Abstract
Soil nonlinear behavior displays noticeable effects on the site seismic response. This study proposes a new functional expression of the skeleton curve to replace the hyperbolic skeleton curve. By integrating shear modulus and combining the dynamic skeleton curve and the damping degradation coefficient, the constitutive equation of the logarithmic dynamic skeleton can be obtained, which considers the damping effect in a soil dynamics problem. Based on the finite difference method and the multi-transmitting boundary condition, a 1D site seismic response analysis program called Soilresp1D has been developed herein and used to analyze the time-domain seismic response in three types of sites. At the same time, this study also provides numerical simulation results based on the hyperbolic constitutive model and the equivalent linear method. The results verify the rationality of the new soil dynamic constitutive model. It can analyze the mucky soil site nonlinear seismic response, reflecting the deformation characteristics and damping effect of the silty soil. The hysteresis loop area is more extensive, and the residual strain is evident.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adampira M, Alielahi H, Panji M, et al. (2015), “Comparison of Equivalent Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Seismic Analysis of Liquefiable Site Response Due to Near-Fault Incident Waves: A Case Study,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(5): 3103–3118.
Assimaki D and Kausel E (2002), “An Equivalent Linear Algorithm with Frequency- and Pressure-Dependent Moduli and Damping for the Seismic Analysis of Deep Sites,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9–12): 959–965.
Boulanger RW and Ziotopoulou K (2019), “A Constitutive Model for Clays and Plastic Silts in PlaneStrain Earthquake Engineering Applications,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 127: 105832.
Chen GX, Zhao DF, Chen WY, et al. (2019), “Excess Pore-Water Pressure Generation in Cyclic Undrained Testing,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 145(7): 04019022.
Chen GX, Wang YZ, Zhao DF, et al. (2021), “A New Effective Stress Method for Nonlinear Site Response Analyses,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 50(6): 1595–1611.
Chopra AK (2000), Dynamics of Structures, 2nd Ed, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA.
Chu F, Shao SJ and Chen CL (2014), “Experimental Study of Dynamic Deformation and Dynamic Strength Properties of Saturated Silty Sand,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 33(S1): 3299–3305. (in Chinese)
Dafalias YF and Manzari MT (2004), “Simple Plasticity Sand Model Accounting for Fabric Change Effects,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(6): 622–634.
Dellow GD, Yetton M, Massey C, et al. (2011), “Landslides Caused by the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake and Management of Landslide Risk in the Immediate Aftermath,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4): 227–238.
Duncan JM and Chang CY (1970), “Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 96(5): 1629–1653.
Hardin BO and Drnevich VP (1972), “Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Design Equations and Curves,” Geotechnical Special Publication, 98(118): 667–692.
Kaklamanos J, Bradley BA, Thompson EM, et al. (2013), “Critical Parameters Affecting Bias and Variability in Site-Response Analyses Using KiK-net Downhole Array Data,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(3): 1733–1749.
Kim JK, Koh HM, Kwon KJ, et al. (2000), “A Three-Dimensional Transmitting Boundary Formulated in Cartesian Co-Ordinate System for the Dynamics of Non-Axisymmetric Foundations,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29(10): 1527–1546.
Kondner RL (1963), “Hyperbolic Stress-Strain Response: Cohesive Soils,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations, 89(1): 115–143.
Lade PV and Duncan JM (1975), “Elastoplastic StressStrain Theory for Cohesionless Soils,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 101(10): 1037–1053.
Li XJ (1992), “A Method to Analyzing Seismic Response of Nonlinear Soil Layers,” South China Journal of Seismology, 12(4): 1–8. (in Chinese)
Li XJ and Liao ZP (1993), “Dynamic Skeleton Curve of Soil Stress-Strain Relationship for Irregular Cyclic Loading,” Earthquake Research in China, 7(4): 469–478. (in Chinese)
Li XJ, Liao ZP and Zhang KX (1994), “A Functional Formula of Dynamic Skeleton Curve Taking Account of Damping Effect,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(1): 30–35. (in Chinese)
Liao ZP and Yang G (1995), “Multi-Directional Transmitting Boundaries for Steady-State SH Waves,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24(3): 361–371.
