skip to main content
research-article

Sentiment Analysis Method of Epidemic-related Microblog Based on Hesitation Theory

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 April 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 brought an unprecedented global crisis. After two years of control efforts, life gradually returned to the pre-pandemic state, but localized outbreaks continued to occur. Toward the end of 2022, COVID-19 resurged in China, leading to another disruption of people’s lives and work. Many pieces of information on social media reflected people’s views and emotions toward the second outbreak, which showed distinct differences compared to the first outbreak in 2020. To explore people’s emotional attitudes toward the pandemic at different stages and the underlying reasons, this study collected microblog data from November 2022 to January 2023 and from January to June 2020, encompassing Chinese reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on hesitancy and the Fuzzy Intuition theory, we proposed a hypothesis: hesitancy can be integrated into machine learning models to select suitable corpora for training, which not only improves accuracy but also enhances model efficiency. Based on this hypothesis, we designed a hesitancy-integrated model. The experimental results demonstrated the model’s positive performance on a self-constructed database. By applying this model to analyze people’s attitudes toward the pandemic, we obtained their sentiments in different months. We found that the most negative emotions appeared at the beginning of the pandemic, followed by emotional fluctuations influenced by social events, ultimately showing an overall positive trend. Combining word cloud techniques and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model effectively helped explore the reasons behind the changes in pandemic attitude.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Ainapure Bharati Sanjay, Pise Reshma Nitin, Reddy Prathiba, Appasani Bhargav, Srinivasulu Avireni, Khan Mohammad S., and Bizon Nicu. 2023. Sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets using deep learning and lexicon-based approaches. Sustainability 15, 3 (2023), 2573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Alamoodi Abdullah Hussein, Zaidan Bilal Bahaa, Zaidan Aws Alaa, Albahri Osamah Shihab, Mohammed Khalid Ibrahim, Malik Rami Qays, Almahdi Esam Motashar, Chyad Mohammed A., Tareq Ziadoon, Albahri Ahmed Shihab, H. Hameed, and M. Alaa. 2021. Sentiment analysis and its applications in fighting COVID-19 and infectious diseases: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications 167, 1 (2021), 114155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Jay J. Van Bavel, Katherine Baicker, Paulo S. Boggio, Valerio Capraro, Aleksandra Cichocka, Mina Cikara, Molly J. Crockett, Alia J. Crum, Karen M. Douglas, James N. Druckman, John Drury, Oeindrila Dube, Naomi Ellemers, Eli J. Finkel, James H. Fowler, Michele Gelfand, Shihui Han, S. Alexander Haslam, Jolanda Jetten, Shinobu Kitayama, Dean Mobbs, Lucy E. Napper, Dominic J. Packer, Gordon Pennycook, Ellen Peters, Richard E. Petty, David G. Rand, Stephen D. Reicher, Simone Schnall, Azim Shariff, Linda J. Skitka, Sandra Susan Smith, Cass R. Sunstein, Nassim Tabri, Joshua A. Tucker, Sander van der Linden, Paul van Lange, Kim A. Weeden, Michael J. A. Wohl, Jamil Zaki, Sean R. Zion, and Robb Willer. 2020. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour 4, 5 (2020), 460–471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Brooks Samantha K., Webster Rebecca K., Smith Louise E., Woodland Lisa, Wessely Simon, Greenberg Neil, and Rubin Gideon James. 2020. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet 395, 10227 (2020), 912920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Cambria Erik and White Bebo. 2014. Jumping NLP curves: A review of natural language processing research. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 9, 2 (2014), 4857.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Chandra Rohitash and Krishna Aswin. 2021. COVID-19 sentiment analysis via deep learning during the rise of novel cases. PloS One 16, 8 (2021), e0255615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Chen Zhenpeng, Cao Yanbin, Lu Xuan, Mei Qiaozhu, and Liu Xuanzhe. 2019. Sentimoji: An emoji-powered learning approach for sentiment analysis in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 841852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Costola Michele, Hinz Oliver, Nofer Michael, and Pelizzon Loriana. 2023. Machine learning sentiment analysis, COVID-19 news and stock market reactions. Research in International Business and Finance 64, 1 (2023), 101881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Dhyani Makrand, Kushwaha Govind Singh, and Kumar Sanjay. 