Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State-of-the-Art Review: Seismic Design and Performance Assessment of Special Concentrically Braced Frames Developed for Complex Industrial Building Structures

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This state-of-the-art review comprehensively evaluates the seismic design and performance assessment of concentrically braced frame (CBF) systems, specifically focusing on special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs). SCBFs have shown remarkable effectiveness in providing seismic resistance for various building types, including residential, commercial, and industrial structures. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that natural disasters can lead to significant losses in human lives, economic impact, social disruption, and damage to industrial facilities. Therefore, this review concentrates on the seismic design and performance assessment of SCBFs developed for complex industrial buildings. Despite significant research efforts in SCBF performance assessment, there remains a notable gap in comprehensive critical reviews focused on studying SCBFs in the context of irregular and complex industrial structures. Identifying this research gap and conducting an updated review incorporating recent advancements, particularly the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, becomes necessary. The major goal of this study is to assess existing research efforts and identify areas that need further inquiry. Furthermore, AI methods, such as Machine Learning (ML) techniques, are highly recommended to enhance the performance of SCBFs and effectively identify damaged structures after severe earthquakes. The review identifies the need for further investigation in this specific area. By addressing these research gaps and leveraging AI advancements, the resilience of industrial buildings can be enhanced, thereby mitigating the losses resulting from seismic events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AISC. (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.

  • Akbas, B., Sutchiewcharn, N., Cai, W., Wen, R., & Shen, J. (2013). Comparative study of special and ordinary braced frames. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 22(13), 989–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfanda, A. M., Dai, K., & Wang, J. (2022). Review of seismic fragility and loss quantification of building-like industrial facilities. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 144(6), 06080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning. MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminian, P., Niroomand, H., Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., & Arab Esmaeili, M. (2013). New design equations for assessment of load carrying capacity of castellated steel beams: A machine learning approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 23(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1138-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreolli, F., Bragolusi, P., D’Alpaos, C., Faleschini, F., & Zanini, M. A. (2022). An AHP model for multiple-criteria prioritization of seismic retrofit solutions in gravity-designed industrial buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE. (2017). ASCE/SEI 7–16. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures.

  • Aslani, H. (2005). Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings. Stanford University.

  • Assaleh, K., AlHamaydeh, M., & Choudhary, I. (2015). Modeling nonlinear behavior of buckling-restrained braces via different artificial intelligence methods. Applied Soft Computing, 37, 923–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J. (2021). A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 147, 107077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balendra, T., & Huang, X. (2003). Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(8), 1019–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barto, A. G., & Dietterich, T. G. (2004). Reinforcement learning and its relationship to supervised learning. Handbook of Learning and Approximate Dynamic Programming, 10, 9780470544785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertero, V. (1986). Evaluation of response reduction factors recommended by ATC and SEAOC. In: Proceedings of the Third US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Charleston, South Carolina,

  • Bijelić, N., Lin, T., & Deierlein, G. G. (2020). Efficient intensity measures and machine learning algorithms for collapse prediction of tall buildings informed by SCEC CyberShake ground motion simulations. Earthquake Spectra, 36(3), 1188–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. M., & Nasrabadi, N. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning (Vol. 4). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursi, O. S., Reza, M. S., Abbiati, G., & Paolacci, F. (2015). Performance-based earthquake evaluation of a full-scale petrochemical piping system. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 33, 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, A. C., Paolacci, F., Bursi, O. S., & Giannini, R. (2019). Problems and perspectives in seismic quantitative risk analysis of chemical process plants. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Carluccio, A. (2007). Structural Characterization and Seismic Evaluation of Steel Equipment in Industrial Plants PhD Thesis in Seismic Risk].

  • Cha, Y.-J., & Buyukozturk, O. (2014). Modal strain energy based damage detection using multi-objective optimization. Structural Health Monitoring. (Vol. 5). Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-H. (2010). Performance-based seismic demand assessment of concentrically braced steel frame buildings. University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, J., & Almazán, J. (2015). Seismic reliability of continuously supported steel wine storage tanks retrofitted with energy dissipation devices. Engineering Structures, 98, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzani, V., Antonioni, G., Landucci, G., Tugnoli, A., Bonvicini, S., & Spadoni, G. (2014). Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 28, 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, E. F., & Valdivia, D. (2011). Performance of industrial facilities in the Chilean earthquake of 27 February 2010. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, K., Alfanda, A. M., Wang, J., Tesfamariam, S., Li, T., & Sharbati, R. (2023). Comparative benefit-cost analysis for a resilient industrial power plant building with isolation system and energy dissipating devices. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2193616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, K., Li, B., Wang, J., Li, A., Li, H., Li, J., & Tesfamariam, S. (2018). Optimal probability-based partial mass isolation of elevated coal scuttle in thermal power plant building. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 27(11), e1477. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., & Tesfamariam, S. (2022). State-of-the-art review of design of experiments for physics-informed deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06416.

  • de Lautour, O. R., & Omenzetter, P. (2010). Damage classification and estimation in experimental structures using time series analysis and pattern recognition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1556–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Corte, G., Iervolino, I., & Petruzzelli, F. (2013). Structural modelling issues in seismic performance assessment of industrial steel buildings. In: 4th Thematic ECCOMAS Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,

  • Ellingwood, B. R., Celik, O. C., & Kinali, K. (2007). Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(13), 1935–1952. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshghi, S., & Razzaghi, M. S. (2005). Performance of industrial facilities in the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell, B. V., Kanvinde, A., Deierlein, G., Myers, A., & Fu, X. (2006). Buckling and fracture of concentric braces under inelastic cyclic loading. Structural Steel Education Council, Steel Tips, 94.

  • Filiatrault, A., & Sullivan, T. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of nonstructural building components: The next frontier of earthquake engineering. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0238-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flah, M., Nunez, I., Ben Chaabene, W., & Nehdi, M. L. (2021). Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: A systematic review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28(4), 2621–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09471-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foraboschi, P. (2019). Lateral load-carrying capacity of steel columns with fixed-roller end supports. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foraboschi, P. (2020). Predictive formulation for the ultimate combinations of axial force and bending moment attainable by steel members. International Journal of Steel Structures, 20(2), 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, E., Takhirov, S., Xie, Q., & Mosalam, K. M. (2014). Seismic vulnerability of power supply: Lessons learned from recent earthquakes and future horizons of research. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on structural dynamics (EURODYN 2014). European association for structural dynamics, Porto, Portugal,

  • Fujita, S., Nakamura, I., Furuya, O., Watanabe, T., Minagawa, K., Morishita, M., Kamada, T., & Takahashi, Y. (2012). Seismic damage of mechanical structures by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. In: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,

  • Gao, Y., Mosalam, K. M., Chen, Y., Wang, W., & Chen, Y. (2021). Auto-regressive integrated moving-average machine learning for damage identification of steel frames. Applied Sciences, 11(13), 6084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., Mosalam, K. M., Chen, Y., Wang, W., & Chen, Y. (2021). Auto-regressive integrated moving-average machine learning for damage identification of steel frames. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiasi, R., Torkzadeh, P., & Noori, M. (2016). A machine-learning approach for structural damage detection using least square support vector machine based on a new combinational kernel function. Structural Health Monitoring, 15(3), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, M. P., & Zapico, J. L. (2008). Seismic damage identification in buildings using neural networks and modal data. Computers & Structures, 86(3–5), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, G., Pan, H., Lin, Z., Li, Y., & Yuan, Z. (2017). Data-driven support vector machine with optimization techniques for structural health monitoring and damage detection. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21, 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadianfard, M., Sharbati, R., & Lashkari, A. (2012). Cyclic behavior of post-tensioned energy Dissipating steel connections. In 14th international conference on computing in civil and Building engineering. Moscow, Russia, 27–29.

  • Hammad, A., & Moustafa, M. A. (2020). Numerical analysis of special concentric braced frames using experimentally-validated fatigue and fracture model under short and long duration earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(1), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00997-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatayama, K. (2008). Lessons from the 2003 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake for prediction of long-period strong ground motions and sloshing damage to oil storage tanks. Journal of Seismology, 12(2), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hee Ryu, Y., Gupta, A., & Seog, Ju. (2019). Fragility evaluation in building-piping systems: Effect of piping interaction with buildings. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 141(1), 010906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (2006). Further improvements on and understanding of SCBF systems. MSCE thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.

  • Hsiao, P.-C. (2012). Seismic performance evaluation of concentrically braced frames. University of Washington.

  • Hsiao, P., Lehman, D., & Roeder, C. (2013). Evaluation of collapse potential and the response modification coefficient of SCBFs. Structures Congress 2013: Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession,

  • Hsiao, P.-C., Hayashi, K., Inamasu, H., Luo, Y.-B., & Nakashima, M. (2016). Development and testing of naturally buckling steel braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(1), 04015077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, P.-C., Lehman, D. E., & Roeder, C. W. (2012a). Improved analytical model for special concentrically braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 73, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, P.-C., Lehman, D. E., & Roeder, C. W. (2013a). Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(10), 1547–1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, P.-C., Lehman, D. E., & Roeder, C. W. (2013b). A model to simulate special concentrically braced frames beyond brace fracture. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, P.-C., & Li, C.-Y. (2023). Seismic performance assessments of naturally buckling braced frame building structures. Journal of Building Engineering, 63, 105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, P.-C., & Li, C.-Y. (2023). Seismic performance assessments of naturally buckling braced frame building structures. Journal of Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S.-H., & Lignos, D. G. (2017). Effect of modeling assumptions on the earthquake-induced losses and collapse risk of steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(9), 04017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imanpour, A., & Tremblay, R. (2017). Analysis methods for the design of special concentrically braced frames with three or more tiers for in-plane seismic demand. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(4), 04016213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M. (2005). Improved seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames University of Washington].

