Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter January 15, 2024

Influence of habitat, density, lignin structure, and extraction treatment on thermal-softening properties of water-swollen wood: a study of 87 wood specimens

  • Yuka Miyoshi EMAIL logo , Hisashi Abe , Hiroaki Horiyama , Keisuke Kojiro and Yuzo Furuta
From the journal Holzforschung

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the diversity of thermal-softening temperatures and identify the factors that determine this temperature. To achieve this, the thermal-softening properties of the radial direction of wood were measured under water-saturated conditions for 15 softwood and 72 hardwood specimens. Wood samples were obtained from the xylarium of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan. A dynamic viscoelastic measurement was performed on samples with uniform heating and cooling history because the difference in cooling rate can alter in the mechanical properties of wood. The storage and loss elastic moduli increased linearly as wood density increased, regardless of the wood species. However, the thermal-softening temperature (defined in this study as the peak temperature of loss tangent) was unrelated to the density, anatomical features, species, latitude, and annual rainfall in the habitat. When the relationship between thermal-softening temperature and lignin structure was investigated, a negative correlation was observed between the thermal-softening temperature and the syringyl ratio (syringyl/(syringyl+guaiacyl)) of lignin aromatics. This indicates that the thermal-softening temperature is higher for wood species with denser lignin structures, supporting the prior research showed correlation between thermal-softening temperature and methoxyl group content of wood.

1 Introduction

Many studies have been conducted on the thermal-softening properties of wood in the lateral direction. One study found that the peak temperature of the logarithmic decrement, measured by the torsional dynamic viscoelasticity of the radial sample, becomes lower at a higher moisture content and reaches around 80 °C when the moisture content is 20 % or more (Becker and Noack 1968). Although the thermal-softening temperature varies with the frequency of measurement and the loading direction of the sample, it is recognized that the softening behavior observed around 80 °C for the water-saturated wood is based on the glass transition of lignin (Salmén 1984). It is known that the thermal-softening temperature of water-saturated wood is higher in softwood than in hardwood (Placet et al. 2007). The lignin structure differs between softwood and hardwood because softwood contains only the guaiacyl nucleus and hardwood contains both guaiacyl and syringyl nuclei. To investigate the effect of lignin on the thermal-softening properties of various species of wood in water-saturated condition, Furuta et al. (2001, 2008a, b) measured the peak temperatures of the loss tangent (tan δ), as the thermal-softening temperature, by dynamic mechanical analysis, and compared this temperature for water-saturated wood samples (10 softwood and 12 hardwood) in the radial direction. The results showed that the thermal-softening temperature is higher for softwood species, with a difference of up to 30 °C. The authors proposed that the difference in thermal-softening temperature between tropical hardwood and Japanese hardwood is caused by a variation in the lignin structure owing to the aromatic nuclei of lignin; however, it did not provide any basis for this in their results. Olsson and Salmén (1997) investigated the relationship between the thermal-softening temperature of wood and the lignin content or methoxyl group content, which was calculated as a molar percentage of the methoxyl groups per phenylpropane unit of lignin. They showed a correlation between thermal-softening temperature and the methoxyl group content. Furuta et al. (2010) measured the thermal-softening properties of delignified wood. They clarified that the thermal-softening temperature of water-saturated wood in the lateral direction varied widely under the influence of a slight change in the lignin structure, rather than a reduction in the amount of lignin. The above researches indicate that there is a main relation between the diversity in thermal-softening properties and lignin structure. However, the reasonable grounds for wood why the diverse thermal-softening properties are expressed cannot be discussed.

Wu et al. (1992) investigated the lignin structure of hardwood using ultraviolet and visible microspectrophotometry, and clarified that the distributions of the syringyl and guaiacyl units of lignin in the vessel and fiber differed according to the habitat and porosity of the wood. According to the classification by Wu et al. (1992), the wood species in sub-frigid zones are rich in syringyl units, while those in tropical zones are rich in guaiacyl units. Therefore, the diversity of thermal-softening temperatures may be related to the lignin structure classified according to the climatic zone of the trees. If such a relationship exists between the physical properties and chemical structure of wood and its growing environment, an understanding of tree evolution and growth strategies can be developed.

In addition, the thermal-softening properties of water-swollen wood are affected by the drying history and cooling rate before measurement, even in the same sample (Furuta et al. 2001, 2008a, b; Kojiro et al. 2008). Moreover, the thermal-softening properties of samples collected from a certain part of a tree with large amounts of extractives, such as the base of the branch can be altered by removing the extractives (Furuta et al. 2014). Therefore, to comprehensively discuss the factors affecting the thermal-softening temperatures of various wood species, it is necessary to conduct experiments that consider the thermal history and extraction treatment of the samples before measurement.

In this study, the thermal-softening properties of various wood specimens, registered in the xylarium of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (TWTw), were measured to reveal the diversity of thermal-softening properties and identify the factors that determine the thermal-softening temperature. Dynamic viscoelastic analysis (DMA) was conducted on specimens subjected to the same heating-cooling history, both with and without extraction treatment, to obtain the precise thermal-softening properties in water-saturated conditions. Since the thermal-softening properties in lateral direction are affected by the density and anatomic features of the wood, the correlation between the thermal-softening property and the density and vessel arrangement type of the wood was investigated. In addition, to clarify the factors that determine the diversity in thermal-softening temperature, the syringyl ratio of lignin (syringyl/(syringyl+guaiacyl)) was measured in the samples used for DMA measurement, and the relationship between thermal-softening temperature and lignin structure was investigated. Elucidating the factors contributing to the diversity of the thermal-softening properties of wood is valuable for basic research and for facilitating advanced discussions on the mechanisms of thermal-softening properties.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Pretreatment of samples

A total of 15 softwood and 72 hardwood specimens were obtained from the xylarium of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (TWTw). The annual rainfall data were obtained from the Japan Meteorological Agency (https://www.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/risk/obsdl/) and the World Weather Online (https://www.worldweatheronline.com/), based on the registered latitude and longitude information. For specimens without latitude information, the latitude data was estimated from the name of the registered region or representative point in the country (Table 1).

Table 1:

List of examined wood species. The syringyl ratio and peak temperature of tan δ were measured for water-saturated, untreated specimens in radial direction. Codes in Köppen climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006); tropical rainforest climate (Af); tropical savanna, wet (Aw); humid subtropical climate (Cfa); hot-summer humid continental climate (Dfa); and warm-summer humid continental climate (Dfb). The specimen with TWTw ID 12075 was classified as Af because it is a tropical wood species lacking provenance.