2022. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy inference system for sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Technology 14, 6 (2022), 31933200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Luna Dolezal and Matthew Ratcliffe. 2023. Emotions of the pandemic: Phenomenological perspectives. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22, 1 (2023), 1023–1030.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Emily A. Holmes, Rory C. O’Connor, V. Huggh Perry, Irene Tracey, Simon Wessely, Louise Arseneault, Clive Ballaard, Helen Christensen, Roxane Cohen Silver, Ian Everall, Tamsin Ford, Ann John, Thomas Kabir, Kate King, Ira Madan, Susan Michie, Andrew K. Przybylski, Roz Shafran, Angela Sweeney, Carol M. Wortman, Lucy Yardley, Katherine Cowan, Claire Cope, Matthew Hotopf, and Ed Bullmore. 2020. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry 7, 6 (2020), 547560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Julia Holzer, Selma Korlat, Christian Haider, Martin Mayerhofer, Elisabeth Pelikan, Barbara Schober, Christiane Spiel, Toumazis Toumazi, Katariina Salmela-Aro, Udo Käser, Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Sebastian Wachs, Mukul Dabas, Suman Verma, Dean Iliev, Daniela Andonovska-Trajkovska, Piotr Plichta, Jacek Pyz̄alski, Natalia Walter, Justyna Michałek-Kwiecień, Aleksandra Lewandowska-Walter, Michelle F. Wright, and Marko Lüftenegger. 2021. Adolescent well-being and learning in times of COVID-19—A multi-country study of basic psychological need satisfaction, learning behavior, and the mediating roles of positive emotion and intrinsic motivation. PloS One 16, 5 (2021), e0251352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Jalil Zunera, Abbasi Ahmed, Javed Abdul Rehman, Khan Muhammad Badruddin, Hasanat Mozaherul Hoque Abul, Malik Khalid Mahmood, and Saudagar Abdul Khader Jilani. 2022. COVID-19 related sentiment analysis using state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning techniques. Frontiers in Public Health 9, 1 (2022), 812735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Jefferson Chris, Liu Han, and Cocea Mihaela. 2017. Fuzzy approach for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. IEEE, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Kaya Tugberk. 2020. The changes in the effects of social media use of Cypriots due to COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society 63, 1 (2020), 101380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Kozae Abdelmonem Mohamed, Shokry Mohamed, and Omran Manar. 2020. Intuitionistic fuzzy set and its application in corona covid-19. Applied and Computational Mathematics 9, 5 (2020), 146154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Lefevor G. Tyler, Davis Edward B., Paiz Jaqueline Y., and Smack Abigail C. P.. 2021. The relationship between religiousness and health among sexual minorities: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 147, 7 (2021), 647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Lim Leonard Thomas S., Regencia Zypher Jude G., Cruz J. Rem C. Dela, Ho Frances Dominique V., Rodolfo Marcela S., Ly-Uson Josefina, and Baja Emmanuel S.. 2022. Assessing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, shift to online learning, and social media use on the mental health of college students in the Philippines: A mixed-method study protocol. Plos One 17, 5 (2022), e0267555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Liu Bing. 2022. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Springer Nature.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Emily Long, Susan Patterson, Karen Maxwell, Carolyn Blake, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Ruth Lewis, Mark McCann, Julie Riddell, Kathryn Skivington, Rachel Wilson-Lowe, and Kirstin R. Mitchell. 2022. COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on social relationships and health. J Epidemiol Community Health 76, 2 (2022), 128132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Mahmoudi Ramzi, Benameur Narjes, Mabrouk Rania, Mohammed Mazin Abed, Garcia-Zapirain Begonya, and Bedoui Mohamed Hedi. 2022. A deep learning-based diagnosis system for COVID-19 detection and pneumonia screening using CT imaging. Applied Sciences 12, 10 (2022), 4825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Mirahmadizadeh Alireza, Ranjbar Keivan, Shahriarirad Reza, Erfani Amirhossein, Ghaem Haleh, Jafari Khoubyar, and Rahimi Tayebeh. 