Skip to main content
Log in

Study on Fire Resistance of Prefabricated Demountable Composite Beams Using Bolted Shear Connectors

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using bolts as shear connectors of the steel–concrete composite beams enables prefabricated assembly and makes it possible to demountable and reuse the prefabricated components. However, studies on the fire resistance of prefabricated demountable composite beams (PDCBs) connected by bolts are limited. In this paper, four full-scale fire resistance tests were conducted to investigate the fire resistance of PDCBs connected by shear bolts with profiled sheet ribs parallel to the steel beam. Experimental observations, heating curves, deformation curves, and critical temperatures of specimens were obtained through fire-resistant tests. Test results show that the shear failure of bolted connectors occurred in the partially connected PDCBs instead of in the fully connected ones. Under the same load ratio, the fire resistance limit of PDCBs with fire protection was 4.4 times that of PDCBs without fire protection. The temperatures of the upper flanges of the steel beams in the PDCBs were overestimated by the existing codes. Moreover, numerical heat transfer analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of concrete slab thickness, concrete moisture content and steel beam upper flange dimensions on the temperature distribution of the steel beam upper flange. Finally, based on the results, relevant recommendations are made for the method of calculating the temperature of the steel beam upper flange in the PDCBs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu B, Wang J (2017) Experimental investigation and analysis on flexural behavior of CFSTTC beams. Thin Wall Struct 116:277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu X, Bradford MA, Ataei A (2017) Flexural performance of innovative sustainable composite steel-concrete beams. Eng Struct 130:282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wan Z, Fang Z, Liang L, He S, Sun X (2022) Structural performance of steel–concrete composite beams with UHPC overlays under hogging moment. Eng Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng XF, Dong TF, Fu F, Weng YH (2022) Resilience of prefabricated concrete frames using hybrid steel-concrete composite connections. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiong G, Li W, Wang X, Liu J, Bai Y, Chen YF (2022) Flexural behavior of prefabricated high-strength steel-concrete composite beams with steel block connectors. J Constr Steel Res 197:107507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loqman N, Safiee NA, Bakar NA, Nasir NAM (2018) Structural behavior of steel-concrete composite beam using bolted shear connectors: a review. MATEC Web of Conf 203:6010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nawaz A, Chen J, Su X (2023) Exploring the trends in construction and demolition waste (C&DW) research: a scientometric analysis approach. Sustain Energy Techn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bao Z (2023) Developing circularity of construction waste for a sustainable built environment in emerging economies: new insights from China. Develop Built Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall WT, Nelson HM, Banerjee HK (1971) An experimental study of the use of high strength friction-grip bolts as shear connectors in composite beams. Struct Eng 4(9):171–178

    Google Scholar 

  10. David JD, Klaiber FW (1984) High-strength bolts as shear connectors in rehabilitation work. Concr Int 6(7):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Leeuwen A, Maas R (2002) Light-weight demountable floor system reduces waste by 65 percent. Steel in Sustainable Construction: IISI World Conference 2002, Luxembourg pp. 125–131

  12. R.B. Richard (2006) Industrialised, flexible and demountable building systems: quality, economy and sustainability. In: Proceedings of CRIOCM 2006 International Research Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, Rotterdam (Netherlands), pp. 1–10

  13. Weiss GC (2007) Demountable concrete buildings, structural design of floor slabs with concrete elements and aluminium foam. In: Grosse CU (ed) Advances in Construction Materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 697–709

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tran M, Van Do VN, Nguyen T (2018) Behaviour of steel-concrete composite beams using bolts as shear connectors, IOP conference series. Earth Environ Sci 143:12027

    Google Scholar 

  15. Du H, Hu X, Meng Y, Han G, Guo K (2020) Study on composite beams with prefabricated steel bar truss concrete slabs and demountable shear connectors. Eng Struct 210:110419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pavlović M, Marković Z, Veljković M, Buđevac D (2013) Bolted shear connectors vs. headed studs behaviour in push-out tests. J Constr Steel Res 88:134–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dai XH, Lam D, Saveri E (2015) Effect of concrete strength and stud collar size to shear capacity of demountable shear connectors, J. Eng, Struct. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001267

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Marshall WT, Nelson HM, Banerjee HK (1971) An experimental study of the use of high-strength friction-grip bolts as shear connectors in composite beams. Struct Eng 49(4):171–178

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moynihan MC, Allwood JM (2014) Viability and performance of demountable composite connectors. J Constr Steel Res 99:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ataei A, Bradford MA, Liu X (2016) Experimental study of composite beams having a precast geopolymer concrete slab and deconstructable bolted shear connectors. Eng Struct 114:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen TT, Tan KH, Burgess IW (2015) Behaviour of composite slab-beam systems at elevated temperatures: experimental and numerical investigation. Eng Struct 82:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Y, Wang M, Li G, Jiang B (2021) Mechanical properties of hot-rolled structural steels at elevated temperatures: a review. Fire Saf J 119:103237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang M, Li Y, Li G, Wang W, Jiang B (2022) Comparative experimental studies of high-temperature mechanical properties of HSSs Q460D and Q690D. J Constr Steel Res 189:107065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez J, Jeffers AE (2021) Analysis of restrained composite beams exposed to fire. Eng Struct 234:111740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aziz EM, Kodur VK, Glassman JD, Moreyra Garlock ME (2015) Behavior of steel bridge girders under fire conditions. J Constr Steel Res 106:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu M, Fan S, Zhou H, Han Y, Liang D (2022) Experimental and numerical research on fire resistance of stainless steel-concrete composite beam. J Constr Steel Res 194:107342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer EC, Varma AH (2015) Fire behavior of composite beams with simple connections: Benchmarking of numerical models. J Constr Steel Res 111:112–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shi D, Hu X, Du H, Xie Z, Meng Y (2021) Study on shear performance of notched connections for glulam-concrete composite beams under fire. Fire Safety J 126:103482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding F, Wang W, Jiang B (2023) Numerical study on the fire behaviour of restrained steel-concrete composite beams. J Build Eng 70:106358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang W, Jiang B, Ding F, Wang Y, Liu X (2023) Numerical study of the fire behavior of encased and Slim-Floor composite beams. J Perform Constr Facil 37(6):04023049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang W, Jiang B, Ding F, Wang YL (2023) Numerical analysis on mechanical behavior of steel-concrete composite beams under fire. Struct Des Tall Spec Build. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li GQ, Zhou HY (2007) Experimental study on the fire-resistance of steel-concrete composite beams. Chin Civil Eng J 40:19–26 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang WY, Engelhardt MD, Li GQ, Huang GS (2017) Behavior of Steel - Concrete Partially Composite Beams Subjected to Fire - Part 1: Experimental Study. Fire Technol 53:1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dietmar H, Thomas D, Osama E (1984) Experimental and numerical studies of composite beams exposed to fire. J Struct Eng 120:2871–2892

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang JC, Zhang DS, Dong YL et al (2019) Experimental study on internal force variation of steel-concrete composite beam under fire. Eng Mech 36(6):183–210

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang YC, Davies JM (2003) A experimental study of the fire performance of non-sway loaded concrete-filled steel tubular column assemblies with extended end plate connections. J Constr Steel Res 59(7):819–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang YC (2002) Steel and Composite Structures: Behaviour and Design for Fire Safety. Crc Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou H, Li S, Chen L (2018) Fire tests on composite steel-concrete beams prestressed with externaltendons. J Constr Steel Res 143:62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mao XY, Xiao Y (2005) Behavior of light weight steel-concrete composite beams subjected to standard fire. J Hunan Univ 32:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang WY, Wang K, Engelhardt MD, Li GQ (2017) Behavior of steel-concrete partially composite beams subjected to fire—part 2: analytical study. Fire Technol 53:1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Selden KL, Varma AH (2016) Composite beams under fire loading: numerical modeling of behavior. J Struct Fire Eng 7(2):142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chinese standard, Code for Fire Safety of Steel Structures in Buildings, GB51249–2017, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2017)

  43. Eurocode 4 Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures—Part 1–2: structural fire design, EN 1994–1–2, CEN, Brussels (1994)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of United Kingdom with Grant No. EP/N011201/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binhui Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical Approval

The authors declare that the research was carried out in compliance with ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, M., Lou, G., Wen, Z. et al. Study on Fire Resistance of Prefabricated Demountable Composite Beams Using Bolted Shear Connectors. Fire Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01533-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01533-1

Keywords

Navigation