Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Framework for evaluating sustainability index of a manufacturing system: a case illustration

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A traditional manufacturing system leads to rapid exploitation of natural resources, global warming, and a decline in biodiversity. Sustainable practices are essential for the conservation of natural resources and environmental protection. A reluctant attitude of manufacturing organizations towards sustainable practices has been observed due to the lack of exposure to sustainability-specific indicators and frameworks. Therefore, relying on the concepts of stakeholder theory, resource-based theory, and institutional theory, this study has proposed a framework to evaluate the sustainability index. There are two aspects of the study: one is to explore the indicators of sustainability considering all dimensions of the triple-bottom-line and validation through a questionnaire survey, and another is prioritization and indexing of the sustainability performance using the Delphi method and Graph Theory Matrix Approach (GTMA). Finally, forty-five indicators have been considered for this study. The GTMA-based framework is proposed for evaluating the sustainability index. Its application is illustrated in the context of an Indian manufacturing organization. The findings of the study unveiled that ‘employees and customers welfare’, ‘material & energy consumption’, and ‘value creation’ possess a strong contribution to the sustainable operations of an organization. This study will assist the concerned professionals in gauging their industrial sustainability performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statements

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1 Respondent’s profile
Table A2 Descriptive analysis of the depicted indicators
Table A3 Structural model fit Indices
Table A4 Rating scale for Interdependency estimation of Indicators
Table A5 KMO and Bartlett's Test results
Table A6 Goodness of fit measures of SM indicators
Table A7 Correlation and discriminant validity of SM indicators
Table A8 Permanent matrix values for the actual, best- and worst-case scenario

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, D., Kumar, P. & Singh, R.K. Framework for evaluating sustainability index of a manufacturing system: a case illustration. Oper Manag Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00438-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00438-0

Keywords

Navigation