Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of uncertain historical information on traffic dynamics in the lattice model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several real-time feedback tactics have been presented and applied for traffic dynamics, such as historical density information, historic flux information, etc. Moreover, complex uncertainties such as equipment malfunctions, network fluctuations, driver personalities, and traffic disruptions may affect traffic information. Therefore, this article is devoted to reflecting better the reality of traffic situations in the transportation system by considering uncertainty about historical information of density (UHDI) based on the lattice approach. The UHDI effect is probed using linear stability analysis and nonlinear stability analysis. The instability is found with an increased value of the UHDI coefficient. The modified Korteweg-de-Vries equation is obtained to describe the characteristics of traffic congestion. Finally, numerical simulations are implemented to analyze the results of theoretical findings. The numerical and hypothetical results show that the UHDI factor significantly affects traffic flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

This manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. H X Ge, S Q Dai, L Y Dong and Y Xue Phys. Rev. E 70 066134 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T Q Tang, Q Yu and K Liu Phys. A 466 1 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W X Zhu and H M Zhang Phys. A 496 274 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. G Zhang, D H Sun, M Zhao, X Y Liao, W N Liu and T Zhou Phys. A 505 1008 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J F Wang, F X Sun, R J Cheng and H X Ge Phys. A 506 1113 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Y Q Sun, H X Ge and R J Cheng Phys. A 521 752 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S An, L Xu, G Chen and Z Shi Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050182 (2020)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P Liao, T Q Tang, T Wang and J Zhang Phys. A 525 108 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S H Li, T Wang, R J Cheng and H X Ge Math. Prob. Eng. 2020 (2020)

  10. C Zhai and W T Wu Physi. A 584 126364 (2021)

  11. G Y Ma, M H Ma, S D Liang, Y S Wang and H Guo Phys. A 562 125303 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M H Ma, G Y Ma and S D Liang Appl. Math. Modell. 94 1 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. G H Peng, T T Jia, H Kuang, H L Tan and T Chen Chinese Phys. B 31 058901 (2022)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G H Peng, K K Wang, H Z Zhao and H L Tan Nonlinear Dyn. 111 13089 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G H Peng, T T Jia, H Z Zhao, H L Tan Phys. A 627 129125 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R Jiang, Q S Wu and Z J Zhu Transp. Res. Part B 36 405 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A K Gupta and V K Katiyar Phys. A 368 551 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T Q Tang, H J Huang and H Y Shang Phys. A 468 322 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Q T Zhai, H X Ge and R J Cheng Phys. A 490 774 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. W Ren, R J Cheng and H X Ge Appl. Math. Modell. 94 369 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T Nagatani Physi. A 261 599 (1998)

  22. T Nagatani Phys. A 265 297 (1999)

  23. C Tian, D H Sun and M Zhang Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16 4524 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. G H Peng Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18 559 (2013)

  25. D H Sun, M Zhang and T Chuan Mod. Phys. Lett. B 28 1450091 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. G H Peng, H Kuang and L Qing Phys. A 509 651 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G H Peng, K H Bai and H Kuang Phys. A 526 121064 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. G H Peng, H Kuang and K H Bai Phys. A 526 120772 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. H X Ge and R J Cheng Phys. A 387 6952 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C T Jiang, R J Cheng and H X Ge Nonlinear Dyn. 91 777 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Q Y Wang and H X Ge Phys. A 513 438 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. X Y Qi, H X Ge and R J Cheng Phys. A 525 714 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. G H Peng Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18 2801 (2013)

  34. A K Gupta and P Redhu Phys. A 392 5622 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A K Gupta and P Redhu Nonlinear Dyn. 76 1001 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. G H Peng, H Kuang and L Qing Phys. A 507 374 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. G H Peng, S H Yang and H Z Zhao Phys. A 509 855 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. G H Peng, S H Yang and H Z Zhao Commun. Theor. Phys. 70 803 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. G H Peng, H Z Zhao and X Q Li Phys. A 515 31 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. G H Peng, S H Yang and L Qing Int. J. Control 93 2370 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. S Sharma Phys. A 421 401 (2015)

  42. R Kaur and S Sharma Phys. A 471 59 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. N Madaan and S Sharma Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 33 1950248 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. T Wang, R Zang, K Xu and J Zhang Phys. A 526 120711 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. D Kaur and S Sharma Phys. A 539 122913 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. D Kaur and S Sharma Eur. Phys. J. B 93 1 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. D Kaur and S Sharma Eur. Phys. J. B 94 1 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. M Verma and S Sharma Chaos Solitons Fractals 162 112435 (2022)

  49. Y Long, M Zhang, S Yang and G H Peng Phys. A 589 126609 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. C Zhai and W T Wu Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050071 (2020)

  51. X Y Qi, R J Cheng and H X Ge Eng. Comput. 37 2939 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. X Y Qi, H X Ge and R J Cheng Math. Prob. Eng. 2020 (2020)

  53. T Wang, R J Cheng and H X Ge Phys. A 527 121425 (2019)

  54. D Kaur, S Sharma and A K Gupta Phys. A 607 128184 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. G H Peng, T T Jia, H Kuang and H L Tan Phys. A 585 126443 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. G H Peng, C L Luo, H Z Zhao and H L Tan Chinese Phys. B 32 018902 (2023)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. X Li, C Jin and G H Peng Europhys. Lett. 141 33001 (2023)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. L Huang, S N Zhang, S B Li, F Y Cui, J Zhang and T Wang Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2450012 (2023)

  59. Y Li, T Zhou and G H Peng Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 34 2350035 (2023)

  60. Q Peng and H Zhao Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 34 2350161 (2023)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. G H Peng W L Wang and H L Tan Chaos Solitons Fractals 177 114252 (2023)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University Institute of Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India

    Daljeet Kaur

  2. School of Mathematics, Thapar Institute of Engineering andTechnology, Patiala, 147004, India

    Daljeet Kaur & Sapna Sharma

Authors
  1. Daljeet Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sapna Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daljeet Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, D., Sharma, S. Effects of uncertain historical information on traffic dynamics in the lattice model. Indian J Phys (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03074-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03074-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation