Abstract
The humanities have begun to embrace self-consciously the idea that our present age has exhausted the plausibility of philosophical humanism. This paper attempts to explain the condition of our posthumanism as the result of a tacit deferral to an exclusively scientific picture of the reality behind all causal explanations. A new role for the philosophy of religion therefore arises in the need and opportunity to reconsider the supernatural, and specifically supernaturalism about mind/body substance dualism, in order to maintain a reasonable optimism about humanity’s identity and significance as a privileged kind, despite the apparent indifference of our universe to personhood. The basis for this optimism is arguably the otherwise inexplicable power and reach of scientific explanation. Ultimately, the resulting supernatural posthumanism is suggested to yield new confidence and motivation towards evaluating competing sources of putative divine revelation philosophically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourdieu, P. (1977). In R. Nice (Ed.), Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.
Brentano, F. (1973). In L. L. McAlister (Ed.), Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150
Chisholm, R. (1976). Person and object: A metaphysical study. Allen & Unwin.
Davidson, D. (2001). Freedom to act. In Essays on actions and events (2nd ed., pp. 63–81). Clarendon Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books.
Derrida, J. (1976). In G. C. Spivak (Ed.), Of grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dreyfus, H. (1979). What computers can’t do: The limits of artificial intelligence (Revised ed). Harper & Row.
Forrest, P. (2007). Developmental theism: From pure will to unbounded love. Clarendon Press.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthumanist future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Profile Books.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). In J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall (Eds.), Truth and method (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, fiction and forecast (4th ed.). Harvard University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Keil, G. (2007). What do deviant causal chains deviate from? In C. Lumer & S. Nannini (Eds.), Intentionality, deliberation and autonomy: The action-theoretic basis of practical philosophy (pp. 71–90). Routledge.
Kripke, S. A. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Basil Blackwell.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, D. K. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61(4), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131
Lewis, D. K. (1984). Putnam’s paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408412340013
Lycan, W. G. (2009). Giving dualism its due. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87(4), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802340642
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realisation of the living. D. Reidel.
McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world with a new introduction from the author. Harvard University Press.
Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
Putnam, H. (1978). Realism and reason. In Meaning and the moral sciences (pp. 123–139). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.
Russell, B. (1918). On the notion of cause. In Mysticism and logic and other essays (pp. 180–208). Allen & Unwin.
Shaffer, J. A. (1968). Philosophy of mind. Prentice Hall.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Belknap Press.
Thweatt-Bates, J. (2012). Cyborg selves: A theological anthropology of the posthuman. Routledge.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Funding
The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gawthorne, D. Back to the Supernatural via the Posthumanist Turn. SOPHIA (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-023-00996-7
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-023-00996-7