Abstract
Two, large weighing lysimeters were installed near the center of a level field and used to measure crop evapotranspiration (ETc) of trailing blackberry (Rubus L. subgenus Rubus Watson ‘Columbia Star’) in western Oregon, USA. The lysimeters were constructed from steel and included an inner soil tank (1.0-m wide × 1.5-m long × 1.7-m deep) positioned within a slightly larger outer tank on four hermetically sealed, shear-beam load cells. Plants were spaced 1.5 × 3.0 m apart (one plant/lysimeter; 2153 plants/ha), irrigated by drip, and trained to a vertical two-wire trellis system. During the first year after planting, when only non-fruiting primocanes were present, ETc totaled 120 mm, or 18% of total potential evapotranspiration (ETo) for the growing season. That year, crop coefficients (Kc), calculated by dividing ETc by ETo obtained from a nearby agricultural weather station, was 0.24 when the measurements were initiated in early July 2020 and, with exception of a brief decline due to heavy wildfire smoke, steadily increased to 0.81 before leaf fall in early October. The following year, ETc doubled, reaching a total of 275 mm, or 34% of total ETo. At that point, Kc increased from 0.30 at budbreak to 0.48, before dropping to 0.27 when the plants were scorched during a heat dome event in late June. Yield was lower than expected in year 2 (2.15 kg/plant) due to 39% fruit loss from heat damage. Afterwards, Kc slowly increased with primocane development to its highest value of 0.85 just before leaf fall. By the third year, the plants reached full production (8.46 kg/plant), and ETc nearly doubled again, reaching a total of 511 mm, or 71% of total ETo. Weekly Kc in year 3 increased from an average of 0.55 in late June to 0.88 in mid-August and stayed relatively constant until the plants were pruned and trained in late September, where it dropped to 0.32. At full production, the plants required an average of 280 L of water to produce each kilogram of fruit. Soil water content readings indicated the plants extracted water primarily from the top 0.6 m of the soil profile on cooler days and up to 1.2 m deep on warmer days. Each year, ETc and Kc increased primarily with new primocane growth but fluctuated due to unusual weather events (i.e., wildfire smoke, heat dome) and pruning and training during the growing season. Results from the study provide new Kc values for estimating crop water requirements and scheduling irrigation from establishment to full production in trailing blackberry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available on request from the authors.
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0182-z
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
ATSM International (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ATSM Standards and Test Methods. D422–63(2007)e2. https://www.astm.org/d0422-63r07e02.html. Accessed 15 May 2023
Ayars JE, Johnson RS, Phene CJ, Trout TJ, Clark DA, Mead RM (2003) Water use by drip-irrigated late-season peaches. Irrig Sci 22:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0084-4
Bell N (2021) What can we learn from the ‘Pacific Northwest heat dome’ of 2021. Washington State University. https://csanr.wsu.edu/what-can-we-learn-from-the-pacific-northwest-heat-dome-of-2021. Accessed 03 May 2023
Bryla DR, Trout TJ, Ayars JE (2010) Weighing lysimeters for developing crop coefficients and efficient irrigation practices for vegetable crops. HortScience 45:1597–1604. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.11.1597
Cahn M, Kamal S, Bolda M (2008) Rooting patterns of caneberries. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension Monterey County, Salinas, CA. https://ucanr.edu/sites/uccemontereycounty/files/171006.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2023
Carroll JL (2023) Water management tools and irrigation strategies for blueberry, blackberry, and raspberry production in the Pacific Northwest. Dissertation, Oregon State University
Dixon EK, Strik BC, Valenzuela-Estrada LR, Bryla DR (2015) Weed management, training, and irrigation practices for organic production of trailing blackberry: I. Mature plant growth and fruit production. HortScience 50:1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.50.8.1165
Eching SO, Moellenberndt D (1997) Fifteen years of growth and a promising future: the California irrigation management information system. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources, Sacramento
Evans RG, Spayd SE, Wample RL, Kroeger MW, Mahan MO (1993) Water use of Vitis vinifera grapes in Washington. Agric Water Manag 23:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(93)90035-9
Finn CE, Strik BC, Yorgey BM, Peterson ME, Lee J, Martin RR, Hall HK (2014) ‘Columbia Star’ thornless trailing blackberry. HortScience 49:1108–1112. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.49.8.1108
Fisher DK (2012) Simple weighing lysimeters for measuring evapotranspiration and developing crop coefficients. Int J Agric Biol Eng 5:35–43
Funt RC, Ross DS (2017) Soil and water management. In: Hall H, Funt D (eds) Blackberries and their hybrids. CABI Press, Wallingford, pp 131–145
Girona J, Marsal J, Mata M, del Campo J (2004) Pear crop coefficients obtained in a large weighing lysimeter. Acta Hortic 664:277–281. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.664.33
Girona J, del Campo J, Lopez G, Mata M, Marsal J (2011) Water consumption in lysimeter-grown apple and pear trees with different training systems. Acta Hortic 903:1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.903.165
Grattan S, Bower W, Dong A, Snyder R, Carroll J, George W (1998) New crop coefficients estimate water use of vegetables, row crops. Calif Agric 52:16–21. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v052n01p16
Harkins RH, Strik BC, Bryla DR (2013) Weed management practices for organic production of trailing blackberry: I. plant growth and early fruit production. HortScience 48:1139–1144. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.9.1139
Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam MM, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M (2013) Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Intl J Molec Sci 14:9643–9684. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14059643
Hunt JF, Honeycutt CW, Starr G, Yarborough D (2008) Evapotranspiration rates and crop coefficients for lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium). Intl J Fruit Sci 8:282–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538360802597549
