Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating AI-driven marketing analytics techniques into the classroom: pedagogical strategies for enhancing student engagement and future business success

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marketing Analytics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines a practical pedagogical framework for integrating AI-driven analytics into marketing education, tailored to equip students for the fast-evolving industry. Central to this approach is an iterative model that adapts teaching strategies to keep pace with technological advancements and industry demands. The framework emphasizes practical application, steering curriculum development towards the inclusion of AI tools like machine learning and predictive analytics, and crafting experiential learning opportunities. A focused examination of current teaching methods reveals gaps and introduces actionable solutions for fostering analytical skills essential for the AI-enhanced marketing landscape. The model not only advocates for a balance between theory and practice but also addresses challenges such as resource accessibility and the necessity of ethical considerations in AI education. By promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and continual curriculum refreshment, the paper positions the model as an essential blueprint for nurturing future marketing professionals capable of leveraging AI analytics for strategic decision-making. The conclusion calls for academia-industry partnerships to further enrich marketing education and underscores the importance of this framework in preparing students for successful careers in AI-driven marketing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J. & DEVIN, M. 2016. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467.

  • ACM. 2018 ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct [Online]. Association for Computing Machinery. Available: https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics [Accessed 28-01-2023 2023].

  • Ahmad, K., Qadir, J., Al-Fuqaha, A., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Benhaddou, D. & Ayyash, M. 2020. Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review.

  • Al-Fudail, M., and H. Mellar. 2008. Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education 51: 1103–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M.J. 2004. Assessing academic programs in higher education. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMA. 2023. AMA Statement of Ethics [Online]. The American Marketing Association Available: https://www.ama.org/ama-statement-of-ethics/ [Accessed 28-01-2023 2023].

  • Aničić, K.P., B. Divjak, and K. Arbanas. 2017. Preparing ICT graduates for real-world challenges: Results of a meta-analysis. IEEE Transactions on Education 60: 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, B., D.L. Heitger, and D. Stoel. 2018. Data-driven decision-making and its impact on accounting undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education 44: 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbeito-Caamaño, A., and R. Chalmeta. 2020. Using big data to evaluate corporate social responsibility and sustainable development practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27: 2831–2848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutoria, A. 2022. Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3: 100068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S., E. Klein, and E. Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, E., Fox-Skelly, J., Jenner, N., Larbey, R., Weitkamp, E. & Winfield, A. 2020. The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. European Parliamentary Research Service.

  • Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5: 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Chaves, E.F., and P.R. Palos-Sánchez. 2023. Exploring the evolution of human resource analytics: A bibliometric study. Behavioral Sciences 13: 244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C.J., and G.S. Smith. 1998. Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education 16: 261–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, I., and X. Chen. 2009. Quantitative models for direct marketing: A review from systems perspective. European Journal of Operational Research 195: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. 2000. Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education 22: 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broby, D. 2022. The use of predictive analytics in finance. The Journal of Finance and Data Science 8: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, I. 2023. Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior 138: 107468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey, D., and F. Ellis-Chadwick. 2019. Digital marketing. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G. & Joordens, M. 2013. Project-oriented design-based learning: aligning students’ views with industry needs.

  • Chollet, F. 2021. Deep learning with Python. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P.R., and J. Clopton. 2019. Business curriculum redesign: Integrating data analytics. Journal of Education for Business 94: 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, J., Nakayama, S. & Jenks, C. Improving curriculum with third party standards and industrial advisory boards. 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008. 13.714. 1–13.714. 10.

  • Cope, B., M. Kalantzis, and D. Searsmith. 2021. Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory 53: 1229–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, W.F., I.K. Biel, and W.A. Lovely. 2019. Embracing digitalization: Student Learning and New Technologies. Journal of Marketing Education 41: 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T., A. Guha, D. Grewal, and T. Bressgott. 2020. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 48: 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, A., I. Maggioni, C. Mauri, and A. Mazzucchelli. 2019. Employability skills for future marketing professionals. European Management Journal 37: 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhajjar, S., S. Karam, and S. Borna. 2021. Artificial intelligence in marketing education programs. Marketing Education Review 31: 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eu Gdpr, E. P. 2016. General data protection regulation (GDPR). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC.

  • Ferrell, O.C., and L. Ferrell. 2020. Technology challenges and opportunities facing marketing education. Marketing Education Review 30: 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G.R. 2017. Behavioral economics in consumer behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst 40: 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglseth, A.M., and Ø. Sørebø. 2014. The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT. Computers in Human Behavior 40: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Marzá, D. 2005. Trust and dialogue: theoretical approaches to ethics auditing. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Géron, A. 2022. Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J.R., V. Cariapa, G. Corliss, and K. Kaiser. 2014. Benefits of industry involvement in multidisciplinary capstone design courses. International Journal of Engineering Education 30: 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudeta, D. 2022. Professional development through reflective practice: The case of Addis Ababa secondary school EFL in-service teachers. Cogent Education 9: 2030076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., M. Page, and N. Brunsveld. 2019. Essentials of business research methods. Philadelphia: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harambašić, S. THE PAST, PRESENT AND DIGITAL FUTURE OF MARKETING EDUCATION. Proceedings of FEB Zagreb International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business, 2023. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, 204–215.

