Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter January 12, 2024

Synthesis and structure refinement of the zinc hydroxide boracite: Zn3B7O13(OH)

  • Raimund Ziegler , Sabrina Jungmann and Hubert Huppertz EMAIL logo

Abstract

The new zinc borate Zn3B7O13(OH) crystallizes trigonally in the space group R3c (no. 161) with the lattice parameters a = 849.76(3), c = 2099.8(2) pm, V = 1.3131(2) nm3, and six formula units per unit cell (Z = 6). It was synthesized at high-pressure/high-temperature conditions in a multianvil device. Single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction experiments were conducted.

1 Introduction

The mineral boracite (Mg3B7O13Cl) was first discovered in 1787 by G. S. O. Lasius [1]. Since then, many natural and synthetic, structurally closely related compounds have been discovered. In general, boracites have the sum formula M 3B7O13 X (short notation M-X) with a divalent metal cation M 2+ (Mg, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd) and a monovalent anion X (F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NO3) [2]. However, there are exceptions with chalcogenides like S2− in Mg3B7O12.65S0.85 [3], where oxygen vacancies compensate the charge of the chalcogenide, and with Li+, which shows related structures in Li4B7O12 X (X = Cl, Br, I) [4,5] and Li5B7O12.5Cl [6]. Boracites crystallize in a cubic high-temperature modification (space group F 4 3c), while the five low-temperature modifications crystallize orthorhombically in Pca21 (e.g. Ni3B7O13Br [7,8]), in two monoclinic intermediate phases (Fe3B7O13I [9]), trigonally in R3c (e.g. Zn3B7O13Cl [10] or Cd3B7O13(OH) [11]), and tetragonally in P 4 21 c (e.g. Cr3B7O13Cl [12]). All those crystal structures are related through their borate network, which consists of the fundamental building block (FBB) shown in Figure 1. In cubic boracites, four (BO4) tetrahedra are corner-connected by one oxygen atom (Figure 1, left), while in lower symmetry boracites that oxygen atom corner connects just three (BO4) units losing one of the boron atoms to form a (BO3) unit (Figure 1, right).

Figure 1: 
FBB in cubic boracites (left) [13] and in Zn3B7O13Cl and Zn3B7O13(OH) (right).
Figure 1:

FBB in cubic boracites (left) [13] and in Zn3B7O13Cl and Zn3B7O13(OH) (right).

Each FBB is corner-connected to six other FBBs forming a 3D network with channels which host the M 2+ and X ions (Figure 2, top). The M 2+ and X ions in the cubic modification form a NaCl-related structure, being surrounded by six ions each (Figure 2, bottom). In the low temperature modifications, the X anions are displaced, changing the coordination number of the M 2+ ions from six to five. This will be discussed later in detail for the zinc hydroxide boracite.

Figure 2: 
Borate network of boracites with an FBB highlighted in the centre (cubic modification top left [13], trigonal modification top right). Coordination of M
2+/X
– ions inside the channels (cubic modification bottom left, trigonal modification bottom right), the B and O atoms of the borate network being omitted for clarity. The M
2+ and X
– ions are connected to enhance the visibility of their six-fold coordination.
Figure 2:

Borate network of boracites with an FBB highlighted in the centre (cubic modification top left [13], trigonal modification top right). Coordination of M 2+/X ions inside the channels (cubic modification bottom left, trigonal modification bottom right), the B and O atoms of the borate network being omitted for clarity. The M 2+ and X ions are connected to enhance the visibility of their six-fold coordination.

Very recently, we were able to synthesize single crystals of boracite nitrates and determined their structures [14]. Here, we present a new member of the hydroxide boracite family: Zn3B7O13(OH). Its trigonal low-temperature modification and structural peculiarities are discussed in the following. Hydroxide boracites have been reported for Mg2+ [15], Mn2+ [15], Fe2+ [16], [17], [18], Co2+ [19], Ni2+ [20], and Cd2+ [11]. However, their crystal structures have only been determined for the iron and cadmium compound.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Synthesis

