Abstract
The new zinc borate Zn3B7O13(OH) crystallizes trigonally in the space group R3c (no. 161) with the lattice parameters a = 849.76(3), c = 2099.8(2) pm, V = 1.3131(2) nm3, and six formula units per unit cell (Z = 6). It was synthesized at high-pressure/high-temperature conditions in a multianvil device. Single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction experiments were conducted.
1 Introduction
The mineral boracite (Mg3B7O13Cl) was first discovered in 1787 by G. S. O. Lasius [1]. Since then, many natural and synthetic, structurally closely related compounds have been discovered. In general, boracites have the sum formula M
3B7O13
X (short notation M-X) with a divalent metal cation M
2+ (Mg, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd) and a monovalent anion X
− (F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NO3) [2]. However, there are exceptions with chalcogenides like S2− in Mg3B7O12.65S0.85 [3], where oxygen vacancies compensate the charge of the chalcogenide, and with Li+, which shows related structures in Li4B7O12
X (X = Cl, Br, I) [4,5] and Li5B7O12.5Cl [6]. Boracites crystallize in a cubic high-temperature modification (space group F
Each FBB is corner-connected to six other FBBs forming a 3D network with channels which host the M 2+ and X − ions (Figure 2, top). The M 2+ and X − ions in the cubic modification form a NaCl-related structure, being surrounded by six ions each (Figure 2, bottom). In the low temperature modifications, the X − anions are displaced, changing the coordination number of the M 2+ ions from six to five. This will be discussed later in detail for the zinc hydroxide boracite.
Very recently, we were able to synthesize single crystals of boracite nitrates and determined their structures [14]. Here, we present a new member of the hydroxide boracite family: Zn3B7O13(OH). Its trigonal low-temperature modification and structural peculiarities are discussed in the following. Hydroxide boracites have been reported for Mg2+ [15], Mn2+ [15], Fe2+ [16], [17], [18], Co2+ [19], Ni2+ [20], and Cd2+ [11]. However, their crystal structures have only been determined for the iron and cadmium compound.
2 Experimental section
2.1 Synthesis
Zn3B7O13OH has been synthesized from ZnO (48.8 mg, 0.6 mmol, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, >99 %), B(OH)3 (24.7 mg, 0.4 mmol, Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany, ≥99.8 %), and B2O3 (34.8 mg, 0.5 mmol, Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, USA, 99 %) at 2.5 GPa and 673 K in a Walker-type multi-anvil high-pressure setup (1000 t downforce press [mavo press LPR 1000-400/50], Walker-type module [Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Mainleus, Germany]). The reactants were mixed together and ground in an agate mortar under air. The powder was filled into a hexagonal BN (hP4) (Henze Boron Nitride Products AG, Lauben, Germany) crucible. The crucible was closed with a lid of the same material and placed in an 18/11 assembly. More information about the high-pressure apparatus can be found in the literature [21], [22], [23]. The pressure was increased to 2.5 GPa within 60 min and held constant during the heating programme. The temperature was raised in 10 min to 673 K and maintained constant for 5 min. Subsequently, the sample was cooled to 373 K within 120 min and then quenched to room temperature, followed by a pressure release to ambient conditions in 600 min. The octahedron was cracked, and the white crystalline sample was recovered from the surrounding parts with a spike.
2.2 X-ray powder diffraction
The sample was ground in an agate mortar and fixed between two thin polyacetate foils with vacuum grease. Subsequently, the sample was put in a flat sample holder and measured at room temperature in transmission geometry on an STOE Stadi P diffractometer (STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) with a Mythen 2 DCS4 detector, using the WinXPOW software package [24]. Ge(111) monochromatized MoK-L3 (λ = 0.7093 Å) radiation was applied to the sample in a 2θ range of 2–80° with a step size of 0.015° and 20 s exposure time. A Rietveld refinement was done with the Diffrac plus -Topas 4.2 software [25]. The single-crystal structure solution (below) was used as starting point and the peak shapes were fitted using modified Thompson-Cox-Hastings pseudo-Voigt profiles [26,27]. The contribution of the diffractometer was adjusted by refining a LaB6 standard. The background was corrected with Chebychev polynomials to the 16th order. The graph was made with OriginPro [28].
