Abstract
The term “self-bias” refers to the human propensity to prioritize self- over other-related stimuli and is believed to influence various stages of the processing stream. By means of event-related potentials (ERPs), it was recently shown that the self-bias in a shape-label matching task modulates early as well as later phases of information processing in neurotypicals. Recent claims suggest autism-related deficits to specifically impact later stages of self-related processing; however, it is unclear whether these claims hold based on current findings. Using the shape-label matching task while recording ERPs in individuals with autism can clarify which stage of self-related processing is specifically affected in this condition. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the temporal course of self-related processing in adults with and without autism. Thirty-two adults with autism and 27 neurotypicals completed a shape-label matching task while ERPs were concomitantly recorded. At the behavioral level, results furnished evidence for a comparable self-bias across groups, with no differences in task performance between adults with and without autism. At the ERP level, the two groups showed a similar self-bias at early stages of self-related information processing (the N1 component). Conversely, the autism group manifested a lessened differentiation between self- and other-related stimuli at later stages (the parietal P3 component). In line with recent claims of later phases of self-related processing being altered in autism, we found an equivalent self-bias between groups at an early, sensory stage of processing, yet a strongly diminished self-bias at a later, cognitive stage in adults with autism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Throughout this paper, we use an abbreviated version of the diagnostic term and refer to a person with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, as a person with (a diagnosis of) autism. With this, we do not intend to take a stance in the ongoing person-first versus identity-first debate, in which there is currently no consensus. We acknowledge and respect different language preferences to refer to a person with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
Due to time constraints, practice was only repeated two times for two participants, who scored below 70% twice. One of the two scored below chance at the actual task, and was thus removed from further analysis, whereas the other scored well above chance. Importantly, our main findings did not change in a statistically significant way when this participant was excluded, therefore we report results from the full sample.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ((5th edn). ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Amodeo, L., Wiersema, J. R., Brass, M., & Nijhof, A. D. (2021). A comparison of self-bias measures across cognitive domains. BMC. Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00639-x
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-Spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471
Burrows, C. A., Usher, L. V., Mundy, P. C., & Henderson, H. A. (2017). The salience of the self: Self-referential processing and internalizing problems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 10(5), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1727
Caharel, S., Poiroux, S., Bernard, C., Thibaut, F., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2002). ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112(12), 1499–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450290158368
Carruthers, P., & Smith, P. K. (1996). Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
Constantino, J.N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). Social responsiveness scale: SRS-2. Western Psychological Services.
Conway, J. R., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2019). Understanding individual differences in theory of mind via representation of minds, not mental states. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1559-x
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
Cunningham, S. J., & Turk, D. J. (2017). A review of self-processing biases in cognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(6), 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1276609
Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Neil Macrae, C. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003
Cunningham, S. J., Vergunst, F., Macrae, C. N., & Turk, D. J. (2013). Exploring early self-referential memory effects through ownership. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12005
Cygan, H. B., Nowicka, M. M., & Nowicka, A. (2021). Impaired attentional bias toward one’s own face in autism spectrum disorder: ERP evidence. Autism Research, 15(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2647
Cygan, H. B., Tacikowski, P., Ostaszewski, P., Chojnicka, I., & Nowicka, A. (2014). Neural correlates of own name and own face detection in autism spectrum disorder. PLoS One, 9(1), e86020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086020
Debener, S., Makeig, S., Delorme, A., & Engel, A. K. (2005). What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.006
Eichenlaub, J.-B., Ruby, P., & Morlet, D. (2012). What is the specificity of the response to the own first-name when presented as a novel in a passive oddball paradigm? An ERP study. Brain Research, 1447, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.072
Fan, W., Chen, J., Wang, X.-Y., Cai, R., Tan, Q., Chen, Y., Yang, Q., Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Yang, Z., Wang, X.-A., & Zhong, Y. (2013). Electrophysiological correlation of the degree of self-reference effect. PLoS One, 8(12), e80289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080289
Folmer, R. L., & Yingling, C. D. (1997). Auditory P3 responses to name stimuli. Brain and Language, 56(2), 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1828
Gillespie-Smith, K., Ballantyne, C., Branigan, H. P., Turk, D. J., & Cunningham, S. J. (2018). The I in autism: Severity and social functioning in autism are related to self-processing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12219
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195138929.001.0001
Golubickis, M., Falben, J. K., Sahraie, A., Visokomogilski, A., Cunningham, W. A., Sui, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2017). Self-prioritization and perceptual matching: The effects of temporal construal. Memory & Cognition, 45(7), 1223–1239. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0722-3
Goris, J., Brass, M., Cambier, C., Delplanque, J., Wiersema, J. R., & Braem, S. (2020). The relation between preference for predictability and autistic traits. Autism Research, 13(7), 1144–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2244
Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2014). Online action monitoring and memory for self-performed actions in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(5), 1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1987-4
Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2017). Recognition memory and source memory in autism spectrum disorder: A study of the intention superiority and enactment effects. Autism, 21(7), 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316653364
Grisdale, E., Lind, S. E., Eacott, M. J., & Williams, D. M. (2014). Self-referential memory in autism spectrum disorder and typical development: Exploring the ownership effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.023
Henderson, H. A., Zahka, N. B., Kojkowski, N. M., Inge, A. P., Schwartz, C. B., Hileman, C. M., Coman, D. C., & Mundy, P. C. (2009). Self-referenced memory, social cognition, and symptom presentation in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(7), 853–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02059.x
Holeckova, I., Fischer, C., Giard, M.-H., Delpuech, C., & Morlet, D. (2006). Brain responses to a subject’s own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Research, 1082(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.089
Höller, Y., Kronbichler, M., Bergmann, J., Crone, J. S., Ladurner, G., & Golaszewski, S. (2011). EEG frequency analysis of responses to the own-name stimulus. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.029
Huang, A. X., Hughes, T. L., Sutton, L. R., Lawrence, M., Chen, X., Ji, Z., & Zeleke, W. (2017). Understanding the self in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A review of literature. In Frontiers in psychology (Vol. 8, issue AUG, p. 1422). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01422
Hudson, A., Wilson, M. J. G., Green, E. S., Itier, R. J., & Henderson, H. A. (2020). Are you as important as me? Self-other discrimination within trait-adjective processing. Brain and Cognition, 142, 105569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105569
Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The self-attention network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1–4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427
Hus, V., & Lord, C. (2014). The autism diagnostic observation schedule, module 4: Revised algorithm and standardized severity scores. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(8), 1996–2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2080-3
Team, J. A. S. P. (2022). JASP (0.16.3.0).
Kim, H.-Y. (2017). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 42(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152
Knyazev, G. G. (2013). EEG correlates of self-referential processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00264
Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38(3), S0048577201990559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201990559
Kotlewska, I., & Nowicka, A. (2015). Present self, past self and close-other: Event-related potential study of face and name detection. Biological Psychology, 110, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.015
Lind, S. E., Williams, D. M., Nicholson, T., Grainger, C., & Carruthers, P. (2020). The self-reference effect on memory is not diminished in autism: Three studies of incidental and explicit self-referential recognition memory in autistic and neurotypical adults and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000467.supp
Lombardo, M. V., Barnes, J. L., Wheelwright, S. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self-referential cognition and empathy in autism. PLoS One, 2(9), 883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000883
Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Unraveling the paradox of the autistic self. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(3), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.45
Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). The role of the self in mindblindness in autism. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.006
Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., Dilavore, P. C., Pickles, A., & Rutter, M. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005592401947
Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press.
Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn’t). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12639
Lyons, V., & Fitzgerald, M. (2013). Atypical sense of self in autism Spectrum disorders: A Neuro- cognitive perspective. In Recent Advances in Autism Spectrum Disorders - Volume I. InTech.. https://doi.org/10.5772/53680
Minshew, N. J., Turner, C. A., & Goldstein, G. (2005). The application of short forms of the Wechsler intelligence scales in adults and children with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-004-1030-x
Nijhof, A. D., & Bird, G. (2019). Self-processing in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 12, 1580–1584. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2200
Nijhof, A. D., Dhar, M., Goris, J., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2018). Atypical neural responding to hearing one’s own name in adults with ASD. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000329
Nijhof, A. D., Shapiro, K. L., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2020). No evidence for a common self-bias across cognitive domains. Cognition, 197, 104186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104186
Nijhof, A. D., von Trott Zu Solz, J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2022). Equivalent own name bias in autism: An EEG study of the attentional blink. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 22(3), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00967-w
Ninomiya, H., Onitsuka, T., Chen, C.-H., Sato, E., & Tashiro, N. (1998). P300 in response to the subject’s own face. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52(5), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.00445.x
Nowicka, A., Cygan, H. B., Tacikowski, P., Ostaszewski, P., & Kuś, R. (2016). Name recognition in autism: EEG evidence of altered patterns of brain activity and connectivity. Molecular Autism, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0102-z
Oomen, D., El Kaddouri, R., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2022). Neural correlates of own name and own face processing in neurotypical adults scoring low versus high on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychology, 172, 108358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108358
Perrin, F. (1999). A differential brain response to the subject’s own name persists during sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(12), 2153–2164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00177-7
Perrin, F., Maquet, P., Peigneux, P., Ruby, P., Degueldre, C., Balteau, E., Del Fiore, G., Moonen, G., Luxen, A., & Laureys, S. (2005). Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: A combined ERPs and PET study. Neuropsychologia, 43(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.002
Perrin, F., Schnakers, C., Schabus, M., Degueldre, C., Goldman, S., Brédart, S., Faymonville, M.-E., Lamy, M., Moonen, G., Luxen, A., Maquet, P., & Laureys, S. (2006). Brain response to One’s own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Archives of Neurology, 63(4), 562. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.63.4.562
Pollux, P. M. J. (2016). Improved categorization of subtle facial expressions modulates late positive potential. Neuroscience, 322, 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.027
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.2.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ragazzoni, A., Di Russo, F., Fabbri, S., Pesaresi, I., Di Rollo, A., Perri, R. L., Barloscio, D., Bocci, T., Cosottini, M., & Sartucci, F. (2019). “Hit the missing stimulus”. A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study to localize the generators of endogenous ERPs in an omitted target paradigm. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 3684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39812-z
Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
RStudio Team. (2022). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (2022.7.1.554). RStudio, PBC.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime (2.0.10.248). Psychology Software Tools Inc..
Sui, J., He, X., Golubickis, M., Svensson, S. L., & Neil Macrae, C. (2023). Electrophysiological correlates of self-prioritization. Consciousness and Cognition, 108, 103475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2023.103475
Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029792
Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The integrative self: How self-reference integrates perception and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015
Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2017). The ubiquitous self: What the properties of self-bias tell us about the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396(1), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13197
Sui, J., & Rotshtein, P. (2019). Self-prioritization and the attentional systems. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.010
Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(19), 7607–7612. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221862110
Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, S. (2006). Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroReport, 17(4), 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000203357.65190.61
Svensson, S. L., Golubickis, M., Maclean, H., Falbén, J. K., Persson, L. M., Tsamadi, D., Caughey, S., Sahraie, A., & Macrae, C. N. (2022). More or less of me and you: Self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x
Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
Tacikowski, P., Jednoróg, K., Marchewka, A., & Nowicka, A. (2011). How multiple repetitions influence the processing of self-, famous and unknown names and faces: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.010
Tacikowski, P., & Nowicka, A. (2010). Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 84(2), 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.009
Tateuchi, T., Itoh, K., & Nakada, T. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying the orienting response to subject’s own name: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 49(6), 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01363.x
Toichi, M., Kamio, Y., Okada, T., Sakihama, M., Youngstrom, E. A., Findling, R. L., & Yamamoto, K. (2002). A lack of self-consciousness in autism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(8), 1422–1424. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1422
Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.004
Uddin, L. Q. (2011). The self in autism: An emerging view from neuroimaging. Neurocase, 17(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2010.509320
van den Bos, M., Cunningham, S. J., Conway, M. A., & Turk, D. J. (2010). Mine to remember: The impact of ownership on recollective experience. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003770938
Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720190
Wang, H., Humphreys, G., & Sui, J. (2016). Expanding and retracting from the self: Gains and costs in switching self-associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000125
Williams, D. M., Nicholson, T., & Grainger, C. (2018). The self-reference effect on perception: Undiminished in adults with autism and no relation to autism traits. Autism Research, 11(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1891
Woźniak, M., & Knoblich, G. (2019). Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(8), 2110–2120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819832981
Yang, H., Wang, F., Gu, N., Gao, X., & Zhao, G. (2013). The cognitive advantage for one’s own name is not simply familiarity: An eye-tracking study. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(6), 1176–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0426-z
Zapparrata, N. M., Brooks, P. J., & Ober, T. M. (2022). Slower processing speed in autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic investigation of time-based tasks. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05736-3
Zhao, K., Yuan, J., Zhong, Y., Peng, Y., Chen, J., Zhou, L., Fan, W., & Ding, D. (2009). Event-related potential correlates of the collective self-relevant effect. Neuroscience Letters, 464(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.017
Zheng, Y., Xiao, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2022). Self-hierarchy in perceptual matching: Variations in different processing stages. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(770604). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.770604
Open practices statements
All materials, datasets, and R scripts are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The experiment was not preregistered.
Funding
LA was supported by a Special Research Fund of Ghent University, awarded to JRW; JG was supported by a PhD fellowship, and ADN by a postdoctoral fellowship, of the FWO—Research Foundation Flanders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics approval
This study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of Ghent University.
Consent to participate
Before the start of the study, written, informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 36.7 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Amodeo, L., Goris, J., Nijhof, A.D. et al. Electrophysiological correlates of self-related processing in adults with autism. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01157-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01157-0