Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in Organization of Activity of Photosystem II in Oat Leaves under Osmotic Stress

  • PLANT BREEDING, PLANT PROTECTION, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

The parameters of chlorophyll α rapid fluorescence were assessed in husked oats (A. sativa subsp. sativa) and naked oats (A. sativa subsp. nudisativa). The goal of the study was to identify differences between two subspecies of oats with respect to the control of primary energy storage processes under the influence of osmotic stress for the subsequent selection of parameters and oat-breeding strategies to increase photosynthetic productivity in early drought conditions. Plants were grown on a complete Knop’s nutrient solution; osmotic stress was created by 10% polyethylene glycol (PEG‑400), and osmotic pressure was 0.709 mPa. Fluorescence parameters were determined using a Fluor Pen FP 110/S fluorometer (Photon Systems Instruments, Czech Republic). The data was processed by principal component analysis. In husked genotypes, the four main factors were responsible for 94.2% (control) and 91.4% (stress) variability of the assessed parameters. In naked oats, three principal factors were found (90.5% of variability) in the absence of stress and four factors (97.1% variability) under stress conditions. The flows of trapped energy (TR0/RC) and electronic transport (ET0/RC) were controlled in naked oat by one and the same factor under stress and by two different factors in the absence of stress, whereas those in husked genotypes were by one factor in the absence of stress and by two different factors under stress. Osmotic stress led to passing the control over adsorbed (ABS/RC) and trapped (TR0/RC) energy flows from one factor to two factors in husked oats but did not affect naked oats. The parameter of efficiency of electron transfer to the primary acceptors of photosystem I (δRE) was controlled by two different factors and enhanced their effect (factor loading from 0.564 to 0.74). Under stress, the δRE parameter weakened the effect of both factors in naked genotypes (factor loading –0.625 and ‒0.705) and reduced the effect of one factor and strengthened the second factor in husked genotypes (factor loading –0.552 and 0.687).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Kul’turnaya flora. Oves. (Cultivated Flora. Oats), Kobylyanskii, V.D. and Soldatov, V.N., Eds., Moscow: Kolos, 1994, vol. 2, part 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batalova, G.A., Shevchenko, S.N., Tulyakova, M.V., et al., Breeding of naked oats having high-quality grain, Ross. S-kh. Nauka, 2016, no. 5, pp. 6–9.

  3. Gerasimov, S.A., Polonskii, V.I., Sumina, A.V., et al., The influence of genotype and cultivation conditions of oats in the contents of biologically active components in grain, Khim. Rastit. Syr’ya, 2020, no. 2, pp. 65–71. https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2020025515

  4. Abugalieva, A.I., Loskutov, I.G., Savin, T.V., et al., Evaluation of naked oat accessions from the VIR collection for their qualitative characteristics in Kazakhstan, Tr. Prikl. Bot., Genet. Sel., 2021, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 9–21. https://doi.org/10.30901/2227‑8834‑2021‑1‑9‑21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loskutov, I.G., Shelenga, T.V., Konarev, A.V., et al., Modern approach of structuring the variety diversity of the naked and covered forms of cultural oats (Avena sativa L.), Ekol. Genet., 2020, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lisitsyn, E.M., Churakova, S.A., and Batalova, G.A., Genotypic variability in the functioning of photosystem II in leaves of covered and naked oats, Tr. Prikl. Bot., Genet. Sel., 2022, vol. 183, pp. 17–26. https://doi.org/10.30901/2227‑8834‑2022‑3‑17‑26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Comrey, A.L., Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 1988, vol. 56, pp. 754–761. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022‑006x.56.5.754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lutova, L.A., Provorov, N.A., Tikhodeev, O.N., et al., Genetika razvitiya rastenii (Genetics of Plant Development), Inge-Vechtomova, S.G., St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2000.

  9. Zhang, X., Liu, W., Lv, Y., et al., Effects of drought stress during critical periods on the photosynthetic characteristics and production performance of Naked oat (Avena nuda L.), Sci. Rep., 2022, vol. 12, p. 11199. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598–022–15322–3. Cited August 21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‑022‑15322‑3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stadnik, B. and Tobiasz-Salach, R., Physiological response of oat (Avena sativa L.) to the foliar application of silicon in conditions of increased soil salinity, Chem.  Proc., 2022, vol. 10, p. 21. https://www.mdpi.com/2673–4583/10/1/21. Cited August 21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022‑12332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcińska, I., Czyczyło-Mysza, I., Skrzypek, E., et al., Application of photochemical parameters and several indices based on phenotypical traits to assess intraspecific variation of oat (Avena sativa L.) tolerance to drought, Acta Physiol. Plant., 2017, vol. 39 p. 153. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11738–017–2453–2. Cited August 21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738‑017‑2453‑2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B., Zhang, D., Sun, M., et al., PSII activity was inhibited at flowering stage with developing black bracts of oat, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2021, vol. 22, p. 5258. https://www.mdpi.com/1422–0067/22/10/5258. Cited August 21, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sunil, B., Strasser, R.J., and Raghavendra, A.S., Targets of nitric oxide (NO) during modulation of photosystems in pea mesophyll protoplasts: studies using chlorophyll a fluorescence, Photosynthetica, 2020, vol. 58, pp. 452–459. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nesterenko, T.V., Shikhov, V.N., and Tikhomirov, A.A., The fluorescence method for determining of photosynthetic apparatus reactivity in plant leaves, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2019, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044459619030060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghaffar, A., Hussain, N., Ajaj, R., et al., Photosynthetic activity and metabolic profiling of bread wheat cultivars contrasting in drought tolerance, Front. Plant Sci., 2023, vol. 14, p. 1123080. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1123080/full. Cited August 21, 2023. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1123080

  16. Osipova, S.V., Rudikovskii, A.V., Permyakov, A.V., et al., Physiological responses to water deficiency in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines with genetically different leaf pubescence, Vavilovsk. Zh. Genet. Sel., 2020, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 813–820. https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ20.678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Churakova.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This work does not contain any studies involving human and animal subjects.

Additional information

Translated by E. Kuznetsova

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Churakova, S.A., Lisitsyn, E.M. & Batalova, G.A. Changes in Organization of Activity of Photosystem II in Oat Leaves under Osmotic Stress. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 49, 583–587 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S106836742306006X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S106836742306006X

Keywords:

Navigation