Scientific name TWTw sample ID Vessel arrangement type Provenance Köppen climate classification Latitude (°) Annual rainfall (mm) Density (kg/m3) Total extraction (%) Syringyl ratio Untreated sample Extracted sample
Peak temperature of tan δ (°C) tan δ value of peak temperature (°C) Peak temperature of tan δ (°C) tan δ value of peak temperature (°C)
Quercus gilva 21463 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.9 2323 890 4.2 0.56 77 0.15 78 0.15
Quercus gilva 1017 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.9 2323 920 7.2 0.65 70 0.17 70 0.17
Quercus gilva 1031 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.9 2323 930 4.0 0.77 78 0.12 72 0.15
Quercus gilva 14447 Radial-porous Chiba, Japan Cfa 35.2 2047 900 3.1 0.56 80 0.14 80 0.14
Quercus gilva 9317 Radial-porous Miyazaki, Japan Cfa 31.9 2626 800 6.1 0.59 78 0.15 80 0.15
Quercus gilva 17750 Radial-porous Miyazaki, Japan Cfa 32.0 2774 760 4.8 0.68 75 0.13 76 0.14
Quercus morii 1055 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.9 2323 910 4.5 0.66 71 0.14 71 0.14
Quercus morii 1018 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.6 2323 910 6.9 0.57 72 0.16 73 0.16
Quercus morii 21465 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.9 2323 920 7.2 0.63 72 0.15 73 0.15
Quercus longinux 21464 Radial-porous Taiwan Cfa 23.9 2323 1020 5.3 0.59 76 0.16 77 0.15
Quercus pseudomolucea 8194 Radial-porous Indonesia Af −7.7 3420 830 10.7 0.53 72 0.15 72 0.14
Quercus gamelliflora 10018 Radial-porous Malaysia Af 5.9 3296 870 3.0 0.70 78 0.11 77 0.12
Quercus acuta 23641 Radial-porous Gifu, Japan Cfa 35.2 1964 910 7.5 0.74 77 0.14 74 0.13
Quercus glaber 18790 Radial-porous Miyazaki, Japan Cfa 31.9 2774 880 11.3 0.58 75 0.12 72 0.13
Quercus crispula 23715 Ring-porous Mie, Japan Cfa 34.2 2158 820 3.3 0.73 71 0.12 72 0.12
Quercus crispula 16810 Ring-porous Russia Dfa 46.8 884 780 5.2 0.65 74 0.11 74 0.12
Quercus crispula 27253 Ring-porous Oita, Japan Cfa 32.8 2405 720 7.5 0.66 75 0.11 75 0.12
Quercus crispula 25002 Ring-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfa 42.0 1075 700 6.8 0.69 74 0.11 75 0.11
Quercus crispula 21861 Ring-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfa 43.1 1146 660 7.6 0.72 73 0.12 73 0.12
Quercus crispula 970 Ring-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfa 43.1 1146 480 5.4 0.69 70 0.14 72 0.12
Lithocarpus soleriana 5056 Radial-porous Philippines Af 14.6 2326 900 6.4 0.51 79 0.14 79 0.15
Lithocarpus edulis 19332 Radial-porous Okinawa, Japan Cfa 26.8 2594 730 4.2 0.55 74 0.14 73 0.15
Lithocarpus edulis 861 Radial-porous Kagoshima, Japan Cfa 31.4 2686 830 4.6 0.37 78 0.12 76 0.13
Lithocarpus edulis 26568 Radial-porous Ibaraki, Japan Cfa 36 1326 770 5.6 0.6 79 0.14 80 0.14
Lithocarpus clementiana 10025 Radial-porous Malaysia Af 5.9 3296 910 4.5 0.62 81 0.12 80 0.13
Lithocarpus glaber 25560 Radial-porous Kumamoto, Japan Cfa 32.3 2535 620 5.5 0.57 81 0.12 80 0.13
Acer carpinifolium 23668 Diffuse-porous Gifu, Japan Cfa 35.3 1964 670 1.4 0.16 84 0.11 86 0.11
Acer carpinifolium 18574 Diffuse-porous Yamanashi, Japan Cfa 35.8 1213 620 2.7 0.47 79 0.12 80 0.12
Acer carpinifolium 24219 Diffuse-porous Nagano, Japan Cfa 35.8 2110 660 2.0 0.09 82 0.11 85 0.11
Acer mono 975 Diffuse-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfa 43.4 1146 710 5.5 0.7 72 0.13 75 0.14
Acer mono 14440 Diffuse-porous Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.6 1643 740 3.2 0.64 73 0.12 76 0.12
Acer mono 7418 Diffuse-porous China Dfa 39.9 531 680 6.1 0.64 73 0.12 73 0.12
Gardenia jasminoides 12919 Diffuse-porous Okinawa, Japan Cfa 26.8 2594 870 7.3 0.69 80 0.12 79 0.12
Gardenia jasminoides 17459 Diffuse-porous Okinawa, Japan Cfa 24.3 2025 820 10.5 0.65 79 0.11 81 0.12
Gardenia jasminoides 19484 Diffuse-porous Kagoshima, Japan Cfa 28.2 2375 830 9.4 0.65 80 0.11 80 0.12
Distylium racemosum 27840 Diffuse-porous Fukuoka, Japan Cfa 33.8 1665 930 5.8 0.53 79 0.11 80 0.12
Distylium racemosum 25950 Diffuse-porous Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.7 1598 740 2.5 0.71 78 0.10 78 0.10
Distylium racemosum 19673 Diffuse-porous Nagasaki, Japan Cfa 34.5 1435 920 4.6 0.51 76 0.12 79 0.12
Cercidiphyllum japonicum 4339 Diffuse-porous Saitama, Japan Cfa 35.9 1375 570 4.5 0.55 77 0.13 77 0.13
Cercidiphyllum japonicum 9328 Diffuse-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfa 42.9 1061 440 4.8 0.5 78 0.13 80 0.13
Cercidiphyllum japonicum 28908 Diffuse-porous Ibaraki, Japan Cfa 36.0 1326 550 4.9 0.46 78 0.11 79 0.11
Populus maximowiczii 12370 Diffuse-porous Kyoto, Japan Cfa 35.3 1808 370 4.9 0.58 78 0.13 78 0.12
Populus maximowiczii 9297 Diffuse-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfb 43.1 920 380 4.3 0.45 80 0.13 80 0.13
Populus maximowiczii 13681 Diffuse-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfb 42.6 1239 420 5.0 0.54 78 0.14 79 0.13
Hebe salicifolia Diffuse-porous New Zealand Cfa −42.4 710 640 5.7 0.74 73 0.13 73 0.12
Ceiba pentandra 7169 Diffuse-porous Mexico Cfa 19.4 1003 420 8.7 0.59 77 0.11 76 0.11
Ceiba pentandra 5504 Diffuse-porous Mexico Cfa 19.4 1003 190 18.8 0.69 76 0.11 74 0.11
Ceiba pentandra 5612 Diffuse-porous Nigeria Cfa 9.6 1216 350 13.6 0.67 71 0.12 74 0.12
Falcataria moluccana 12075 Diffuse-porous Af 240 3.3 0.63 78 0.10 80 0.09
Falcataria moluccana 11400 Diffuse-porous New Britain, Papua New Guinea Af −9.4 1183 490 3.3 0.58 76 0.13 76 0.13
Falcataria moluccana 11509 Diffuse-porous Indonesia Af −6.1 1907 410 3.8 0.63 80 0.13 79 0.13
Shorea parvistipulata 12929 Diffuse-porous Malaysia Af 3.1 2842 510 5.4 0.42 87 0.14 86 0.14
Shorea leprosula 25109 Diffuse-porous Borneo, Indonesia Af −1.0 3151 730 3.1 0.28 89 0.12 89 0.12
Shorea pauciflora 19978 Diffuse-porous Malaysia Af 3.1 2842 580 3.8 0.34 91 0.14 92 0.14
Eusideroxylon zwageri 3150 Diffuse-porous Indonesia Af −6.1 1907 1040 4.7 0.1 89 0.18 91 0.17
Eusideroxylon zwageri 13083 Diffuse-porous Borneo, Indonesia Af −1.0 3151 1040 3.5 0.04 90 0.25 93 0.25
Eusideroxylon zwageri 12070 Diffuse-porous Borneo, Indonesia Af −1.0 3151 1090 4.9 −0.14 85 0.25 88 0.25
Fraxinus mandshurica 9344 Ring-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfb 42.9 1061 660 4.2 0.59 75 0.12 75 0.12
Fraxinus mandshurica 21867 Ring-porous Hokkaido, Japan Dfb 43.1 1146 680 3.3 0.62 77 0.10 77 0.11
Fraxinus mandshurica 2773 Ring-porous China Dfb 39.9 531 620 3.5 0.6 72 0.11 76 0.11
Zelkova serrata 18339 Ring-porous Ibaraki, Japan Cfa 36.0 1326 690 10.1 0.67 77 0.12 73 0.12
Zelkova serrata 13676 Ring-porous Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.7 1643 740 12.2 0.57 74 0.13 73 0.13
Zelkova serrata 9326 Ring-porous Gunma, Japan Cfa 36.1 1250 620 10.6 0.55 73 0.13 74 0.12
Tetracentron sinense 13657 Non-porous China Aw 39.9 531 380 3.5 0.57 74 0.16 74 0.15
Tetracentron sinense 7486 Non-porous China Aw 39.9 531 410 4.0 0.58 75 0.17 72 0.17
Tetracentron sinense 7808 Non-porous British Aw 51.5 633 450 6.1 0.57 73 0.15 74 0.13
Trochodendron aralioides 2842 Non-porous Kyoto, Japan Cfa 35.1 1523 540 2.5 0.7 72 0.15 71 0.14
Trochodendron aralioides 855 Non-porous Kumamoto, Japan Cfa 32.3 2497 670 4.3 0.64 71 0.17 70 0.16
Trochodendron aralioides 14727 Non-porous Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.7 1643 680 1.6 0.65 71 0.16 71 0.16
Gnetum gnemon 6580 Diffuse-porous Philippines Af 14.6 2326 650 4.5 0.64 76 0.15 72 0.15
Gnetum gnemon 22089 Diffuse-porous Java, Indonesia Af −7.7 3420 720 3.1 0.57 84 0.10 83 0.10
Gnetum gnemon 13738 Diffuse-porous Malaysia Af 3.1 2842 700 2.7 0.66 79 0.12 76 0.11
Ginkgo biloba 28959 Softwood Ibaraki, Japan Cfa 36.0 1326 470 2.1 −0.04 93 0.12 94 0.13
Ginkgo biloba 79 Softwood Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.7 1643 540 7.3 0.01 88 0.15 94 0.14
Ginkgo biloba 21789 Softwood Hokkaido, Japan Dfa 43.1 1146 570 6.7 0.07 86 0.14 92 0.13
Cryptomeria japonica 9290 Softwood Akita, Japan Cfa 39.7 2053 340 4.2 0.04 93 0.13 95+ 0.14+
Cryptomeria japonica 6427 Softwood Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.7 1643 370 4.5 −0.12 95+ 0.13+ 95+ 0.13+
Cryptomeria japonica 12854 Softwood Okinawa, Japan Cfa 26.8 2594 640 4.7 −0.05 91 0.15 95+ 0.14+
Chamaecyparis obtusa 28890 Softwood Ibaraki, Japan Cfa 36.1 1326 410 8.8 −0.03 91 0.12 95+ 0.13+
Chamaecyparis obtusa 9293 Softwood Nagano, Japan Cfa 35.8 1927 390 5.7 0.03 91 0.15 95+ 0.15+
Chamaecyparis obtusa 14666 Softwood Tokyo, Japan Cfa 35.7 1643 380 6.6 −0.12 92 0.14 95+ 0.16+
Larix kaempferi 16334 Softwood Ibaraki, Japan Cfa 36.3 1368 790 14.8 −0.06 93 0.14 93 0.14
Larix kaempferi 9279 Softwood Nagano, Japan Cfa 36.2 964 520 12.4 −0.05 95+ 0.15+ 95+ 0.16+
Larix kaempferi 8887 Softwood Netherlands Dfb 52.1 853 610 15.8 0.03 91 0.14 94 0.14
Agathis borneensis 17742 Softwood Malaysia Af 3.1 2842 480 2.3 −0.08 93 0.17 92 0.16
Agathis borneensis 20089 Softwood Malaysia Af 3.1 2842 470 1.3 0.07 90 0.15 89 0.14
Agathis borneensis 3103 Softwood Indonesia Af −6.1 1907 450 7.2 0.06 91 0.15 93 0.15

For DMA measurement, each wood sample was cut in the longitudinal direction into an end-grain plate (1 mm thickness). Subsequently, the strip-shaped DMA samples (3.2 mm (tangential) × 30 mm (radial)) and square-shaped weight measurement samples (15 mm (tangential) × 15 mm (radial)) were cut from the plate (Figure 1). Half of the DMA samples were extracted for 6 h with ethanol:benzene (1:2, v/v) in a Soxhlet extractor to remove the resin, fat, wax, and soluble tannin. The extracted DMA samples were air-dried at room temperature and freeze-dried for 6 h to completely volatilize the liquid. The weight measurement samples were first treated in the same manner as the extracted DMA samples. Next, they were boiled for 10 min and cooled naturally to room temperature in water. This process was performed two times according to the temperature rise and fall program of the DMA samples. The weight loss rate due to the extraction treatment was calculated by weighing the oven-dried (105 °C) samples (Figure 2). The density of all the samples was obtained from the dimensions and weight of the oven-dried weight measurement samples before extraction. The weight loss due to extraction and density were calculated from the average value measured from two or three weight measurement samples that could be taken from each specimen.

Figure 1: 
Sample dimensions used for measurements.
Figure 1:

Sample dimensions used for measurements.

Figure 2: 
Sample preparation procedures and temperature program for dynamic viscoelastic measurement.
Figure 2:

Sample preparation procedures and temperature program for dynamic viscoelastic measurement.

2.2 Dynamic viscoelasticity measurement

A forced-vibration dynamic viscoelastometer (DMA 42E-SF 28 Artemis, NETZSCH Japan K.K., Kanagawa, Japan) was used to measure the temperature-dependent, dynamic viscoelastic properties of the unextracted and extracted water-swollen samples. The dynamic viscoelastic properties of wood changed due to the drying history or cooling rate, even for the same samples (Furuta et al. 2001, 2008a, b; Kojiro et al. 2008). Therefore, to unify the heating history immediately before viscoelastic measurement for all the specimens, this study recorded the data in the second temperature rise after cooling them from 95 °C to 5 °C at 1 °C/min (Figure 2). The data for temperatures up to 98 °C were obtained originally, which is very close to the boiling point of water. Since some samples contained noise in the temperature range higher than 95 °C, DMA data up to 95 °C, which could be stably measured, was analyzed to compare the results. During the viscoelastic measurement, the span was 10 mm in radial direction (Figure 1) and a 0.1 Hz sine wave with a tension displacement amplitude of 5 µm was applied to the sample. In the preliminary experiments conducted on several wood samples, the offset loads in the measured temperature range, when the displacement amplitude was controlled at 5 µm, were within the linear region of the stress-strain line. DMA measurement was performed one time for each sample because the preliminary experiments confirmed that the same temperature program would produce nearly identical measurement results. As an example of the measured DMA data, the results of the temperature dependence of tan δ before and after extraction for softwood and hardwood samples are shown in Figure 3. The peak top of tan δ was read as the peak temperature.

Figure 3: 
Examples of DMA data for untreated and extracted samples.
Figure 3:

Examples of DMA data for untreated and extracted samples.

2.3 Estimation of the syringyl ratio

The extracted DMA samples, which were used for the dynamic viscoelastic measurements, were analyzed using an IR spectrometer (FT/IR-4700, JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Fine wood meal was prepared from the middle length portion of dried DMA samples, using a glass file, mixed at 1 % with KBr and pressed into a disc. Each spectrum was based on 64 scans with a wavenumber range from 4000 to 500 cm−1. Following Huang et al. (2012), the areas under the IR peak at 1595 cm−1 (range: 1605–1574 cm−1, A 1595) and 1509 cm−1 (range: 1535–1492 cm−1, A 1509) were measured. Huang et al. (2012) presented a linear regression equation with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 to describe the relationship between the syringyl ratio (syringyl/(syringyl+guaiacyl)) of lignin aromatics, measured by alkaline nitrobenzene oxidation analysis, and log (peak area ratio of A 1595/A 1509). In the present study, the same regression equation was used to determine the syringyl ratio of all the specimens from their IR spectra. The peak areas were measured three times for each sample, and after confirming that there were no outliers, area ratios were calculated from the data that showed the clearest spectrum with the least noise.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Relationship between thermal-softening temperature and the growing environment of the wood