Zn3B7O13OH has been synthesized from ZnO (48.8 mg, 0.6 mmol, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, >99 %), B(OH)3 (24.7 mg, 0.4 mmol, Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany, ≥99.8 %), and B2O3 (34.8 mg, 0.5 mmol, Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, USA, 99 %) at 2.5 GPa and 673 K in a Walker-type multi-anvil high-pressure setup (1000 t downforce press [mavo press LPR 1000-400/50], Walker-type module [Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Mainleus, Germany]). The reactants were mixed together and ground in an agate mortar under air. The powder was filled into a hexagonal BN (hP4) (Henze Boron Nitride Products AG, Lauben, Germany) crucible. The crucible was closed with a lid of the same material and placed in an 18/11 assembly. More information about the high-pressure apparatus can be found in the literature [21], [22], [23]. The pressure was increased to 2.5 GPa within 60 min and held constant during the heating programme. The temperature was raised in 10 min to 673 K and maintained constant for 5 min. Subsequently, the sample was cooled to 373 K within 120 min and then quenched to room temperature, followed by a pressure release to ambient conditions in 600 min. The octahedron was cracked, and the white crystalline sample was recovered from the surrounding parts with a spike.

2.2 X-ray powder diffraction

The sample was ground in an agate mortar and fixed between two thin polyacetate foils with vacuum grease. Subsequently, the sample was put in a flat sample holder and measured at room temperature in transmission geometry on an STOE Stadi P diffractometer (STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) with a Mythen 2 DCS4 detector, using the WinXPOW software package [24]. Ge(111) monochromatized MoK-L3 (λ = 0.7093 Å) radiation was applied to the sample in a 2θ range of 2–80° with a step size of 0.015° and 20 s exposure time. A Rietveld refinement was done with the Diffrac plus -Topas 4.2 software [25]. The single-crystal structure solution (below) was used as starting point and the peak shapes were fitted using modified Thompson-Cox-Hastings pseudo-Voigt profiles [26,27]. The contribution of the diffractometer was adjusted by refining a LaB6 standard. The background was corrected with Chebychev polynomials to the 16th order. The graph was made with OriginPro [28].

2.3 Single-crystal X-ray diffraction

A single crystal was picked from the oil-coated sample using a polarization microscope and mounted on a loop (MircoMounts™, MiTeGen, LLC, Ithaca, NY, USA). The data was collected at T = 301 K on a Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, USA) with an Incoatec microfocus MoK-L2,3 (λ = 0.71073 Å) X-ray source (Incoatec, Geesthacht, Germany) and a Photon 300 detector system. The data collection routine, cell refinement, and data reduction were performed with the Apex3 programme package, as well as a multi-scan absorption correction based on spherical harmonics [29]. The structure was solved with ShelXT [30] using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the ShelXL [31] refinement package using least squares minimisation. The programme Olex2 [32] was used as graphical interface and illustrations were made with Diamond [33]. The non-centrosymmetric space group R3c was verified with the ADDSYM [34] routine of the Platon [35] programme package. The oxygen atom OA was isotropically refined, due to its split position. Apart from that, all non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The atoms O/OA are the only oxygen atoms coming into consideration to be bound to the hydrogen atoms, which fits to the isostructural compounds Fe3B7O13(OH) [16,17] and Cd3B7O13(OH) [11]. The estimated positions of the hydrogen atoms are shown as black spheres in the figures. However, the hydrogen atoms could not be refined in the single-crystal structure which was refined as inversion twin. The crystal data, data collection, and structure refinement results are shown in Table 1. The fractional atomic coordinates, Wyckoff positions, and displacement parameters are listed in Tables 2 and 3. The fractional atomic coordinates fit those of the structurally related compound Zn3B7O13Cl, which are also included in Table 2.

Table 1:

Crystal data, data collection, and structure refinement results for Zn3B7O13(OH).

Zn3B7O13(OH)
Molar mass/g mol−1 496.79
Crystal system Trigonal
Space group R3c
Cell formula units 6
Powder diffractometer STOE Stadi P
Radiation MoKα1 (λ = 70.93 pm)
Powder data:
a/pm 853.38(2)
c/pm 2115.78(6)
V/nm3 1.33439(7)
Single-crystal diffractometer Bruker D8 Quest
Radiation MoKα (λ = 71.073 pm)
Single-crystal data:
a/pm 849.76(3)
c/pm 2099.8(2)
V/nm3 1.3131(2)
Calculated density/g∙cm−3 3.76
Crystal size/mm3 0.03 × 0.02 × 0.02
Temperature/K 301
Absorption coefficient/mm−1 8.3
F(000)/e 1428
Detector distance/mm 37
2θ range/deg 6.76–74.98
Range in hkl −14 ≤ h ≤ 14; −14 ≤ k ≤ 14; −35 ≤ l ≤ 35
Total no. reflections 12041
Data; ref. parameters 1549; 86
Reflections with I > 2σ(I) 1393
R int; R σ 0.0614; 0.0485
Goodness-of-fit on F 2 1.184
Absorption correction Multi-scan
Transmission max.; min. 0.7483; 0.6098
R1; wR2 for I > 2σ(I) 0.0459; 0.1400
R1; wR2 for all data 0.0480; 0.1414
BASF 0.84
Largest diff. peak; hole/e∙Å−3 2.60; −2.98
Table 2:

