Skip to main content
Log in

LGBTQ + Grassroots Activists’ Perspectives on Banning Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Change Efforts

  • Published:
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts (SOGICE) remains a threat to LGBTQ + young people throughout many parts of the USA, increasing risks for many mental health problems, including suicidal behaviors. Little research, though, has examined the strategies activists use to ban licensed professionals (e.g., social workers) from practicing SOGICE. The present study, therefore, involved semi-structured interviews with 15 LGBTQ + individuals affiliated with a grassroots organization focused on banning SOGICE in one Southern state in the USA. Thematic analysis generated six themes: knowledge is power, empathy and communication, utilizing media platforms, professional development, awareness of diversity, and growth areas. Findings suggest LGBTQ + grassroots activism organizations should focus on educating members and volunteers about SOGICE, history, and the legislative process, strengthen empathy-related skills, amplify their voices through media platforms, provide opportunities for job skill development, and foster inclusive environments. Social workers can use these findings to strengthen activism-related skills among LGBTQ + individuals interested in becoming activists to ban SOGICE in Southern states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. However, participant data are not available to protect the confidentiality of the participants.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the respondents for their willingness to contribute to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Travis R. Scheadler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The procedures performed in the present study involved human participants and were in accordance with ethical standards set by the authors’ institutions and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its amendments.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent to be involved in the present study.

Conflict of Interest

The first author previously volunteered with the organization participants were drawn from whereas the third author used to be the Executive Director. The authors have no other conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheadler, T.R., Haus, K.R., Mobley, T.A. et al. LGBTQ + Grassroots Activists’ Perspectives on Banning Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Change Efforts. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-023-00283-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-023-00283-y

Keywords

Navigation