Abstract
Objectives
Much of the research involving mindfulness, meditation, and other awareness-based interventions have repeated many historical patterns in non-participatory research that exclude Black communities and perpetuate racial hierarchies. A shift toward community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches is critical to facilitating authentic community partnership and advancing racial equity. The objective of this case study was to describe the evolution of a research-practice partnership within a parent mindfulness intervention study, which took place at a predominantly Black school community, as the project team increasingly incorporated CBPR principles into the project.
Method
Following pilot phase, the project team (including researchers, mindfulness teachers, and project staff) along with a cohort of prior participants engaged in a series of facilitated reflective discussions and semi-structured interviews. These discussions examined various challenges within the research-practice partnership and the principles of CBPR that alleviated these challenges, to highlight key lessons learned from critical phases of the project.
Results
The case study demonstrates that applying CBPR principles cultivated an enhance sense of authentic partnership in key phases of the project: developing a theory of change (TOC) and evaluation strategy; assembling project team roles and responsibilities; measure selection, data collection and interpretation; and during dissemination efforts.
Conclusions
Our lessons learned demonstrate how a commitment to CBPR principles can culminate in an intervention and evaluation process grounded in racial equity and help build community investment in mindfulness research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
De-identified study data can be released to qualified researchers under a data use agreement by contacting the senior author.
References
Blum, H. A. (2014). Mindfulness equity and western Buddhism: Reaching people of low socioeconomic status and people of color. International Journal of Dharma Studies, 2(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40613-014-0010-0
Buchanan, N. T., Perez, M., Prinstein, M. J., & Thurston, I. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. American Psychologist, 76, 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000905
Center for Clinical and Translational Science. (2023). CIRTification: Community Involvement in Research Training. https://training.ccts.uic.edu/course/CourseDetails.aspx?CourseID=3
Chung, B., Jones, L., Dixon, E. L., Miranda, J., Wells, K., & Council, C. P. in C. S. (2010). Using a community partnered participatory research approach to implement a randomized controlled trial: Planning the design of community partners in care. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 780. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0345
DC Health Matters Collaborative. (2023). DC health matters: Demographics. DC Health Matters. Retrieved August 8, 2023, from https://www.dchealthmatters.org/index.php?module=demographicdata&controller=index&action=index
Diver, S. W., & Higgins, M. N. (2014). Giving back through collaborative research: Towards a practice of dynamic reciprocity. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), M9.
Frierson, G. M., Pinto, B. M., Denman, D. C., Leon, P. A., & Jaffe, A. D. (2019). Bridging the gap: Racial concordance as a strategy to increase African American participation in breast cancer research. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(11), 1548–1561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317740736
Garcia, A., Barnhart, S., Pope, N., Showalter, K., & Trinadad, A. O. (2022). If not now, when? A call to end social work’s tolerance of White supremacy in the academy. Critical Social Work, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v23i1.7586
Ginwright, S. (2015). Hope and healing in urban education: How urban activists and teachers are reclaiming matters of the heart. Routledge.
Gonzalez, J., & Trickett, E. J. (2014). Collaborative measurement development as a tool in CBPR: Measurement development and adaptation within the cultures of communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9655-1
Khan, M. S., Lakha, F., Tan, M. M. J., Singh, S. R., Quek, R. Y. C., Han, E., Tan, S. M., Haldane, V., Gea-Sánchez, M., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2019). More talk than action: Gender and ethnic diversity in leading public health universities. The Lancet, 393(10171), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32609-6
Kwan, C., & Walsh, C. (2018). Ethical issues in conducting community-based participatory research: A narrative review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 23, 369–386. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Ethical-Issues-in-Conducting-Community-Based-A-of-Kwan-Walsh/67d2b60cee29b8737941ffc2c91a8776091414fd
Lane, A., Gavins, A., Watson, A., Domitrovich, C. E., Oruh, C. M., Morris, C., Boogaard, C., Sherwood, C., Sharp, D. N., Charlot-Swilley, D., Coates, E. E., Mathis, E., Avent, G., Robertson, H., Le, H.-N., Williams, J. C., Hawkins, J., Patterson, J., Ouyang, J. X., … Spencer, T. (2022). Advancing antiracism in community-based research practices in early childhood and family mental health. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 61(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.06.018
Mathis, E. T., Hawkins, J., Charlot‑Swilley, D., Spencer, T., Lingo, K. J., Trachtenberg, D., McPherson, S. K. L., Somitrovich, C. E., Shapiro, A., Williams, J. C., & Biel, M. G. (2024). Mindfulness intervention with African-American caregivers at a head start program: An acceptability and feasibility study. Mindfulness, in press.
Mkabela, Q. (2015). Using the Afrocentric Method in Researching Indigenous African Culture. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1864
Moore, C., Coates, E., Watson, A., de Heer, R., McLeod, A., & Prudhomme, A. (2022). “It’s important to work with people that look like me”: Black patients’ preferences for patient-provider race concordance. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 10, 2552–2564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022-01435-y
Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(03)00057-2
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., Katz, M., Oschwald, M., Goe, R., Leotti, S., Grantham, L., Plourde, E., Salomon, J., Hughes, R. B., & Powers, L. E. (2015). Community-based participatory research to adapt health measures for use by people with developmental disabilities. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 9(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2015.0037
Schindler, H. S., Fisher, P. A., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2017). From innovation to impact at scale: Lessons learned from a cluster of research–community partnerships. Child Development, 88(5), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12904
Seidman, G., & Chahine, T. (2015). Using social incubation to drive local innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/using_social_incubation_to_drive_local_innovation
Stanley, S. (2012). Mindfulness: Towards a critical relational perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00454.x
Thomas-Hughes, H. (2018). Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: Reflections from a U.K.-based case study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1364065
U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). QuickFacts: District of Columbia. Retrieved August 9, 2023, from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/DC/PST045222
Vaughn, L., & Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory research methods – Choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., Rhodes, S., Samuel-Hodge, C., Maty, S., Lux, L., Webb, L., Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., Jackman, A., & Whitener, L. (2004). Community‐based participatory research: assessing the evidence: Summary. In AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK11852/
Wallerstein, N. B., & Duran, B. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7(3), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906289376
Wallerstein, N., Muhammad, M., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Rodriguez Espinosa, P., Avila, M., Baker, E. A., Barnett, S., Belone, L., Golub, M., Lucero, J., Mahdi, I., Noyes, E., Nguyen, T., Roubideaux, Y., Sigo, R., & Duran, B. (2019). Power dynamics in community-based participatory research: A multiple–Case study analysis of partnering contexts, histories, and practices. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1_suppl), 19S–32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119852998
Washington, H. A. (2006). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. Doubleday.
Watson, N. N., Black, A. R., & Hunter, C. D. (2016). African american women’s perceptions of mindfulness meditation training and gendered race-related stress. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0539-3
Acknowledgements
All the school staff at Educare DC, who supported the Mindful Parenting Project. All the caregivers who participated in the Mindful Parenting Project and the interviewees who shaped this manuscript. Kaira Jewel for leadership and dedication toward bringing mindfulness to families
Funding
Mindfulness Parenting Project is funded by the J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JH: contributed to the conception of the study, supervised data collection and analysis, and provided substantial revisions to the manuscript.
JCW: contributed substantially to manuscript development and provided critical revisions to the manuscript.
NB: assisted with data collection, contributed substantially to manuscript development, and provided critical revisions to the manuscript.
SKLM: assisted with data collection, provided resources and guidance throughout the study, critically reviewed and edited the manuscript for important intellectual content.
TS: provided expertise in the study design, and data interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content.
DC-S: contributed to the experimental design, data collection, and analysis. Provided substantial feedback on the manuscript.
CED: provided expertise in the study design, data interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content.
MGB: provided expertise in the study design, data interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
IRB exemption from Georgetown University (IRB ID: MOD00011015).
Consent to Participate
Research team members and study participants provided verbal consent by agreeing to participate in either the semi-structured interview or the manuscript development process or both.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
No AI was used.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hawkins, J., Williams, J.C., Bravo, N. et al. Evolving Toward Community-Based Participatory Research: Lessons Learned from a Mindful Parenting Project. Mindfulness (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02289-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02289-z