Skip to main content

Evaluation of the effects of curcumin on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a bio-computational approach

Abstract

Background

According to the increasing trend of COPD, the timely diagnosis and treatment of the disease can reduce the high costs to the health systems. Therefore, by biological calculation methods, signaling pathways and genes involved in this disease can be obtained and used to design drugs and other treatment methods. By using biological calculations, we determined that curcumin can affect this disease and its genes and signaling pathways. Our goal in this study was to find the genes by which curcumin exerts its effect and can maintain the function of corticosteroids against oxidizing agents.

Results

By finding the genes, it is possible to find precisely the pathways by which curcumin works, which can be used to design other drugs that cause these pathways and minimize their side effects. This study considers healthy samples (with/without curcumin) and oxygen-free radicals (with/without curcumin). Finally, statistical algorithms extract meaningful genes as effective biomarkers to investigate curcumin's effects and signaling pathways in COPD. The results show that the genes finally obtained as the most critical genes confirmed by the literature are effective in COPD. Finally, curcumin was input in SwissTargetPrediction to identify potential protein receptors. We used LigPlot+ software to visualize the receptor–ligand binding result provided by iGEMDOCK.

Conclusions

The data showed that the most significant genes in each group have been confirmed in other studies to be effective in this disease, and protein–protein interaction networks can be established between them to investigate their roles.

Introduction

Chronic bronchitis and pulmonary emphysema are two primary components of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [1], a significant global health burden ranks statistically third in terms of causes of death worldwide, and its incidence is steadily increasing [2]. The pathophysiology of this disease shows that airflow restriction is due to the destruction of small airways and the parenchyma of the lungs, which causes balance disorders between protease and antiprotease in the lung. The disease has four stages that are classified from mild to severe. COPD patients commonly struggle with symptoms such as whooping cough, shortness of breath, and wheezing. Available approaches to controlling the disease include preventing illness progression, maintaining signs, and improving the exercise tolerance test (ETT). The essential and fundamental step is to quit smoking. This disease uses beta-agonists, anticholinergics, methylxanthines such as theophylline, and corticosteroids. One of the most critical challenges for controlling disease attacks is air pollution and lung infections [1]. The literature has ample evidence of the genetic role in the development of lung carcinoma. It is worth noting that the two diseases, lung cancer and COPD, share several genetic mechanisms; these include, i. inflammation, where both conditions involve chronic inflammation in the lungs, and it can lead to cellular damage and mutations; ii. transformed mesenchymal cells can contribute to the development of both lung cancer and COPD; iii. lung tissues are susceptible to oxidative stress, which can result in DNA damage and increase the risk of cancer and COPD; iv. the formation of new blood vessels in the lungs can promote the growth and spread of cancer cells, as well as contribute to the development of COPD; v. impaired DNA repair mechanisms can increase the risk of genetic mutations and cancer in both lung tissues; vi. cell proliferation can lead to the development of both lung cancer and COPD. These common genetic mechanisms highlight the close relationship between lung cancer and COPD, and suggest potential targets for therapeutic interventions. Considering the mechanism of inflammation, inhaling cigarette smoke or other carcinogens exposes the body to a weakened immune system associated with increased inflammation, all of which lead to the formation and progression of tumors, specifically COPD [3].

Increased oxidative stress through the generation of free radicals is one of the results of the smoking-related contributing factors; in other words, it, in turn, increases ROS production of ROS (reactive oxygen species) by lung epithelial cells [4]. Phytochemicals from the Curcuma longa roots include curcumin, which is naturally polyphenolic [5]. This plant belongs to the Zingiberaceae family and is native to Southeast Asia. Turmeric, with various pharmacological properties, contains a group of substances known as curcumin, including curcumin, dimethoxy curcumin, and methoxy-curcumin. Curcumin, with medicinal properties, is the main active ingredient in curcuminoids. The yellow color of turmeric and its therapeutic effects are related to the existence of curcumin [6]. Regarding the placement of curcumin in the pharmacological drug groups, it belongs to the group of anti-inflammatory substances with a non-steroidal structure. In addition to its non-inflammatory effects, curcumin has analgesic, antipyretic, and platelet inhibitory effects [7].

Curcumin has antioxidant activity that can reduce the body's ROS. This property of curcumin is due to its excellent electron transfer capacity due to its unique structure and various functional groups such as β-diketone and several π electrons. They can connect two phenyl rings [8]. Because genes are the potential source of many diseases, identifying and investigating significant biomarkers involved in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using curcumin may increase the patient's chances of survival since early detection and treatment can benefit recurrence prevention. The use and analysis of gene expression data are essential in biomarker determination. Therefore, identifying genes with statistically significant expression values compared to other genes and assessing the signaling pathways are paramount. In this experiment, we want to find out the genes involved in COPD using different periods classified in other groups of samples by comparing them in the existence or absence of curcumin and taking into account the standard and high ROS levels. In the author's opinion, this work is a first, enabling further research and the development of effective treatments based on genes and pathways associated with COPD to be addressed in further studies.

Methods

The flowchart of the process of answering the research question is summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The schematic flowchart of the research process starting from selection of the GEO microarray dataset to final post processing stages

Source of microarray data sets

In this study, we obtained gene expression data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO), a publicly accessible repository of gene expression information maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Specifically, we retrieved GSE10896 with platform GPL570 Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array-based microarray dataset, from the GEO database. This platform offers a comprehensive analysis of genome expression, allowing for the detection of subtle changes in gene expression levels across different samples. By leveraging the resources of the GSE and the Affymetrix platform, we aimed to generate valuable insights into the complex mechanisms underlying specific biological processes and diseases. To assess the effects of curcumin, 24 samples are divided into eight groups to compare the possible significant gene expression levels at different conditions. The eight groups include group 1, naive_untreated_4h versus naive_curcumin_4h, group 2, naive_untreated_4h versus ROS_curcumin_4h, group 3, naive_curcumin_4h versus ROS_untreated_4h, group 4, ROS_untreated_4h versus ROS_curcumin_4h, group 5, naive_untreated_18h versus naive_curcumin_18h, group 6, naive_untreated_18h versus ROS_curcumin_18h, group 7, naive_curcumin_18h versus ROS_untreated_18h, group 8, ROS_untreated_18h versus ROS_curcumin_18h.

In the GSE10896 dataset, a specific cell line U937 was employed for investigative purposes. This cell line was allegedly derived from histiocytic lymphoma samples taken from a 37-year-old male individual and was intended to elucidate the behavior and differentiation of monocytes.

Different genes expressed between groups (DEG)

The BRB-Array Tools (version 4.6.1stable) development team, led by Dr. Richard Simon, has developed an analysis tool that can be used to identify noteworthy and differentially expressed genes. The steps in this tool included entering the GEO dataset, filtering genes by applying the |log(fold change)|≥ 1 option, normalizing with the quantile normalization option, and categorizing the most important DEGs. Due to inspecting even small changes of curcumin effects on gene expression levels, the cutoff for fold change was set to 1. This tool organized genes according to their intensity of expression using the MAS5 algorithm. The results obtained from DEGs were significant, considering p < 0.05.

DEGs priority

Based on evidence from the literature, the DEGs discussed in the previous section were ranked using the GeneCards [9] and ToPPGene [10] websites. Through 150 online sites and keywords, the GeneCards database (https://genecards.org) was used to find genes associated with a given disease, based on the training group's definitions. The terms "COPD" and "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease" were included in the keywords searched in this context. ToPPGene was used to rank the imported gene list and compare it with the train gene list to determine the gene(s) associated with COPD that was significantly differentially expressed (p-values less than 0.05). The test group was scored and ranked using the train group's similarity scores based on fuzzy and Pearson correlation measurement computations on the ToPPGene website.

Ontology and functional analysis of genes

In this section, we evaluate the ontology of genes through the DAVID version 6.8, a comprehensive information tool available for free at http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/summary.jsp. It presents an extensive examination of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their involvement in KEGG signaling pathways, covering an assessment of their biological processes (BP) containing several chemical reactions, cellular components (CC) with various complex biomolecules, and molecular functions demonstrating activities of a target macromolecular with others (MF) [9, 10]. EASE score threshold was set to 0.1 by default.

Constructed network of protein–protein interactions

The constricted network of protein–protein interaction among the DEGs obtained from the previous steps helped find the interconnections among corresponding proteins through existing search tools. The search tool included STRING version 11.5 and GeneMANIA. In the STRING database, which contains data relating to protein–protein interactions, there are currently over 67 million proteins derived from nearly fourteen thousand distinct organisms. In August 2021, the database had accumulated over twenty million interactions between these proteins, representing a tremendous amount of data on protein–protein interactions. In the development of this tool, a comprehensive integration of GO, KEGG, Biocarta, and Reactome has been accomplished. With seamless information exchange between these databases, these pathways and networks can be identified more efficiently. IntAct, MINT, PID, BIND, DIP, GRID, HPRD, and IntAct are some of the prominent databases and initiatives that are affiliated with the tool. The tool can access a wealth of biological data and knowledge through these collaborations. In the protein–protein interaction network, the proteins obtained were represented by their nodes and the corresponding protein–protein relationships [11]. The GeneMANIA website at http://www.genemania.org was used to examine the functional possibilities of genes, analyze gene groups, and prioritize them for functional measurement. The website used genomics and proteomics information to link imported genes to similar genes in terms of functionality. Also, its search engine included a wealth of data on the functional roles of genes from the GEO, BioGRID, Pathway Commons, and I2D (Interlogous Interaction Database) databases. Additionally, the default cutoff score for STRING was 0.4, and no thresholds were available for GeneMANIA.

Relationship between curcumin efficacy and its structural components

PubChem, a comprehensive public access chemical compendium maintained by NCBI, was searched for the structural formula and SMILES code of curcumin [12]. Generally, strings of SMILES code could be used to determine structural similarity obtained from PubChem and the ADME forecasting tool using SwissADME online websites [13,14,15] and SwissTargetPrediction [16]. By calculating numerous factors, such as physicochemical descriptors, ADME-relative parameters, and pharmacokinetic properties and effects similar to medicines and studying the medicinal chemistry of SMILES structure, we employed the SwissADME web server for drug creation and detection. A general theory of similarity states that two molecules with similar properties (thresholds of similarity of 0.65 in 2D and 0.85 in 3D) are likely to be similar. We have statistically quantified that bioactive molecules with similar targets will likely share them under the SwissTargetPrediction. Subsequently, through the analysis of a dataset comprising 370,000 active molecules with known targets, the most closely related molecules were identified for a given query molecule. This was achieved by employing a sophisticated computational approach that enabled the identification of the most similar molecules based on their shared target proteins. Target molecules with the highest similarity to the query molecule are predicted targets. Moreover, in SwissTargetPrediction, those targets with similar binding properties to similar structure queries were selected with a probability criterion over 0.50 for molecular docking purposes.

Molecular docking

In the first step, probability values were used to determine which receptors are most likely to be targeted by curcumin in treating COPD. To validate the predicted targets, we employed molecular docking techniques. In this process, we utilized the protein data bank (PDB) or Research Coordination Center for Biological Systems accessible from https://www.rcsb.org/) to obtain the studied proteins structures, which provided a molecular framework for docking simulations. Water molecule was removed from the structure. With the help of OpenBabel (v.3.1.1) software (https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel), the verified curcumin structure obtained from ZINC15 (http://zinc15.docking.org/) was converted to.mol2 format. With default parameters, docking was done with iGEMDOCK (version 2.1) [17]. Using LigPlot+ software (version 2.2.8), the identified low-energy receptors were visualized.

Results

In the first phase of this research, the significant genes of the studied groups were obtained using BRB-ArrayTools. Different genes expressed between the samples in each group are obtained and labeled upregulation/downregulation based on fold change values. Since ignoring each gene can affect the final result, all genes with fold changes more significant than one in the microarray dataset are considered. For example, 67 different expressed genes are obtained between the two samples in group 6, of which 12 are upregulated and 55 are downregulated. The detailed results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 The number of DEGs obtained from analysis in BRB_Array tools

Next, the effective genes found in the clinically published literature on COPD patients at GeneCards.org were compared with the significant genes derived by BRB-Array Tools, and their expressions were obtained between two comparing samples in each group. Then, the ToppGene prediction server ranked the input test dataset (i.e., genes obtained from BRB-Array Tools) based on the training dataset (i.e., the clinically confirmed genes from GeneCards.org) for all compared groups in each step; however, one of the groups did not contain a considerable number of essential genes. The p-value was considered lower than 0.05 to select significant genes at this stage. Among the DEGs identified at this stage for each group, groups one to six contain one, six, three, one, four, six, and twelve genes, respectively, as shown in Table 2. The gene list was reduced, and groups 7 and 8 remained unchanged.

Table 2 The final number of DEGs after prioritization in TOPPGene website

Based on the output of the DAVID bioinformatics tool, eight groups of prioritized genes are analyzed biologically and functionally. The processes in which these molecules are involved can be divided into BP, CC, MF, and KEGG signaling pathways. We have inserted genes with a p-value below 0.05 into this website so that they can be analyzed. For example, genes with mRNA positive regulation function in biological processing have practical expressions in catabolic processing, positive regulation of cytokine expression, and development of skeletal muscle tissue. Considering the cellular components, some genes affect extracellular space, the Golgi apparatus, and cell connections. In terms of molecular functions, there are genes with DNA binding activity, GDP binding, and 3'-UTR binding mRNA binding. The KEGG signaling pathway analysis shows that various genes play a role in histidine metabolism, serotonergic synapses, and the regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The outcomes for BP (red), CC (blue), MF (green), KEGG signaling pathway (orange) enrichment analysis for target groups one, two, three, five, and six. The remaining groups four, seven, and eight did not present any enrichment analysis

Utilizing the GeneMANIA website, the p-values less than 0.05 for the resulting genes in each protein–protein interaction network are illustrated (Fig. 3). In group 7, there are no data because there were no genes with p-value < 0.05. The images' purple, blue, yellow, and green lines (i.e., Fig. 3) mean coexpression, colocalization, shared protein domains, and genetic interactions.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The PPI networks constructed for a group 1, b group 2, c group 3, d group 4, e group 5, f group 6, and g group 8 propose the identified effected genes by other possible interacted genes

PPI networks are generated for eight groups using Cytoscape software and the STRING database. Furthermore, genes with a p-value of less than 0.05 were entered into Cytoscape software to determine their interconnection relationships and identify genes using the cytohubba algorithm. The results show that in groups one to eight except seven, there are 16 nodes and one edge, 24 nodes and two edges, 22 nodes and one edge, eight nodes and no edge, 16 nodes and four edges, 25 nodes and four edges and two nodes and 0 edges; however, group 7 did not have results. Among the genes with higher interactions in PPI networks using eight groups, in group one, TCF3 and TCF7L1 were both upregulated with degree 1; in group two, SPON1, ADAMTS9, GABRA5 and NPTN were downregulated, and all had degree 1, in group three, TLE1 was upregulated, and ASCL1 was downregulated. Both had degree 1. In group five, HDC, SLC15A4 and HTR7 were downregulated, and MAOA was upregulated. In contrast, their degrees were 3, 1, 2 and 2, respectively, and in group six, UBE2A, RC3H1, HNRNPR, SLC1A2, GABRB2, ABHD5 and RAB18 were all downregulated, and their degrees were 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1 and 1, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 The list of genes interacted with each other in PPI network from GeneMANIA

In biochemical networks, degrees 1, 2, 3, etc., classify the order in which protein–protein interactions occur: 1. First-degree interactions—Direct physical interactions between two proteins, such as enzymes and substrates. The proteins interact directly. Two proteins indirectly interact through an intermediate protein. For example, it is unclear whether protein A binds protein B or protein C directly. In addition, protein A indirectly affects the activity of protein C. 3. Third-degree interactions. In this case, two proteins (A and D) interact through a path involving two intermediate proteins (A–B, B–C, C–D). As a result, the functionally associated proteins A and D involve three steps. Two proteins that interact n-degrees indicate that they are linked by n-1 intermediate proteins, creating a chain of functional associations between the end proteins. In large protein functional networks within the cell, we can map the connectivity of indirect interactions and associations by analyzing these degrees of separation. To better understand information flow, network concepts like hubs, modules, and shortest paths take advantage of these interactions. They better understand how protein signaling has been interconnected and how signals propagate.