Fractional atomic coordinates (×104), Wyckoff positions, equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2 × 103), and site occupancy factors (S.O.F.) for Zn3B7O13(OH) and Zn3B7O13Cl [10]. U eq is defined as 1/3rd of the trace of the orthogonalized U ij tensor.

Atom (Zn3B7O13(OH)) Wyckoff site x y z U eq S.O.F.
Zn 18b 1355.1(8) 2715(2) 3210(2) 8.2(2) 0.94
ZnA 18b 1991(17) 3980(20) 3514(9) 15(3) 0.06
B1 18b 1622(7) −1639(7) 810(3) 6.9(9) 1
B2 18b 1011(7) −1021(7) −305(3) 6.8(9) 1
B3 6a 0 0 1006(7) 10(2) 1
O 6a 0 0 2856(5) 11(2) 0.94
OA 6a 3333.33 6666.67 3800(90) 10(20) 0.06
O1 6a 0 0 −134(5) 10(2) 1
O21 18b −1603(5) 26(5) 1029(2) 9.3(6) 1
O22 18b 2925(5) 2650(5) −384(2) 8.2(5) 1
O23 18b 1987(5) −242(5) −902(2) 9.3(6) 1
O24 18b −3095(5) −2310(5) 188(2) 8.9(6) 1

Atom (Zn3B7O13Cl) Wyckoff site x y z U eq S.O.F.

Zn 18b 1463.5(9) 2941.5(8) 3270 6.39(1) 1
B1 18b 1645(7) −1653(7) 831(3) 3(1) 1
B2 18b 1022(7) −1025(7) −288(3) 4(1) 1
B3 6a 0 0 1017(5) 5(1) 1
Cl 6a 0 0 2667(2) 9.4(3) 1
O1 6a 0 0 −109(3) 2.9(6) 1
O21 18b −1603(5) −3(5) 1050(2) 4.2(7) 1
O22 18b 2914(4) 2633(5) −361(2) 3.5(7) 1
O23 18b 1972(5) −234(5) −879(2) 3.8(7) 1
O24 18b −3074(5) −2301(5) 212(2) 3.5(7) 1
Table 3:

Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2 × 103) for Zn3B7O13(OH). The factor exponent takes the form: –2π 2(U 11 h 2 a*2 + U 22 k 2 b*2 + U 33 l 2 c*2 + 2U 12 hka*b* + 2U 13 hla*c* + 2U 23 klb*c*).

Atom U 11 U 22 U 33 U 23 U 13 U 12
Zn 7.6(3) 8.8(3) 8.2(3) 0.9(2) 0.4(2) 4.2(2)
ZnA 15(5) 20(7) 11(6) 5(5) 4(4) 10(4)
B1 8(2) 9(2) 4(2) 1(2) 0(2) 5(2)
B2 7(2) 6(2) 5(2) 0(2) 1(2) 2(2)
B3 5(2) 5(2) 19(5) 0 0 3(2)
O 9(2) 9(2) 15(4) 0 0 5(2)
O1 11(2) 11(2) 10(3) 0 0 5(2)
O21 8(2) 8(2) 12(2) −1(2) 0(2) 4(2)
O22 8(2) 9(2) 8(2) −2(2) 0(2) 4(2)
O23 11(2) 8(2) 7(2) 0.1(2) −1(2) 3(2)
O24 10(2) 9(2) 8(2) −1(2) 1(2) 5(2)

CSD 2301661 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Crystal structure