Jensen ME, Allen RG (2016) Evaporation, evapotranspiration, and irrigation water requirements. ASCE manual 70, 2nd edn. ASCE, Reston
Johnson RS, Ayars JE, Trout TJ, Mead RM, Phene CJ (2000) Crop coefficients for mature peach trees are well correlated with midday canopy light interception. Acta Hortic 537:455–460. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.537.53
López-Urrea R, Montoro A, Mañas F, López-Fuster P, Fereres E (2012) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients from lysimeter measurements of mature ‘Tempranillo’ wine grapes. Agric Water Manag 112:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.05.009
Marek T, Piccinni G, Schneider A, Howell T, Jett M, Dusek D (2005) Weighing lysimeters for the determination of crop water requirements and crop coefficients. Appl Eng Agric 22:851–856. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22256
Marsal J, Johnson S, Casadesus J, Lopez G, Girona J, Stöckle C (2014) Fraction of canopy intercepted radiation relates differently with crop coefficient depending on the season and the fruit tree species. Agric Forest Meteorol 184:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.08.008
McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW (1997) Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric Forest Meteorol 87:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00027-0
Montoro A, López-Urrea R, Fereres E (2008) Evapotranspiration of grapevines measures by a weighing lysimeter in La Mancha, Spain. Acta Hortic 796:459–466. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.792.53
Northwest Berry Foundation (2023) 2022 Caneberry and strawberry plant sales by variety. The Small Fruit Update. 18 Jan. 2023. https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1g1an-0cjw7BIfngHdQFkSY_dOeykPuTw. Accessed 12 May 2023
ORBC (2023) Caneberry assessment report. Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission. https://oregon-berries.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ORBC-2021-22-FY-Final-Assessment-Report.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2023
Pannunzio A, Holzapfel E, Cirelli AF, Texeira P, Souto C, Bryla DR (2023) Agricultural water footprint of southern highbush blueberry produced commercially with drip irrigation and sprinkler frost protection. Agric Sci 14:114–128. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.141008
Payero JO, Irmak S (2008) Construction, installation, and performance of two repacked weighing lysimeters. Irrig Sci 26:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0085-9
Pereira LS, Paredes P, Hunsaker DJ, López-Urrea R, Mohammadi Shad Z (2021) Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method. Agric Water Manag 250:106466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106466
Pruitt WO (1991) Development of crop coefficients using lysimeters. In: Allen RG, Howell TA, Pruitt WO, Walter IA, Jensen ME (eds) Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements. ASCE Publications, New York, pp 182–190
Rallo G, Paço TA, Paredes P, Puig-Sirera À, Massai R, Provenzano G, Pereira LS (2021) Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops. Agric Water Manag 250:106645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106645
Smesrud JK, Hess M, Selker J, Strik B, Mansour NS, Stebbins RL, Mosley A (1998) Western Oregon irrigation guides, EM 8713. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Strik BC (2017) Growth and development. In: Hall H, Funt D (eds) Blackberries and their hybrids. CABI Press, Wallingford, pp 17–34
Strik BC (2018) Pruning and training systems impact yield and cold hardiness of ‘Marion’ trailing blackberry. Agriculture 8(9):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8090134
Strik BC, Bryla DR (2015) Uptake and partitioning of nutrients in blackberry and raspberry and evaluating plant nutrient status for accurate assessment of fertilizer requirements. HortTechnology 25:452–459. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.4.452
Strik BC, Clark JR, Finn CE, Banados MP (2007) Worldwide blackberry production. HortTechnology 17:205–213. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.17.2.205
Strik B, Takeda F, Gao G (2017) Pruning and training. In: Hall H, Funt D (eds) Blackberries and their hybrids. CABI Press, Wallingford, pp 169–201
Wang HX, Liu CM (2007) Soil evaporation and its affecting factors under crop canopy. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 38:259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620601094213
Williams LE (2014) Effect of applied water amounts at various fractions of evapotranspiration on productivity and water footprint of Chardonnay grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 65:215–221. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2014.12105
Williams LE, Ayars JE (2005) Grapevine water use and crop coefficient are linear functions of shaded area beneath the canopy. Agric Forest Meteorol 132:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.07.010
Williams LE, Phene CJ, Grimes DW, Trout TJ (2003a) Water use of young Thompson Seedless grapevines in California. Irrig Sci 22:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0066-6
Williams LE, Phene CJ, Grimes DW, Trout TJ (2003b) Water use of mature Thompson Seedless grapevines in California. Irrig Sci 22:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0067-5
Zhao J, Lu Z, Wang L, Jin B (2021) Plant responses to heat stress: physiology, transcription, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetics. Intl J Mol Sci 22(1):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010117
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission, the Northwest Center for Small Fruits Research, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (CRIS Project Number 2072-21000-055-00D). The authors thank Patrick Jones, Joe Battilega, Trevor Wood, and Ally Hand for technical assistance. The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation, endorsement, or exclusion by the USDA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JLC: data collection and analysis, and manuscript text; STO: lysimeter design and installation, data collection, and analysis; AJD: data collection; BCS: conception and funding; DRB: conception and design, funding, and manuscript text. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved of its final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carroll, J.L., Orr, S.T., Davis, A.J. et al. Water use by ‘Columbia Star’ trailing blackberry in western Oregon. Irrig Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00912-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00912-4