A molecular weight (MW) of 368.38 g/mol was observed by SwissADME, indicating curcumin's ability to absorb and distribute efficiently. The main feature of curcumin is that it forms hydrogen bonds with water molecules and accepts hydrogen bonds, which suggest that it enhances the solubility of water molecules through both donors and acceptors of hydrogen bonds. Approximately half of curcumin administered after oral administration reaches the systemic circulation, according to a study indicating 0.55 percent oral bioavailability. A lower topological polar surface area (TPSA) value indicates a low likelihood of curcumin interacting with membranes and moving across biological barriers. The absorption percentage of curcumin was impressively high at 93.06%, demonstrating the drug's excellent ability to penetrate the body. According to the findings presented, curcumin exhibits noteworthy oral bioavailability and solubility, rendering it a potentially valuable drug candidate. Studying the relationship between the effectiveness of curcumin and its structural components in the SwissTargetPrediction section, 101 curcumin target proteins were identified, among which enzymes, oxidoreductases, and isomerases had the highest probability values. Among 101 target proteins, monoamine oxidase A from the class of oxidoreductases, beta-amyloid A4 protein from the cell membrane category, histone acetyltransferase P300 from the Writer category, prostaglandin E synthase from the enzyme category, Toll-like receptor (TLR7/TLR9) from the toll-like and ll-1 receptors, beta-secretase one from the protease, and DNA topoisomerase II alpha from isomerase, with a probability of more than 50% were determined. This study also demonstrated curcumin's anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties through the evidence from the literature presented in the next section.

In the SwissTargetPrediction analysis, the receptors mentioned earlier played a role in curcumin's impact on COPD. As listed in Table 4, we selected potential targets with their PDB IDs: 2BXR, 6UWP, 6GYR, 4BPM, 3WPF, 6ZJZ, 6OD6, 3QX3. Our next step involved docking eight target proteins with curcumin, a potentially active molecule. Stable conformations have lower binding energies. Our assessment of the binding level was based on the quantitative fitness value. Predicted poses in a binding site are evaluated according to their fitness. In iGEMDOCK, fitness is computed as the product of van der Waal, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic energy [17]. We used LigPlot+ to visualize protein–ligand interactions (Fig. 4) and the potential receptors along with their molecular docking results are proposed in Table 4.

Table 4 The list of potential receptors and molecular docking results of iGEMDOCK and LigPlot+ using curcumin compound
Fig. 4
figure 4

Ligplot.+ output of the interactions at the receptor–ligand (curcumin) interface in a 2BXR, b 6UWP, c 6GYR, d 4BPM, e 3WPF, f 6ZJZ, g 6OD6 and h 3QX3

Discussion

Currently, the incidence and mortality of COPD, an inflammatory disease caused mainly by daily smoking, is continuously growing globally. COPD is a serious health problem and a danger to human life [76,77,78]. Studies on curcumin's pharmacological effects have gained momentum since its molecular structure (C21H20O6) was discovered as difluorocarbonyl methane in 1910 [79]. It has also been shown that curcumin, an organic polyphenol produced from turmeric, a member of the ginger family, helps treat COPD [79].

Only 25% of people who smoke will get COPD, despite smoking being the leading cause of COPD cases [80]. Despite this, most smokers do not end up with COPD, and a significant number of people with COPD have never smoked. It suggests that COPD is a complex degenerative disease [81]. When compared with smokers who do not have COPD, those who have COPD and who smoke have an elevated risk of developing lung cancer that ranges from 1.3 to 4.9 times higher [80].

Further research findings demonstrated that curcumin alleviated emphysema and helped restore structural integrity to the alveolar epithelium of rats suffering from COPD [77, 81]. Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who received curcumin had more favorable body weight and respiratory rates than those who received a control treatment [81]. In a study examining the effects of curcumin on COPD, the BALF total cell count was notably decreased without curcumin treatment [81]. On the other hand, it is yet uncertain whether oral curcumin may help with COPD-related mitochondrial dysfunction [77].

Patients with COPD can be restored to corticosteroid resistance with curcumin by inhibiting HDAC2 expression and revising histone modifications [82]. So, curcumin is an important regulator of chronic airway inflammation in COPD and inhibits an increase in pro-inflammatory chemokines in AEC II isolated from COPD rats [82].

As oral curcumin bioavailability is limited, more bioavailable curcumin may have a greater impact on COPD rats [77]. In COPD rats with skeletal muscle injury, curcumin treatment improved mitochondrial structure and increased mitochondrial enzyme activity [77].

Around 40% of people with COPD have mitering and dysfunction of their skeletal muscles [77].

Rats with COPD whose skeletal muscles were treated with curcumin had dramatically reduced levels of IL-6 and TNF-α [77]. Curcumin-treated COPD individuals showed a significant difference in their alveolar epithelial cell death rate from COPD model subjects in terms of apoptosis rates [81]. The reason for using curcumin as a preventive agent is that chronic inflammation and oxidative stress are involved in COPD [81].

The hypothesis is that Theracurmin®, a highly absorbable curcumin with increased bioavailability using a medication delivery method, reduces inflammation in people with moderate COPD [78]. According to the literature, curcumin may be beneficial in stopping arteriosclerosis by lowering AT-LDL levels, which have been shown to drop considerably after therapy with Theracurmin® [78].

Research has shown that curcumin may reduce inflammation in the patients’ airways through affecting the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells and hence the gene expression values of cyclooxygenase-2 [76].

Curcumin can also slow lung cancer development in patients with high-risk COPD by prolonging the premalignant period [80]. These discoveries might lead to new therapeutic development approaches to treating COPD [76, 83].

Through a bio-computational approach, the study investigates how curcumin inhibits the progression of COPD by regulating genes and biological pathways. And COPD is a progressive chronic obstructive lung disease [1]. Patients with mild-to-moderate COPD are more likely to die of lung cancer; those with severe COPD are more likely to die of respiratory failure. According to studies, 46 to 60% of lung cancer patients also had COPD. According to current understanding, the growth of lung cancer is closely linked to a person's genetics [3]. It has already been discussed that COPD is a disease characterized by oxidative stress, and ROS has a significant role in that development and progression [4]. As a result, substances that contain antioxidants in their structure can be considered a treatment for this chronic disease. Curcumin can be an antioxidant and anticancer due to its structure and functional groups [8]. This study used a microarray dataset consisting of 24 samples divided into eight groups at two different time intervals of 4 and 18 h.

In addition, the 4-h and 18-h groups were compared using BRB-ArrayTools, where significant genes are identified through statistical analysis to obtain more accurate results. This study used several integrated groups, pre-processing algorithms, and normalization and filtering approaches to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for eight groups. To find effective genes in treating this disease with curcumin, the DEGs between the compared groups in which curcumin is present and the ROS enzyme is active are more important than those in healthy groups not treated with curcumin. In this study, it was determined that groups 2 and 6 experienced significant differences in gene expression over the period of 4 and 18 h, with particular differences observed in gene expression between those groups. The results show that these genes are significantly expressed and can be effective in the curcumin process in this disease. In the next stage, analyses on gene ontology and the KEGG pathway of DEGs were performed using the DAVID web server to determine the function of those genes involved in oxidative stress and carcinogenesis. In this stage, genes with a p-value < 0.05 were evaluated regarding BP, CC, MF and KEGG signaling pathways, and the results were presented in the results section. When the GeneMANIA and Cytoscape stages are performed, interconnections between genes are obtained; they indicate extensive connections between these genes, which may be involved in the effects of curcumin on gene expression levels in this disease. The STRING database also analyzed the PPI network and revealed several hub genes for eight groups. The clinical and experimental studies in the literature were used to validate gene biomarkers. Group 1 has two TCF3 and TCF7L1 genes; group 2 has four ADAMTS9, SPON1, GABRA5 and NPTN genes; group 3 has two TLE1 and ASCL1 genes; group 5 has four HDC, MAOA, HTR7 and SLC15A4 genes, group 6 has seven RC3H1, UBEPRA, HN genes, SLC1A2, GABRB2, ABHD5 and RAB18 were the most important among the target genes. No significant genes were found in groups 4, 7, and 8, possibly due to the proximity and lack of differences in the genes expressed. In the phase of curcumin efficacy with its structural components identified in the SwissTargetPrediction section, 101 proteins were obtained, of which oxidoreductases and enzymes had the highest percentages (Fig. 5), and the rest of the proteins with similar rates were classified accordingly. For example, monoamine oxidase A and prostaglandin E synthase were present in the enzyme group with a probability of more than 50%, and the effect of these proteins on COPD has been shown in other articles (Table 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The predicted potential receptors for the curcumin structure

Table 5 The potential receptors functional for curcumin predicted by SwissTargetPrediction

Curcumin may lower depression via interacting with serotonin and dopamine systems [101, 102]. Dopamine and serotonin release are affected by curcumin's monoamine oxidase inhibition [103]. Additionally, curcumin inhibits monoamine oxidases A and B, whereas Tetrabenazine reduces VMAT-2, which affects depressed motivation. Oral or intraventricular curcumin may reduce these effects. [104, 105].

Curcumin modulates cellular targets and effects, suggesting COPD therapy potential [106]. To prevent COPD, it regulates Th17 and Treg balance, inflammation, and anti-inflammatory factors [107]. For corticosteroid-resistant COPD patients, curcumin seems promising. Because of this novel advantage, curcumin may treat COPD by alleviating corticosteroid resistance symptoms [108]. Curcumin may directly affect beta-amyloid protein formation, which may affect Alzheimer's disease progression [109]. The reduction in plasma beta-amyloid protein levels suggests a connection between curcumin and the A4 receptor [109].

Through altering COPD and Alzheimer's disorders, curcumin inhibited liver cancer and signaling pathways [110]. Curcumin inhibits breast cancer cell growth and induces death via modulating signaling pathways which makes scientists believe curcumin may cure cancer and COPD [111].

Curcumin also has an effect on the p300 receptor, which is a transcription factor that acetylates histones and transcription factors (HAT), including GATA4. This receptor is known to affect gene expression and cell function, including COPD [112,113,114]. Curcumin has been shown to decrease p300 HAT activity, which causes heart failure and hypertrophy by acetylating histones and GATA4 [112,113,114]. Additionally, curcumin was shown to reduce p300 HAT activity in animal models, reducing heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy [115, 116].

It was shown that curcumin inhibited the activity of p300 HAT in cancer and neuropathic pain models, which suggests that it has a wide range of potential therapeutic applications [117, 118]. In COPD, curcumin reduces p300 HAT activity, may affect major pathophysiological variables such as gene expression related to inflammation, tissue remodeling, corticosteroid resistance, and renal ischemia–reperfusion [119]. So, by targeting the p300 HAT receptor, researchers may overcome COPD corticosteroid resistance and reduce inflammation and fibrosis [119].

On the other hand, in patients with COPD, interacting with the prostaglandin E synthase (PGES) receptor may result in inhibiting microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1, secreting pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). As a result, inhibition of mPGES-1 enhances its anti-inflammatory capabilities and possible treatment against cancer and chronic inflammation [89].

Curcumin inhibits IL-1β, reducing mPGES-1 production, a crucial enzyme in the inflammatory response. This is done by inhibiting Egr-1 and other signaling pathways. Thus, curcumin may modulate mPGES enzyme expression and activity [120]. Curcumin has been studied further in relation to the prostaglandin E receptor EP4, which is implicated in PGE2 activity [121]. Both the prostaglandin E synthase and the PGE2 signaling pathways, which are both regulated by curcumin, may be attributable to inflammation and tissue damage.

According to the sources, curcumin may treat COPD via Toll-like receptors 9 and 7. For decades, TLR activation has been recognized to initiate innate immune responses [122]. In asthma and COPD-related chronic inflammation, TLR9 and TLR7 may inappropriately trigger immunological responses [123].

In numerous diseases, curcumin regulates TLR expression and activation. TLR4 downregulation by curcumin decreases inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in atherosclerotic plaques [124]. Curcumin also reduces TLR4 expression while increasing TLR2 expression in resting microglia [125] and may contribute to its anti-atherosclerosis activities [126].

TLRs, including as TLR9 and TLR7, have been implicated in the immunopathology of stable COPD [127]. Furthermore, in COPD, TLR2 gene expression is highly related to the amount of neutrophils in sputum [128]. TLR4 has also been linked to COPD-induced inflammation [129]. In addition, the researchers reported TLR4 polymorphisms have been linked to both tuberculosis and COPD [130].

Curcumin, the principal active element in turmeric, has been demonstrated in several studies to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. However, it is challenging to link curcumin's interactions with a variety of protein targets to its possible therapeutic benefits which might be important for treating COPD; (i) the enzyme CA12, which guards the body from free radical damage, may be activated by curcumin. Patients with COPD may have less lung tissue damage from damaging oxidative stress if CA12 activation is present, (ii) this compound may reduce COPD-related lung inflammation by controlling pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhance lung function by modifying NF-κB activity, reducing excessive inflammation. (iii) Histone deacetylases (HDACs), which affect chromatin structure and inflammation, were downregulated by curcumin. By inhibiting HDAC, corticosteroids may cure COPD longer, while curcumin may slow lung fibrosis. On the other hand, MicroRNAs regulate a wide range of gene networks, which has a significant impact on COPD severity.

To understand the intricate relationship between genetic predisposition and COPD progression/treatment, one must analyze the patient's genetic profile. By doing so, one may better understand COPD development processes and therapy effectiveness. This information may help personalize treatment and improve patient outcomes by adjusting therapies to genetics. Numerous genetic investigations have found COPD susceptibility genes, such as α1-antitrypsin deficiency, smoking-induced CFTR failure, and newly discovered genes [131,132,133]. Genes linked to the pathophysiology of COPD have been linked to the condition's possible association and provide unique insights into the development and severity of the disease [132]. Additionally, the prevention and treatment of COPD depend on the identification and prioritization of COPD candidate genes [134]. Immune-related gene research has also revealed putative COPD mechanisms and diagnostic biomarkers, resulting in a better knowledge of the disease's management [135].

In the research, there were significant variations in the expression of genes linked to stress response, inflammation, and cell death [136]. Biological medicines targeting particular pathological characteristics and disease endotypes may be used to treat COPD [137]. Studying the genetic overlap between COPD and asthma has discovered SNPs linked to their development or therapy [138].

In addition, there has been debate over the role of individual susceptibility or genetic variables in the development of COPD, which shows that the disease may be affected by genetic polymorphisms and interactions between genes and the environment [139]. Furthermore, it has been shown that certain genetic variants are associated with the severity of the advancement of COPD illness. This finding provides evidence of the possible effect that genetic differences might have on the progression of the disease [140, 141].

