Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of hydrodynamics load on the heave and pitch coupling oscillations of a plate

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heave plate is one of the most commonly used plates for controlling the movement of floating structures that are used for offshore deep water operations. Heave plates, in fact, move in both directions simultaneously. Therefore, the primary goal of this work is to examine the coupling motion’s effects on hydrodynamic coefficients caused by the heave and pitch motion of a heave plate. Numerical simulations are used to first simulate coupling motion in phase, and then out of phase which varies from \(0^\circ\) to \(90^\circ\). The effects of added mass and moment, as well as pitching and heaving damping are investigated. Based on the results of the coupling oscillation of the heaving plate at different Keulegan–Carpenter (KC), the results indicate that added mass and pitching damping have more influence than added moment and heave damping coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available on request from the correspounding author.

Abbreviations

\(A\) :

Amplitude

\({A}_{33}\) :

Added mass of heave oscillation

\({A}_{33}^{*}\) :

Non-dimensional added mass

\({A}_{55}\) :

Added moment of inertia

\({A}_{55}^{*}\) :

Non-dimensional added moment of inertia

\({B}_{33}\) :

Damping coefficient of heave oscillation

\({B}_{33}^{*}\) :

Non-dimensional damping coefficient

\({B}_{55}\) :

Damping coefficient of pitch oscillation

\({B}_{55}^{*}\) :

Non-dimensional damping coefficient

\({C}_{33}\) :

Restoring coefficient

\({D}_{d}\) :

Plate diameter

\({F}_{3}\) :

Exciting force

\({F}_{5}\) :

Exciting moment

\({M}_{3}^{*}\) :

Solid mass of plate

\({M}_{5}^{*}\) :

Solid moment of inertia

\(f\) :

Frequency

\({\tau }_{\rm w}\) :

Wall shear stress

\({C}_{\rm f}\) :

Friction coefficient

\(r\) :

Refinement ratio

\(\beta\) :

Frequency parameter

\(\varepsilon\) :

Phase lag

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity

\(\vartheta\) :

Kinematic viscosity

\(\omega\) :

Circular frequency

\(\theta\) :

Rotational motion

\({\theta }_{\rm max}\) :

Amplitude of rotational oscillation

\(\rho\) :

Density

2DOF:

Two degrees of freedom

CM:

Coarse mesh

FM:

Fine mesh

F s :

Factor of safety

FVM:

Finite volume method

KC:

Keulegan–Carpenter

MM:

Medium mesh

P :

Order of accuracy

Re:

Reynolds number

References

  1. Keulegan GH (1958) Twelfth progress report on model laws for density currents: the motion of saline fronts in still water, vol 5831. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards

  2. Sarpkaya T, Isaacson M, Wehausen J (1982) Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures

  3. An S, Faltinsen OM (2013) An experimental and numerical study of heave added mass and damping of horizontally submerged and perforated rectangular plates. J Fluids Struct 39:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He H, Troesch AW, Perlin M (2008) Hydrodynamics of damping plates at small KC numbers. In: IUTAM symposium on fluid-structure interaction in ocean engineering

  5. Li J, Liu S, Zhao M, Teng B (2013) Experimental investigation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of heave plates using forced oscillation. Ocean Eng 66:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Molin B (2001) On the added mass and damping of periodic arrays of fully or partially porous disks. J Fluids Struct 15(2):275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molin B, Nielsen F (2004) Heave added mass and damping of a perforated disk below the free surface. In: Proceedings of the 19th international workshop on water waves and floating bodies, Cortona, Italy

  8. Molin B, Remy F, Rippol T (2007) Experimental study of the heave added mass and damping of solid and perforated disks close to the free surface. In: Proc. IMAM conf

  9. Shen W-J, Tang Y-G, Liu L-Q (2012) Research on the hydrodynamic characteristics of heave plate structure with different form edges of a spar platform. China Ocean Eng 26(1):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tao L, Cheng L, Thiagarajan K (1999) Numerical estimation of hydrodynamic heave damping of a vertical cylinder with appendages. In: The proceedings of the international offshore and polar engineering conference

  11. Tao L, Dray D (2008) Hydrodynamic performance of solid and porous heave plates. Ocean Eng 35(10):1006–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vu KH, Chenu B, Thiagarajan KP (2004) Hydrodynamic damping due to porous plates. In: Proceedings of the WSEAS international conference on fluid mechanics, Corfu

  13. Wadhwa H, Krishnamoorthy B, Thiagarajan KP (2010) Variation of heave added mass and damping near seabed. In: International conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering

  14. Yang J, Tian X, Li X (2014) Hydrodynamic characteristics of an oscillating circular disk under steady in-plane current conditions. Ocean Eng 75:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nallayarasu S, Mathai TP (2016) Effect of Mathieu instability on motion response of Spar hull with heave damping plate. Ships Offshore Struct 11(8):833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Srinivasan N, Chakrabarti S, Radha R (2005) Damping-controlled response of a truss-pontoon semi-submersible with heave-plates. In: International conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering

  17. Zhu L, Lim H-C (2017) Hydrodynamic characteristics of a separated heave plate mounted at a vertical circular cylinder. Ocean Eng 131:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abazari A, Behzad M, Thiagarajan KP (2022) Experimental assessment of hydrodynamic coefficients for a heave plate executing pitch oscillations. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 148(1):04021038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abazari A, Behzad M, Thiagarajan KP (2020) Hydrodynamic performance of multiple co-axial heave plates with different diameters. Ships Offshore Struct 15(4):380–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Philip NT, Nallayarasu S, Bhattacharyya S (2019) Experimental investigation and CFD simulation of heave damping effects due to circular plates attached to spar hull. Ships Offshore Struct 14(4):396–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malavasi S, Messa GV, Fratino U, Pagano A (2015) On cavitation occurrence in perforated plates. Flow Meas Instrum 41:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tian X, Tao L, Li X, Yang J (2017) Hydrodynamic coefficients of oscillating flat plates at \(0.15\leqslant KC\leqslant 3.15\). J Mar Sci Technol 22:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ezoji M, Shabakhty N, Tao L (2022) Hydrodynamic damping of solid and perforated heave plates oscillating at low KC number based on experimental data: a review. Ocean Eng 253:111247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garrido-Mendoza CA, Thiagarajan KP, Souto-Iglesias A, Colagrossi A, Bouscasse B (2015) Computation of flow features and hydrodynamic coefficients around heave plates oscillating near a seabed. J Fluids Struct 59:406–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tao L, Thiagarajan K (2003) Low KC flow regimes of oscillating sharp edges I. Vortex shedding observation. Appl Ocean Res 25(1):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abazari A, Alvandi M, Behzad M, Thiagarajan KP (2021) Vortex shedding modes around oscillating non-uniform double heave plates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ 235(2):558–569

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hegde P, Nallayarasu S (2023) Investigation of heave damping characteristics of buoy form spar with heave plate near the free surface using CFD validated by experiments. Ships and Offshore Structures 18(12):1650–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao MJ, Nallayarasu S, Bhattacharyya S (2021) CFD approach to heave damping of spar with heave plates with experimental validation. Appl Ocean Res 108:102517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Journee JM (2001) Discrepancies in hydrodynamic coefficents of Wigley hull forms. In: MARIND'2001, Varna

  30. Garrido-Mendoza CA, Souto-Iglesias A, Thiagarajan K (2013) Numerical simulation of hydrodynamics of a circular disk oscillating near a seabed. In: International conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering

  31. Schlichting H, Kestin J (1961) Boundary layer theory, vol 121. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  32. ITTC (2017) Uncertainty analysis in CFD verification and validation methodology and procedures. In: ITTC-recommended procedures and guidelines, pp 1–13

  33. Roache PJ (1997) Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29(1):123–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajad Hajizadeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tahmasebi Boldaji, E., Hajizadeh, S. & Farrokhi Derakhshandeh, J. The effects of hydrodynamics load on the heave and pitch coupling oscillations of a plate. J Mar Sci Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00983-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00983-0

Keywords

Navigation