Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Combination pharmacological therapy targeting multiple mechanisms of sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled cross-over trial
  1. Scott A Sands1,2,
  2. Jinny Collet3,
  3. Laura K Gell1,2,
  4. Nicole Calianese1,
  5. Lauren B Hess1,
  6. Daniel Vena1,2,
  7. Ali Azarbarzin1,2,
  8. Suzanne M Bertisch1,2,
  9. Shane Landry3,
  10. Luke Thomson3,
  11. Simon A Joosten4,5,6,
  12. Garun S Hamilton4,5,6,
  13. Bradley A Edwards3,7
  1. 1 Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3 Department of Physiology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  5. 5 Monash Lung, Sleep, Allergy, and Immunity, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  6. 6 Monash Partners – Epworth, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  7. 7 School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Scott A Sands, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; sasands{at}bwh.harvard.edu

Abstract

Rationale Acetazolamide and atomoxetine-plus-oxybutynin (‘AtoOxy’) can improve obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by stabilising ventilatory control and improving dilator muscle responsiveness respectively. Given the different pathophysiological mechanisms targeted by each intervention, we tested whether AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide would be more efficacious than AtoOxy alone.

Methods In a multicentre randomised crossover trial, 19 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA received AtoOxy (80/5 mg), acetazolamide (500 mg), combined AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide or placebo at bedtime for three nights (half doses on first night) with a 4-day washout between conditions. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and night 3 of each treatment period. Mixed model analysis compared the reduction in Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI) from baseline between AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide and AtoOxy (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included hypoxic burden and arousal index.

Results Although AtoOxy lowered AHI by 49 (33, 62)%baseline (estimate (95% CI)) vs placebo, and acetazolamide lowered AHI by+34 (14, 50)%baseline vs placebo, AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide was not superior to AtoOxy alone (difference: −2 (−18, 11)%baseline, primary outcome p=0.8). Likewise, the hypoxic burden was lowered with AtoOxy (+58 (37, 71)%baseline) and acetazolamide (+37 (5, 58)%baseline), but no added benefit versus AtoOxy occurred when combined (difference: −13 (−5, 39)%baseline). Arousal index was also modestly reduced with each intervention (11%baseline–16%baseline). Mechanistic analyses revealed that similar traits (ie, higher baseline compensation, lower loop gain) were associated with both AtoOxy and acetazolamide efficacy.

Conclusions While AtoOxy halved AHI, and acetazolamide lowered AHI by a third, the combination of these leading experimental interventions provided no greater efficacy than AtoOxy alone. Failure of acetazolamide to further increase efficacy suggests overlapping physiological mechanisms.

Trial registration number NCT03892772.

  • sleep apnoea

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Individual patient signals and summary data will data be made available after publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound 1-page proposal; requestors will be asked to sign a data use agreement.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Individual patient signals and summary data will data be made available after publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound 1-page proposal; requestors will be asked to sign a data use agreement.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors Conception and design: SS and BE. Study coordination and data collection: NC, JC and LT. Sleep Study Scoring: LH. Regulatory Management: LH. Study physicians: SB, SJ, GH. Interpretation of results: SS, LG, DV, AA, SL, LT and BE and colleagues. Manuscript draft: SS and BE. Guarantor responsible for overall conduct: SS and BE. All authors interpreted data, edited the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final draft.

  • Funding The study was a jointly initiated project sponsored by Apnimed. Apnimed provided intellectual input into the study conception and design, but had no input on the study execution or data analysis once the study had commenced. SS is also supported by the NIH (R01HL146697) and the AASM Foundation (228-SR-20). AA was supported by the NIH (R01HL153874) and AASM Foundation (188-SR-17, SR-2217). BAE was supported by Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship (101167). SJ is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (1139745).

  • Competing interests The combination intervention under investigation in the current study was protected by a patent ('Combination pharmacological interventions for multiple mechanisms of obstructive sleep apnoea', WO-2021091902-A1, Sands co-inventor) licensed to Apnimed from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. SS has received grant funding from Apnimed, Prosomnus and Dynaflex, and has served as a consultant for Apnimed, Nox Medical, Inspire, Eli Lilly, Merck, Forepont, LinguaFlex, Achaemenid. He is also co-inventor on a patent related to wearable oximetry technology. He has received royalties from licensed intellectual property. AA served as a consultant for Somnifix, Respicardia and Apnimed; SS and AA’s industry interactions are managed by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. SJ and GH has received equipment to support research projects from Resmed, Philips Respironics and Air Liquide Healthcare. BE has received grant funding from Apnimed and Incannex, and received personal fees from Signifier Medical outside the current work.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.