Abstract
Plume rising from wildfire due to the buoyancy generated by the heat released from the fire is a crucial phenomenon to model for a correct description of smoke dispersion within the atmosphere. During the rise, the plume experiences the drag of external air which limits the rising itself. In this work, we investigate the dependence of the hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian plume rise scheme embedded in the Lagrangian stochastic particle model SPRAY-WEB on the drag coefficient and on the horizontal resolution of the plume rise grid. We test four different drag coefficient models depending on the Reynolds number of the cells as well as a constant drag coefficient. As for the horizontal resolution, we use three different horizontal cell sizes: 200 m, 400 m, and 600 m, namely roughly a quarter, a half, and three-quarters of the source size. We compare the simulation results with the observations taken during a field experiment performed in Idaho organized by the US Environmental Protection Agency, where they collected lidar data and aircraft CO concentration measurements. We found that the drag coefficient influences mainly the plume near the source, where the drag role is more important due to the higher vertical velocities. It has also turned out that the best cell-to-source size ratio for our purpose is one to two.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors have no rights to provide experimental data.
References
Alessandrini S, Ferrero E (2009) A hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian particle model for reacting pollutant dispersion in non-homogeneous non-isotropic turbulence. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 388:1375–1387
Alessandrini S, Ferrero E, Anfossi D (2013) A new Lagrangian method for modelling the buoyant plume rise. Atmos Environ 77:239–249
Andreae MO, Artaxo P, Fischer H et al (2001) Transport of biomass burning smoke to the upper troposphere by deep convection in the equatorial region. Geophys Res Lett 28(6):951–954
Anfossi D, Ferrero E, Brusasca G et al (1993) A simple way of computing buoyant plume rise in a Lagrangian stochastic model for airborne dispersion. Atmos Environ 27A(9):1443–1451
Bisignano A, Mortarini L, Ferrero E et al (2016) Model chain for buoyant plume dispersion. Int J of Environ and Pollut 62(2/3/4):200–213
Briggs G (1975) Plume rise predictions. In: Haugen d (ed) lectures on air pollution and environmental impact analyses. Workshop Proceedings, Boston, Massachusetts, September 29 e October 3 American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 36 pp 59–111
Briggs GA (1965) A plume rise model compared with observations. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 15(9):433–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1965.10468404
Brown PP, Lawler DF (2003) Sphere drag and settling velocity revisited. J Environ Eng 129(3):222–231
Cheng NS (2009) Comparison of formulas for drag coefficient and settling velocity of spherical particles. Powder Technol 189(3):395–398
Colarco PR, Schoeberl MR, Doddridge BG et al (2004) Transport of smoke from Canadian forest fires to the surface near Washington, D.C.: Injection height, entrainment, and optical properties. J Geophys Res Atmos 109(D6)
Ferrero E, Alessandrini S, Anderson B et al (2019) Lagrangian simulation of smoke plume from fire and validation using ground-based lidar and aircraft measurements. Atmos Environ 213:659–674
Ferrero E, Alessandrini S, Meech S et al (2022) A 3D Lagrangian stochastic particle model for the concentration variance dispersion. Bulletin of Atmos Sci Technol 3(1):2
Freitas S, Longo K, Trentmann J et al (2010) Sensitivity of 1-D smoke plume rise models to the inclusion of environmental wind drag. Atmos Chem Phys 10(2):585–594
Freitas SR, Longo KM, Andreae MO (2006) Impact of including the plume rise of vegetation fires in numerical simulations of associated atmospheric pollutants. Geophys Res Lett 33(17):L17808
Freitas SR, Longo KM, Chatfield R et al (2007) Including the sub-grid scale plume rise of vegetation fires in low resolution atmospheric transport models. Atmos Chem Phys 7(13):3385–3398
Goldstein S, Jeffreys H (1929) The steady flow of viscous fluid past a fixed spherical obstacle at small Reynolds numbers. Proc R Soc London Ser A Containing Papers Math Phys Char 123(791):225–235
Kovalev V, Urbanski S, Petkov A et al (2014) Validation of smoke plume rise models using ground-based Lidar. In: Neale CMU, Maltese A (eds) Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XVI, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol 9239. SPIE, p 92391S
Kovalev V, Petkov A, Wold C et al (2015a) Determination of the smoke-plume heights and their dynamics with ground-based scanning lidar. Appl Opt 54(8):2011–2017
Kovalev V, Petkov A, Wold C et al (2015b) Determination of the smoke-plume heights and their dynamics with ground-based scanning lidar. Appl Opt 54(8):2011–2017
Kovalev VA, Petkov A, Wold C et al (2009) Determination of smoke plume and layer heights using scanning lidar data. Appl Opt 48(28):5287–5294
Mikhailov M, Freire AS (2013) The drag coefficient of a sphere: an approximation using shanks transform. Powder Technol 237:432–435
Ooms G (1972) A new method for the calculation of the plume path of gases emitted by a stack. Atmos Environ 6:899–909
Paugam R, Wooster M, Freitas S et al (2016) A review of approaches to estimate wildfire plume injection height within large-scale atmospheric chemical transport models. Atmos Chem Phys 16(2):907–925
Rio C, Hourdin F, Chédin A (2010) Numerical simulation of tropospheric injection of biomass burning products by pyro-thermal plumes. Atmos Chem Phys 10(8):3463–3478
Shanks D (1955) Non-linear transformations of divergent and slowly convergent sequences. J Math Phys 34(1–4):1–42
Sofiev M, Ermakova T, Vankevich R (2012) Evaluation of the smoke-injection height from wild-land fires using remote-sensing data. Atmos Chem Phys 12(4):1995–2006
Stokes G (1880) Mathematical and physical papers, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K
Tinarelli G, Anfossi D, Trini Castelli S et al (2000) A new high performance version of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model spray. Some Case Studies, Springer, US, Boston, MA, pp 499–507
Tomasi E, Giovannini L, Zardi D et al (2017) Optimization of noah and noah_mp wrf land surface schemes in snow-melting conditions over complex terrain. Mon Weather Rev 145(12):4727–4745
Turton R, Levenspiel O (1986) A short note on the drag correlation for spheres. Powder Technol 47(1):83–86
Underwood MC, Buchner S (1984) The applications of an integral plume rise model, Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2691-5_44
Urbanski S, Kovalev V, Petkov A et al (2014) Remote sensing for agriculture, ecosystems, and hydrology xvi, proc. of spie. In: Christopher MU, Neale AM (ed) Validation of smoke plume rise models using ground-based lidar
Webster H, Thomson D (2002) Validation of a Lagrangian model plume rise scheme using the kincaid data set. Atmos Environ 36(32):5031–5042. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00559-9, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231002005599
Zhou L, Baker KR, Napelenok SL et al (2018) Modeling crop residue burning experiments to evaluate smoke emissions and plume transport. Sci Total Environ 627:523–533
Funding
Part of the activities were carried out in the framework of the SAPERI Project, funded by Aethia Srl and Regione Piemonte (POR FESR 2014/2020 - Asse I - Azione I.1b.1.2 - Bando PRISM-E).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical standard
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tenti, B., Ferrero, E. Smoke plume from fire Lagrangian simulation: dependence on drag coefficient and resolution. Air Qual Atmos Health (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01494-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01494-y