Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Shear Reinforcement and Steel Liner on Ballistic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Targets under Flat and Hemisphere Nose Missile Impact

  • Published:
Mechanics of Solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) is widely utilized in protective structures which might be exposed to high strain rate loadings, missile impacts, explosives and accidental or intentional attacks. Though many experimental and numerical studies are available in the literature to understand and improve the ballistic performance of reinforced, pre-stressed and fiber reinforced targets of ultra high and high performance of concrete. Limited studies are available to quantify the effect of shear reinforcement in resisting the impact load. This paper is an attempt to numerically compare the ballistic performance of RC targets with steel liner and special types of shear reinforcement arrangements subjected to hard missile impact with consideration of shape of the missile nose i.e., flat nose and hemisphere nose missile. Square targets (1200 × 1200 mm) of thickness 180 mm were subjected to normal missile impact by 11.75 kg, flat nose and hemisphere nose missiles of diameter 80 mm and length 300 mm. Numerical simulations were carried out in LS-Dyna and striking velocities were varied from 100 to 150 m/s. Penetration depth, residual velocity, ejected mass and ballistic resistance of RC targets for the five distinct confinements and steel liner at rear face have been discussed and compared for the two missiles. Double Laced RC and steel liner at the rear face found to be effective in reducing the penetration depth, residual velocity and improving ballistic performance. Even though the penetration depth, residual velocity is less when the targets are subjected to flat nose compare to hemisphere nose the damage in terms of ejected mass is more in flat nose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

REFERENCES

  1. R. P. Kennedy, “A review of procedures for the analysis and design of concrete structures to resist missile impact effects,” Nuclear Eng. Des. 37, 183–203 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(76)90015-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. K. Mohamed and F. Ahmed, “Equivalent concrete thickness for perforation of mild steel plates,” J. Construct. Steel Res. 135, 213–229 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Wu, Q. Fang, Y. Peng, Z. M. Gong, et al., “Hard projectile perforation on the monolithic and segmented RC panels with a rear steel liner,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 76, 232–250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Ben-Dor, A. Dubinsky, and T. Elperin, “Optimization of reinforced concrete panels with rear face steel liner under impact loading,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 37 (4), 503–512 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/15397730903190438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kamran and M. A. Iqbal, “The ballistic evaluation of plain, reinforced and reinforced- prestressed concrete,” Thin-Walled Struct. 179, 109707 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109707

  6. K. Kamran and M. A. Iqbal, “Ballistic response and induced damage of plain and reinforced concrete plates,” Mater. Phys. Mech. 47, 557–568 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18149/MPM.4742021_2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. P. Gang, L. Minjoo, L. Namkon, et al., “Dynamic structural responses of high- performance fiber- reinforced cement composites panels subjected to high-velocity projectile impact loadings,” Compos. Struct. 306, 116581 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116581

  8. K. Sanghee, H. Hyeon-Jong, and H. K. Thomas, “Behavior of high strength and ultrahigh performance concrete targets subjected to relatively rigid projectile impact,” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (10), (2021). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003129

  9. A. Husain, A. S. Nadeem, H. A. Tarek, et al., “Effect of rebar spacing on the behaviour of concrete slabs under projectile impact,” Struct. Eng. Mech. 77, 329–342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.77.3.329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. K. Mohamed and F. Ahmed, “Effect of reinforcement on the response of concrete panels to impact of hard projectiles,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 63, 1–17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. K. Mohamed and F. Ahmed, “Improving the impact resistance of concrete panels by glass fiber reinforced polymer sheets,” Int. J. Protect. Struct. 8, 304–320, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419617712168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. K. Mohamed and F. Ahmed, “Improving the resistance of concrete panels to hard projectile impact,” Int. J. Protect. Struct. 10 (4), 510–538 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419619834568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. X. Xiangzhao, M. Tianbao, and N. Jianguo, “Failure mechanism of reinforced concrete subjected to projectile impact loading,” Eng. Fail. Anal. 96, 468–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Wu, Q. Fang, Z. M. Gong, and Y. Peng, “Hard projectile impact on layered SFRHSC composite target,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 84, 88-95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. D. Avraham, Z. Y. David, and J. Chanoch, “Response of high performance concrete plates to impact of non-deforming projectiles,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 34, 1768–1779 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Martin, L.T. Oda, D. Sumita, and B. Tore, “Ballistic perforation resistance of thin concrete slabs impacted by ogive- nose steel projectiles,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 156, 103957 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103957

  17. R. Abhishek, M. A. Iqbal, and N. K. Gupta, “Ballistic performances of concrete targets subjected to long projectile impact,” Thin-Walled Struct. 126, 171–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Xiao, B. Li, and K. Fujikake, “Behavior of reinforced concrete slabs under low velocity impact,” ACI Structural Journal. 114 (3), 643–658 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14359/51689565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Mohit and M.A. Iqbal, “Numerical study on single and multi-layered concrete target against steel projectile impact,” Mech. Solids 58, 189–201 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654422600982

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Mohit, M. A. Iqbal, K. Kamaran, et al., “Numerical study of thin UHPC targets response against ballistic impact,” Mater. Phys. Mech. 50 (1), 74–88 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.18149/MPM.5012022_6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abhishek Rajput, M.A. Iqbal, “Ballistic performance of plain, reinforced and pre-stressed concrete slabs under normal impact by an ogival-nosed projectile,” International Journal of Impact Engineering 110, 57–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.03.008 .

  22. I. Kojima, “An experimental study on local behavior reinforced concrete slabs to missile impact,” Nucl. Eng. Des. 2, 121–132 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(91)90121-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Livermore Software Technology Corporation LS-OPT User’s Manual, Version 3.2 (LSTC, Livermore, 2006).

  24. CEB-FIP Model Code, Vol. 1, fib Bulletin No. 55 (Ernst & Sohn, 2010). https://doi.org/10.35789/fib.BULL.0055

  25. Q. M. Li, S. R. Reid, H. M. Wen, and A. R. Telford, “Local impact effects of hard missiles on concrete targets,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 32 (1–4), 224–284 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.005

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I Yamini Sreevalli.

Ethics declarations

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, T.R., Sreevalli, I.Y. Effect of Shear Reinforcement and Steel Liner on Ballistic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Targets under Flat and Hemisphere Nose Missile Impact. Mech. Solids 58, 2319–2332 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423601143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423601143

Keywords:

Navigation