2.3 Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
A single crystal was picked from the oil-coated sample using a polarization microscope and mounted on a loop (MircoMounts™, MiTeGen, LLC, Ithaca, NY, USA). The data was collected at T = 301 K on a Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, USA) with an Incoatec microfocus MoK-L2,3 (λ = 0.71073 Å) X-ray source (Incoatec, Geesthacht, Germany) and a Photon 300 detector system. The data collection routine, cell refinement, and data reduction were performed with the Apex3 programme package, as well as a multi-scan absorption correction based on spherical harmonics [29]. The structure was solved with ShelXT [30] using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the ShelXL [31] refinement package using least squares minimisation. The programme Olex2 [32] was used as graphical interface and illustrations were made with Diamond [33]. The non-centrosymmetric space group R3c was verified with the ADDSYM [34] routine of the Platon [35] programme package. The oxygen atom OA was isotropically refined, due to its split position. Apart from that, all non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The atoms O/OA are the only oxygen atoms coming into consideration to be bound to the hydrogen atoms, which fits to the isostructural compounds Fe3B7O13(OH) [16,17] and Cd3B7O13(OH) [11]. The estimated positions of the hydrogen atoms are shown as black spheres in the figures. However, the hydrogen atoms could not be refined in the single-crystal structure which was refined as inversion twin. The crystal data, data collection, and structure refinement results are shown in Table 1. The fractional atomic coordinates, Wyckoff positions, and displacement parameters are listed in Tables 2 and 3. The fractional atomic coordinates fit those of the structurally related compound Zn3B7O13Cl, which are also included in Table 2.
Zn3B7O13(OH) | |
---|---|
Molar mass/g mol−1 | 496.79 |
Crystal system | Trigonal |
Space group | R3c |
Cell formula units | 6 |
Powder diffractometer | STOE Stadi P |
Radiation | MoKα1 (λ = 70.93 pm) |
Powder data: | |
a/pm | 853.38(2) |
c/pm | 2115.78(6) |
V/nm3 | 1.33439(7) |
Single-crystal diffractometer | Bruker D8 Quest |
Radiation | MoKα (λ = 71.073 pm) |
Single-crystal data: | |
a/pm | 849.76(3) |
c/pm | 2099.8(2) |
V/nm3 | 1.3131(2) |
Calculated density/g∙cm−3 | 3.76 |
Crystal size/mm3 | 0.03 × 0.02 × 0.02 |
Temperature/K | 301 |
Absorption coefficient/mm−1 | 8.3 |
F(000)/e | 1428 |
Detector distance/mm | 37 |
2θ range/deg | 6.76–74.98 |
Range in hkl | −14 ≤ h ≤ 14; −14 ≤ k ≤ 14; −35 ≤ l ≤ 35 |
Total no. reflections | 12041 |
Data; ref. parameters | 1549; 86 |
Reflections with I > 2σ(I) | 1393 |
R int; R σ | 0.0614; 0.0485 |
Goodness-of-fit on F 2 | 1.184 |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan |
Transmission max.; min. | 0.7483; 0.6098 |
R1; wR2 for I > 2σ(I) | 0.0459; 0.1400 |
R1; wR2 for all data | 0.0480; 0.1414 |
BASF | 0.84 |
Largest diff. peak; hole/e∙Å−3 | 2.60; −2.98 |
Atom (Zn3B7O13(OH)) | Wyckoff site | x | y | z | U eq | S.O.F. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zn | 18b | 1355.1(8) | 2715(2) | 3210(2) | 8.2(2) | 0.94 |