Natural polyphenol curcumin from Curcuma may treat COPD due to its anti-inflammatory characteristics. By suppressing NLRP3, a key component of the NLRP3 inflammasome, IL-1β release is decreased and inflammation is avoided [142]. Curcumin suppresses NF-κB signaling and COX-2, reducing lung remodeling and inflammation in mice with cigarette-induced COPD [76]. Moreover, curcumin regulates SIRT1 to modify autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress in rats, improving COPD [107]. Additionally, curcumin inhibits oxidative stress in human nasal fibroblasts via activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway by preventing its oxidation [143]. Curcumin may be beneficial for respiratory diseases, according to some research. It may also lower blood levels of low-density lipoprotein, a sign of atherosclerosis, which may help with COPD symptoms [144].

In summary, curcumin targets COPD-related anti-inflammatory and antioxidant protein factors. More clinical studies are needed to prove curcumin's effectiveness and understand how it activates its main pathways in COPD patients. Lung cell protein indicators affected by curcumin may help optimize future therapies.

Conclusions

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a growing health and economic burden globally. Finding better prevention and treatment options is important. Curcumin is a natural compound with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that may have therapeutic potential for treating COPD. This study used a bioinformatics approach to analyze gene expression data and identify genes and pathways affected by curcumin treatment in COPD model cell lines. Several differentially expressed genes and pathways were identified previously implicated in COPD pathogenesis or shown to be modulated by curcumin. Protein–protein interaction network analysis revealed connections between the identified genes and highlighted some hub genes that may be key targets of curcumin. Literature mining provided evidence to support the roles of some of the identified genes and pathways in COPD and as targets of curcumin. Molecular docking analysis indicated potential binding interactions between curcumin and some protein targets involved in inflammation and oxidative stress pathways underlying COPD. Further clinical research is needed to confirm curcumin's therapeutic efficacy and mechanisms in COPD patients. This bioinformatics study concludes that curcumin modulates multiple genes and pathways involved in COPD pathogenesis, warranting further investigation of its therapeutic potential.

Availability of data and materials

The initial dataset for analysis is available from PubMed in the following link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE10896. And, all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Gholami K, Mojtahedzade M (2018) Comprehensive textbook of therapeutics (In Persian). Abadisteb

  2. Brashier BB, Kodgule R (2012) Risk factors and pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). J Assoc Physicians India 60(Suppl):17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang IA, Relan V, Wright CM, Davidson MR, Sriram KB, Savarimuthu Francis SM et al (2011) Common pathogenic mechanisms and pathways in the development of COPD and lung cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 15(4):439–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Faux SP, Tai T, Thorne D, Xu Y, Breheny D, Gaca M (2009) The role of oxidative stress in the biological responses of lung epithelial cells to cigarette smoke. Biomarkers 14(sup1):90–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moghaddam S, Barta P, Mirabolfathinejad S, Ammar-Aouchiche Z, Garza NT, Vo T et al (2009) Curcumin inhibits COPD-like airway inflammation and lung cancer progression in mice. Carcinogenesis 30(11):1949–1956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehta HJ, Patel V, Sadikot RT (2014) Curcumin and lung cancer—a review. Target Oncol 9(4):295–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. PubChem (2020) Curcumin 2020. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Curcumin

  8. Barzegar A, Moosavi-Movahedi AA (2011) Intracellular ROS protection efficiency and free radical-scavenging activity of curcumin. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37(1):1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J et al (2019) STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):D607–D613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S et al (2021) PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 49(D1):D1388–D1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V (2017) SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep 7(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daina A, Zoete V (2016) A boiled-egg to predict gastrointestinal absorption and brain penetration of small molecules. ChemMedChem 11(11):1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V (2014) iLOGP: a simple, robust, and efficient description of n-octanol/water partition coefficient for drug design using the GB/SA approach. J Chem Inf Model 54(12):3284–3301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gfeller D, Michielin O, Zoete V (2013) Shaping the interaction landscape of bioactive molecules. Bioinformatics 29(23):3073–3079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu KC, Chen YF, Lin SR, Yang JM (2011) iGEMDOCK: a graphical environment of enhancing GEMDOCK using pharmacological interactions and post-screening analysis. BMC bioinformatics. 12(Suppl 1):S33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang S (2017) Down-regulated TCF3 expression inhibits growth and migratory abilities of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Chin J Pathophysiol 289–96

  19. Wang R, Chen X-F, Shu Y-Q (2014) Prediction of non-small cell lung cancer metastasis-associated microRNAs using bioinformatics. Am J Cancer Res 5(1):32–51

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramroach S, John M, Joshi A (2020) Lung cancer type classification using differentiator genes. Gene Reports 19:100647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dai C-H, Li J, Chen P, Jiang H-G, Wu M, Chen Y-C (2015) RNA interferences targeting the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway upstream genes reverse cisplatin resistance in drug-resistant lung cancer cells. J Biomed Sci 22(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Catarata MJ, Lourenço M, Martins MF, Frade J, Pêgo A, Cordeiro CR et al (2021) Pharmacogenetics of advanced lung cancer: Predictive value of functional genetic polymorphism AGXT Pro11Leu in clinical outcome? Pulmonology 27(2):116–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeon H-S, Dracheva T, Yang S-H, Meerzaman D, Fukuoka J, Shakoori A et al (2008) SMAD6 contributes to patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer and its knockdown reestablishes TGF-β homeostasis in lung cancer cells. Can Res 68(23):9686–9692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Park S-A, Lee JW, Herbst RS, Koo JS (2016) GSK-3α is a novel target of CREB and CREB-GSK-3α signaling participates in cell viability in lung cancer. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0153075

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Westerman B, Breuer R, Poutsma A, Chhatta A, Noorduyn L, Koolen M et al (2007) Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor profiling of lung tumors shows aberrant expression of the proneural gene atonal homolog 1 (ATOH1, HATH1, MATH1) in neuroendocrine tumors. Int J Biol Markers 22(2):114–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gemmill RM, Roche J, Potiron VA, Nasarre P, Mitas M, Coldren CD et al (2011) ZEB1-responsive genes in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett 300(1):66–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li H, He J, Zhang R, Wei Y, Zhang S, Chen X, et al (2021) FOXO3 regulates Smad3 and Smad7 through SPON1 circular RNA to inhibit idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. ResearchSquare

  28. Liu C, Yang Z, Deng Z, Zhou Y, Gong Q, Zhao R et al (2018) Upregulated lncRNA ADAMTS9-AS2 suppresses progression of lung cancer through inhibition of miR-223-3p and promotion of TGFBR3. IUBMB Life 70(6):536–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva VM, Gomes JA, Tenório LPG, de Omena Neta GC, da Costa PK, Duarte AKF et al (2019) Schwann cell reprogramming and lung cancer progression: a meta-analysis of transcriptome data. Oncotarget 10(68):7288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Srivastva P, Yoo H (2015) SLC6A15, a novel potential metabolic target for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 75(15):1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang R, Lai L, Dong X, He J, You D, Chen C et al (2019) SIPA1L3 methylation modifies the benefit of smoking cessation on lung adenocarcinoma survival: an epigenomic–smoking interaction analysis. Mol Oncol 13(5):1235–1248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y, Yang P (2011) GPC5 gene and its related pathways in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6(1):2–5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. An Y-X, Shang Y-J, Xu Z-W, Zhang Q-C, Wang Z, Xuan W-X et al (2019) STAT3-induced long noncoding RNA LINC00668 promotes migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer via the miR-193a/KLF7 axis. Biomed Pharmacother 116:109023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu H, Liu K, Dong Z (2021) Targeting CDK12 for cancer therapy: function, mechanism, and drug discovery. Can Res 81(1):18–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Park C, Lee Y, Je S, Chang S, Kim N, Jeong E et al (2019) Overexpression and selective anticancer efficacy of ENO3 in STK11 mutant lung cancers. Mol Cells 42(11):804

