Ma, H., & Li, J. (2014). Strategic CSR investment and market competition - an analytical framework based on the Hotelling model. Economic Perspectives, 642(08), 78–89.
Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275676
Mendel, J. M., & Korjani, M. M. (2012). Charles Ragin’s fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) used for linguistic summarizations. Information Sciences, 202, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.02.039
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Miller, J. I., & Guthrie, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Institutional response to labor, legal and shareholder environments. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2007.26508229
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1984). An evolutionary theory of economic change // review. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 17(4), 868–871.
Newman, C., Rand, J., Tarp, F., & Trifkovic, N. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in a competitive business environment. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(8), 1455–1472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1694144
Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019
Orlitzky, M. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/corporate-social-financial-performance-meta/docview/222443081/se-2?accountid=15198
Owusu-Ansah, S. (1998). The impact of corporate attribites on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting, 33(5), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(98)90015-2
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310.
Preston, L. E., & O’bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406
Qu, R. (2007). Effects of government regulations, market orientation and ownership structure on corporate social responsibility in China: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 24(3), 582. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effects-government-regulations-market-orientation/docview/233230158/se-2
Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2017). Intersectional inequality: Race, class, test scores, and poverty. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226414546.001.0001
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/zhejiang/detail.action?docID=432281
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Olya, H. (2021). The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1571–1592. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2020-1164
Rhee, M., & Kim, T. (2014). Great vessels take a long time to mature: Early success traps and competences in exploitation and exploration. Organization Science, 26, 141223041331004. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0892
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Applied Social Research Series. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
Schneider, C. Q. (2012). Determinants of democratization: explaining regime change in the world, 1972–2006. Acta Politica, 47(4), 468–471. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.10
Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. (1988). Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 601. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/antecedents-organizational-slack/docview/210956810/se-2?accountid=15198
Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods and Research, 40(2), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124111404818
Stav, F., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. (2020). The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00313-1
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Tang, X. (2016). Internal control, institutional environment, and disclosure quality of corporate social responsibility. Accounting and Economics Research, 30(02), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.16314/j.cnki.31-2074/f.2016.02.006
Tang, Z. (2010). Research on the Relationship between Ownership Structure and Firm Value [D, Tianjing University].
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
Walsh, J., & Seward, J. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 421. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/on-efficiency-internal-external-corporate-control/docview/210944610/se-2?accountid=15198
Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2018). Government’s green grip: multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2714
Wang, L., Hu, S., & Dong, Z. (2020). Will artificial intelligence technology induce labor income inequality-model deduction and classification evaluation. China Industrial Economics, 385(04), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.04.005
Wang, H., Tong, L., & Luo, Y. (2020). Corporate social responsibility: overview and implications for future research. Quarterly Journal of Management, 5(03), 1–15+160.
Xiao, H., & Li, P. (2019). Ecological governance of platform enterprises’ CSR. Journal of Management World, 35(04), 120–144+196. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2019.0054
Xiao, H., & Yang, Z. (2020). Corporate social responsibility of platform enterprises: logical origin and practical paradigm. Business and Management Journal, 42(04), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2020.04.003
Xu, P., Zhang, H., & Bai, G. (2019). Immoral governance behaviors of listed companies-a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis based on the configurational perspective. Quarterly Journal of Management, 4(03), 72–86+142.
Yang, Z., & Xu, Y. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance: Causes, models and mechanisms. Nanjing Business Review, 14(04), 145–174.
Yang, Z. (2018). Platform-based corporate social responsibility: boundaries, governance and evaluation. Economist, 79–88.
Yang, H. X. Z. (2020). Corporate social responsibility of platform enterprises: Logical Origin and Practical Paradigm. Business and Management Journal.
Yao, S., Pan, Y., Wang, L., Sensoy, A., & Cheng, F. (2023). Building eco-friendly corporations: The role of minority shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(4), 933–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05291-y
Yu, X., & Liu, S. (2012). Governance structure and illegal actions of information disclosure-evidence from China’s a share listed companies. Systems Engineering, 30(06), 43–52.
Zhou, H., & Tang, L. (2015). Can market competition force companies to treat their employees well? – Micro evidence from manufacturing companies. Journal of Management World, 266(11), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2015.11.015
Zhu, W., & Shang, Y. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and its governance for platform business in China—Based on literature analysis. Management Review, 32, 175–183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Sunghan Ryu
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lyu, T., Shen, Q. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) study on the formation mechanism of Internet platform companies’ social responsibility risks. Electron Markets 34, 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9