ZnA | 18b | 1991(17) | 3980(20) | 3514(9) | 15(3) | 0.06 |
B1 | 18b | 1622(7) | −1639(7) | 810(3) | 6.9(9) | 1 |
B2 | 18b | 1011(7) | −1021(7) | −305(3) | 6.8(9) | 1 |
B3 | 6a | 0 | 0 | 1006(7) | 10(2) | 1 |
O | 6a | 0 | 0 | 2856(5) | 11(2) | 0.94 |
OA | 6a | 3333.33 | 6666.67 | 3800(90) | 10(20) | 0.06 |
O1 | 6a | 0 | 0 | −134(5) | 10(2) | 1 |
O21 | 18b | −1603(5) | 26(5) | 1029(2) | 9.3(6) | 1 |
O22 | 18b | 2925(5) | 2650(5) | −384(2) | 8.2(5) | 1 |
O23 | 18b | 1987(5) | −242(5) | −902(2) | 9.3(6) | 1 |
O24 | 18b | −3095(5) | −2310(5) | 188(2) | 8.9(6) | 1 |
|
||||||
Atom (Zn3B7O13Cl) | Wyckoff site | x | y | z | U eq | S.O.F. |
|
||||||
Zn | 18b | 1463.5(9) | 2941.5(8) | 3270 | 6.39(1) | 1 |
B1 | 18b | 1645(7) | −1653(7) | 831(3) | 3(1) | 1 |
B2 | 18b | 1022(7) | −1025(7) | −288(3) | 4(1) | 1 |
B3 | 6a | 0 | 0 | 1017(5) | 5(1) | 1 |
Cl | 6a | 0 | 0 | 2667(2) | 9.4(3) | 1 |
O1 | 6a | 0 | 0 | −109(3) | 2.9(6) | 1 |
O21 | 18b | −1603(5) | −3(5) | 1050(2) | 4.2(7) | 1 |
O22 | 18b | 2914(4) | 2633(5) | −361(2) | 3.5(7) | 1 |
O23 | 18b | 1972(5) | −234(5) | −879(2) | 3.8(7) | 1 |
O24 | 18b | −3074(5) | −2301(5) | 212(2) | 3.5(7) | 1 |
Atom | U 11 | U 22 | U 33 | U 23 | U 13 | U 12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zn | 7.6(3) | 8.8(3) | 8.2(3) | 0.9(2) | 0.4(2) | 4.2(2) |
ZnA | 15(5) | 20(7) | 11(6) | 5(5) | 4(4) | 10(4) |
B1 | 8(2) | 9(2) | 4(2) | 1(2) | 0(2) | 5(2) |
B2 | 7(2) | 6(2) | 5(2) | 0(2) | 1(2) | 2(2) |
B3 | 5(2) | 5(2) | 19(5) | 0 | 0 | 3(2) |
O | 9(2) | 9(2) | 15(4) | 0 | 0 | 5(2) |
O1 | 11(2) | 11(2) | 10(3) | 0 | 0 | 5(2) |
O21 | 8(2) | 8(2) | 12(2) | −1(2) | 0(2) | 4(2) |
O22 | 8(2) | 9(2) | 8(2) | −2(2) | 0(2) | 4(2) |
O23 | 11(2) | 8(2) | 7(2) | 0.1(2) | −1(2) | 3(2) |
O24 | 10(2) | 9(2) | 8(2) | −1(2) | 1(2) | 5(2) |
CSD 2301661 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Crystal structure
Zn3B7O13(OH) crystallizes trigonally in the space group R3c (no. 161) with the lattice parameters a = 849.76(3), c = 2099.8(2) pm, V = 1.3131(2) nm3, and six formula units per unit cell (Z = 6). Its structure consists of trigonal planar (BO3), tetrahedral (BO4), and distorted square pyramidal (ZnO5) units. The zinc hydroxide boracite is isostructural to e.g. Fe3B7O13(OH) [16,17], Cd3B7O13(OH) [11], and Zn3B7O13Cl [10]. Its structure is shown on the right side of Figure 2. Looking at the M 2+ and X − ions, the anion X − is displaced from the central position of the Zn6 octahedra of the cubic modification (of e.g. Cu3B7O13Br [13]) (Figure 3). In low-temperature modifications e.g. Zn3B7O13Cl [10] or Zn3B7O13(OH) (both crystallize in the trigonal space group R3c), the interatomic distances on one side of the octahedron decrease (Figure 3, lavender), while that to the opposite atom distance increases (Figure 3, orange). This fact leads to five-fold coordinated Zn2+ cations. In hydroxide boracites, the OH group replaces the halogenide. The oxygen atom is even more displaced to one side, because of the shorter distance M 2+–O2− compared with M 2+–Cl−, M 2+–Br−, or M 2+–I−. This leaves enough space for the hydrogen atom, which is part of a hydroxyl group without an acceptor anion.