2020. Evaluation of students’ attitude and emotions towards the sudden closure of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology 8, 1 (2020), 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Mitchell Kirstin R. and Wellings Kaye. 2013. Measuring sexual function in community surveys: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sex Research 50, 1 (2013), 1728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Nezhad Zahra Bokaee and Deihimi Mohammad Ali. 2022. Twitter sentiment analysis from Iran about COVID 19 vaccine. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 16, 1 (2022), 102367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Pfefferbaum Betty and North Carol S.. 2020. Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine 383, 6 (2020), 510512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Phan Huyen Trang, Tran Van Cuong, Nguyen Ngoc Thanh, and Hwang Dosam. 2020. Improving the performance of sentiment analysis of tweets containing fuzzy sentiment using the feature ensemble model. IEEE Access 8, 1 (2020), 1463014641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Dong Qiu, Yang Yu, and Lei Chen. 2022. Emotion analysis of COVID-19 vaccines based on a fuzzy convolutional neural network. Cognitive Computation (2022), Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Riccaboni Massimo and Verginer Luca. 2022. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific research in the life sciences. PLoS One 17, 2 (2022), e0263001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Rodriguez Rosa M., Martinez Luis, and Herrera Francisco. 2011. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems 20, 1 (2011), 109119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Saeed Muhammad, Ahsan Muhammad, Saeed Muhammad Haris, Rahman Atiqe Ur, Mehmood Asad, Mohammed Mazin Abed, Jaber Mustafa Musa, and Damaševičius Robertas. 2022. An optimized decision support model for COVID-19 diagnostics based on complex fuzzy hypersoft mapping. Mathematics 10, 14 (2022), 2472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Schmidt Anna and Wiegand Michael. 2017. A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Hima Suresh. 2016. An unsupervised fuzzy clustering method for twitter sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computation System and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions, IEEE, 80–85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Aurelle Tchagna Kouanou, Thomas Mih Attia, Cyrille Feudjio, Anges Fleurio Djeumo, Adèle Ngo Mouelas, Mendel Patrice Nzogang, Christian Tchito Tchapga, and Daniel Tchiotsop. 2021. An overview of supervised machine learning methods and data analysis for COVID-19 detection. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2021 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Torra Vicenç and Narukawa Yasuo. 2009. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. IEEE, 13781382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Vashishtha Srishti and Susan Seba. 2019. Fuzzy rule based unsupervised sentiment analysis from social media posts. Expert Systems with Applications 138, 1 (2019), 112834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Wisesty Untari N., Rismala Rita, Munggana Wira, and Purwarianti Ayu. 2021. Comparative study of covid-19 tweets sentiment classification methods. In Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology. IEEE, 588593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Xia Meimei and Xu Zeshui. 2011. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52, 3 (2011), 395407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. [38] Xu Yan, Li Yilan, Zhang Qingfang, Yue Xianghua, and Ye Yan. 2022. Effect of social media overload on college students’ academic performance under the COVID-19 quarantine. Frontiers in Psychology 13, 1 (2022), 890317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Na Zhu, Dingyu Zhang, Wenling Wang, Xingwang Li, Bo Yang, Jingdong Song, Xiang Zhao, Baoying Huang, Weifeng Shi, Roujian Lu, Peihua Niu, Faxian Zhan, Xuejun Ma, Dayan Wang, Wenbo Xu, Guizhen Wu, George F. Gao, and Wenjie Tan. 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine 382, 8 (2020), 727–733.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sentiment Analysis Method of Epidemic-related Microblog Based on Hesitation Theory

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
          ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 23, Issue 4
          April 2024
          221 pages
          ISSN:2375-4699
          EISSN:2375-4702
          DOI:10.1145/3613577
          • Editor:
          • Imed Zitouni
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 April 2024
          • Online AM: 14 February 2024
          • Accepted: 31 January 2024
          • Revised: 1 January 2024
          • Received: 28 September 2023
          Published in tallip Volume 23, Issue 4

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)108
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text