Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding mechanisms of racial disparities in breast cancer: an assessment of screening and regular care in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Screening history influences stage at detection, but regular preventive care may also influence breast tumor diagnostic characteristics. Few studies have evaluated healthcare utilization (both screening and primary care) in racially diverse screening-eligible populations.

Methods

This analysis included 2,058 women age 45–74 (49% Black) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based cohort of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2008 and 2013. Screening history (threshold 0.5 mammograms per year) and pre-diagnostic healthcare utilization (i.e. regular care, based on responses to “During the past ten years, who did you usually see when you were sick or needed advice about your health?”) were assessed as binary exposures. The relationship between healthcare utilization and tumor characteristics were evaluated overall and race-stratified.

Results

Among those lacking screening, Black participants had larger tumors (5 + cm) (frequency 19.6% vs 11.5%, relative frequency difference (RFD) = 8.1%, 95% CI 2.8–13.5), but race differences were attenuated among screening-adherent participants (10.2% vs 7.0%, RFD = 3.2%, 0.2–6.2). Similar trends were observed for tumor stage and mode of detection (mammogram vs lump). Among all participants, those lacking both screening and regular care had larger tumors (21% vs 8%, RR = 2.51, 1.76–3.56) and advanced (3B +) stage (19% vs 6%, RR = 3.15, 2.15–4.63) compared to the referent category (screening-adherent and regular care). Under-use of regular care and screening was more prevalent in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of North Carolina.

Conclusions

Access to regular care is an important safeguard for earlier detection. Our data suggest that health equity interventions should prioritize both primary care and screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

To preserve patient confidentiality, Carolina Breast Cancer Study data are not publicly available but may be accessed after submission of a letter of intent and approval from the CBCS steering committee.

References

  1. Yedjou CG, Sims JN, Miele L et al (2019) Health and racial disparity in breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 1152:31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Giaquinto AN, Miller KD, Tossas KY, Winn RA, Jemal A, Siegel RL (2022) Cancer statistics for African American/Black People 2022. CA 72(3):202–229. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iqbal J, Ginsburg O, Rochon PA, Sun P, Narod SA (2015) Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA 313(2):165–173. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones CE, Maben J, Jack RH et al (2014) A systematic review of barriers to early presentation and diagnosis with breast cancer among black women. BMJ Open 4(2):e004076. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. US Preventive Services Task Force (2023) Draft recommendation: breast cancer: screening|United States Preventive Services Taskforce. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/breast-cancer-screening-adults. Accessed 28 May 2023

  6. American Cancer Society (2022) ACS Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/american-cancer-society-recommendations-for-the-early-detection-of-breast-cancer.html. Accessed 28 May 2023

  7. Valencia EM, Pruthi S (2021) Practice-changing opportunity to reduce disparities in screening mammography—implementation of risk assessment in primary care. JAMA Netw Open 4(9):e2124535–e2124535. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Radiology (2023) New ACR Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines call for earlier screening for high-risk women. https://www.acr.org/Media-Center/ACR-News-Releases/2023/New-ACR-Breast-Cancer-Screening-Guidelines-call-for-earlier-screening-for-high-risk-women. Accessed 27 May 2023

  9. Chen T, Kharazmi E, Fallah M (2023) Race and ethnicity-adjusted age recommendation for initiating breast cancer screening. JAMA Netw Open 6(4):e238893. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8893

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman CH, Schechter CB, Cadham CJ et al (2021) Identifying equitable screening mammography strategies for Black Women in the United States using simulation modeling. Ann Intern Med 174(12):1637–1646. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-6506

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer JR, Zirpoli G, Bertrand KA et al (2021) A validated risk prediction model for breast cancer in US Black women. J Clin Oncol 39(34):3866–3877. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pettit N, Sarmiento E, Kline J (2022) Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer in proximity to an emergency department visit. Sci Rep 12(1):10667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13422-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikka V, Ornato JP (2012) Cancer diagnosis and outcomes in Michigan EDs vs other settings. Am J Emerg Med 30(2):283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delamare Fauvel A, Bischof JJ, Reinbolt RE et al (2023) Diagnosis of cancer in the emergency department: a scoping review. Cancer Med 12(7):8710–8728. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McPhail S, Elliss-Brookes L, Shelton J et al (2013) Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality. Br J Cancer 109(8):2027–2034. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Ayanian JZ, Winer EP, Guadagnoli E (2005) The association of ambulatory care with breast cancer stage at diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries. J Gen Intern Med 20(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40079.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Roetzheim RG, Ferrante JM, Lee JH et al (2012) Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among medicare beneficiaries. Ann Fam Med 10(5):401–411. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Winkfield KM, Regnante JM, Miller-Sonet E, González ET, Freund KM, Doykos PM (2021) Development of an actionable framework to address cancer care disparities in medically underserved populations in the United States: expert roundtable recommendations. JCO Oncol Pract 17(3):e278–e293. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarfati D (2023) Why social inequalities matter in the cancer continuum. In: Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Saracci R, Conway DI, Straif K, Wild CP (eds) Reducing social inequalities in cancer: evidence and priorities for research. IARC Scientific Publications. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566166/. Accessed 19 Aug 2023

  20. Newman B, Moorman PG, Millikan R et al (1995) The Carolina Breast Cancer Study: integrating population-based epidemiology and molecular biology. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smedley BD (2012) The lived experience of race and its health consequences. Am J Public Health 102(5):933–935. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300643

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Emerson MA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Tipaldos HJ et al (2020) Integrating biology and access to care in addressing breast cancer disparities: 25 years’ research experience in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 12(3):149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00365-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dodd GD (1992) American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview Cancer 69(7 Suppl):1885–1887. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7+%3c1885::aid-cncr2820691702%3e3.0.co;2-b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Durham DD, Roberts MC, Khan CP et al (2021) Age at initiation of screening mammography by family history of breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancer Causes Control 32(1):103–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01354-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerlikowske K, Bissell MCS, Sprague BL et al (2021) Advanced Breast Cancer Definitions by Staging System Examined in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 113(7):909–916. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. USDA ERS (2023) Rural-urban continuum codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/. Accessed 19 Aug 2023

  27. NCI (2023) Census Tract-level SES and Rurality Database. SEER. https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/databases/census-tract/index.html. Accessed August 19, 2023

  28. Larsen A, Kolpacoff V, McCormack K, Seewaldt V, Hyslop T (2020) Using latent class modeling to jointly characterize economic stress and multipollutant exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 29(10):1940–1948. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2023) Social determinants of health database. https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/data-analytics/sdoh-data.html. Accessed 2 July 2023

  30. Sheps Health Workforce NC. North Carolina Health Professional Supply Data. Published online 2022. https://nchealthworkforce.unc.edu/interactive/supply/

  31. Reeder-Hayes KE, Mayer SE, Olshan A et al (2019) Race and delays in breast cancer treatment across the care continuum in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Cancer 125(22):3985–3992. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. North Carolina Area Health Education Centers. About Us. Published 2022. https://www.ncahec.net/about-nc-ahec/about-us/. Accessed 3 May 2023

  33. Ward JB, Gartner DR, Keyes KM, Fliss MD, McClure ES, Robinson WR (2019) How do we assess a racial disparity in health? Distribution, interaction, and interpretation in epidemiological studies. Ann Epidemiol 29:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Knol MJ, VanderWeele TJ, Groenwold RHH, Klungel OH, Rovers MM, Grobbee DE (2011) Estimating measures of interaction on an additive scale for preventive exposures. Eur J Epidemiol 26(6):433–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9554-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen T, Kharazmi E, Fallah M (2023) Race and ethnicity-adjusted age recommendation for initiating breast cancer screening. JAMA Netw Open 6(4):e238893–e238893. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8893

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Partridge AH, Hughes ME, Ottesen RA et al (2012) The effect of age on delay in diagnosis and stage of breast cancer. Oncologist 17(6):775–782. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. SAS Institute (2013) SAS Software Version 9.4

  38. R Studio Team (2020) RStudio: integrated development for R. http://www.rstudio.com/

  39. Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD et al (2022) Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA 72(6):524–541. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ahmed AT, Welch BT, Brinjikji W et al (2017) Racial disparities in screening mammography in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 14(2):157-165.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ganguly A, Baker KK, Redman MW, McClintock A, Yung RL (2022) Racial disparities in the screening mammography continuum within a diverse healthcare system. JCO 40(16_suppl):18580. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jatoi I, Sung H, Jemal A (2022) The emergence of the racial disparity in U.S. breast-cancer mortality. N Engl J Med 386(25):2349–2352. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2200244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Amend K, Hicks D, Ambrosone CB (2006) Breast cancer in African-American women: differences in tumor biology from European-American women. Cancer Res 66(17):8327–8330. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sineshaw HM, Gaudet M, Ward EM et al (2014) Association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer subtypes in the National Cancer Data Base (2010–2011). Breast Cancer Res Treat 145(3):753–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2976-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Perez NP, Baez YA, Stapleton SM et al (2022) Racially conscious cancer screening guidelines: a path towards culturally competent science. Ann Surg 275(2):259–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi L (2003) Mammography screening in African American women. Cancer 97(S1):258–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Helvie MA, Chang JT, Hendrick RE, Banerjee M (2014) Reduction in late-stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer. Cancer 120(17):2649–2656. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Yen AMF et al (2020) Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: Results in 549,091 women. Cancer 126(13):2971–2979. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L (2016) Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 164(4):244–255. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-0969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Park HL, Chang J, Haridass V, Wang SS, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H (2021) Mammography screening and mortality by risk status in the California teachers study. BMC Cancer 21(1):1341. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09071-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Yen AMF et al (2021) Beneficial effect of consecutive screening mammography examinations on mortality from breast cancer: a prospective study. Radiology 299(3):541–547. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021203935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Corkum M, Urquhart R, Kendell C, Burge F, Porter G, Johnston G (2012) Impact of comorbidity and healthcare utilization on colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis: literature review. Cancer Causes Control 23(2):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9875-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Camacho F, Hwang W, Kern T, Anderson RT (2015) Receipt of regular primary care and early cancer detection in Appalachia. J Rural Health 31(3):269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Qiao EM, Guram K, Kotha NV et al (2022) Association between primary care use prior to cancer diagnosis and subsequent cancer mortality in the veterans affairs health system. JAMA Netw Open 5(11):e2242048. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsui J, DeLia D, Stroup AM et al (2019) Association of Medicaid enrollee characteristics and primary care utilization with cancer outcomes for the period spanning Medicaid expansion in New Jersey. Cancer 125(8):1330–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Webber C, Whitehead M, Eisen A, Holloway CMB, Groome PA (2021) Factors associated with waiting time to breast cancer diagnosis among symptomatic breast cancer patients: a population-based study from Ontario. Can Breast Cancer Res Treat 187(1):225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-06051-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Warnecke RB, Oh A, Breen N et al (2008) Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: the National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities. Am J Public Health 98(9):1608–1615. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.102525