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kettunen E, Hernandez-Vargas H, Cros MP, Durand G, Le Calvez-Kelm F, Stuopelyte K et al (2017) Asbestos-associated genome-wide DNA methylation changes in lung cancer. Int J Cancer 141(10):2014–2029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barros-Filho MC, de Mello JB, Marchi FA, Pinto CA, da Silva IC, Damasceno PK et al (2020) GADD45B transcript is a prognostic marker in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients treated with total thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy. Front Endocrinol 11:269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Andersson Å, Yang S-C, Huang M, Zhu L, Kar UK, Batra RK et al (2009) IL-7 promotes CXCR3 ligand-dependent T cell antitumor reactivity in lung cancer. J Immunol 182(11):6951–6958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Petersen DL, Berthelsen J, Willerslev-Olsen A, Fredholm S, Dabelsteen S, Bonefeld CM et al (2017) A novel BLK-induced tumor model. Tumor Biol 39(7):1010428317714196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu L, Zhang W, Qian J, Wu J, Jiang L, Ling C (2019) R-spondin family members as novel biomarkers and prognostic factors in lung cancer. Oncol Lett 18(4):4008–4015

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wiecek AJ, Cutty SJ, Kornai D, Parreno-Centeno M, Gourmet LE, Tagliazucchi GM, et al (2021) Genomic hallmarks of cellular dormancy in cancer and therapeutic implications. bioRxiv

  42. Chen L, Niu Y, Xiao M, Li X, Lin H (2020) LncRNA NEAT1 regulated cell proliferation, invasion, migration and apoptosis by targeting has-miR-376b-3p/SULF1 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 24(9):4810–4821

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dong Z, Zhong Z, Yang L, Wang S, Gong Z (2014) MicroRNA-31 inhibits cisplatin-induced apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating the drug transporter ABCB9. Cancer Lett 343(2):249–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wielscher M, Vierlinger K, Kegler U, Ziesche R, Gsur A, Weinhäusel A (2015) Diagnostic performance of plasma DNA methylation profiles in lung cancer, pulmonary fibrosis and COPD. EBioMedicine 2(8):929–936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosell R, Pifarré A, Monzó M, Astudillo J, López-Cabrerizo MP, Calvo R et al (1997) Reduced survival in patients with stage-I non-small-cell lung cancer associated with DNA-replication errors. Int J Cancer 74(3):330–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Furuta M, Sakakibara-Konishi J, Kikuchi H, Yokouchi H, Nishihara H, Minemura H et al (2019) Analysis of DLL3 and ASCL1 in surgically resected small cell lung cancer (HOT1702). Oncologist 24(11):e1172–e1179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li M-Y, Peng W-H, Wu C-H, Chang Y-M, Lin Y-L, Chang G-D et al (2019) PTPN3 suppresses lung cancer cell invasiveness by counteracting Src-mediated DAAM1 activation and actin polymerization. Oncogene 38(44):7002–7016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yao X, Ireland SK, Pham T, Temple B, Chen R, Raj MH et al (2014) TLE1 promotes EMT in A549 lung cancer cells through suppression of E-cadherin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 455(3–4):277–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hsu Y-L, Hung J-Y, Lee Y-L, Chen F-W, Chang K-F, Chang W-A et al (2017) Identification of novel gene expression signature in lung adenocarcinoma by using next-generation sequencing data and bioinformatics analysis. Oncotarget 8(62):104831

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Shang Z, Qian L, Liu S, Niu X, Qiao Z, Sun Y et al (2018) Graphene oxide-facilitated comprehensive analysis of cellular nucleic acid binding proteins for lung cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(21):17756–17770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Huang H, Wang J, Chen S, He H, Shang Y, Guo X et al (2021) SLC15A4 serves as a novel prognostic biomarker and target for lung adenocarcinoma. Front Genet 12:713

    Google Scholar 

  52. Du X, Wang T, Wang Z, Wu X, Gu Y, Huang Q et al (2020) 5-HT7 receptor contributes to proliferation, migration and invasion in NSCLC cells. Oncotargets 13:2139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lin M, Zhang L, Hildebrandt MA, Huang M, Wu X, Ye Y (2017) Common, germline genetic variations in the novel tumor suppressor BAP1 and risk of developing different types of cancer. Oncotarget 8(43):74936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Sheng K, Lu J, Zhao H (2018) ELK1-induced upregulation of lncRNA HOXA10-AS promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by increasing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 501(3):612–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang H, Yu Z, Huo S, Chen Z, Ou Z, Mai J et al (2018) Overexpression of ELF3 facilitates cell growth and metastasis through PI3K/Akt and ERK signaling pathways in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 94:98–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kidd M, Modlin IM, Drozdov I, Aslanian H, Bodei L, Matar S et al (2018) A liquid biopsy for bronchopulmonary/lung carcinoid diagnosis. Oncotarget 9(6):7182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gregory W, Birkhead B, Souhami R (1988) A mathematical model of drug resistance applied to treatment for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 6(3):457–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cohen AS, Khalil FK, Welsh EA, Schabath MB, Enkemann SA, Davis A et al (2017) Cell-surface marker discovery for lung cancer. Oncotarget 8(69):113373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Liang B, Shao Y, Long F, Jiang S-J (2016) Predicting diagnostic gene biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. BioMed Res Int 2016

  60. Liu F, Hu L, Ma Y, Huang B, Xiu Z, Zhang P et al (2018) Increased expression of monoamine oxidase A is associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition and clinicopathological features in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett 15(3):3245–3251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jeltsch KM, Hu D, Brenner S, Zöller J, Heinz GA, Nagel D et al (2014) Cleavage of roquin and regnase-1 by the paracaspase MALT1 releases their cooperatively repressed targets to promote TH 17 differentiation. Nat Immunol 15(11):1079–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhou J, Cheng T, Li X, Hu J, Li E, Ding M et al (2021) Epigenetic imprinting alterations as effective diagnostic biomarkers for early-stage lung cancer and small pulmonary nodules. Clin Epigenetics 13:220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Yi G-Z, Xiang W, Feng W-Y, Chen Z-Y, Li Y-M, Deng S-Z et al (2018) Identification of key candidate proteins and pathways associated with temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma based on subcellular proteomics and bioinformatical analysis. BioMed Res Int 2018:5238760

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Guo W, Li K, Sun B, Xu D, Tong L, Yin H et al (2021) Dysregulated glutamate transporter SLC1A1 propels cystine uptake via Xc—for glutathione synthesis in lung cancer. Can Res 81(3):552–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Bao L, Zhang Y, Wang J, Wang H, Dong N, Su X et al (2016) Variations of chromosome 2 gene expressions among patients with lung cancer or non-cancer. Cell Biol Toxicol 32(5):419–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Feng J, Zhang X, Zhu H, Wang X, Ni S, Huang J (2012) High expression of FoxP1 is associated with improved survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 138(2):230–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tan J-J, Long S-Z, Zhang T (2020) Effects of LncRNA UNC5B-AS1 on adhesion, invasion and migration of lung cancer cells and its mechanism. Chin J Appl Physiol 36(6):622–627