  • Hargittai, E., and Y.P. Hsieh. 2012. Succinct Survey Measures of Web-Use Skills. Social Science Computer Review 30: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart Research Associates. 2015. Falling short? college learning and career success. Washington: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, J., and O. Netzer. 2023. Natural language processing in marketing. In Artificial intelligence in marketing, ed. K. Sudhir and O. Toubia. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, J.H. Friedman, and J.H. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, J. 2018. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville: Deep learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Lara, A.B., A. Perera-Lluna, and E. Serradell-López. 2019. Applying learning analytics to students’ interaction in business simulation games. The usefulness of learning analytics to know what students really learn. Computers in Human Behavior 92: 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herreid, C.F. 2007. Start with a story: The case study method of teaching college science. Arlington: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. 2007. Continuous curriculum assessment and improvement: A case study. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2007: 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J., and C.D. Manning. 2015. Advances in natural language processing. Science 349: 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochheiser, H., and J. Lazar. 2007. HCI and societal issues: A framework for engagement. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 23: 339–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M.-H., and R.T. Rust. 2021. A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 49: 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D., M. Petrescu, A. Krishen, and M. Bendixen. 2019. The state of marketing analytics in research and practice. Journal of Marketing Analytics 7: 152–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imran, R., A. Fatima, I. Elbayoumi Salem, and K. Allil. 2023. Teaching and learning delivery modes in higher education: Looking back to move forward post-COVID-19 era. The International Journal of Management Education 21: 100805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., and R.T. Johnson. 2009. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher 38: 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B. 2002. Lifelong learning: Implications for institutions. Higher Education 44: 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, J.D., B. Mac Namee, and A. D’arcy. 2020. Fundamentals of machine learning for predictive data analytics: algorithms, worked examples, and case studies. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., H. Lee, and Y.H. Cho. 2022. Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies 27: 6069–6104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, A. 2008. The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education 6: 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi, R., N.J. Rothleder, and E. Simoudis. 2002. Emerging trends in business analytics. Communications of the ACM 45: 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. 1967. Marketing management: Analysis, planning, and control. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzke, S., and J. Setkute. 2021. Analytics capability in marketing education: A practice-informed model. Journal of Marketing Education 43: 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberton, C., and A.T. Stephen. 2016. A Thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an Agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing 80: 146–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L.R. 2001. Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University PRESS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, R.J., and G.A. Steiner. 1961. A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing 25: 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclair, D. 2018. Integrating business analytics in the marketing curriculum: Eight recommendations. Marketing Education Review 28: 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., B.A. Greenberg, and J.A.F. Nicholls. 2007. Teaching experiential learning: Adoption of an innovative course in an MBA marketing Curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education 29: 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libai, B., Y. Bart, S. Gensler, C.F. Hofacker, A. Kaplan, K. Kötterheinrich, and E.B. Kroll. 2020. Brave new world? On AI and the management of customer relationships. Journal of Interactive Marketing 51: 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. 2012. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Cham: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., and M.A. Levin. 2018. A progressive approach to teaching analytics in the marketing curriculum. Marketing Education Review 28: 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. 2019. Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 1: 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari, S., P. Gautam, and C.K. Jaggi. 2021. Role of big data analytics in supply chain management: Current trends and future perspectives. International Journal of Production Research 59: 1875–1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, K.M., and M. Zhu. 2023. Do project-based learning, hands-on activities, and flipped teaching enhance student’s learning of introductory theoretical computing classes? Education and Information Technologies 28: 3581–3604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandinach, E.B., and E.S. Gummer. 2013. A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher 42: 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangalaraj, G., S. Nerur, and R. Dwivedi. 2023. Digital transformation for agility and resilience: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems 63: 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, M.M., R. Perez-Vega, and J. Wirtz. 2022. AI in marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Psychology & Marketing 39: 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. 2015. Ethical issues in the big data industry. MIS Quarterly Executive 14: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, S.M., and C.S. Saunders. 2003. The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research 14: 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstadt, B.D., P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, and L. Floridi. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society 3: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, E.W.T., and Y. Wu. 2022. Machine learning in marketing: A literature review, conceptual framework, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research 145: 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, E.W.T., L. Xiu, and D.C.K. Chau. 2009. Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications 36: 2592–2602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, A., H.N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B.-P.T. Nguyen. 2023. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies 28: 4221–4241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D.J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31: 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, B., and L. Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 2: 1–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedró, F., M. Subosa, A. Rivas, and P. Valverde. 2019. Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. London: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirker, J., Riffnaller-Schiefer, M. & Gütl, C. 2014. Motivational active learning: engaging university students in computer science education. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education. Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Plangger, K., D. Grewal, K. De Ruyter, and C. Tucker. 2022. The future of digital technologies in marketing: A conceptual framework and an overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 50: 1125–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93: 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, S., and N. Declerck. 2018. Customer perception analysis using deep learning and NLP. Procedia Computer Science 140: 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, Y.M., and H. Andrade. 2010. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35: 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohm, A.J., M. Stefl, and J. Saint Clair. 2019. Time for a marketing curriculum overhaul: Developing a digital-first approach. Journal of Marketing Education 41: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooks, R.N., J. Scandlyn, K. Pelowich, and S. Lor. 2022. Co-teaching two interdisciplinary courses in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 16: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenboom, A. 2023. Marketing and Artificial Intelligence: Responsible Management (and Marketing) Education at the Nexus of Today and Tomorrow. In The Future of Responsible Management Education: University Leadership and the Digital Transformation Challenge. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozo, H., and M. Real. 2019. Pedagogical guidelines for the creation of adaptive digital educational resources: A review of the literature. Journal of Technology and Science Education 9: 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.J., and P. Norvig. 2022. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, J., M. Mustak, J. Corporan, S.-G. Jung, and B.J. Jansen. 2022. Detecting pain points from user-generated social media posts using machine learning. Journal of Interactive Marketing 57: 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Gamazo, A., Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. AI-driven assessment of students: Current uses and research trends. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2020. Springer, Berlin, 292–302.