Zn3B7O13(OH) crystallizes trigonally in the space group R3c (no. 161) with the lattice parameters a = 849.76(3), c = 2099.8(2) pm, V = 1.3131(2) nm3, and six formula units per unit cell (Z = 6). Its structure consists of trigonal planar (BO3), tetrahedral (BO4), and distorted square pyramidal (ZnO5) units. The zinc hydroxide boracite is isostructural to e.g. Fe3B7O13(OH) [16,17], Cd3B7O13(OH) [11], and Zn3B7O13Cl [10]. Its structure is shown on the right side of Figure 2. Looking at the M 2+ and X ions, the anion X is displaced from the central position of the Zn6 octahedra of the cubic modification (of e.g. Cu3B7O13Br [13]) (Figure 3). In low-temperature modifications e.g. Zn3B7O13Cl [10] or Zn3B7O13(OH) (both crystallize in the trigonal space group R3c), the interatomic distances on one side of the octahedron decrease (Figure 3, lavender), while that to the opposite atom distance increases (Figure 3, orange). This fact leads to five-fold coordinated Zn2+ cations. In hydroxide boracites, the OH group replaces the halogenide. The oxygen atom is even more displaced to one side, because of the shorter distance M 2+–O2− compared with M 2+–Cl, M 2+–Br, or M 2+–I. This leaves enough space for the hydrogen atom, which is part of a hydroxyl group without an acceptor anion.

Figure 3: 

X
− coordination in zinc chloride boracite (left) and in Zn3B7O13(OH). Lines of the same colour have the same length. All distances are given in pm.
Figure 3:

X coordination in zinc chloride boracite (left) and in Zn3B7O13(OH). Lines of the same colour have the same length. All distances are given in pm.

Zn3B7O13(OH) has disordered Zn/ZnA and O/OA atoms, with a site occupancy factor (s.o.f.) of 0.94/0.06. During cooling from the cubic high-temperature to the trigonal low temperature modification, the oxygen atom O is not always displaced toward the same side of the Zn6 octahedra. If the atom O is displaced to the other side also the Zn atom is disordered, resulting in a nearly identical structure inverted by 180° (Figure 4).

Figure 4: 
Disordered Zn/ZnA and O/OA atoms in Zn3B7O13(OH).
Figure 4:

Disordered Zn/ZnA and O/OA atoms in Zn3B7O13(OH).

All distances (Table 4) and angles (Table 5) in the zinc hydroxy boracite are within usual values.

Table 4:

Selected interatomic distances in Zn3B7O13(OH).

Atoms Length/pm Atoms Length/pm
Zn–O 213.2(4) B1–O21e 147.8(8)
Zn–O21a 212.9(4) B1–O22f 146.4(7)
Zn–O22b 206.7(4) B1–O23f 147.9(7)
Zn–O23c 204.1(5) B1–O24e 146.6(7)
Zn–O24d 206.1(4) av. B1–O 147.2
av. Zn–O 208.6
B2–O1 153.8(7)
ZnA–OA 207(5) B2–O22g 143.9(6)
ZnA–O21a 200(2) B2–O23 146.5(8)
ZnA–O22b 224(2) B2–O24e 145.3(8)
ZnA–O23c 193(2) av. B2–O 147.4
ZnA–O24d 222(2)
av. ZnA–O 209.1 B3–O21 137.4(4)
B3–O21e 137.4(4)
B3–O21g 137.4(4)
  1. a–1/3 + x, −2/3 + x – y, −1/6 + z; b–2/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; c+x, +x – y, –1/2 + z; d1/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; ey, +x – y, +z; f–1/3 + y – x, 1/3 + y, −1/6 + z; g+y – x, –x, +z.

Table 5:

Selected angles in Zn3B7O13(OH).

Atoms Angle/deg Atoms Angle/deg
O21a–Zn–O 125.2(3) O21e–B1–O23f 105.7(4)
O22b–Zn–O 101.8(2) O22f–B1–O21e 108.3(5)
O22b–Zn–O21a 84.0(2) O22f–B1–O23f 111.2(5)
O23c–Zn–O 98.8(3) O22f–B1–O24e 108.3(4)
O23c–Zn–O21a 136.0(2) O24e–B1–O21e 114.8(5)
O23c–Zn–O22b 88.1(2) O24e–B1–O23f 108.5(5)
O23c–Zn–O24d 92.5(2) av. O–B1–O 109.5
O24d–Zn–O 93.2(2)
O24d–Zn–O21a 84.9(2) O22g–B2–O1 109.7(4)
O24d–Zn–O22b 164.7(2) O22g–B2–O23 110.5(5)
O22g–B2–O24e 109.6(5)
OA–ZnA–O22b 106(2) O23–B2–O1 107.1(5)
OA–ZnA–O24d 117(2) O24e–B2–O1 110.8(5)
O21a–ZnA–OA 83(5) O24e–B2–O23 109.1(4)
O21a–ZnA–O22b 82.8(6) av. O–B2–O 109.5
O21a–ZnA–O24d 83.9(5)
O23c–ZnA–OA 117(4) O21–B3–O21e 119.88(8)
O23c–ZnA–O21a 159(2) O21–B3–O21g 119.88(8)
O23c–ZnA–O22b 86.2(5) O21g–B3–O21e 119.88(8)
O23c–ZnA–O24d 91.0(6)
O24d–ZnA–O22b 133.2(9)
  1. a–1/3 + x, −2/3 + x – y, −1/6 + z; b–2/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; c+x, +x – y, –1/2 + z; d1/3 – y, −1/3 + x – y, −1/3 + z; ey, +x – y, +z; f–1/3 + y – x, 1/3 + y, −1/6 + z; g+y – x, –x, +z.

