Skip to main content
Log in

The grounded theory approach to brand purpose equity drivers: the practitioner’s perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marketing Analytics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brand purpose is a relevant new concept considered and applied by companies. However, the existing research is primarily isolated case studies, highlighting evidence of its application as a generator of value and brand identity. No studies still identify the value of a brand purpose, and there is no theory or concept around this point. In this sense, this research aims to map the theory related to the value of a brand purpose from data analyzed systematically that could reveal the related phenomenon and its relations. An exploratory study of an inductive nature was carried out using Grounded Theory with specialists (practitioners) in marketing. The Atlas. Ti 23 software was selected to carry out the analyses in this study. After completing the open, axial, and selective coding phases, the core phenomenon was identified and entitled brand purpose equity (BPE). Four subcategories of BPE were classified: activists, inspirational, differentiators, and identity creators, suggesting that BPE is a multidimensional construct. This is the first study that offers an exploratory conceptual framework to conceptualize and create a theoretical basis for the value of brand purpose. In this sense, this research paves the way for building the brand purpose value theory and a measurement prototype scale, in addition to allowing the identification of antecedents and consequences of the brand purpose and its impacts on brand equity, representing advances and fundamentals for the development of models and empirical evidence of improvement in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source Authors

Fig. 2

Source Authors

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This qualitative study does not have a dataset, but a set of interviews transcriptions.

References

  • Aaker, D.A. 1992. The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy 13 (4): 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D.A. 2009. Managing brand equity. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D.A. 2012. Building Strong Brands. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accenture. 2018. From me to we: The rise of the purpose-led brand. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/strategy/brand-purpose. Accessed 26 Nov 2023.

  • Ball, A.D., and L.H. Tasaki. 1992. The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 (2): 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R.W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B.J. 2022. Customer interaction strategy, brand purpose and brand communities. Journal of Service Management 33 (4–5): 747–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., and S. Yeung. 1991. Creating a sense of mission. In Strategy process, content, context—An international perspective, ed. B. De Witt and R. Meyer, 147–156. New York, NY: West Publishing Company.

  • Campbell, A. 1992. The power of mission: Aligning strategy and culture. Planning Review Special Issue 20 (5): 10–13.

  • Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G.A., Jr. 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. 2017. Grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (3): 301–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delve, L., and A. Limpaecher. 2023. Member check and respondent validation in qualitative research. https://delvetool.com/blog/member-check-respondent-validation. Accessed 3 Nov 2023.

  • Drucker, P. F. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: HarperCollins.

  • EY. 2020. Why business must harness the power of purpose. https://www.ey.com/en_us/purpose/why-business-must-harness-the-power-of-purpose. Accessed 29 Nov 2023.

  • Gambetti, R.C., G. Graffigna, and S. Biraghi. 2012. The Grounded Theory approach to consumer-brand engagement: The practitioner’s standpoint. International Journal of Market Research 54 (5): 659–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghodeswar, B.M. 2008. Building brand identity in competitive markets: A conceptual model. Journal of Product & Brand Management 17 (1): 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajdas, M., and R. Kłeczek. 2021. The real purpose of purpose-driven branding: Consumer empowerment and social transformations. Journal of Brand Management 28 (4): 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C.-K.J. 2017. Selling products by selling brand purpose. Journal of Brand Strategy 5 (4): 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J.-N. 2012. The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. 2001. Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands. Marketing Science Institute 1 (107): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. 2020. Consumer research insights on brands and branding: A JCR curation. Journal of Consumer Research 46 (5): 995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, G. 2014. Your company’s purpose is not its vision, mission, or values. Harvard Business Review 3: 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. 2017. Brand purpose: The navigational code for growth. Journal of Brand Strategy 6 (1): 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokmanoglu, Z. 2019. The Brand Identity Prism: What it is and how to use it. 99Designs. https://99designs.com/blog/resources/brand-identity-prism/. Accessed 30 Oct 2023.

  • Madhavaram, S., V. Badrinarayanan, and R.E. McDonald. 2005. Integrated marketing communication (IMC) and brand identity as critical components of brand equity strategy: A conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Advertising 34 (4): 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malnight, T.W., I. Buche, and C. Dhanaraj. 2019. Put purpose at the core of your strategy. Harvard Business Review 97 (5): 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei, A., C.M. Webster, and H. Siuki. 2021. Exploring brand purpose dimensions for non-profit organizations. Journal of Brand Management 28 (2): 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M. 2009. Mixing qualitative methods. Qualitative Health Research 19 (11): 1523–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, S., and J.R. Das. 2021. Can the marketing innovation of purpose branding make brands meaningful and relevant? International Journal of Innovation Science 3/4: 519–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R.G., W.O. Bearden, and S. Sharma. 2003. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parris, D.L., and F. Guzmán. 2023. Evolving brand boundaries and expectations: Looking back on brand equity, brand loyalty, and brand image research to move forward. Journal of Product & Brand Management 32 (2): 191–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, M.J., and J. Bartels. 2017. The roles of identity and brand equity in organic consumption behavior: Private label brands versus national brands. Journal of Brand Management 24 (1): 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R.T., and B. Cooil. 1994. Reliability measures for qualitative data: Theory and implications. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinek, S. 2009. Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souki, G.Q., F.B. Chinelato, and C.G. Filho. 2022. Sharing is entertaining: The impact of consumer values on video sharing and brand equity. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 16 (1): 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., C.S. Park, and D.R. Chang. 2005. An approach to the measurement, analysis, and prediction of brand equity and its sources. Management Science 51 (9): 1433–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques.

  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 2008. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollstedt, M., and S. Rezat. 2019. An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education 13 (1): 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vredenburg, J., S. Kapitan, A. Spry, and J.A. Kemper. 2020. Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 39 (4): 444–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., and N. Donthu. 2001. Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research 52 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flavia Braga Chinelato.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Category and subcategories—according to Strauss and Corbin (1990) paradigm

See Fig. 1.

figure a

Appendix 2: Prototype of Brand Purpose Equity Scale—Drivers (dimensions) and items candidates

Drivers (dimensions)

Items candidates

Inspirational

Inspiring

Deals with dreams

Focuses on the human essence

Brings deep connections

Brings passion

Generates horny

Relates to unconscious desires

Differentiators

Original/Unique

Consistent with all brand elements end-to-end

Is identifiable

It is believable

Differentiation driver

Activists

Advocates causes shared with clients

Focuses on Change, Transformation,

Support, Empowerment and Causes

Challenge the status quo

It relates to with consumer ideals

Broad Scope—consumers, society, and planet

Identity Creators

Generates customer identification

Co-created with the consumer

Associated with a desire, lifestyle/philosophy/dogma

Basis for sharing identity with groups

Source Data research

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonçalves Filho, C., Chinelato, F.B. & Prado, F.V. The grounded theory approach to brand purpose equity drivers: the practitioner’s perspective. J Market Anal (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00277-9

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00277-9

Keywords

Navigation