Abstract
Shape irregularity, a sub-factor of parcel fragmentation is a problem that hinders sustainable agriculture and is solved using land consolidation projects. Determination of the parcel shape degree contributes significantly to spatial prioritization where there is also a high probability of achieving positive effects of consolidation projects. This study aims to determine the shape degree of the agricultural parcels both at singular and rural county scales in Tekirdag Province, Turkey in 2020 by combining the parcel shape index (PSI) with the minimum bounding geometry index (MBG) to improve parcel scores. Hot-spot zones of the highly irregular and near optimum parcels were also determined using Getis-Ord Gi* statistic. The parcel degrees were classified into four categories, namely highly irregular, irregular, regular and near optimum. The obtained unweighted scores of the parameters exhibit deviations from the expected values. After weighting by pairwise comparison, the values approached ideal scores. Among 346 740 parcels, 53% were highly irregular and irregular and 47% were regular and near optimum shapes after weighting whereas these were 70% and 30%, respectively before weighting. The average parcel degree of 63 rural counties was regular while the average parcel degree of the remaining 264 rural counties was irregular. The combined use of PSI and MBG index improved the correctness of the parcel shape score. It could be suggested to use as a tool in land consolidation prioritization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkaya Aslan Ş T, Gundogdu K S, Arici I, 2007. Some metric indices for the assessment of land consolidation projects. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(9): 1390–1397. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.1390.1397
Akkaya Aslan Ş T, Küçük M, 2020. A study on the possible effects of the new inheritance law on land consolidation. Turkish Studies, 15(1): 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.29228/turkishstudies.40118
Alturk B, Konukcu F, 2020. Modeling land use/land cover change and mapping morphological fragmentation of agricultural lands in Thrace Region/Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(7): 6379–6404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00485-3
Arslan F, 2020. Geospatial and Geostatistical Analysis of Land Consolidation Projects. Kahramanmaraş, Turkey: Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University.
Arslan F, Degirmenci H, Akkaya S et al., 2021. A new approach to measure parcel shapes for land consolidation. Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 24(5): 1059–1067. doi: https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.774846
Boyce R R, Clark W A V, 1964. The concept of shape in geography. Geographical Review, 54(4): 561–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/212982
Çay T, Uyan M, 2013. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Land Use Policy, 30(1): 541–548. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land-usepol.2012.04.023
Comber A J, Birnie R V, Hodgson M, 2003. A retrospective analysis of land cover change using a polygon shape index. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12(3): 207–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00028.X
Değirmenci H, Arslan F, Keten M, 2019. Change of parcel shapes in land consolidation projects: the case study of Şanlıurfa Bozca village. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 6(3): 557–565. doi: https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.595385
Demetriou D, Stillwell J, See L, 2013. A new methodology for measuring land fragmentation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39: 80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.02.001
Demetriou D, See L, Stillwell J, 2013b. A parcel shape index for use in land consolidation planning. Transactions in GIS, 17(6): 861–882. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01371.x
Demirtaş E I, Sarı M, 2016. Arazi Toplulaştırması. Derim, 20(1): 48–58.
Djanibekov U, Finger R, 2018. Agricultural risks and farm land consolidation process in transition countries: the case of cotton production in Uzbekistan. Agricultural Systems, 164: 223–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.03.009
European Environment Agency, 2018. Corıne Land Cover. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/datahub/datahubitemview/a5144888-ee2a-4e5d-a7b0-2bbf21656348. Cited 30 November 2022.
Forman R T T, Sperling D, Bissonette J A et al., 2003. Road Ecology: Science and Solutions. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Getis A, Ord J K, 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3): 189–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
Gonzalez X P, Alvarez C J, Crecente R, 2004. Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape. Agricultural Systems, 82(1): 31–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.10.009
Hawbaker T J, Radeloff V C, Clayton M K et al., 2006. Road development, housing growth, and landscape fragmentation in northern Wisconsin: 1937–1999. Ecological Applications, 16(3): 1222–1237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1222:RDHGAL]2.0.CO;2
Hudecová Ľ, Geisse R, Gašincová S et al., 2017. Quantification of land fragmentation in Slovakia. Geodetski List, 71(4): 327–338.