  • Schlee, R.P., and G.L. Karns. 2017. Job requirements for marketing graduates: Are there differences in the knowledge, skills, and personal attributes needed for different salary levels? Journal of Marketing Education 39: 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli, G., and O.R. Koppius. 2011. Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 35: 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlok, F., and P. Hibbert. 2014. The organization of interdisciplinary research: Modes, drivers and barriers. International Journal of Management Reviews 16: 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokhanvar, Z., K. Salehi, and F. Sokhanvar. 2021. Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation 70: 101030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasa, K.G., M. Kurni, and K. Saritha. 2022. Harnessing the power of AI to education. In Learning, teaching, and assessment methods for contemporary learners: pedagogy for the digital generation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, B., N.J. Wilson, J.H. Yun, and E.J. Lee. 2020. What can neuroscience offer marketing research? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 32: 1089–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. 2023. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for innovation in education. In Learning intelligence: Innovative and digital transformative learning strategies: Cultural and social engineering perspectives. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thontirawong, P., and S. Chinchanachokchai. 2021. Teaching artificial intelligence and machine learning in marketing integrating HPWS and organizational memory for enhanced employee performance. Marketing Education Review 31: 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanslambrouck, S., C. Zhu, K. Lombaerts, B. Philipsen, and J. Tondeur. 2018. Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education 36: 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S., R. Sharma, S. Deb, and D. Maitra. 2021. Artificial intelligence in marketing: Systematic review and future research direction. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 1: 100002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlačić, B., L. Corbo, S. Costa E Silva, and M. Dabić. 2021. The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research 128: 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers, D., and O. Aragón. 2019. Integrating analytics into marketing curricula: Challenges and effective practices for developing six critical competencies. Marketing Education Review 29: 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., and P.K. Kannan. 2016. Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing 80: 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernli, D. & Ohlmeyer, J. 2023. Implementing interdisciplinarity in research-intensive universities.

  • Wilson, E.J., C. Mccabe, and R.S. Smith. 2018. Curriculum innovation for marketing analytics. Marketing Education Review 28: 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yogish, D., Manjunath, T. N. & Hegadi, R. S. Review on Natural Language Processing Trends and Techniques Using NLTK. 2019 Singapore. Springer Singapore, 589–606.

  • Younan, M., Elhoseny, M., Ali, A. A. & Houssein, E. H. Quantum Chain of Things (QCoT): A New Paradigm for Integrating Quantum Computing, Blockchain, and Internet of Things. 2021 17th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), 29–30 Dec. 2021 2021. 101–106.

  • Zhang, C., and Y. Lu. 2021. Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 23: 100224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulfiqar, S., R. Zhou, F. Asmi, and A. Yasin. 2018. Using simulation system for collaborative learning to enhance learner’s performance. Cogent Education 5: 1424678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

    Kamaal Allil

Authors
  1. Kamaal Allil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamaal Allil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

As the sole author of this manuscript, I declare that I have no financial, personal, or professional interests that could be construed as influencing the content of this paper. This includes any affiliations, funding sources, or financial holdings that might raise a question of bias in the work reported or the conclusions, implications, or opinions stated. I affirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allil, K. Integrating AI-driven marketing analytics techniques into the classroom: pedagogical strategies for enhancing student engagement and future business success. J Market Anal (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00281-z

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00281-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation