Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of sand particle trajectories and erosion distribution in offshore oil and gas pipelines

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sand erosion in pipelines during offshore oil and gas exploitation and transportation can lead to serious equipment failures, considerable economic losses, and environmental burdens. Accurate prediction of sand erosion in these pipelines, especially near elbow sections, is crucial to reduce pipeline failure. In this study, the CFD-DPM method verified by experiment data is used for numerical simulation. The effects of particle size, shape, and fluid viscosity on elbow erosion have been discussed. The results show that the maximum erosion rate decreases exponentially with the increase in fluid viscosity. It shows a decrease first and then increases with the increase in particle diameter, and an opposite trend with the increase in particle shape factor. More importantly, the correlation between the maximum erosion position of the elbow and the Stokes number has been derived. Our work is expected to provide theoretical guide for anti-erosion design strategy for submarine pipelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parsi M, Najmi K, Najafifard F et al (2014) A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 21:850–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Solnordal CB, Wong CY, Boulanger J (2015) An experimental and numerical analysis of erosion caused by sand pneumatically conveyed through a standard pipe elbow. Wear 336–337:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.04.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie Z, Cao X, Zhang J et al (2020) Study of erosion behavior in elbows mounted in series using computational fluid dynamics method. J Energy Resour Technol 142:113001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao X, Cao X, Xie Z et al (2022) Numerical study on the particle erosion of elbows mounted in series in the gas-solid flow. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 99:104423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajkumar Y, Shirazi SA, Karimi S (2023) Effect of pipe size on erosion measurements and predictions in liquid-dominated multiphase flows for the elbows. Wear 523:204797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2023.204797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sedrez TA, Rajkumar YR, Shirazi SA et al (2018) CFD predictions and experiments of erosion of elbows in series in liquid dominated flows

  7. Farokhipour A, Mansoori Z, Saffar-Avval M, Ahmadi G (2020) 3D computational modeling of sand erosion in gas-liquid-particle multiphase annular flows in bends. Wear 450–451:203241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.203241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng W, Cao X (2016) Numerical prediction of erosion distributions and solid particle trajectories in elbows for gas–solid flow. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 30:455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duarte CAR, de Souza FJ (2017) Innovative pipe wall design to mitigate elbow erosion: a CFD analysis. Wear 380–381:176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.03.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duarte CAR, de Souza FJ, dos Santos VF (2016) Mitigating elbow erosion with a vortex chamber. Powder Technol 288:6–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li R, Sun Z, Li A et al (2022) Design optimization of hemispherical protrusion for mitigating elbow erosion via CFD-DPM. Powder Technol 398:117128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng L, Zhang GA, Guo XP (2014) Erosion–corrosion at different locations of X65 carbon steel elbow. Corros Sci 85:318–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.04.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao Y-L, Ye F-X, Zhang G et al (2022) Investigation of erosion-corrosion behavior of Q235B steel in liquid-solid flows. Pet Sci 19:2358–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.05.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J, BaKeDaShi W, Li Z et al (2017) Effect of flow velocity on erosion–corrosion of 90-degree horizontal elbow. Wear 376–377:516–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang J, Kang J, Fan J, Gao J (2016) Study on erosion wear of fracturing pipeline under the action of multiphase flow in oil & gas industry. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 32:334–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sedrez TA, Shirazi SA, Rajkumar YR et al (2019) Experiments and CFD simulations of erosion of a 90° elbow in liquid-dominated liquid-solid and dispersed-bubble-solid flows. Wear 426–427:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sedrez TA, Shirazi SA (2021) Erosion evaluation of elbows in series with different configurations. Wear 476:203683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.203683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng W, Cao X (2016) Numerical simulation of solid particle erosion in pipe bends for liquid–solid flow. Powder Technol 294:266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Wang Y, Li X et al (2015) Reprint of “Erosion prediction of liquid-particle two-phase flow in pipeline elbows via CFD–DEM coupling method.” Powder Technol 282:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.05.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang K, Li X, Wang Y, He R (2017) Numerical investigation of the erosion behavior in elbows of petroleum pipelines. Powder Technol 314:490–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu H, Qi Y (2019) Numerical investigation of flow erosion of sand-laden oil flow in a U-bend. Process Saf Environ Prot 131:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amaechi CV, Hosie G, Reda A (2023) Review on subsea pipeline integrity management: an operator’s perspective. Energies 16:98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin N, Arabnejad H, Shirazi SA et al (2018) Experimental study of particle size, shape and particle flow rate on Erosion of stainless steel. Powder Technol 336:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.05.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou J, Liu Y, Liu S et al (2017) Effects of particle shape and swirling intensity on elbow erosion in dilute-phase pneumatic conveying. Wear 380–381:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.03.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Othayq M, Haider G, Vieira RE, Shirazi SA (2021) Experimental study of the effect of particle size on erosion of elbows in series for annular gas-liquid flows

  26. Nguyen VB, Nguyen QB, Zhang YW et al (2016) Effect of particle size on erosion characteristics. Wear 348–349:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mclaury BS (1996) Predicting solid particle erosion resulting from turbulent fluctuations in oilfield geometries. University of Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hong B, Li X, Li Y et al (2021) Numerical simulation of elbow erosion in shale gas fields under gas-solid two-phase flow. Energies 14:3804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao X, Cao X, Cao H et al (2023) Numerical study of elbow erosion due to sand particles under annular flow considering liquid entrainment. Particuology 76:122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2022.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zahedi P, Zhang J, Arabnejad H et al (2017) CFD simulation of multiphase flows and erosion predictions under annular flow and low liquid loading conditions. Wear 376–377:1260–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Morsi SA, Alexander AJ (1972) An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems. J Fluid Mech 55:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112072001806

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Haider A, Levenspiel O (1989) Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technol 58:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Parsi M, Kara M, Agrawal M et al (2017) CFD simulation of sand particle erosion under multiphase flow conditions. Wear 376–377:1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.12.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gosman AD, Loannides E (1983) Aspects of computer simulation of liquid-fueled combustors. J Energy 7:482–490. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.62687

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Organisation NV (2007) Recommended Practice, RP O501: erosive wear in piping systems. Det Norske Veritas

  36. Cui B, Chen P, Zhao Y (2022) Numerical simulation of particle erosion in the vertical-upward-horizontal elbow under multiphase bubble flow. Powder Technol 404:117437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xie Z, Cao X, Zhang J et al (2021) Effect of cell size on erosion representation and recommended practices in CFD. Powder Technol 389:522–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Patankar S (2018) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Taylor & Francis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Inc. A (2022) ANSYS Fluent 2022R1 User’s Guide

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52025061). This work was also supported by the Zhuhai Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team Project (No. 2120004000225) and the project of Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Team (No. 2023-CX-TD-25).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HY contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, and writing—original draft. XL contributed to formal analysis, visualization, and data curation. QJ contributed to data curation, software, and investigation. DJ contributed to formal analysis, writing—review and editing, and supervision. LM contributed to validation and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dengwei Jing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Li, X., Jin, Q. et al. Prediction of sand particle trajectories and erosion distribution in offshore oil and gas pipelines. Comp. Part. Mech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00718-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00718-x

Keywords

Navigation