Zn3B7O13(OH) has disordered Zn/ZnA and O/OA atoms, with a site occupancy factor (s.o.f.) of 0.94/0.06. During cooling from the cubic high-temperature to the trigonal low temperature modification, the oxygen atom O is not always displaced toward the same side of the Zn6 octahedra. If the atom O is displaced to the other side also the Zn atom is disordered, resulting in a nearly identical structure inverted by 180° (Figure 4).
All distances (Table 4) and angles (Table 5) in the zinc hydroxy boracite are within usual values.
Atoms | Length/pm | Atoms | Length/pm |
---|---|---|---|
Zn–O | 213.2(4) | B1–O21e | 147.8(8) |
Zn–O21a | 212.9(4) | B1–O22f | 146.4(7) |
Zn–O22b | 206.7(4) | B1–O23f | 147.9(7) |
Zn–O23c | 204.1(5) | B1–O24e | 146.6(7) |
Zn–O24d | 206.1(4) | av. B1–O | 147.2 |
av. Zn–O | 208.6 | ||
B2–O1 | 153.8(7) | ||
ZnA–OA | 207(5) | B2–O22g | 143.9(6) |
ZnA–O21a | 200(2) | B2–O23 | 146.5(8) |
ZnA–O22b | 224(2) | B2–O24e | 145.3(8) |
ZnA–O23c | 193(2) | av. B2–O | 147.4 |
ZnA–O24d | 222(2) | ||
av. ZnA–O | 209.1 | B3–O21 | 137.4(4) |
B3–O21e | 137.4(4) | ||
B3–O21g | 137.4(4) |
-
a–1/3 + x, −2/3 + x – y, −1/6 + z; b–2/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; c+x, +x – y, –1/2 + z; d1/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; e–y, +x – y, +z; f–1/3 + y – x, 1/3 + y, −1/6 + z; g+y – x, –x, +z.
Atoms | Angle/deg | Atoms | Angle/deg |
---|---|---|---|
O21a–Zn–O | 125.2(3) | O21e–B1–O23f | 105.7(4) |
O22b–Zn–O | 101.8(2) | O22f–B1–O21e | 108.3(5) |
O22b–Zn–O21a | 84.0(2) | O22f–B1–O23f | 111.2(5) |
O23c–Zn–O | 98.8(3) | O22f–B1–O24e | 108.3(4) |
O23c–Zn–O21a | 136.0(2) | O24e–B1–O21e | 114.8(5) |
O23c–Zn–O22b | 88.1(2) | O24e–B1–O23f | 108.5(5) |
O23c–Zn–O24d | 92.5(2) | av. O–B1–O | 109.5 |
O24d–Zn–O | 93.2(2) | ||
O24d–Zn–O21a | 84.9(2) | O22g–B2–O1 | 109.7(4) |
O24d–Zn–O22b | 164.7(2) | O22g–B2–O23 | 110.5(5) |
O22g–B2–O24e | 109.6(5) | ||
OA–ZnA–O22b | 106(2) | O23–B2–O1 | 107.1(5) |
OA–ZnA–O24d | 117(2) | O24e–B2–O1 | 110.8(5) |
O21a–ZnA–OA | 83(5) | O24e–B2–O23 | 109.1(4) |
O21a–ZnA–O22b | 82.8(6) | av. O–B2–O | 109.5 |
O21a–ZnA–O24d | 83.9(5) | ||
O23c–ZnA–OA | 117(4) | O21–B3–O21e | 119.88(8) |
O23c–ZnA–O21a | 159(2) | O21–B3–O21g | 119.88(8) |
O23c–ZnA–O22b | 86.2(5) | O21g–B3–O21e | 119.88(8) |
O23c–ZnA–O24d | 91.0(6) | ||
O24d–ZnA–O22b | 133.2(9) |
-
a–1/3 + x, −2/3 + x – y, −1/6 + z; b–2/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; c+x, +x – y, –1/2 + z; d1/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; e–y, +x – y, +z; f–1/3 + y – x, 1/3 + y, −1/6 + z; g+y – x, –x, +z.