Igbozurike M U, 1974. Land tenure relations, social relations and the analysis of spatial discontinuity. Area, 6(2): 132–135.
Jaeger J A G, 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 15(2): 115–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1026/A:1008129329289
Janus J, Zygmunt M, 2016. MKSCAl - system for land consolidation project based on CAD platform. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape, 2: 49–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.15576/gll/2016.2.49
Janus J, Taszakowski J, 2018. Spatial differentiation of indicators presenting selected barriers in the productivity of agricultural areas: a regional approach to setting land consolidation priorities. Ecological Indicators, 93: 718–729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.050
Januszewski J, 1968. Index of land consolidation as a criterion of the degree of concentration. Geographia Polonica, 14: 291–296.
Jin X B, Shao Y, Zhang Z H et al., 2017. The evaluation of land consolidation policy in improving agricultural productivity in China. Scientific Reports, 7: 2792. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03026-y
King R, Burton S, 1982. Land fragmentation: notes on a fundamental rural spatial problem. Progress in Human Geography, 6(4): 475–494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258200600401
Kirmikil M, Arici I, 2013. The role of land consolidation in the development of rural areas in irrigation areas.. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 11(2): 1150–1155.
Krummel J R, Gardner R H, Sugihara G et al., 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos, 48(3): 321–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3565520
Kurşun E, Konukcu F, Altürk B, 2023. Evaluation of agricultural parcels in terms of land consolidation with shape analysis in Tekirdağ Province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 11(1): 74–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i1.74-87.5585
Küsek G, 2014. Effect of land consolidation on the parcel shape and mechanization applications: a case study of Konya-Eregli-Acıkıyu and Ozgurler villages. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 29(2): 1–14.
Kwinta A, Gniadek J, 2017. The description of parcel geometry and its application in terms of land consolidation planning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 136: 117–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.03.006
McGarigal K, Marks B J, 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Portland, OR: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Pašakarnis G, Maliene V, 2010. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe: applying land consolidation. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 545–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.008
Pavlidis T, 1978. A review of algorithms for shape analysis. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 7(2): 243–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-664X(78)90115-6
Preparata F P, Shamos M I, 1985. Computational Geometry: An Introduction. New York: Springer.
Saaty T L, 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.
Simmons A J, 1964. An index of farm structure, with a Nottinghamshire example. East Midlands Geographer, 3: 255–261.
Su S L, Hu Y, Luo F H et al., 2014. Farmland fragmentation due to anthropogenic activity in rapidly developing region. Agricultural Systems, 131: 87–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.005
TESR, 2018. Tekirdağ environmental status report in 2017. Available at: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/tekrdag_-cdr2017-20181114160234.pdf. Cited 7 November 2022.
Tomić H, Ivić S M, Roić M, 2018. Land consolidation suitability ranking of cadastral municipalities: information-based decision-making using multi-criteria analyses of official registers’ data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3): 87. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030087
TUIK (Turkish Statistic Institute), 2020. Agricultural Holding Structure Statistics. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111. Cited 15 May 2021.
TUIK (Turkish Statistic Institute), 2022. Population and Demography Statistics. Available at: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Ust-Menu.do?metod=temelist. Cited 5 February 2022.
Vijulie I, Matei E, Manea G et al., 2012. Assessment of agricultural land fragmentation in Romania, a case study: izvoarele commune, Olt County. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 52(2): 403–430. doi: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS52206
Vitikainen A, 2004. An overview of land consolidation in Europe. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1(1): 25–44.
Vogt P, Riitters K H, Estreguil C et al., 2007. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology, 22(2): 171–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9013-2
Wójcik-Leń J, Sobolewska-Mikulska K, Sajnóg N et al., 2018. The ıdea of rational management of problematic agricultural areas in the course of land consolidation. Land Use Policy, 78: 36–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.044
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alturk, B. Shape Analysis of Agricultural Parcels for Land Consolidation Priorities in Tekirdag Province, Turkey. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 34, 93–105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-024-1410-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-024-1410-4