3.2 Rietveld analysis

The Rietveld refinement is shown in Figure 5. The sample contains 49.9(3) % Zn3B7O13OH, 41.0(3) % Zn4O(BO2)6 and 9.1(5) % γ-HBO2 (cP96). The refined cell parameters fit well to those from the single-crystal structure refinement (Table 1). We were not able to produce the zinc hydroxide boracite phase pure. Therefore, no further analytical investigations were carried out.

Figure 5: 
X-ray powder diffraction pattern (MoK-L3 radiation, λ = 70.93 pm) and Rietveld refinement of Zn3B7O13OH. The reflection positions of Zn3B7O13OH (R
Bragg = 1.84 %), Zn4O(BO2)6 (R
Bragg = 1.29 %) and γ-HBO2 (cP96) (R
Bragg = 2.00 %) are shown in orange, green, and lavender, respectively. (R
exp = 3.28 %, R
wp = 3.78 %, R
p = 2.96 %, GooF = 1.15).
Figure 5:

X-ray powder diffraction pattern (MoK-L3 radiation, λ = 70.93 pm) and Rietveld refinement of Zn3B7O13OH. The reflection positions of Zn3B7O13OH (R Bragg = 1.84 %), Zn4O(BO2)6 (R Bragg = 1.29 %) and γ-HBO2 (cP96) (R Bragg = 2.00 %) are shown in orange, green, and lavender, respectively. (R exp = 3.28 %, R wp = 3.78 %, R p = 2.96 %, GooF = 1.15).

4 Summary

Herein, we have described the synthesis and crystal structure of Zn3B7O13(OH). The new hydroxide boracite was synthesized at 2.5 GPa and 673 K. It crystallizes isostructurally to other trigonal boracites (e.g. Zn3B7O13Cl [10]), but shows disorder for the Zn/ZnA and O/OA atoms (Figures 3 and 4). The variation in the chemical environment of the hydroxide anion explains the disorder of the structure.


Dedicated to Professor Wolfgang Bensch on the occasion of his 70th birthday.



Corresponding author: Hubert Huppertz, Department of General, Inorganic, and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80–82, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

We thank Leonard C. Pasqualini for the fruitful discussions. Furthermore, we want to thank Gunter Heymann for the collection of the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and Klaus Wurst for the help concerning the structure refinement.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this article.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Lasius, G. S. O. Vom Hrn Ingenieur-Lieut. Lasius in Hannover. In Chemische Annalen für die Freunde der Naturlehre, Arzneygelahrtheit, Haushaltungskunst und Manufakturen (L. F. F. Crell); Müllersche Buchhandlung: Helmstädt, Leipzig, Vol. 2, 1787; pp. 333–336.Search in Google Scholar

2. Schnelle, W., Schmid, H. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 184411.Search in Google Scholar

3. Fouassier, C., Levasseur, A., Joubert, J. C., Muller, J., Hagenmuller, P. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1970, 375, 202–208; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19703750210.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jeitschko, W., Bither, T. A. Z. Naturforsch. 1972, 27b, 1423.10.1515/znb-1972-1133Search in Google Scholar

5. Jeitschko, W., Bither, T. A., Bierstedt, P. E. Acta Crystallogr. 1977, B33, 2767–2775.10.1107/S0567740877009443Search in Google Scholar

6. Vlasse, M., Levasseur, A., Hagenmuller, P. Solid State Ionics 1981, 2, 33–37; https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(81)90016-3.Search in Google Scholar

