Abstract
Penile pearls are artificial implants placed beneath the skin of a penis to provide enhanced sexual experience for the partner or present a stigma of a particular social subgroup (e.g., prisoner, member of a gang). This genital modification is usually encountered in men of low socioeconomic status and prisoners who might (self) implant improvised pearls under poor sanitary conditions. We have only recently started to encounter penile pearls on autopsy, incidentally. The aim of this study was to analyze our autopsy cases with penile pearls to assess the characteristics of these subjects regarding their socioeconomic status, history of imprisonment, substance abuse, as well as the characteristics of implants. Nineteen men were included. Most were born in the 1970s and 1980s, with only elementary/vocational school education (n = 10). Only five men graduated from high school. At least 14 were in prison at some point in life and 13 were unemployed. Ten men were unmarried. In 11 men, regular alcohol consumption was reported. 12 used illicit substances, most with a history of heroin injection. Penile pearls were improvised and made of rigid plastic in 10 men, eight were of soft silicone-like material, and one was of metal. A distinct characteristic was a ribbed contour of some implants. Although this genital modification seems to gain more attention outside of described vulnerable groups, it mostly remains limited to them in our region. It is most likely performed in improvised, non-professional, unsanitary conditions, probably in prisons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data available on request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Brown, D. E., Donald, E., Edwards, J. W., & Moore, R. P. (1988). The penis inserts of Southeast Asia: An annotated bibliography with an overview and comparative perspectives. Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.
Fischer, N., Hauser, S., Brede, O., Fisang, C., & Müller, S. (2010). Implantation of artificial penile nodules—A review of literature. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(11), 3565–3571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01659.x
Flynn, R. M., & Jain, S. (2014). A domino effect? The spread of implantation of penile foreign bodies in the prison system. Urology Case Reports, 2(2), 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2014.01.006
Furr, J., Hebert, K., Wisenbaugh, E., & Gelman, J. (2018). Complications of genital enlargement surgery. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15(12), 1811–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.10.007
Kadouch, J. A., van Rozelaar, L., Kanhai, R. J. C., Sawor, J. H., & Karim, R. B. (2012). Complications of penis or scrotum enlargement due to injections with permanent filling substances. Dermatologic Surgery, 38(7), 1244–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02479.x
Kelly, A., Kupul, M., Nake Trumb, R., Aeno, H., Neo, J., Fitzgerald, L., Hill, P. S., Kaldor, J. M., Siba, P., & Vallely, A. (2012). More than just a cut: A qualitative study of penile practices and their relationship to masculinity, sexuality and contagion and their implications for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-12-10
Lu, Y., Sanusi, T., Li, Q., & Huang, C. (2016). Complications from penile bead implantation: Three cases from China [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 789–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10508-016-0722-6
Marzouk, E. (1990). Implantation of beads into the penile skin and its complications. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 24(3), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599009180852
Murty, O. P. (2008). Male genital ornaments: penis pearls. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 15(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2007.01.005
Nguyen, D. P., Desai, B. K., & Falgiani, M. (2011). Visual diagnosis: Pearling: A case study. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 4(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-74
Rothschild, M. A., Ehrlich, E., Klevno, W. A., & Schneider, V. (1997). Self-implanted subcutaneous penile balls—a new phenomenon in Western Europe. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 110(2), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140050037
Rowanchilde, R. (1996). Male genital modification. Human Nature, 7(2), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692110
Tsunenari, S., Idaka, T., Kanda, M., & Koga, Y. (1981). Self-mutilation: Plastic spherules in penile skin in Yakuza, Japan’s racketeers. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 2(3), 203–208.
Wright, J. D. (2015). Penile implants. In P. Whelehan & A. Bolin (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of human sexuality (pp. 861–1042). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs340
Yap, L., Butler, T., Richters, J., Malacova, E., Wand, H., Smith, A. M. A., Grant, L., Richards, A., & Donovan, B. (2013). Penile implants among prisoners—a cause for concern? PLoS ONE, 8(1), e53065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053065
Živković, V., & Nikolić, S. (2014). Penile pearls: A Westward traveling phenomenon. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 10(1), 130–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-013-9490-y
Funding
This work was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, IDEAS Program, [Grant No. 7749444] (BoFraM project) and by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 200110).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors hereby declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
This study was the result of a routine forensic autopsy and did not compromise any procedure; therefore, obtaining formal consent was not necessary.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Leković, A., Živković, V. & Nikolić, S. Penile Pearls and Pearling: Characteristics and Social Identity from the Perspective of Forensic Pathologists. Arch Sex Behav 53, 1395–1401 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02791-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02791-4