Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation study on the effect of hydro-active patches in passive micromixer geometry for fluid flow and mixing

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of steady and unsteady microflows plays an important role in micromixing applications. In this paper, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations using OpenFOAM have been carried out to investigate mixing efficiency and flow characteristics with rectangular geometry of three different wall conditions. The geometries of the microchannels were rectangular with the dimensions of 4000 μ length, 1000 μ depth and 1000 μ width. The first channel does not have a hydro-active patch along the length of the channel. In the second channel, hydro-active patches of 1000 μ are placed symmetrically on the top and bottom along the length of the microchannel. In the third channel, hydro-active patches of 1000 μ are placed asymmetrically on the top and bottom along the length of the microchannel. A three-dimensional (3D) model was created for three geometries and simulations were performed to investigate the mixing effect for mixing two different fluids. The developed mathematical model was based on modified wall surface boundary conditions with an unsteady state of the flow field. The effect of introducing hydro-active patches in the form of symmetric boundary conditions led to a reduction in micromixer length approximately by a factor of three. The enhancement in the mixing efficiency in shorter lengths is due to surface modification, which significantly affects the unsteady behaviour of the flow field. In symmetric and asymmetric geometries with hydro-active patches, swirling vortexes were developed providing good mixing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Matrinelli, M Nimafar and V Viktorov, Majlesi J. Mechatron. Syst. 1, 20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Shinde, Sverian Sci. 1, 1 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J H Tsui, W Lee, S H Pun, J Kim and D H Kim, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 1575 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S J Park, J K Kim, J Park, S Chung, C Chung and J K Chang, J. Micromech. Microeng. 14, 6 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V Viktorov, C Visconte and M R Mahmud, J. Fluids Eng. Trans. 138, 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. V Rudyak and A Minakov, Micromachines 5, 886 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G P Zhu and N T Nguyen, Lab Chip. 12, 4772 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V Viktorov and M Nimafar, J. Micromech. Microeng. 23, 55023 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H Le The, B Q Ta, H Le Thanh, T Dong, T N Thoi and F Karlsen, J. Micromech. Microeng. 25, 094004 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L Balasubramaniam, R Arayanarakool, S D Marshall, Li, P S Lee and P C Y Chen, J. Micromech. Microeng. 27, 95016 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C Saikat, M Sharath, M Srujana, K Narayan and P K Pattnaik, AIP Conf. Proc. 1715, 020013 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M K Parsa and F Hormozi, J. Micromech. Microeng. 24, 065018 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C Te Lee and C C Lee, J. Micromech. Microeng. 22, 105034 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S Naher, D Orpen, D Brabazon, C R Poulsen and M M Morshed, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 19, 1088 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M G Reddy, M S Rani, K G Kumar, B C Prasannakumar and H J Lokesh, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 551, 123975 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K Ganesh Kumar, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 669 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K G Kumar, E H B Hani, M Assad, M Rahimi-Gorji and S Nadeem, Microsyst. Technol. 27, 97 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K Kumar, M Reddy, M Gnaneswara, P Vijaya Kumari, P Aldalbahi A Rahimi-Gorji, M Rahaman, Chaos Solitons Fractals 141, 110350 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. M Gnaneswara Reddy, K Ganesh Kumar and S Shehzad, Phys. Scr. 95, 125201 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M G Reddy, N Kumar, B C Prasannakumara, N G Rudraswamy and K G Kumar, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 045002 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S K Ranjith, B S V Patnaik and S Vedantam, Soft Matter 10, 4184 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J Kim, I Hwang, D Britain, T D Chung, Y Sun and D H Kim, Lab Chip. 11, 3941 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. I O De Solorzano, L Uson, A Larrea, M Miana, V Sebastian and M Arruebo, Int. J. Nanomed. 11, 3397 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S Togashi, E Katayama and M Matsuzawa, Int. J. Chem. Eng. 7, 489 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. H Wu, C Wang, C Zeng and L Zhang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 5313 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. H Hadidi and R Kamali, J. Micromech. Microeng. 26, 35019 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J Jamaati, H Niazmand and M Renksizbulut, JCARME 3, 41 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. F Huchet, P Legentilhomme, J Legrand, A Montillet and J Comiti, Exp. Fluids 51, 597 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J H E Cartwright, M Feingold and O Piro, J. Fluid Mech. 316, 259 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S Contreras and M Speetjens, 71st Annu. Meet. APS Div. Fluid Dyn. 63, 13 (2018)

  31. M Bedau, Weak emergence philosophical perspectives, in: Mind, causation and world (Wiley-Blackwell, 1997) Vol. 11, pp. 375–399

  32. P Hovda, Minds Mach. 18, 461 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. H Thoren and P Gerlee, Weak emergence and complexity (MIT Press, Denmark, 2010) pp. 879–886

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y Liu, K Pekkan, S C Jones and A P Yoganathan, J. Biomech. Eng. 126, 594 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. L Capretto, W Cheng and M Hill, Top. Curr. Chem. 304, 27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J M Ottino, The kinematics of mixing: Stretching, chaos, and transport (The Press Sindicate of the University of Cambridge, 1989) pp. 1–3, 227–237

  37. P J Roache, Fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics (Hermosa Publishers, 1998)

  38. I B Celik, U Ghia, P J Roache, C J Freitas, H Coleman and P E Raad, J. Fluids Eng. Trans. 130, 0780011 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. M Dhlamini, H Mondal and P Sibanda, Pramana – J. Phys. 96, 112 (2022)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. J Coleman, M McKechnie and D Sinton, Lab Chip. 6, 1033 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. F Yang, W Zhao and G Wang, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 42, 256 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinalini Amritkar.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amritkar, M., Patil, A., Barve, S. et al. Simulation study on the effect of hydro-active patches in passive micromixer geometry for fluid flow and mixing. Pramana - J Phys 98, 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-023-02680-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-023-02680-4

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation