Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting the cryptocurrency market using social media metrics and search trends during COVID-19

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bitcoin is one of the most well-known cryptocurrencies worldwide. Recently, as the COVID-19 pandemic raged globally, a new wave of price volatility and interest in Bitcoin was witnessed. Identifying the roles played by different information sources in the emergence and diffusion of content through Internet resources can reveal the influential factors affecting cryptocurrencies’ value. This study aims to reveal the forces behind cryptocurrencies’ monetary value—the market price movements on major exchanges before, during, and post the March 2020, COVID-19 market crash. The daily prices of the two largest cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and Ether, were obtained from CoinDesk. By integrating Google Trends data, we found that Google searches increase when the number of tweets on COVID-19 soars, with a one-period lag (one day). Furthermore, search trends have a significant impact on cryptocurrencies’ future returns such that increased (decreased) searches for a negative event indicate lower (higher) future cryptocurrency prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali, M., Alam, N., & Rizvi, S. A. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19)—An epidemic or pandemic for financial markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora, V. S., McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Google Trends: Opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research. Health Policy, 123, 338–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashraf, B. N. (2020). Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BajaJ, S., & Dua, V. (2014). Investigation of causal relationship between stock prices and trading volume using Toda and Yamamoto procedure. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 7(14), 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bomfim, A. N. (2003). Pre-announcement effects, news effects, and volatility: Monetary policy and the stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(1), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boone, T., Ganeshan, R., Hicks, R. L., & Sanders, N. R. (2018). Can Google Trends improve your sales forecast? Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1770–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouteska, A., Mefteh-Wali, S., & Dang, T. (2022). Predictive power of investor sentiment for Bitcoin returns: Evidence from COVID-19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 184, 121999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulut, L. (2017). Google Trends and the forecasting performance of exchange rate models. Journal of Forecasting, 37, 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrière-Swallow, Y., & Labbé, F. (2013). Nowcasting with Google Trends in an emerging market. Journal of Forecasting, 32, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, C., Liu, L., & Zhao, N. (2020). Fear sentiment, uncertainty, and bitcoin price dynamics: The case of COVID-19. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2298–2309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, B., & Pearl, J. (2013). Regression and causation: A critical examination of six econometrics textbooks. Real-World Economics Review, 65, 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, L., Shi, J., Guo, Y., Wang, P., & Li, Y. (2019). Agenda-setting on traditional vs social media: An analysis of haze-related content grounded in the extended parallel process model. Internet Research, 29(4), 688–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho, S., Sohn, C. H., Jo, M. W., Shin, S. Y., Lee, J. H., Ryoo, S. M., Kim, W. Y., & Seo, D. W. (2013). Correlation between national influenza surveillance data and Google trends in South Korea. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e81422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with Google Trends. Economic Record, 88, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Conlon, T., & McGee, R. (2020). Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the Covid-19 bear market. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coin ATM Radar. (2021) Bitcoin ATM map. Retrieved from https://coinatmradar.com/

  19. Corbet, S., Hou, Y., Hu, Y., Larkin, C., & Oxley, L. (2020). Any port in a storm: Cryptocurrency safe-havens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Economics Letters, 194, 109377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019). Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62, 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. De, P. K., & Sun, R. (2023). Impacts of COVID-19 on mental health in the US: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of Mental Health, 32(5), 910–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delfabbro, P., King, D. L., & Williams, J. (2021). The psychology of cryptocurrency trading: Risk and protective factors. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(2), 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Demirel, A. (2020). An examination of a campaign hashtag (#OptOutside) with Google Trends and Twitter. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1840460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dinis, G., Breda, Z., Costa, C., & Pacheco, O. (2019). Google Trends in tourism and hospitality research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(4), 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ding, D., Guan, C., Chan, C. M., & Liu, W. (2020). Building stock market resilience through digital transformation: Using Google trends to analyze the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14(21), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Elsayed, A. H., Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. M. (2022). Risk transmissions between bitcoin and traditional financial assets during the COVID-19 era: The role of global uncertainties. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guan, C., Liu, W., & Cheng, J. Y. C. (2022). Using social media to predict the stock market crash and rebound amid the pandemic: The digital ‘haves’ and ‘have-mores.’ Annals of Data Science, 9(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodell, J. W., & Goutte, S. (2021). Co-movement of COVID-19 and Bitcoin: Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guégan, D., & Renault, T. (2021). Does investor sentiment on social media provide robust information for Bitcoin returns predictability? Finance Research Letters, 38, 101494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo, X., Lu, F., & Wei, Y. (2021). Capture the contagion network of bitcoin – Evidence from pre and mid COVID-19. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo, L., Mays, K., Zhang, Y., Wijaya, D., & Betke, M. (2021). What makes gun violence a (less) prominent issue? A computational analysis of compelling arguments and selective agenda setting. Mass Communication and Society, 24(5), 651–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall, D. M. (2020). Customer and employee social media comments/feedback and stock purchasing decisions enhanced by sentiment analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University.

  33. Harding LaToya. (2020). Bitcoin hits $500bn market cap for the first time in history. Retrieved from https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-cryptocurrency-hits-500bn-market-cap-first-time-in-history-121325677.html

  34. Haroon, O., & Rizvi, S. A. (2020). COVID-19: Media coverage and financial markets behavior—A sectoral inquiry. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. He, Z., & Maekawa, K. (2001). On spurious Granger causality. Economics Letters, 73(3), 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu, H., Tang, L., Zhang, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Predicting the direction of stock markets using optimized neural networks with Google Trends. Neurocomputing, 285, 188–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang, M. Y., Rojas, R. R., & Convery, P. D. (2020). Forecasting stock market movements using Google Trend searches. Empirical Economics, 59, 2821–2839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang, Y., Duan, K., & Mishra, T. (2021). Is Bitcoin really more than a diversifier? A pre- and post-COVID-19 analysis. Finance Research Letters, 43, 102016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsu, N. J., Hung, H. L., & Chang, Y. M. (2008). Subset selection for vector autoregressive processes using Lasso. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(7), 3645–3657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Husnayain, A., Fuad, A., & Lazuardi, L. (2019). Correlation between Google Trends on dengue fever and national surveillance report in Indonesia. Global Health Action, 12(1), 1552652. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1552652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kang, M., Zhong, H., He, J., Rutherford, S., & Yang, F. (2013). Using Google Trends for influenza surveillance in South China. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Karalevicius, V., Degrande, N., & De Weerdt, J. (2018). Using sentiment analysis to predict interday Bitcoin price movements. The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(1), 56–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Katsiampa, P., Yarovaya, L., & Zieba, D. (2022). High-frequency connectedness between Bitcoin and other top-traded crypto assets during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 79, 101578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Khan, D., Ullah, A., Alim, W., & ul Haq, I. (2022). Does terrorism affect the stock market returns and volatility? Evidence from Pakistan’s stock exchange. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim, J. H., Nan, D., Kim, Y., & Park, M. H. (2021). Computing the user experience via big data analysis: A case of Uber services. CMC-Computers Materials & Continua, 67(3), 2819–2829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kollias, C., Manou, E., Papadamou, S., & Stagiannis, A. (2011). Stock markets and terrorist attacks: Comparative evidence from a large and a small capitalization market. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, S64–S77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar, A. S., & Padakandla, S. R. (2022). Testing the safe-haven properties of gold and bitcoin in the backdrop of COVID-19: A wavelet quantile correlation approach. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lahmiri, S., & Bekiros, S. (2019). Cryptocurrency forecasting with deep learning chaotic neural networks. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 118, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Laskowski, M., & Kim, H. M. (2016). Rapid prototyping of a text mining application for cryptocurrency market intelligence. In 2016 IEEE 17th international conference on information reuse and integration.

  51. Lei, L. (2018). Wavelet neural network prediction method of stock price trend based on rough set attribute reduction. Applied Soft Computing, 62, 923–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu, Y., Peng, G., Hu, L., Dong, J., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Using Google Trends and Baidu Index to analyze the impacts of disaster events on company stock prices. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(2), 350–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lütkepohl, H. (2007). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer Publishing.

  54. Park, S., Lee, J., & Song, W. (2017). Short-term forecasting of Japanese tourist inflow to South Korea using Google trends data. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(3), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Patnaik, S., Irrera, A., & Randall, D. (2021). A Tesla for a Bitcoin: Musk drives up cryptocurrency price with $1.5 billion purchase. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-crypto-currency-idUSKBN2A81CG

  56. Patel, M. M., Tanwar, S., Gupta, R., & Kumar, N. (2020). A deep learning-based cryptocurrency price prediction scheme for financial institutions. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 55, 102583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Preis, T., Moat, H. S., & Stanley, H.E. (2013). Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Scientific Reports, 3, Article number: 1684.

  58. Poongodi, M., Sharma, A., Vijayakumar, V., Bhardwaj, V., Sharma, A. P., Iqbal, R., & Kumar, R. (2020). Prediction of the price of Ethereum blockchain cryptocurrency in an industrial finance system. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 81, 106527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rivera, R. (2016). A dynamic linear model to forecast hotel registrations in Puerto Rico using Google Trends data. Tourism Management, 57, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Samadi, A. H., Owjimehr, S., & Halafi, Z. N. (2021). The cross-impact between financial markets, Covid-19 pandemic, and economic sanctions: The case of Iran. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43, 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Siami-Namini, S. (2017). Granger causality between exchange rate and stock price: A Toda Yamamoto approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 603–607.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Siggiridou, E., & Kugiumtzis, D. (2016). Granger causality in multivariate time series using a time-ordered restricted vector autoregressive model. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 64(7), 1759–1773. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2015.2500893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Smuts, N. (2018). What drives cryptocurrency prices?: An investigation of Google Trends and telegram sentiment. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 46(3), 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Talwar, M., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., Tripathy, N., & Dhir, A. (2021). Has financial attitude impacted the trading activity of retail investors during the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tahamtan, I., Potnis, D., Mohammadi, E., Singh, V., & Miller, L. E. (2022). The mutual influence of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Twitter users during COVID-19: Network agenda-setting analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e34321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tantaopas, P., Padungsaksawasdi, C., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2016). Attention effect via Internet search intensity in Asia-Pacific stock markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 38, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tsay, R. S. (2021). Analysis of financial time series (3rd ed. text only). Wiley.

  69. Tweet Binder. (2020) https://www.tweetbinder.com/blog/covid-19-coronavirus-twitter/. Accessed 8 May 2020

  70. Mai, F., Zhe, S., Qing, B., Wang, X. (S.), & Chiang, R. H. L. (2018). How does social media impact bitcoin value? A test of the silent majority hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 19–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440774

  71. Mariana, C. D., Ekaputra, I. A., & Husodo, Z. A. (2021). Are Bitcoin and Ethereum safe-havens for stocks during the COVID-19 pandemic? Finance Research Letters, 38, 101798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. McLaren, N., & Shanbhogue, R. (2011). Using Internet search data as economic indicators. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 51(2), 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mou, J., Shin, D., & Cohen, J. (2016). Health beliefs and the valence framework in health information seeking behaviors. Information Technology & People, 29(4), 876–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Naccarato, A., Falorsi, S., Loriga, S., & Pierini, A. (2018). Combining official and Google Trends data to forecast the Italian youth unemployment rate. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 130, 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Nasekin, S., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). Deep learning-based cryptocurrency sentiment construction. Digital Finance, 2, 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Neria, Y., Gross, R., Marshall, R. D., & Susser, E. S. (2006). 9/11: Mental health in the wake of terrorist attacks. Cambridge University Press.

  78. Nguyen, K. Q. (2022). The correlation between the stock market and Bitcoin during COVID-19 and other uncertainty periods. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., & Murugiah, K. (2014). The use of Google Trends in health care research: A Systematic review. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Sarkodie, S. A., Ahmed, M. Y., & Owusu, P. A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic improves market signals of cryptocurrencies–evidence from Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, and Litecoin. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Shehzad, K., Bilgili, F., Zaman, U., Kocak, E., & Kuskaya, S. (2021). Is gold favourable than bitcoin during the COVID-19 outbreak? Comparative analysis through wavelet approach. Resources Policy, 73, 102163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Walker, A., Hopkins, C., & Surda, P. (2020). Use of Google Trends to investigate loss-of-smell–related searches during the COVID-19 outbreak. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 10(7), 839–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wang, X., Chen, L., Shi, J., & Tang, H. (2021). Who sets the agenda? The dynamic agenda setting of the wildlife issue on social media. Environmental Communication, 17(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wen, F., Tong, X., & Ren, X. (2022). Gold or Bitcoin, which is the safe haven during the COVID-19 pandemic? International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Weng, B., Lu, L., Wang, X., Megahed, F. M., & Martinez, W. (2018). Predicting short-term stock prices using ensemble methods and online data sources. Expert Systems with Applications, 112, 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. WHO. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic leads to major backsliding on childhood vaccinations, new WHO, UNICEF data shows. https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2021-covid-19-pandemic-leads-to-major-backsliding-on-childhood-vaccinations-new-who-unicef-data-shows. Accessed 14 Oct 2023.

