Abstract
The high-precision time and frequency transfer method, based on the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) precise point positioning (PPP), has high precision, wide range, and low cost, and the GNSS common-view (CV) can remove all satellite clock errors and partial satellite orbit errors. We conducted a study to select the best satellite and combined PPP and CV to eliminate satellite clock errors, weaken the impact of satellite orbit errors, and unmodeled atmospheric asymmetry in PPP frequency transfer, thus improving the performance of frequency transfer. This study uses conventional dual-frequency ionosphere-free PPP that does not solve for an azimuthal asymmetry in the troposphere. It uses international GNSS service (IGS) products to determine the carrier phase difference between each CV satellite time and the ground clock, for each epoch. Then, the comparison difference is obtained by directly subtracting the carrier phase differences between the CV satellite time and two ground clocks. For each hour, only the satellite that is fully visible at both sites and gives the smallest standard deviation in time comparison of the day between the two ground clocks is selected as the CV satellite. To evaluate the performance of PPP-CV, five stations connected to individual active hydrogen masers are selected to form four links, of which two stations (USN7 and USN8) are common-clock and common-antenna. The results show that the time comparison precision of PPP-CV improves by approximately 12% on average for the three European links compared to PPP with respect to IGS final clock products. For frequency transfer modified Allan deviation (MDEV) over 600,000 s, PPP-CV can reach 2 × 10–16 and 2 × 10–17 for the SPT0-IENG and USN7-USN8 links, respectively. In addition, the frequency transfer stability ranging from 1200 s to 60,000 s of PPP-CV improves by 7% on average compared to PPP, and its short-term stability is also better than that of PPP when the CV satellite does not change. However, the performance of PPP-CV is comparable to PPP when the link length reaches 5991 km and the short-term stability of PPP-CV is slightly worse than PPP when the CV satellite is constantly changing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Allan DW, Weiss MA (1980) Accurate time and frequency transfer during common-view of a GPS satellite. In: Proceedings of the 1980 IEEE frequency control symposium, Philadelphia, PA, USA, May 28–30, pp 334–346
Böhm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) Global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025546
Ge Y, Chen S, Wu T, Fan C, Qin W, Zhou F, Yang X (2021) An analysis of BDS-3 real-time PPP: time transfer, positioning, and tropospheric delay retrieval. Measurement 172:108871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108871
Han J, Zhang J, Zhong S, M, Wang S, (2021) Study on the influence of differential code bias on PPP timing precision. Navig Pos Timing 8(6):131–137
Kouba J (2009) A guide to using international GNSS service (IGS) products IGS Central Bureau. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, p34.
Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4thedn. Wiley, Hoboken
Matsakis D, Senior K, Cook P (2002) Comparison of continuously filtered gps carrier-phase time and frequency transfer with independent daily gps carrier-phase solutions and with two-way satellite time transfer.
Niell A (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 101(B2):3227–3246. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB03048
Petit G (2021) Sub-10–16 accuracy GNSS frequency transfer with IPPP. GPS Solut 25(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01062-2
Petit G, Jiang Z (2008) GPS all in view time transfer for TAI computation. Metrologia 45(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/1/006
Petit G, Meynadier F, Harmegnies A, Parra C (2022) Continuous IPPP links for UTC. Metrologia 59(4):5007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ac7687
Petit G, Defraigne P (2016) The performance of GPS time and frequency transfer: comment on ‘A detailed comparison of two continuous GPS carrier-phase time transfer techniques.’ Metrologia 53(3):1003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/1003
Petit G, Jiang Z (2007) Precise point positioning for TAI computation. In: 2007 IEEE international frequency control symposium joint with the 21st European Frequency and Time Forum, pp 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1109/freq.2007.4319104
Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS conventions 2010 (IERS technical note; 36), Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, 179 pp. ISBN 3-89888-989-6.
Ren Z, Lyu D, Gong H et al (2023) Continuous time and frequency transfer using robust GPS PPP integer ambiguity resolution method. GPS Solut 27:82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01420-w
Saastamoinen J (1973) Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction. Bulletin Géodésique 1946–1975(107):13–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522083
Shi J, Gao Y (2014) A comparison of three PPP integer ambiguity resolution methods. GPS Solut 18(4):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0348-2
Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1992) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Astrodynamics 18:1647–1660
Zhang X, Guo J, Hu Y, Sun B, He Z (2021) Influence of precise products on the day-boundary discontinuities in gnss carrier phase time transfer. Sensors 21(4):1156
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2019) (No. YJKYYQ20190062), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41904165, 42174222), and the Project Supported by the Open Fund of Hubei Luojia Laboratory (No. 220100062). We gratefully acknowledge IGS MGEX for providing GNSS data and precise satellite orbit and clock bias products. We also acknowledge the CODE for providing DCB products. We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their careful corrections, valuable comments, and suggestions, which greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by RL, JZ, SZ, and JH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RL, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. RL, JZ, and SZ wrote the main manuscript text, and JH and JW prepared Figs. 1–19. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interests or nonfinancial interests in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study does not involve ethical issues, and affiliates agree with the author's submission. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
The participant has consented to the submission of the study to the journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, R., Zhang, J., Zhong, S. et al. A common-view carrier phase frequency transfer based on PPP-derived parameters. GPS Solut 28, 58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01598-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01598-z