Lu T, Zhou ZH and Huo JY (2008), “1D Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis of Soil Layers in Time Domain,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, 29(8): 2170–2176. (in Chinese)
Martin PP and Seed HB (1982), “One-Dimensional Dynamic Ground Response Analyses,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 108(7): 935–952.
Masing G (1926), “Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing,” Proceedings of Second International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 332–335. (in German)
Muravskii G (2005), “On Description of Hysteretic Behaviour of Materials,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42(9–10): 2625–2644.
Prevost JH and Keane CM (1990), “Shear Stress-Strain Curve Generation from Simple Material Parameters,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 116(8): 1255–1263.
Pyke RM (1979), “Non-linear Soil Models for Irregular Cyclic Loadings,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 105(6): 715–726.
Ray RP and Woods RD (1988), “Modulus and Damping Due to Uniform and Variable Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114(8): 861–876.
Roscoe KH, Thurairajah A and Schofield AN (1963), “Yielding of Clays in States Wetter Than Critical,” Geotechnique, 13(1): 211–240.
Rosenblueth E and Newmark NM (1971), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA.
Ruan B, Zhao DF, Chen GX, et al. (2017), “A New Effective Stress Method Using the Integration Algorithm of the Modified Davidenkov Constitutive Model and the Byrne Pore Pressure Increment Model, and Validation and Calibration,” Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 25(5): 956–966.
Ruan B, Zhao K, Wang SY, et al. (2019), “Numerical Modeling of Seismic Site Effects in a Shallow Estuarine Bay (Suai Bay, Shantou, China),” Engineering Geology, 260(3): 105233.
Song CM and Wolf JP (1997), “The Scaled Boundary Finite-Element Method—Alias Consistent Infinitesimal Finite-Element Cell Method — for Elastodynamics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 147(3): 329–355.
Sugito M, Goda H and Masuda T (1994), “Frequency Dependent Equi-Linearized Technique for Seismic Response Analysis of Multi-Layered Ground,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 493(III-27): 49–58.
Sun J, Gong MS and Tao XX (2013), “Dynamic Shear Modulus of Undisturbed Soil Under Different Consolidation Ratios and Its Effects on Surface Ground Motion,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 4(12): 561–568.
Sun R and Yuan XM (2020), “A Holistic Equivalent Linear Method for Site Response Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 141: 106476.
Tafili M and Triantafyllidis T (2020), “Cyclic and Monotonic Response of Silts and Clays: Experimental Analysis and Constitutive Modelling,” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 27(2): 2303–2312.
Trifunac MD (2016), “Site Conditions and Earthquake Ground Motion–A Review,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 90: 88–100.
Wang W, Liu BD, Zhou ZH, et al. (2010), “Equivalent Linear Method Considering Frequency Dependent Stiffness and Damping,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, 31(12): 3928–3933. (in Chinese)
Wang ZQ, Xie JF and Shi ZJ (1983), Introduction to Earthquake Engineering Geology, Beijing: Seismological Press, China.
Wolf JP and Song CM (2000), “The Scaled Boundary Finite-Element Method–A Primer: Derivations,” Computers and Structures, 78(1–3): 191–210.
Yao EL, Wang SY, Ruan B, et al. (2019), “Numerical Study on Site Response Considering Ground Motion Spatial Variation,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 127(12): 361–366.
Yniesta S, Brandenberg SJ and Shafiee A (2017), “ARCS: A One Dimensional Nonlinear Soil Model for Ground Response Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 102(11): 75–85.
Zhang Y, Zhao K, Peng YJ, et al. (2022), “Dynamic Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio Characteristics of Undisturbed Marine Soils in the Bohai Sea, China,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 21(2): 297–312.
Zhuang HY and Chen GX (2006), “A Viscous-Plastic Model for Soft Soil Under Cyclic Loadings,” Geotechnical Special Publication, 343–350.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52192675) and the 111 Project of China under Grant No. D21001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Supported by: Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 52192675 and the 111 Project of China under Grant No. D21001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, Q., Chen, S., Jin, L. et al. Time-domain dynamic constitutive model suitable for mucky soil site seismic response. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 23, 1–13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-024-2222-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-024-2222-3