In this study, the peak temperature of tan δ is defined as the thermal-softening temperature of the sample. In this paper, the peak temperatures of tan δ were read for samples for which the peak was observed in the range of 95 °C. Samples for which no peak was observed at 95 °C are indicated as 95+ in Table 1, and the legend is marked in red in the figure. The tan δ values for the 95+ samples were read at 95 °C and indicated in Table 1. Figure 4 shows the relationship between the peak temperature of and the value of tan δ. The peak temperatures of tan δ were slightly different between the extracted and unextracted samples (Figure 4a and b, respectively). Six softwood samples were identified in which the extraction process changed the peak temperature to 95 °C or higher. Table 1 shows that the peak temperature of tan δ in softwoods changed to higher temperatures after extraction. However, some hardwood samples showed a decrease in the peak temperature of tan δ due to extraction. Although the thermal-softening temperatures changed by a maximum of 6 °C due to extraction, the temperature range and the direction of increase or decrease varied among individual samples. No uniform trend was observed among the wood species and no correlation was observed between the peak temperature and the value of tan δ in Figure 4. The peak temperature of tan δ is generally lower for hardwood and higher for softwood, as reported in previous studies (Furuta et al. 2001, 2008a, b). In hardwood species, the peak temperature of tan δ in the radial-, ring-, and non-porous samples was in a temperature range from 70 to 80 °C; however, the temperature range was wider for diffuse-porous samples. The two diffuse-porous samples (both were Ulin (Eusideroxylon zwageri), which is a tropical hardwood) showed higher tan δ values than the others. Table 1 lists the peak temperature of tan δ for unextracted specimens, showing some variation within the same wood species.

Figure 4: 
Relationship between loss tangent (tan δ) and peak temperature of tan δ in water-saturated radial samples measured at 0.1 Hz. (a) Untreated samples and (b) extracted samples. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.
Figure 4:

Relationship between loss tangent (tan δ) and peak temperature of tan δ in water-saturated radial samples measured at 0.1 Hz. (a) Untreated samples and (b) extracted samples. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.

Previous studies have reported that among hardwood species, tropical species show higher thermal-softening temperatures (Furuta et al. 2010) and are rich in guaiacyl units (Wu et al. 1992). If both the physical properties and chemical structures observed in tropical wood species are determined by their habitat, the regional climate may exert an influence on the thermal-softening temperature. To confirm this possibility, the relationship between the peak temperature of tan δ in untreated specimens and the latitude and annual rainfall at the collection site is plotted in Figure 5.

Figure 5: 
Relationship between habitat and peak temperature of tan δ of water-saturated, untreated radial specimens measured at 0.1 Hz. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.
Figure 5:

Relationship between habitat and peak temperature of tan δ of water-saturated, untreated radial specimens measured at 0.1 Hz. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.

The softwood specimens showed high peak temperatures of tan δ, regardless of latitude. Among the hardwood specimens, the radial-porous and diffuse-porous wood cover a wide latitude range. Certain diffuse-porous specimens collected from near the equator exhibited high peak temperatures compared to softwood. This distribution of the peak temperature of tan δ was similar to the high peak temperatures of tan δ previously observed in tropical hardwood species (Furuta et al. 2001, 2008a, b). However, this study suggests that the latitude does not necessarily correspond to the thermal-softening temperature among various wood species.

Specifically, in softwood and hardwood except diffuse-porous wood, no relationship was observed between the annual rainfall and peak temperature of tan δ (Figure 5b). Among the diffuse-porous specimens, there was only a weak positive correlation between the two parameters. However, this correlation could be enhanced in certain tropical diffuse-porous wood, because many areas with high rainfall are located near the equator (see the clustering of diffuse-porous specimens near 0° latitude in Figure 5a). Overall, neither the latitude nor annual precipitation were related to the thermal-softening temperatures of wood in this study.

3.2 Relationship between thermal-softening property and density

In this section, the thermal-softening properties of extracted samples are presented to discuss the relationship between the wood cell wall constituents and the thermal-softening properties. Figure 6a–c plot the storage elastic modulus (E′) at 30 °C, loss elastic modulus (E″) at 30 °C, and peak temperatures of tan δ versus the wood density, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between E′ and density in softwood, ring-porous hardwood, non-porous hardwood, and diffuse-porous hardwood, all following the same linear relationship. However, radial-porous wood was distributed at slightly lower locations and did not display a clear positive correlation with density. The relationship between E″ and density showed a positive correlation when the density was 1000 kg/m3 or less. The distribution patterns of E″ and E′ were nearly the same. Figure 6a and b presents three Ulin specimens with the highest densities (1000 kg/m3 or more). Their E′ and E″ values deviate from the linear distribution of the other specimens. While E′ and E″ show a positive correlation with wood density, the peak temperature of tan δ shows no such relationship (Figure 6c). Thus, the wood species exhibited a wide range of thermal-softening temperatures, regardless of their density.