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zhong K, Chen K, Han L, Li B (2014) MicroRNA-30b/c inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation by targeting Rab18. BMC Cancer 14(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Liang M, Chen X, Wang L, Qin L, Wang H, Sun Z et al (2020) Cancer-derived exosomal TRIM59 regulates macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation to promote lung cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kawabata R, Nishiyama M (2015) 41P RNA-sequencing data analysis suggests that immunotherapy might be a potent treatment option in elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 26:ix8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Chen X, Chen S, Hang W, Huang H, Ma H (2014) MiR-95 induces proliferation and chemo-or radioresistance through directly targeting sorting nexin1 (SNX1) in non-small cell lung cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 68(5):589–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hu Z, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Chen B (2022) N6-methyladenosine-induced SVIL antisense RNA 1 restrains lung adenocarcinoma cell proliferation by destabilizing E2F1. Bioengineered 13(2):3093–3107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Saviozzi S, Ceppi P, Novello S, Ghio P, Iacono ML, Borasio P et al (2009) Non–small cell lung cancer exhibits transcript overexpression of genes associated with homologous recombination and DNA replication pathways. Can Res 69(8):3390–3396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Swarts DR, Henfling ME, van Neste L, van Suylen R-J, Dingemans A-MC, Dinjens WN et al (2013) CD44 and OTP are strong prognostic markers for pulmonary carcinoids. Clin Cancer Res 19(8):2197–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Li L, Schaid DJ, Fridley BL, Kalari KR, Jenkins GD, Abo RP et al (2012) Gemcitabine metabolic pathway genetic polymorphisms and response in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 22(2):105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Yuan J, Liu R, Ma Y, Zhang Z, Xie Z (2018) Curcumin attenuates airway inflammation and airway remolding by inhibiting NF-κB signaling and COX-2 in cigarette smoke-induced COPD Mice. Inflammation 41(5):1804–1814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhang M, Tang J, Li Y, Xie Y, Shan H, Chen M et al (2017) Curcumin attenuates skeletal muscle mitochondrial impairment in COPD rats: PGC-1α/SIRT3 pathway involved. Chem Biol Interact 277:168–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Funamoto M, Sunagawa Y, Katanasaka Y, Miyazaki Y, Imaizumi A, Kakeya H et al (2016) Highly absorptive curcumin reduces serum atherosclerotic low-density lipoprotein levels in patients with mild COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11:2029–2034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Shen Q, Jiang Y, Chen J, Wang X, Zheng J (2021) A novel curcumin-based drug powder inhalation medicine for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2021:8001787

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Moghaddam SJ, Barta P, Mirabolfathinejad SG, Ammar-Aouchiche Z, Garza NT, Vo TT et al (2009) Curcumin inhibits COPD-like airway inflammation and lung cancer progression in mice. Carcinogenesis 30(11):1949–1956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang M, Xie Y, Yan R, Shan H, Tang J, Cai Y et al (2016) Curcumin ameliorates alveolar epithelial injury in a rat model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Life Sci 164:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gan L, Li C, Wang J, Guo X (2016) Curcumin modulates the effect of histone modification on the expression of chemokines by type II alveolar epithelial cells in a rat COPD model. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11:2765–2773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Tang F, Ling C (2019) Curcumin ameliorates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by modulating autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress through regulation of SIRT1 in a rat model. J Int Med Res 47(10):4764–4774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Mirzaei M, Nazemi H (2022) In silico interactions between curcumin derivatives and monoamine oxidase-a enzyme. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 12:3752–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Audi SH, Dawson CA, Ahlf SB, Roerig DL (2001) Oxygen dependency of monoamine oxidase activity in the intact lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 281(4):L969–L981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bu XL, Cao GQ, Shen LL, Xiang Y, Jiao SS, Liu YH et al (2015) Serum amyloid-beta levels are increased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Neurotox Res 28(4):346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. van den Bosch T, Boichenko A, Leus NGJ, Ourailidou ME, Wapenaar H, Rotili D et al (2016) The histone acetyltransferase p300 inhibitor C646 reduces pro-inflammatory gene expression and inhibits histone deacetylases. Biochem Pharmacol 102:130–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Oike T, Komachi M, Ogiwara H, Amornwichet N, Saitoh Y, Torikai K et al (2014) C646, a selective small molecule inhibitor of histone acetyltransferase p300, radiosensitizes lung cancer cells by enhancing mitotic catastrophe. Radiother Oncol 111(2):222–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Koeberle A, Northoff H, Werz O (2009) Curcumin blocks prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis through direct inhibition of the microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase-1. Mol Cancer Ther 8(8):2348–2355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Gurusamy M, Nasseri S, Rampa DR, Feng H, Lee D, Pekcec A et al (2021) Inhibition of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 ameliorates acute lung injury in mice. J Transl Med 19(1):340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Gao W, Xiong Y, Li Q, Yang H (2017) Inhibition of toll-like receptor signaling as a promising therapy for inflammatory diseases: a journey from molecular to nano therapeutics. Front Physiol 8:508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Zhou H, Jiang M, Yuan H, Ni W, Tai G (2021) Dual roles of myeloid-derived suppressor cells induced by toll-like receptor signaling in cancer. Oncol Lett 21(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  93. Avitan I, Halperin Y, Saha T, Bloch N, Atrahimovich D, Polis B et al (2021) Towards a consensus on Alzheimer’s disease comorbidity? J Clin Med 10(19):4360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Fischer BM, Voynow JA, Ghio AJ (2015) COPD: balancing oxidants and antioxidants. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 10:261–276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Smith P, Soues S, Gottlieb T, Falk S, Watson J, Osborne R et al (1994) Etoposide-induced cell cycle delay and arrest-dependent modulation of DNA topoisomerase II in small-cell lung cancer cells. Br J Cancer 70(5):914–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Sakamoto H, Mashima T, Sato S, Hashimoto Y, Yamori T, Tsuruo T (2001) Selective activation of apoptosis program by Sp-bromobenzylglutathione cyclopentyl diester in glyoxalase I-overexpressing human lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 7(8):2513–2518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Yamada K, Asai K, Nagayasu F, Sato K, Ijiri N, Yoshii N et al (2016) Impaired nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 expression increases apoptosis of airway epithelial cells in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to cigarette smoking. BMC Pulm Med 16(1):27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Zeng Z, Wang Z-Y, Li Y-K, Ye D-M, Zeng J, Hu J-l et al (2020) Nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NF-E2)-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in non-small cell lung cancer. Life Sciences 254:117325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Balode L, Strazda G, Jurka N, Kopeika U, Kislina A, Bukovskis M et al (2012) Lipoxygenase-derived arachidonic acid metabolites in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medicina 48(6):43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Avis IM, Jett M, Boyle T, Vos MD, Moody T, Treston AM et al (1996) Growth control of lung cancer by interruption of 5-lipoxygenase-mediated growth factor signaling. J Clin Investig 97(3):806–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Kulkarni SK, Bhutani MK, Bishnoi M (2008) Antidepressant activity of curcumin: involvement of serotonin and dopamine system. Psychopharmacology 201(3):435–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Xia X, Cheng GS, Pan Y, Zhao X, Kong L-D (2007) Behavioral, neurochemical and neuroendocrine effects of the ethanolic extract from Curcuma longa L. in the mouse forced swimming test. J Ethnopharmacol 110(2):356–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Kulkarni SK, Dhir A, Akula KK (2009) Potentials of curcumin as an antidepressant. Sci World J 9:1233–1241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Nadjafi S, Hosseini N, Farhadi M, Khojasteh F (2019) Interaction of curcumin with one subunit of monoamine oxidase-B in comparison with safinamide: an in silico study. Thrita 8(1):e90380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Yohn SE, Gorka D, Mistry A, Collins SL, Qian E, Correa M et al (2017) Oral ingestion and intraventricular injection of curcumin attenuates the effort-related effects of the VMAT-2 inhibitor tetrabenazine: implications for motivational symptoms of depression. J Nat Prod 80(10):2839–2844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Schneider C, Gordon ON, Edwards RA, Luis PB (2015) Degradation of curcumin: from mechanism to biological implications. J Agric Food Chem 63(35):7606–7614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Tang F, Ling C (2019) Curcumin ameliorates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by modulating autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress through regulation of SIRT1 in a rat model. J Int Med Res 47(10):4764–4774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Li L-Y, Zhang C, Zhu F, Zheng G, Liu Y-F, Liu K et al (2022) Potential natural small molecular compounds for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an overview. Front Pharmacol 13:821941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. DiSilvestro RA, Joseph E, Zhao S, Bomser JA (2012) Diverse effects of a low dose supplement of lipidated curcumin in healthy middle aged people. Nutr J 11:79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Ren B, Luo S, Tian X, Jiang Z, Zou G, Xu F et al (2018) Curcumin inhibits liver cancer by inhibiting DAMP molecule HSP70 and TLR4 signaling. Oncol Rep 40(2):895–901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Hu S, Xu Y, Li M, Huang L, Sun H (2018) Curcumin inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Exp Ther Med 16(2):1266–1272