3.2 Rietveld analysis
The Rietveld refinement is shown in Figure 5. The sample contains 49.9(3) % Zn3B7O13OH, 41.0(3) % Zn4O(BO2)6 and 9.1(5) % γ-HBO2 (cP96). The refined cell parameters fit well to those from the single-crystal structure refinement (Table 1). We were not able to produce the zinc hydroxide boracite phase pure. Therefore, no further analytical investigations were carried out.
4 Summary
Herein, we have described the synthesis and crystal structure of Zn3B7O13(OH). The new hydroxide boracite was synthesized at 2.5 GPa and 673 K. It crystallizes isostructurally to other trigonal boracites (e.g. Zn3B7O13Cl [10]), but shows disorder for the Zn/ZnA and O/OA atoms (Figures 3 and 4). The variation in the chemical environment of the hydroxide anion explains the disorder of the structure.
Dedicated to Professor Wolfgang Bensch on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
Acknowledgment
We thank Leonard C. Pasqualini for the fruitful discussions. Furthermore, we want to thank Gunter Heymann for the collection of the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and Klaus Wurst for the help concerning the structure refinement.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this article.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Lasius, G. S. O. Vom Hrn Ingenieur-Lieut. Lasius in Hannover. In Chemische Annalen für die Freunde der Naturlehre, Arzneygelahrtheit, Haushaltungskunst und Manufakturen (L. F. F. Crell); Müllersche Buchhandlung: Helmstädt, Leipzig, Vol. 2, 1787; pp. 333–336.Search in Google Scholar
2. Schnelle, W., Schmid, H. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 184411.Search in Google Scholar
3. Fouassier, C., Levasseur, A., Joubert, J. C., Muller, J., Hagenmuller, P. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1970, 375, 202–208; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19703750210.Search in Google Scholar
4. Jeitschko, W., Bither, T. A. Z. Naturforsch. 1972, 27b, 1423.10.1515/znb-1972-1133Search in Google Scholar
5. Jeitschko, W., Bither, T. A., Bierstedt, P. E. Acta Crystallogr. 1977, B33, 2767–2775.10.1107/S0567740877009443Search in Google Scholar
6. Vlasse, M., Levasseur, A., Hagenmuller, P. Solid State Ionics 1981, 2, 33–37; https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(81)90016-3.Search in Google Scholar
7. Mao, S. Y., Kubel, F., Schmid, H., Schobinger, P., Fischer, P. Ferroelectrics 1993, 146, 81–97; https://doi.org/10.1080/00150199308008529.Search in Google Scholar
8. Abrahams, S. C., Bernstein, J. L., Svensson, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75, 1912–1918; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.442216.Search in Google Scholar
9. Kobayashi, J., Sato, Y., Schmid, H. Phys. Status Solidi A 1972, 10, 259–270; https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210100131.Search in Google Scholar
10. Mao, S. Y., Mendoza-Alvarez, M. E., Depmeier, W., Kubel, F., Schmid, H., Yvon, K. Ferroelectrics 1991, 115, 91–96; https://doi.org/10.1080/00150199108014482.Search in Google Scholar
11. Glinnemann, J., Werthmann, U., Gies, H., Hahn, T. Z. Kristallogr. 2000, 215, 393–396; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.2000.215.7.393.Search in Google Scholar
12. Mao, S. Y., Kubel, F., Schmid, H., Yvon, K. Acta Crystallogr. 1991, B47, 692–696.10.1107/S0108768191003920Search in Google Scholar