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Antonucci TC, Webster NJ (2014) Rethinking cells to society. Res Hum Dev 11(4):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.967052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Monsivais P, Amiri S, Robison J, Pflugeisen C, Kordas G, Amram O (2022) Racial and socioeconomic inequities in breast cancer screening before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of two cohorts of women 50 years +. Breast Cancer 29(4):740–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01352-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zoorob RJ, Mejia MC, Matas J, Wang H, Salemi JL, Levine R (2022) Smoking history and adherence to cancer-related recommendations in a primary care setting. Transl Behav Med 12(2):362–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Crabtree BF, Wartenberg D (2007) Cancer screening in women: BMI and adherence to physician recommendations. Am J Prev Med 32(6):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Alexandraki I, Mooradian AD (2010) Barriers related to mammography use for breast cancer screening among minority women. J Natl Med Assoc 102(3):206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30527-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Selove R, Kilbourne B, Fadden MK et al (2016) Time from screening mammography to biopsy and from biopsy to breast cancer treatment among Black and White, non-HMO Medicare women beneficiaries. Womens Health Issues 26(6):642–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Lawson MB, Bissell MCS, Miglioretti DL et al (2022) Multilevel factors associated with time to biopsy after abnormal screening mammography results by race and ethnicity. JAMA Oncol 8(8):1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Freeman AT, Meyer AM, Smitherman AB et al (2016) Statewide geographic variation in outcomes for adults with acute myeloid leukemia in North Carolina. Cancer 122(19):3041–3050. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hinshaw T, Lea S, Arcury J, Parikh AA, Snyder RA (2021) Racial and geographic disparities in stage-specific incidence and mortality in the colorectal cancer hotspot region of eastern North Carolina, 2008–2016. Cancer Causes Control 32(3):271–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01381-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Akinyemiju T, Moore JX, Ojesina AI, Waterbor JW, Altekruse SF (2016) Racial disparities in individual breast cancer outcomes by hormone-receptor subtype, area-level socio-economic status and healthcare resources. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(3):575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3840-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Riehman KS, Stephens RL, Henry-Tanner J, Brooks D (2018) Evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers. Am J Prev Med 54(2):190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pham C, Sin MK (2021) Use of electronic health records at federally qualified health centers: a potent tool to increase viral hepatitis screening and address the climbing incidence of liver cancer. J Cancer Educ 36(5):1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01741-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Greenwald ZR, El-Zein M, Bouten S, Ensha H, Vazquez FL, Franco EL (2017) Mobile screening units for the early detection of cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26(12):1679–1694. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, Cauch-Dudek K, Booth GL (2007) Administrative data algorithms can describe ambulatory physician utilization. Health Serv Res 42(4):1783–1796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00681.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Anderson J, Bourne D, Peterson K, Mackey K (2019) Evidence Brief: Accuracy of Self-Report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening. Department of Veterans Affairs (US). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539386/. Accessed 23 April 2023

  73. CDC - National Center for Health Statistics. Mammography. Published June 26, 2023. Accessed July 12, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/topics/mammography.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank CBCS participants for their generous participation, as well as study staff. This work and the CBCS was supported by a grant from UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (Chapel Hill, NC), which is funded by the University Cancer Research Fund of North Carolina; the Susan G. Komen Foundation (OGUNC1202 and TREND21686258 to M.A. Troester); and the NCI of the NIH (P01CA151135, to M.A. Troester), including the NCI Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (P50CA058223, M.A. Troester). This work was also supported by the UNC Lineberger Cancer Outcomes Research Program (M.R. Dunn). This research recruited participants and/or obtained data with the assistance of Rapid Case Ascertainment, a collaboration between the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Rapid Case Ascertainment is supported by a grant from the NCI of the NIH (grant no. P30CA016086). The Pathology Services Core is supported in part by NCI of the NIH Center Core Support Grant (P30CA016080) and the UNC-CH University Cancer Research Fund. The authors would like to acknowledge the UNC-CH BioSpecimen Processing Facility for sample processing, storage, and sample disbursements (http://bsp.web.unc.edu/).

Funding

This work and the CBCS was supported by a grant from UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (Chapel Hill, NC), which is funded by the University Cancer Research Fund of North Carolina; the Susan G. Komen Foundation (OGUNC1202 and TREND21686258 to M.A. Troester); and the NCI of the NIH (P01CA151135, to M.A. Troester), including the NCI Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (P50CA058223, M.A. Troester). This work was also supported by the UNC Lineberger Cancer Outcomes Research Program (M.R. Dunn). This research recruited participants and/or obtained data with the assistance of Rapid Case Ascertainment, a collaboration between the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Rapid Case Ascertainment is supported by a grant from the NCI of the NIH (grant no. P30CA016086). The Pathology Services Core is supported in part by NCI of the NIH Center Core Support Grant (P30CA016080) and the UNC-CH University Cancer Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study was conceived by MD, EM, MT, and EB. All authors contributed to study methodology. Data analysis and figure preparation were performed by MD. Analysis was supervised by MT and EB. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MD. All authors contributed revisions for subsequent drafts. Funding for the Carolina Breast Cancer Study was acquired by MT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthew R. Dunn or Melissa A. Troester.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosures

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All study protocols were adherent to ethical standards of the institutional review board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which approved the study.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 102 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunn, M.R., Metwally, E.M., Vohra, S. et al. Understanding mechanisms of racial disparities in breast cancer: an assessment of screening and regular care in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Causes Control 35, 825–837 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01833-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01833-5

Keywords

Navigation