Figure 6: 
Relationship between data from dynamic viscoelastic measurements at 0.1 Hz and the density of extracted radial specimens in water-saturated conditions. (a) Storage elastic modulus (E′) at 30 °C, (b) loss elastic modulus (E″) at 30 °C, and (c) peak temperatures of tan δ. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.
Figure 6:

Relationship between data from dynamic viscoelastic measurements at 0.1 Hz and the density of extracted radial specimens in water-saturated conditions. (a) Storage elastic modulus (E′) at 30 °C, (b) loss elastic modulus (E″) at 30 °C, and (c) peak temperatures of tan δ. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.

3.3 Relationship between thermal-softening property and lignin structure

To investigate the relationship between thermal-softening temperature and lignin structure, the syringyl ratio of lignin aromatics was estimated from the peak area ratio of the IR spectrum. Since the sample used for the IR measurement had undergone a heating history during DMA measurement, there was a possibility that the syringyl ratio would be slightly different from that of the untreated sample. However, this experiment prioritized the comparison of the results with the same sample.

Understanding the partial structure of lignin is useful for inferring its structural characteristics. The β-O-4 and phenyl-coumarin structures are the specific partial structures responsible for lignin’s linear chain, while the biphenyl (5-5 bond) and diaryl ether structures (4-O-5 structure) are responsible for its branch chain. The composition ratio of the partial structures changes according to the aromatic nucleus during lignin production. The main reason for this is that the aromatic nuclei of guaiacyl can be coupled at the 5-position to form fused structures, such as β-5, 5-5, and 4-O-5, whereas the aromatic nuclei of syringyl cannot be coupled alone at the 5-position due to the methoxy group, which acts as the substitute (Stewart et al. 2009). Akiyama et al. (2005) investigated the relationship between the partial structure of lignin and the syringyl ratio of lignin aromatics in various wood species and found that the biphenyl structure content decreased quadratically with an increase in the syringyl ratio. Based on previous research and this study’s results, it can be concluded that wood species with a low syringyl ratio have a dense lignin structure, with several condensed structures derived from the guaiacyl unit, whereas wood species with a high syringyl ratio have a sparse lignin structure, with several linear partial structures.

In Figure 7, the syringyl ratio is distributed in a wide range from 0 to 0.8 (approximately), and almost 0 in softwood and tropical hardwood species. Since softwood has no syringyl aromatic nuclei, the syringyl ratio should be exactly 0. However, the syringyl ratio was estimated using a calibration curve with an error of about ±0.2. Tropical hardwood samples showed a wide range of syringyl ratios, indicating that these samples are not necessarily rich in the guaiacyl unit. Nevertheless, several samples showed particularly low syringyl ratios. Hardwoods with syringyl ratios near 0 possessed a high peak temperature of tan δ compared to softwoods. Thus, the syringyl ratio and peak temperature of tan δ display a negative correlation. Based on the interpretation of the partial structure of lignin, the peak temperature of tan δ is considered to be higher for wood species with denser lignin structures and lower for those with sparser lignin structures. It is known that in polymers, the glass transition temperature (T g) shifts to higher values as the crosslink density increases (Nielsen 1962). In wood, the peak temperature of tan δ, derived from lignin, could similarly depend on the lignin’s condensation structure in each wood species. Although this study’s results were obtained by using the calibration curves of IR spectra, they supported the correlation shown by Olson and Salmén (1997) between thermal-softening temperature and methoxyl group content.

Figure 7: 
Relationship between peak temperature of tan δ measured at 0.1 Hz and syringyl ratio of extracted radial specimens. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.
Figure 7:

Relationship between peak temperature of tan δ measured at 0.1 Hz and syringyl ratio of extracted radial specimens. The symbol for hardwood species indicates the vessel arrangement type. “Non” = vesselless. Samples collected from tropical climates are presented in green. Samples for which the peak temperature of tan δ could not be observed by 95 °C are presented in red.

4 Conclusions

To elucidate the diversity of the thermal-softening properties of wood, the peak temperature of tan δ was measured for 87 wood specimens from the global collection of the xylarium of Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute. The peak temperature of tan δ was found to be higher for softwood and tropical hardwood species as compared to other hardwood species, regardless of the extraction treatment. There was no clear relationship between the peak temperature of tan δ and the latitude and annual rainfall of the habitat. Furthermore, the peak temperature of tan δ was not uniquely determined by anatomical features and wood species. E′ and E″ showed strong correlations with density, regardless of species; however, there was no relationship between the peak temperature of tan δ and density. Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between the peak temperature of tan δ and the syringyl ratio, which depends on the amounts of different partial structures in lignin. This result indicates that the thermal-softening temperature is higher for wood species with a denser lignin structure (low syringyl ratio) and lower for species with a sparse lignin structure (high syringyl ratio).


