Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Simulation of Wildfire Spread in Inclined Trenches

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of the slope and the trench inclination on the spread of wildfires with a homogeneous fuel bed in inclined trenches, were studied numerically by Fire Dynamics Simulator. This simulation is based on a solid–gas two-phase numerical model that incorporates the physicochemical combustion characteristics of Platycladus orientales leaves. The results show that the rate of fire spread accelerates with increasing slope and trench inclination. The flame front inclines until it attaches to the fuel bed for slope angles ranging from 20.9° to 35.2°, and it was found a critical angle for full attachment is about 35.2° for trench inclination of 45°. Increasing the trench inclination causes a decrease in the critical angle because the trench wall restricts air entrainment at the bottom flame, promoting the flame to adhere to obtain sufficient air. Flame radiation is the dominant heat transfer mechanism at low slopes, and as the slope increases, convective heat transfer starts to be relevant and significantly changes with the trench inclination. This study provides scientific insights and guidance for early prevention and fire fighting in inclined trenches of wildfires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li H, Liu N, Xie X et al (2021) Effect of fuel bed width on upslope fire spread: an experimental study. Fire Technol 57:1063–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-01031-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sánchez-Monroy X, Mell W, Torres-Arenas J, Butler BW (2019) Fire spread upslope: numerical simulation of laboratory experiments. Fire Saf J 108:102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morandini F, Silvani X, Honoré D et al (2014) Slope effects on the fluid dynamics of a fire spreading across a fuel bed: PIV measurements and OH* chemiluminescence imaging. Exp Fluids 55:1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1788-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dold J (2010) Flow attachment in eruptive fire growth. VI International conference on forest fire research, D. X. Viegas (Ed.)

  5. Dold JW, Zinoviev A (2009) Fire eruption through intensity and spread rate interaction mediated by flow attachment. Combust Theor Model 13:763–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830902977570

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Agranat V, Perminov V (2020) Mathematical modeling of wildland fire initiation and spread. Environ Model Softw 125:104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Viegas DX, Simeoni A (2011) Eruptive behaviour of forest fires. Fire Technol 47:303–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0193-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drysdale DD, Macmillan AJR, Shilitto D (1992) The king’s cross fire: experimental verification of the ‘Trench Effect.’ Fire Saf J 18:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(92)90048-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C, Nie Y, Zhang Y et al (2021) Experimental study on flame spread over poplar plywood in inclined trench: phenomenon of flame injection. J Therm Anal Calorim 146:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09949-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Viegas DX (2006) Parametric study of an eruptive fire behaviour model. Int J Wildland Fire 15:169. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xavier Viegas D (2004) A mathematical model for forest fires blowup. Combust Sci Technol 177:27–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200590883624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grumstrup TP, McAllister SS, Finney MA (2017) Qualitative flow visualization of flame attachment on slopes. 10th U.S. national combustion meeting. The Eastern States Section of the Combustion Institute, College Park, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Innocent J, Sutherland D, Khan N, Moinuddin K (2023) Physics-based simulations of grassfire propagation on sloped terrain at field scale: motivations, model reliability, rate of spread and fire intensity†. Int J Wildland Fire 32:496–512. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Innocent J, Sutherland D, Khan N, Moinuddin K (2023) Physics-based simulations of grassfire propagation on sloped terrain at field scale: flame dynamics, mode of fire propagation and heat fluxes†. Int J Wildland Fire 32:513–530. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mell W, Jenkins MA, Gould J, Cheney P (2007) A physics-based approach to modelling grassland fires. Int J Wildland Fire 16:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mell W, Maranghides A, McDermott R, Manzello SL (2009) Numerical simulation and experiments of burning douglas fir trees. Combust Flame 156:2023–2041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.015

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Woodburn PJ, Drysdale DD (1998) Fires in inclined trenches: the dependence of the critical angle on the trench and burner geometry. Fire Saf J 31:143–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(98)00004-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Drysdale DD, Macmillan AJR (1992) Flame spread on inclined surfaces. Fire Saf J 18:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(92)90018-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie X, Liu N, Lei J et al (2017) Upslope fire spread over a pine needle fuel bed in a trench associated with eruptive fire. Proc Combust Inst 36:3037–3044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morandini F, Perez-Ramirez Y, Tihay V et al (2013) Radiant, convective and heat release characterization of vegetation fire. Int J Therm Sci 70:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.03.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Perez-Ramirez Y, Mell WE, Santoni PA et al (2017) Examination of WFDS in modeling spreading fires in a furniture calorimeter. Fire Technol 53:1795–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-017-0657-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meerpoel-Pietri K, Tihay-Felicelli V, Graziani A et al (2022) Modeling with WFDS combustion dynamics of ornamental vegetation structures at WUI: focus on the burning of a hedge at laboratory scale. Combust Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2021.2019235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cornelissen JHC, Grootemaat S, Verheijen LM et al (2017) Are litter decomposition and fire linked through plant species traits? New Phytol 216:653–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shannon W, Anand C, Shotorban B, Mahalingam S (2020) Fire behavior in multiple burning shrubs separated horizontally and vertically. Fire Saf J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fiorini C, Craveiro HD, Santiago A et al (2023) Parametric evaluation of heat transfer mechanisms in a WUI fire scenario. Int J Wildland Fire. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morvan D (2011) Physical phenomena and length scales governing the behaviour of wildfires: a case for physical modelling. Fire Technol 47:437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0160-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Porterie B, Consalvi JL, Kaiss A, Loraud JC (2005) predicting wildland fire behavior and emissions using a fine-scale physical model. Numer Heat Trans, Part A: Applic 47:571–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407780590891362

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Morandini F, Santoni PA, Tramoni JB, Mell WE (2019) Experimental investigation of flammability and numerical study of combustion of shrub of rockrose under severe drought conditions. Fire Saf J 108:102836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dahale A, Ferguson S, Shotorban B, Mahalingam S (2013) Effects of distribution of bulk density and moisture content on shrub fires. Int J Wildland Fire 22:625. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McGrattan KB, Forney GP (2004) Fire dynamics simulator (version 4): user’s guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Houssami ME, Thomas JC, Lamorlette A et al (2016) Experimental and numerical studies characterizing the burning dynamics of wildland fuels. Combust Flame 168:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.04.004

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hilton JE, Sullivan AL, Swedosh W et al (2018) Incorporating convective feedback in wildfire simulations using pyrogenic potential. Environ Model Softw 107:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tihay V, Morandini F, Santoni P-A et al (2014) Combustion of forest litters under slope conditions: burning rate, heat release rate, convective and radiant fractions for different loads. Combust Flame 161:3237–3248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.06.003

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Finney MA, Cohen JD, Grenfell IC, Yedinak KM (2010) An examination of fire spread thresholds in discontinuous fuel beds. Int J Wildland Fire 19:163. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2018YFC0808406), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2023ZZTS0803), the Industrial Internet Innovation and Development Project (ZTZB-23-990-021), and the Ningxia Autonomous Region Key Research and Development Plan (2022BEE02001). This work was also supported by the High Performance Computing Center of Central South University.

Funding

This study was funded by Key Technologies Research and Development Program, 2018YFC0808406, Rui Huang, Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University, 2023ZZTS0803, Yi Wang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: YW; Methodology: YW; Formal analysis: YW, FX; Investigation: YW, JJ, YJ; Writing—original draft preparation: YW; Writing—review and editing: RH; Funding acquisition: RH; Resources: RH; Supervision: RH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Huang, R., Xu, F. et al. Numerical Simulation of Wildfire Spread in Inclined Trenches. Fire Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01537-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01537-x

Keywords

Navigation