Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electrophysiological correlates of self-related processing in adults with autism

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “self-bias” refers to the human propensity to prioritize self- over other-related stimuli and is believed to influence various stages of the processing stream. By means of event-related potentials (ERPs), it was recently shown that the self-bias in a shape-label matching task modulates early as well as later phases of information processing in neurotypicals. Recent claims suggest autism-related deficits to specifically impact later stages of self-related processing; however, it is unclear whether these claims hold based on current findings. Using the shape-label matching task while recording ERPs in individuals with autism can clarify which stage of self-related processing is specifically affected in this condition. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the temporal course of self-related processing in adults with and without autism. Thirty-two adults with autism and 27 neurotypicals completed a shape-label matching task while ERPs were concomitantly recorded. At the behavioral level, results furnished evidence for a comparable self-bias across groups, with no differences in task performance between adults with and without autism. At the ERP level, the two groups showed a similar self-bias at early stages of self-related information processing (the N1 component). Conversely, the autism group manifested a lessened differentiation between self- and other-related stimuli at later stages (the parietal P3 component). In line with recent claims of later phases of self-related processing being altered in autism, we found an equivalent self-bias between groups at an early, sensory stage of processing, yet a strongly diminished self-bias at a later, cognitive stage in adults with autism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout this paper, we use an abbreviated version of the diagnostic term and refer to a person with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, as a person with (a diagnosis of) autism. With this, we do not intend to take a stance in the ongoing person-first versus identity-first debate, in which there is currently no consensus. We acknowledge and respect different language preferences to refer to a person with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.

  2. Due to time constraints, practice was only repeated two times for two participants, who scored below 70% twice. One of the two scored below chance at the actual task, and was thus removed from further analysis, whereas the other scored well above chance. Importantly, our main findings did not change in a statistically significant way when this participant was excluded, therefore we report results from the full sample.

References

Download references

Open practices statements

All materials, datasets, and R scripts are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The experiment was not preregistered.

Funding

LA was supported by a Special Research Fund of Ghent University, awarded to JRW; JG was supported by a PhD fellowship, and ADN by a postdoctoral fellowship, of the FWO—Research Foundation Flanders.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Letizia Amodeo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of Ghent University.

Consent to participate

Before the start of the study, written, informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 36.7 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amodeo, L., Goris, J., Nijhof, A.D. et al. Electrophysiological correlates of self-related processing in adults with autism. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01157-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01157-0

Keywords

Navigation