Abstract
Background
Previously, we reported SMR (skeletal muscle radiodensity) as a potential prognostic marker for colorectal cancer. However, there have been limited studies on the association between SMR and the continuation of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 143 colorectal cancer patients underwent curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy using the CAPOX regimen. Patients' SMRs were measured from preoperative CT images and divided into low (bottom quarter) and high (top three quarters) SMR groups. We compared chemotherapy cycles, capecitabine and oxaliplatin doses, and adverse effects in each group.
Results
The low SMR group had significantly fewer patients completing adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the high SMR group (44% vs. 68%, P < 0.01). Capecitabine and oxaliplatin doses were also lower in the low SMR group. Incidences of Grade 2 or Grade 3 adverse effects did not differ between groups, but treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects was significantly higher in the low SMR group. Logistic regression analysis revealed Stage III disease (odds ratio 18.09, 95% CI 1.41–231.55) and low SMR (odds ratio 3.26, 95% CI 1.11–9.56) as factors associated with unsuccessful treatment completion. Additionally, a higher proportion of low SMR patients received fewer than 2 cycles of chemotherapy (50% vs. 12%).
Conclusion
The low SMR group showed higher treatment incompletion rates and received lower drug doses during adjuvant chemotherapy. Low SMR independently contributed to treatment non-completion in colorectal cancer patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aro R, Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck E, Ämmälä N et al (2020) The impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis on postoperative outcomes and 5-year survival in curatively operated colorectal cancer patients - A retrospective register study. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.206
Choi MH, Oh SN, Lee IK et al (2018) Sarcopenia is negatively associated with long-term outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 9:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12234
Dolan DR, Knight KA, Maguire S et al (2019) The relationship between sarcopenia and survival at 1 year in patients having elective colorectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 23:877–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02072-0
Malietzis G, Currie AC, Athanasiou T et al (2016) Influence of body composition profile on outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 103:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10075
Martin L, Birdsell L, MacDonald N et al (2013) Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: Skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol 31:1539–1547. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2722
Miyamoto Y, Baba Y, Sakamoto Y et al (2015) Sarcopenia is a negative prognostic factor after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2663–2668. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4281-6
Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ et al (2008) Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 9:629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0
Shirdel M, Andersson F, Myte R et al (2020) Body composition measured by computed tomography is associated with colorectal cancer survival, also in early-stage disease. Acta Oncol 59(7):799–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1744716
Tokunaga R, Nakagawa S, Miyamoto Y et al (2020) The clinical impact of preoperative body composition differs between male and female colorectal cancer patients. Color Dis 22:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14793
Wang S, Xie H, Gong Y et al (2020) The value of L3 skeletal muscle index in evaluating preoperative nutritional risk and long-term prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Sci Rep 10:8153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65091-0
Yokoi K, Tanaka T, Kojo K et al (2022) Skeletal muscle changes assessed by preoperative computed tomography images can predict the long-term prognosis of stage III colorectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 6:386–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12532
André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2343–2351. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032709
André T, Boni C, Navarro M et al (2009) Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol 27:3109–3116. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6771
Kuebler JP, Wieand HS, O’Connell MJ et al (2007) Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: results from NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol 25:2198–2204. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2974
Grothey A, Sobrero AF, Shields AF et al (2018) Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 378:1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1713709
Cespedes Feliciano EM, Lee VS, Prado CM et al (2017) Muscle mass at the time of diagnosis of nonmetastatic colon cancer and early discontinuation of chemotherapy, delays, and dose reductions on adjuvant FOLFOX: The C-SCANS study. Cancer 123:4868–4877. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30950
Jung HW, Kim JW, Kim JY et al (2015) Effect of muscle mass on toxicity and survival in patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 23:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2418-6
Yoshino T, Yamanaka T, Oki E et al (2019) Efficacy and long-term peripheral sensory neuropathy of 3 vs 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: the ACHIEVE phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5:1574–1581. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2572
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2018) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma, 9th edn. Kanehara, Tokyo
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
van Dijk DPJ, Bakens MJAM, Coolsen MME et al (2017) Low skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and visceral adiposity are associated with overall survival and surgical site infections in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 8:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12155
Kroenke CH, Prado CM, Meyerhardt JA et al (2018) Muscle radiodensity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer 124:3008–3015. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31405
Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A et al (2018) Clinical impact of muscle quantity and quality in colorectal cancer patients: a propensity score matching analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 42:1322–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1171
Larson-Meyer DE, Smith SR, Heilbronn LK, Kelley DE, Ravussin E, Newcomer BR, Look AHEAD Adipose Research Group (2006) Muscle-associated triglyceride measured by computed tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.10
van Wijk L, van Duinhoven S, Liem MSL et al (2021) Risk factors for surgery-related muscle quantity and muscle quality loss and their impact on outcome. Eur J Med Res 26:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00507-9
Gau RY, Tsai HI, Yu MC et al (2022) Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with less significant muscle loss than the conventional open approach. World J Surg Oncol 20:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02854-1
Abdiev S, Kodera Y, Fujiwara M et al (2011) Nutritional recovery after open and laparoscopic gastrectomies. Gastric Cancer 14:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0021-9
Funding
This study was conducted through the use of internal funds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Yokoi, Dr. Watanabe, Dr. Yokota, Dr. Kojima, Dr. Tanaka, Dr. Kojo, Dr. Miura, Dr. Yamanashi, and Dr. Yamashita have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Naioth receives research grant from Medtronic, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Dr. Naitoh also receives honoraria from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Olympus. Dr. Hiki receives research grant from Abbot Japan, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan, Johnson & Johnson, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Covidien Japan, Shionogi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Tsumura, Terumo Corporation, Hogy Medical, Miyarisan Pharmaceutical, and Yakult. Dr. Hiki also receives honoraria from AstraZeneca, Abbot Japan, EA Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Olympus Medical Science Sales Corporation, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Covidien Japan, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Tsumura, Terumo Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Biofermin Pharmaceutical, Fuji Pharma, Mitsubishi Research Institute, Miyarisan Pharmaceutical, and Yakult. Dr. Sato receives research grant from Taiho Pharmaceutical and Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Sato also receives consulting fee from Takeda Pharmaceutical and Kaken Pharmaceutical. Dr. Sato also receives honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bayer, and Yakult. Dr. Kumamoto receives grant from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly Japan, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Terumo Corporation, Daiichi Sankyo Company, and Yakult. Dr. Kumamoto receives honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Viatris Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kaken Pharmaceutical, and Johnson & Johnson.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yokoi, K., Watanabe, A., Yokota, K. et al. Low skeletal muscle radiodensity is a risk factor for adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation in colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 29, 276–285 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02463-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02463-2