Corresponding author: Yuka Miyoshi, Department of Wood Properties and Processing, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Matsunosato 1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: JP20K15570

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation of Dr. Takami Saito (Forestry and Forest Product Research Institute, Japan) and Dr. Takuya Akiyama (University of Tokyo, Japan) for providing helpful literature and suggestions.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: YM conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript, HA selected and provided the wood specimens from the wood library of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, HH and KK participated in result discussions, and YF supervised the work. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: The authors states no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: This study was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (grant number: JP20K15570).

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

Akiyama, T., Goto, H., Nawai, D.S., Syafii, W., Matsumoto, Y., and Meshitsuka, G. (2005). Erythro/threo ratio of β-O-4-5 structures as an important structural characteristic of lignin. Part 4: variation in the erythro/threo ratio in softwood and hardwood lignins and its relation to syringyl/guaiacyl ratio. Holzforschung 59: 276–281, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2005.045.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, H. and Noack, D. (1968). Studies on dynamic torsional viscoelasticity of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 2: 213–230, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00350910.Search in Google Scholar

Furuta, Y., Soma, N., Obata, Y., and Kanayama, K. (2001). Research to make better use of wood as sustainable resource – physical property change of wood to heating and drying histories. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on materials for resources 2001 Akita (ICMR 2001), October 11-13, 2001. SMERJ, Akita, pp. 260–265.Search in Google Scholar

Furuta, Y., Kojiro, J., Nakatani, T., Nakajima, M., and Ishimaru, Y. (2008a). The dynamic viscoelastic properties of wood in nonequilibrium states. J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Jpn. 57: 338–343, https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.57.338.Search in Google Scholar

Furuta, Y., Nakajima, M., Nakatani, T., Kojiro, K., and Ishimaru, Y. (2008b). Effects of the lignin on the thermal-softening properties of the water-swollen wood. J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Jpn. 57: 344–349, https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.57.344.Search in Google Scholar

Furuta, Y., Nakajima, M., Nakanii, E., and Ohkoshi, M. (2010). The effects of lignin and hemicellulose on thermal-softening properties of water-swollen wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 56: 132–138, https://doi.org/10.2488/jwrs.56.132.Search in Google Scholar

Furuta, Y., Okuyama, T., Kojiro, K., Miyoshi, Y., and Kiryu, T. (2014). Temperature dependence of the dynamic viscoelasticity of bases of Japanese cypress branches and the trunk close to the branches saturated with water. J. Wood Sci. 60: 249–254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-014-1402-6.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y., Wang, L., Chao, Y., Nawai, D.S., Akiyama, T., Yokoyama, T., and Matsumoto, Y. (2012). Analysis of lignin aromatic structure in wood based on the IR spectrum. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 32: 294–303, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2012.666316.Search in Google Scholar

Kojiro, K., Furuta, Y., and Ishimaru, Y. (2008). Influence of histories on dynamic viscoelastic properties and dimensions of water-swollen wood. J. Wood Sci. 54: 95–99, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-007-0926-4.Search in Google Scholar

Kottek, M., Griester, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Zeitschrift 15: 259–263, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130.Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, L.E. (1962). Mechanical properties of polymers. Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York.Search in Google Scholar

Olsson, A.M. and Salmén, L. (1997). The effect of lignin composition on the viscoelastic properties of wood. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 12: 140–144, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1997-12-03-p140-144.Search in Google Scholar

Placet, V., Passard, J., and Perré, P. (2007). Viscoelastic properties of green wood across the grain measured by harmonic tests in the range 0–95 °C: hardwood vs. softwood and normal wood vs. reaction wood. Holzforschung 61: 548–557, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2007.093.Search in Google Scholar

Salmén, L. (1984). Viscoelastic properties of in situ lignin under water-saturated conditions. J. Mater. Sci. 19: 3090–3096, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01026988.Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, J.J., Akiyama, T., Chapple, C., Ralph, J., and Mansfield, S.D. (2009). The effects on lignin structure of overexpression of ferulate 5-hydroxylase in hybrid poplar. Plant Physiol. 150: 621–635, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.137059.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wu, J., Fukazawa, K., and Ohtani, J. (1992). Distribution of syringyl and guaiacyl lignins in hardwoods in relation to habitat and porosity form in wood. Holzforschung 46: 181–185, https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1992.46.3.181.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-09
Accepted: 2023-12-12
Published Online: 2024-01-15
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 1.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/hf-2023-0083/html
Scroll to top button