  87. Wolk, K. (2020). Advanced social media sentiment analysis for short-term cryptocurrency price prediction. Expert Systems, 37, e12493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Woo, C. W., Brigham, M. P., & Gulotta, M. (2020). Twitter talk and Twitter sharing in times of crisis: Exploring rhetorical motive and agenda-setting in the Ray Rice Scandal. Communication Studies, 71(1), 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Young, A., & Atkin, D. (2022). An agenda-setting test of Google News world reporting on foreign nations. Electronic News, 17(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhang, D., Hu, M., & Ji, Q. (2020). Financial markets under the global pandemic of COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported under the framework of an international cooperation program managed by the National Research Foundation of Korea (2020K2A9A2A1110432911 FY2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jongki Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Related literature

Appendix A: Related literature

Study

Topic

Pre/post COVID-19

Cryptocurrency or stock

Data

Research method

Findings

Chen et al. [12]

Investigating the impact of fear caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on Bitcoin price

During COVID-19

Bitcoin

Hourly Google search queries on COVID-19-related keywords

Sentiment analysis

Market volatility is exacerbated by fear, with an increase in the search for COVID-19-related information. Additionally, negative Bitcoin returns and high trading volume are explained by fear regarding the pandemic. The authors found that Bitcoin failed to act as a safe haven during the pandemic

Ding et al. [25]

Using Google trends to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the stock market

During COVID-19

Stock market

The daily closing stock prices of a total usable sample of 1,567 firms from 37 sectors listed on the NASDAQ

Augmented vector autoregression (VAR)

Market sentiment toward the pandemic significantly impacted the stock prices of the sectors

Conlon and McGee [17]

Examining whether a Bitcoin can act as a safe haven during COVID-19

During COVID-19

Bitcoin

1. Daily price data for the S&P 500

2. Price data for Bitcoin are obtained from Coinmetrics using CM reference rates

Two-moment value at risk (VaR)

Bitcoin does not act as a safe haven, instead, its price decreased in lockstep with the S&P 500 as the crisis developed

Huang et al. [38]

To examine whether a Bitcoin can act as a safe haven during COVID-19

Pre and Post COVID-19

Bitcoin and stock

A panel dataset including closing price series of a Bitcoin, stock, and bond covering the five major countries/regions with daily frequency

Bayesian panel VAR method

The outbreak of COVID has altered the role of Bitcoin in various segmented markets except for the US

Mariana et al. [71]

To examine whether Bitcoin and Ethereum are safe-havens during COVID-19

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin and Ethereum

Bitcoin and Ethereum data collected from coindesk.com, while the S&P500 and gold spot prices data were collected from DataStream

DCC-GARCH methodology

The two largest cryptocurrencies are suitable as short-term safe havens

Guo et al. [30, 31]

Comparing the contagion phenomenon of Bitcoin and other financial markets or assets pre and during the COVID-19

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin and stock

1. MSCI USA index is used to measure the United States market

2. MSCI EUROPE index is used to represent the European market

3. Chinese market is denoted by the Shanghai composite index

DAG approach

The contagion effect between Bitcoin and the developed markets was strengthened during the pandemic

Shehzad et al. [81]

Is gold more favorable than bitcoin during the COVID-19 outbreak

During COVID-19

Bitcoin and gold

S&P500, US Technology Stock Market Index, French, Germany, Madrid, Italy, London, Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Shanghai Composite Index, bitcoin, and gold

Morlet Wavelet approach

This study found gold as a potential safe haven for investors of renowned stock markets such as Asia, Europe, and the US

Goodell and Goutte [28]

Co-movement of COVID pandemic and Bitcoin

During COVID-19

Bitcoin

Daily data of COVID-19 world deaths and daily Bitcoin prices from December 31, 2019 to April 29, 2020

Wavelet coherence analysis

Post-April 5, COVID-19 levels caused a rise in Bitcoin prices

Nguyen [78]

Examining the impact of the stock market on Bitcoin during COVID-19 and other uncertainty periods

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin

The weekly time-series data of Bitcoin and the S&P 500 Index from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021

VAR (1)–GARCH (1, 1) model

Stock market shocks also influenced Bitcoin’s volatility during COVID-19 and other periods of turmoil

Guan et al. [27]

Examining market sentiments from social media to predict the stock market performance

Pre and during COVID-19

Stock market

2,000 firms listed on the NASDAQ

Augmented VAR

Market sentiments toward the pandemic have significantly influenced the price differences

Elsayed et al. [26]

Examining return and volatility connectedness between Bitcoin, traditional financial assets, and major global uncertainty measures

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin and traditional financial assets

The data for Bitcoin (closing price) and traditional financial assets: Stocks (S&P 500 index), Bonds (S&P 500 bond index), the United States Dollar (broad exchange rate), Gold (spot prices), and Crude Oil (West Texas Intermediate-WTI spot prices)

Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR), Dynamic connectedness approaches, and network analyses

Total spillover indices reached unprecedented levels during COVID-19 and have remained high since then. This confirms the high return and volatility spillovers across markets during the pandemic. Regarding the return spillovers, Gold is the center of the system and demonstrates safe heaven properties. Bitcoin was a net transmitter of volatility spillovers to other markets, particularly during the COVID-19 period

Wen et al. [84]

Comparing the dynamic spillover effects of gold and Bitcoin prices on the oil and stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin and stock

The COMEX gold futures price (COMEX), the WTI oil price (WTI), and the S&P 500 index (SPX)

Time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR model)

Gold is a safe haven for oil and stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Bitcoin’s response is the opposite, and is rejected as a safe haven property

Sarkodie et al. [80]

Investigating the impact of COVID-19 on market prices of Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, and Litecoin

During COVID-19

Bitcoin, Cash, Ethereum, and Litecoin

1. Data on COVID confirmed cases (number), recovery cases (number), and deaths (number) were employed from John Hopkins’ database on COVID-19

2. Data on Bitcoin cash, Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Litecoin were collected from Coinbase, retrieved from FRED economic database

Novel Romano-Wolf multiple hypotheses

COVID-19 shocks spur Litecoin by 3.20–3.84%, Bitcoin by 2.71–3.27%, Ethereum by 1.43–1.75%, and Bitcoin Cash by 1.34–1.62%

Kumar and Padakandla [48]

Testing the safe-haven properties of gold and bitcoin in the backdrop of COVID-19

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin and gold

Daily returns of Bitcoin, Gold, DJIA, CAC40, NSE50, S&P 500, NASDAQ, and EUROSTOXX from 05–01–2015 to 31–12–2020

Wavelet quantile correlation approach

Gold consistently exhibits itself as a safe haven property for all the markets except NSE in the long and short run, while Bitcoin provided mixed results

Katsiampa et al. [44]

Co-movements and correlations between Bitcoin and thirty-one of the most-tradable crypto assets

Pre and during COVID-19

Bitcoin and thirty-one major altcoins

Hourly closing prices in US Dollars and 17,544 observations for each digital asset

Diagonal-BEKK model, the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST), and Planar Maximally Filtered Graph (PMFG) methods

Apps and protocols have become more attractive to investors than pure cryptocurrencies

Bouteska et al. [9]

Examining the impact of investor sentiment on Bitcoin returns

During COVID-19

Bitcoin

Dataset of messages discussed on social media and several financial indicators

Vector autoregressive analysis

The sentiment index is a strong predictor of cryptocurrency market returns in the short term

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mou, J., Liu, W., Guan, C. et al. Predicting the cryptocurrency market using social media metrics and search trends during COVID-19. Electron Commer Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09801-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09801-6

Keywords

Navigation