Skip to main content
Log in

Nano-reinforced cement composites and novel insights from graphene oxide: a review

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advancement in the field of nanomaterials offers a significant prospect for developing cement-based composites at a nanoscale level. The three primary structures of engineered nanomaterials are the zero-dimensional nanoparticle, one-dimensional nanofibre and two-dimensional nanosheet. The literature reports the incorporation of zero-dimensional nanoparticles and one-dimensional nanofibres, primarily nanosilica and carbon nanotubes, in various applications. The recently discovered structure of graphene oxide, a two-dimensional nanosheet, has attracted significant interest due to its potential to interact with cement matrix in an additional dimension. Recent findings from studies indicate that graphene oxide possesses the potential to improve the properties of cement composites, resulting in the development of advanced cement composites with an improved performance. The present study provides a comprehensive review of recent research studies associated with the development of cement nanocomposites. This article focuses on the influence of introducing nanomaterials at low dosages on the properties of cement composites, such as workability, strength, hydration and microstructural characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shamsaei E, de Souza F B, Yao X, Benhelal E, Akbari A and Duan W 2018 Constr. Build. Mater. 183 642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuah S, Pan Z, Sanjayan J G, Wang C M and Duan W H 2014 Constr. Build. Mater. 73 113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt A M 2008 Compos. Struct. 86 3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao X-L and Zhang L 2007 Eng. Struct. 29 1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grubb J A, Blunt J, Ostertag C P and Devine T M 2007 Cem. Concr. Res. 37 1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marikunte S, Aldea C and Shah S P 1997 Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 5 100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Proctor B A, Oakley D R and Litherland K L 1982 Compos. 13 173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentur A, Peled A and Yankelevsky D 1997 Cem. Concr. Res. 27 1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qian C X and Stroeven P 2000 Cem. Concr. Res. 30 63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamoush S, Abu-Lebdeh T and Cummins T 2010 Constr. Build. Mater. 24 2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wichmann M H G, Schulte K and Wagner H D 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oltulu M and Şahin R 2013 Energy Build. 58 292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawashima S, Hou P, Corr D J and Shah S P 2013 Cem. Concr. Compos. 36 8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Qing Y, Zenan Z, Deyu K and Rongshen C 2007 Constr. Build. Mater. 21 539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Said A M, Zeidan M S, Bassuoni M T and Tian Y 2012 Constr. Build. Mater. 36 838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasibulin A G, Koltsova T, Nasibulina L I, Anoshkin I V, Semencha A, Tolochko O V et al 2013 Acta Mater. 61 1862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V et al 2004 Science (1979) 306 666

  18. Geim A K and Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alkhateb H, Al-Ostaz A, Cheng AH-D and Li X 2013 J. Nanomech. Micromech. 3 67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang X, Zhu X, Qian J, Liu J and Huang Y 2019 Constr. Build. Mater. 203 514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng H, Ge Y, Cai C S, Zhang Y and Liu Z 2019 Constr. Build. Mater. 194 102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li H, Xiao H, Yuan J and Ou J 2004 Compos. B Eng. 35 185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma P-C, Siddiqui N A, Marom G and Kim J-K 2010 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 41 1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Strano M S, Moore V C, Miller M K, Allen M J, Haroz E H, Kittrell C et al 2003 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 3 81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins F, Lambert J and Duan W H 2012 Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tyson B M, Abu Al-Rub R K, Yazdanbakhsh A and Grasley Z 2011 J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li G Y, Wang P M and Zhao X 2005 Carbon N Y 43 1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li G Y, Wang P M and Zhao X 2007 Cem. Concr. Compos. 29 377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang H, Monasterio M, Cui H and Han N 2017 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 102 263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Reddy P V R K and Prasad D R 2022 J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 7 30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan Z, He L, Qiu L, Korayem A H, Li G, Zhu J W et al 2015 Cem. Concr. Compos. 58 140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reddy P V R K and Ravi Prasad D 2022 Mater. Today Proc. 62 2919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gong K, Pan Z, Korayem A H, Qiu L, Li D, Collins F et al 2015 J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27

  34. Zheng Q, Han B, Cui X, Yu X and Ou J 2017 Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 7 184798041774230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li X, Liu Y M, Li W G, Li C Y, Sanjayan J G, Duan W H et al 2017 Constr. Build. Mater. 145 402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shang Y, Zhang D, Yang C, Liu Y and Liu Y 2015 Constr. Build. Mater. 96 20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu Z, Li X, Hanif A, Chen B, Parthasarathy P, Yu J et al 2017 Constr. Build. Mater. 152 232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Reddy P V R K and Ravi Prasad D 2023 Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 31 255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Reddy P V R K and Prasad D R 2023 J. Build. Eng. 63 105481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lv S, Liu J, Sun T, Ma Y and Zhou Q 2014 Constr. Build. Mater. 64 231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lv S, Ma Y, Qiu C, Sun T, Liu J and Zhou Q 2013 Constr. Build. Mater. 49 121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stephens C, Brown L and Sanchez F 2016 Carbon N Y 107 482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Q, Cui X, Wang J, Li S, Lv C and Dong Y 2017 Constr. Build. Mater. 138 35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lv S H, Deng L J, Yang W Q, Zhou Q F and Cui Y Y 2016 Cem. Concr. Compos. 66 1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Li X, Lu Z, Chuah S, Li W, Liu Y, Duan W H and Li Z 2017 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 100 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Long W-J, Gu Y, Xing F and Khayat K H 2018 Cem. Concr. Compos. 94 72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Reddy P V R K and Prasad D R 2022 Jordan. J. Civ. Eng. 16 507

    Google Scholar 

  48. Reddy P V R K and Ravi Prasad 2023 In: Shamsher Bahadur Singh, Muthukumar Gopalarathnam, Venkatesh Kumar R Kodur and Vasant A Matsagar (eds) Fiber reinforced polymeric materials and sustainable structures (Singapore: Springer Nature) 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8979-7

  49. Wang M, Wang R, Yao H, Farhan S, Zheng S and Du C 2016 Constr. Build. Mater. 126 730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lu L, Zhao P and Lu Z 2018 Constr. Build. Mater. 189 33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Long W-J, Li H-D, Fang C-L and Xing F 2018 Nanomater. 8 31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hu M, Guo J, Fan J, Li P and Chen D 2019 Constr. Build. Mater. 216 128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu Z, Chen B, Leung Christopher K Y, Li Z and Sun G 2019 Cem. Concr. Compos. 100 85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sharma S and Kothiyal N C 2016 Constr. Build. Mater. 115 256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tong T, Fan Z, Liu Q, Wang S, Tan S and Yu Q 2016 Constr. Build. Mater. 106 102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Abrishami M E and Zahabi V 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 1073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Qin H, Wei W and Hang Hu Y 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 103 67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lv S, Ma Y, Qiu C and Zhou Q 2013 Mag. Concr. Res. 65 1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Qureshi T S and Panesar D K 2019 Constr. Build. Mater. 206 71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang B, Jiang R and Wu Z 2016 Nanomater. 6 200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mohammed A, Sanjayan J G, Duan W H and Nazari A 2015 Constr. Build. Mater. 84 341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P V R K Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reddy, P.V.R.K., Prasad, D.R. Nano-reinforced cement composites and novel insights from graphene oxide: a review. Bull Mater Sci 47, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03092-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03092-1

Keywords

Navigation