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Morimoto T, Sunagawa Y, Kawamura T, Takaya T, Wada H, Nagasawa A et al (2008) The dietary compound curcumin inhibits P300 histone acetyltransferase activity and prevents heart failure in rats. J Clin Investig 118(3):868–878

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Wei J, Mitrani J, Pessanha M, Slepak TI, Webster KA, Bishopric NH (2008) Quantitative control of adaptive cardiac hypertrophy by acetyltransferase P300. Circulation 118(9):934–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Yanazume T, Hasegawa K, Morimoto T, Kawamura T, Wada H, Matsumori A et al (2003) Cardiac P300 is involved in myocyte growth with decompensated heart failure. Mol Cell Biol 23(10):3593–3606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Morimoto T, Sunagawa Y, Fujita M, Hasegawa K (2010) Novel heart failure therapy targeting transcriptional pathway in cardiomyocytes by a natural compound. Curcumin Circ J 74(6):1059–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sunagawa Y, Hasegawa K, Morimoto T (2013) Application of curcumin to heart failure therapy by targeting transcriptional pathway in cardiomyocytes. Biol Pharm Bull 36(1):13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Boyanapalli SS, Kong ANT (2015) Curcumin, the king of spices: epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in the prevention of cancer, neurological, and inflammatory diseases. Curr Pharmacol Rep 1(2):129–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Zhu X, Li Q, Chang R, Yang D, Song Z, Guo Q et al (2014) Curcumin alleviates neuropathic pain by inhibiting P300/CBP histone acetyltransferase activity-regulated expression of BDNF and Cox-2 in a rat model. PLOS ONE 9(3):e91303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Yang L, Chen X, Bi Z, Liu J, Zhao W, Huang W (2021) Curcumin attenuates renal ischemia reperfusion injury via JNK pathway with the involvement of P300/CBP-mediated histone acetylation. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 25(5):413–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Moon Y, Glasgow WC, Eling TE (2005) Curcumin suppresses interleukin 1β-mediated microsomal prostaglandin E Synthase 1 by altering early growth response gene 1 and other signaling pathways. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 15(2):788–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Li N, Liu T, Yu J-Z, Li C, Yang L, Wu Y et al (2019) Curcumin and curcumol inhibit NF-κB and TGF-β1/Smads signaling pathways in CSE-treated RAW246.7 cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019:3035125

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Hansbro PM, Haw TJ, Starkey MR, Miyake K (2017) Toll-like receptors in COPD. Eur Respir J 49(5):1700739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Zuo L, Lucas K, Fortuna CA, Chuang CC, Best TM (2015) Molecular regulation of toll-like receptors in asthma and COPD. Front Physiol 6:312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Shimizu K, Funamoto M, Sunagawa Y, Shimizu S, Miyazaki Y, Wada H et al (2019) Anti-inflammatory action of curcumin and its use in the treatment of lifestyle-related diseases. Eur Cardiol Rev 14(2):117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Karlstetter M, Lippe E, Walczak Y, Moehle C, Aslanidis A, Mirza M et al (2011) Curcumin is a potent modulator of microglial gene expression and migration. J Neuroinflam 8:125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Zhang S, Zou J, Li P, Zheng X, Feng D (2018) Curcumin protects against atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein e-knockout mice by inhibiting toll-like receptor 4 expression. J Agric Food Chem 66(2):449–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Stefano AD, Ricciardolo FLM, Caramori G, Adcock IM, Chung KF, Barnes PJ et al (2017) Bronchial inflammation and bacterial load in stable COPD is associated with TLR4 overexpression. Eur Respir J 49(5):1602006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Simpson JL, Baines KJ, Horvat JC, Essilfie A-T, Brown AC, Tooze M et al (2016) COPD is characterized by increased detection of Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and a deficiency of Bacillus species. Respirology 21(4):697–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Lin L, Li J, Song Q, Cheng W, Chen Y (2022) The role of HMGB1/RAGE/TLR4 signaling pathways in cigarette smoke-induced inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Immun Inflamm Dis 10(11):e711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Zavala M, Becker GL, Blount RJ (2023) Interrelationships between tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 29(2):104–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Pillai S, Ge D, Zhu G, Kong X, Shianna KV, Need AC et al (2009) A genome-wide association study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): identification of two major susceptibility loci. PLoS Genet 5(3):e1000421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Shi J, Li H, Yuan C, Luo M, Wei J, Liu X (2018) Cigarette smoke-induced acquired dysfunction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018:6567578

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Silverman EK (2020) Genetics of COPD. Annu Rev Physiol 82:413–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Li W, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Rong Z, Liu C, Miao H et al (2021) Candidate gene prioritization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using expression information in protein–protein interaction networks. BMC Pulm Med 21(1):280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Meng H, Long Q, Wang R, Zhou X, Su H, Wang T et al (2022) Identification of the key immune-related genes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on immune infiltration analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 17:13–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Chen ZH, Kim HP, Ryter SW, Choi AM (2008) Identifying targets for COPD treatment through gene expression analyses. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 3(3):359–370

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Brandsma CA, Berge M, Hackett T-L, Brusselle G, Timens W (2019) Recent advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathogenesis: from disease mechanisms to precision medicine. J Pathol 250(5):624–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Hardin M, Cho M, McDonald M-L, Beaty TH, Ramsdell J, Bhatt SP et al (2014) The clinical and genetic features of COPD-asthma overlap syndrome. Eur Respir J 44(2):341–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Shukla R, Kant S, Bhattacharya S, Mittal B (2011) Association of genetic polymorphism of GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTM3in COPD patients in a North Indian population. COPD: J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 8(3):167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Mostovoy Y, Dmytriiev K, Slepchenko N (2021) Features of the COPD course in patients with different alleles of C79G (Rs1072714) of ADRB2 gene. Biomed Biosoc Anthropol 42:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Korytina GF, Akhmadishina LZ, Yanbaeva DG, Viktorova TV (2008) Polymorphism in promoter regions of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, MMP9, and MMP12) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Russ J Genet 44(2):202–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Yin H, Guo Q, Li X, Tang T, Li C, Wang H et al (2018) Curcumin suppresses IL-1β secretion and prevents inflammation through inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome. J Immunol 200(8):2835–2846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Kim J, Oh JS, Choi H, Kim SW, Kim SW, Kim BG et al (2020) Activation of the Nrf2/Ho-1 pathway by curcumin inhibits oxidative stress in human nasal fibroblasts exposed to urban particulate matter. BMC Complement Med Ther 20(1):101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Funamoto M, Sunagawa Y, Katanasaka Y, Miyazaki Y, Imaizumi A, Kakeya H et al (2016) Highly absorptive curcumin reduces serum atherosclerotic low-density lipoprotein levels in patients with mild COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11:2029–2034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Research Office of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and acknowledge the School of Pharmacy and Biotechnology Research Center for providing support under thesis No. 4282 and Grant No. 66615.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SA, YJ and BS conceived the study. SA, SD, and BS designed the experiment and developed the methodology. EA and MM performed in silico experiments. EA, SA, BS, SD and YJ analyzed data. All authors contributed to experimental design and data analysis. All authors wrote the manuscript. BS and YJ reviewed and supervised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Babak Sokouti or Yousef Javadzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

As this study is solely based on computational and publicly available microarray dataset, i.e., GSE10896, so the article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by authors in this research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maboudian, M., Amjad, E., Asnaashari, S. et al. Evaluation of the effects of curcumin on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a bio-computational approach. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 25, 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00486-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00486-6

Keywords