7. Mao, S. Y., Kubel, F., Schmid, H., Schobinger, P., Fischer, P. Ferroelectrics 1993, 146, 81–97; https://doi.org/10.1080/00150199308008529.Search in Google Scholar

8. Abrahams, S. C., Bernstein, J. L., Svensson, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75, 1912–1918; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.442216.Search in Google Scholar

9. Kobayashi, J., Sato, Y., Schmid, H. Phys. Status Solidi A 1972, 10, 259–270; https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210100131.Search in Google Scholar

10. Mao, S. Y., Mendoza-Alvarez, M. E., Depmeier, W., Kubel, F., Schmid, H., Yvon, K. Ferroelectrics 1991, 115, 91–96; https://doi.org/10.1080/00150199108014482.Search in Google Scholar

11. Glinnemann, J., Werthmann, U., Gies, H., Hahn, T. Z. Kristallogr. 2000, 215, 393–396; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.2000.215.7.393.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mao, S. Y., Kubel, F., Schmid, H., Yvon, K. Acta Crystallogr. 1991, B47, 692–696.10.1107/S0108768191003920Search in Google Scholar

13. Nelmes, R. J., Hay, W. J. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1981, 14, 5247; https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/14/34/007.Search in Google Scholar

14. Pasqualini, L. C., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2022, 77b, 719–725.Search in Google Scholar

15. Joubert, J.-C., Ferrand, B., Pernet, M., Muller, J. Bull. Soc. Fr. Minéral. Cristallogr. 1972, 95, 68–74; https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1972.6646.Search in Google Scholar

16. Nénert, G., Nomoto, I., Sato, H. 2014, arXiV:1410.6602v1411.Search in Google Scholar

17. Nomoto, I., Sato, H., Fukui, T., Narumi, Y., Kindo, K., Nakamura, S., Tsunoda, Y. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2011, 80, 014801; https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.80.014801.Search in Google Scholar

18. Neumair, S. C., Knyrim, J. S., Oeckler, O., Kaindl, R., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2011, 66b, 107–114.10.1515/znb-2011-0201Search in Google Scholar

19. Berset, G., Yvon, K., Depmeier, W., Boutellier, R., Schmid, H. Ferroelectrics 1984, 56, 13–16; https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198408012708.Search in Google Scholar

20. Joubert, J. C., Muller, J., Fouassier, C., Levasseur, A. Krist. Tech. 1971, 6, 65–68; https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.19710060109.Search in Google Scholar

21. Huppertz, H. Z. Kristallogr. 2004, 219, 330–338; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633.Search in Google Scholar

22. Walker, D., Carpenter, M. A., Hitch, C. M. Am. Mineral. 1990, 75, 1020–1028.Search in Google Scholar

23. Walker, D. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 1092–1100.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar

24. WinXPOW, (version 3.3); STOE & Cie GmbH: Darmstadt (Germany), 2015.Search in Google Scholar

25. Topas, (version 4.2). General Profile and Structure Analysis Software for Powder Diffraction Data; Bruker AXS GmbH: Karlsruhe (Germany), 2009.Search in Google Scholar

26. Thompson, P., Cox, D. E., Hastings, J. B. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 79–83; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889887087090.Search in Google Scholar

27. Young, R. A., Desai, P. Arch. Nauki Mater. 1989, 10, 71–90.10.1524/klio.1989.71.71.90Search in Google Scholar

28. OriginPro (version 2021b); OriginLab Corp.: Northampton, Massachusetts (USA), 2021.Search in Google Scholar

29. Apex3 (version 2017.3-0), Cell_Now (version 2008/4), Saint (version 8.40B), Twinabs (version 2012/1), and Sadabs (version 2016/2); Bruker AXS GmbH: Karlsruhe (Germany).Search in Google Scholar

30. Sheldrick, G. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8.10.1107/S2053273314026370Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Sheldrick, G. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

32. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K., Puschmann, H. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889808042726.Search in Google Scholar

33. Brandenburg, K. Diamond (version 4.6.8). Crystal and Molecular Structure Visualization, Crystal Impact; Brandenburg K., Putz H., Eds. GbR: Bonn, Germany, 2022.Search in Google Scholar

34. Le Page, Y. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1988, 21, 983–984; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889888007022.Search in Google Scholar

35. Spek, A. Acta Crystallogr. 2009, D65, 148–155.10.1107/S090744490804362XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2023-10-31
Accepted: 2023-11-15
Published Online: 2024-01-12
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2023-0096/html
Scroll to top button