13. Nelmes, R. J., Hay, W. J. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1981, 14, 5247; https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/14/34/007.Search in Google Scholar
14. Pasqualini, L. C., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2022, 77b, 719–725.Search in Google Scholar
15. Joubert, J.-C., Ferrand, B., Pernet, M., Muller, J. Bull. Soc. Fr. Minéral. Cristallogr. 1972, 95, 68–74; https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1972.6646.Search in Google Scholar
16. Nénert, G., Nomoto, I., Sato, H. 2014, arXiV:1410.6602v1411.Search in Google Scholar
17. Nomoto, I., Sato, H., Fukui, T., Narumi, Y., Kindo, K., Nakamura, S., Tsunoda, Y. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2011, 80, 014801; https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.80.014801.Search in Google Scholar
18. Neumair, S. C., Knyrim, J. S., Oeckler, O., Kaindl, R., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2011, 66b, 107–114.10.1515/znb-2011-0201Search in Google Scholar
19. Berset, G., Yvon, K., Depmeier, W., Boutellier, R., Schmid, H. Ferroelectrics 1984, 56, 13–16; https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198408012708.Search in Google Scholar
20. Joubert, J. C., Muller, J., Fouassier, C., Levasseur, A. Krist. Tech. 1971, 6, 65–68; https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.19710060109.Search in Google Scholar
21. Huppertz, H. Z. Kristallogr. 2004, 219, 330–338; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633.Search in Google Scholar
22. Walker, D., Carpenter, M. A., Hitch, C. M. Am. Mineral. 1990, 75, 1020–1028.Search in Google Scholar
23. Walker, D. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 1092–1100.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar
24. WinXPOW, (version 3.3); STOE & Cie GmbH: Darmstadt (Germany), 2015.Search in Google Scholar
25. Topas, (version 4.2). General Profile and Structure Analysis Software for Powder Diffraction Data; Bruker AXS GmbH: Karlsruhe (Germany), 2009.Search in Google Scholar
26. Thompson, P., Cox, D. E., Hastings, J. B. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 79–83; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889887087090.Search in Google Scholar
27. Young, R. A., Desai, P. Arch. Nauki Mater. 1989, 10, 71–90.10.1524/klio.1989.71.71.90Search in Google Scholar
28. OriginPro (version 2021b); OriginLab Corp.: Northampton, Massachusetts (USA), 2021.Search in Google Scholar
29. Apex3 (version 2017.3-0), Cell_Now (version 2008/4), Saint (version 8.40B), Twinabs (version 2012/1), and Sadabs (version 2016/2); Bruker AXS GmbH: Karlsruhe (Germany).Search in Google Scholar
30. Sheldrick, G. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8.10.1107/S2053273314026370Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
31. Sheldrick, G. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar
32. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K., Puschmann, H. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889808042726.Search in Google Scholar
33. Brandenburg, K. Diamond (version 4.6.8). Crystal and Molecular Structure Visualization, Crystal Impact; Brandenburg K., Putz H., Eds. GbR: Bonn, Germany, 2022.Search in Google Scholar
34. Le Page, Y. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1988, 21, 983–984; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889888007022.Search in Google Scholar
35. Spek, A. Acta Crystallogr. 2009, D65, 148–155.10.1107/S090744490804362XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.