  • Khademi, M., Tehranizadeh, M., Shirkhani, A., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2023). Earthquake-induced loss assessment of steel dual concentrically braced structures subjected to near-field ground motions. Structures, 51, 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal, K., El-Tawil, S., & Sadek, F. (2009). Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(3), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khetarpal, K., Riemer, M., Rish, I., & Precup, D. (2022). Towards continual reinforcement learning: A review and perspectives. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75, 1401–1476.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kheyroddin, A., & Mashhadiali, N. (2018). Response modification factor of concentrically braced frames with hexagonal pattern of braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 148, 658–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosravikia, F., & Clayton, P. (2021). Machine learning in ground motion prediction. Computers & Geosciences, 148, 104700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiani, J., Camp, C., & Pezeshk, S. (2019). On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves. Computers & structures, 218, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-J., Park, W., Koh, H.-M., & Choo, J. F. (2013). Identification of structural performance of a steel-box girder bridge using machine learning technique. IABSE Symposium Report,

  • Kim, B., Yuvaraj, N., Park, H. W., Preethaa, K. S., Pandian, R. A., & Lee, D.-E. (2021). Investigation of steel frame damage based on computer vision and deep learning. Automation in Construction, 132, 103941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, C., Deierlein, G., Hooper, J., Krawinkler, H., Mahin, S., Shing, B., & Wallace, J. (2010). Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors.

  • Kongar, I., Esposito, S., & Giovinazzi, S. (2015). Post-earthquake assessment and management for infrastructure systems: Learning from the Canterbury (New Zealand) and L’Aquila (Italy) earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(2), 589–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9761-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, E., & Ozcelik, Y. (2022). Seismic performance assessment of concentrically braced steel frames designed to the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018. Structures, 40, 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotulka, B. A. (2007). Analysis for a design guide on gusset plates used in special concentrically braced frames University of Washington Seattle, WA].

  • Kumar, M. S., Senthilkumar, R., & Sourabha, L. (2019). Seismic performance of special concentric steel braced frames. Structures, 20, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P. C. A., Anand, S., & Sahoo, D. R. (2017). Modified seismic design of concentrically braced frames considering flexural demand on columns. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(10), 1559–1580. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep Learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, D., & Roeder, C. (2008). Improved seismic design of concentrically braced frames and gusset plate connections. Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders,

  • Li, B., Dai, K., Li, H., Li, B., & Tesfamariam, S. (2019). Optimum design of a non-conventional multiple tuned mass damper for a complex power plant structure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(7), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1585461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Deep learning-based brace damage detection for concentrically braced frame structures under seismic loadings. Advances in Structural Engineering, 22(16), 3473–3486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219859389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J., & Buyukozturk, O. (2014). Automated structural damage detection using one-class machine learning. Dynamics of Civil Structures. In Proceedings of the 32nd IMAC, A conference and exposition on structural dynamics, Vol 4

  • Lu, D., Yu, X., & Jia, M. (2012). Analytical formulations of fragility functions with applications to probabilistic seismic risk analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering. Lisbon,

  • Lu, P., Chen, S., & Zheng, Y. (2012). Artificial intelligence in civil engineering. Mathematical problems in engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/145974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luco, N., Bachman, R. E., Crouse, C. B., Harris, J. R., Hooper, J. D., Kircher, C. A., Caldwell, P. J., & Rukstales, K. S. (2015). Updates to building-code maps for the 2015 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), S245–S271. https://doi.org/10.1193/042015EQS058M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, E. J. (2009). Enhanced seismic performance of multi-story special concentrically brace frames using a balanced design procedure University of Washington].

  • Lumpkin, E. J., Hsiao, P.-C., Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., Tsai, C.-Y., Wu, A.-C., Wei, C.-Y., & Tsai, K.-C. (2012). Investigation of the seismic response of three-story special concentrically braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 77, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F. (1997). Object-oriented finite element programming Ph. D. dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., University …].

  • Merino Vela, R. J., Brunesi, E., & Nascimbene, R. (2019a). Floor spectra estimates for an industrial special concentrically braced frame structure. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 141(1), 010909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino Vela, R. J., Brunesi, E., & Nascimbene, R. (2019b). Seismic assessment of an industrial frame-tank system: Development of fragility functions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(5), 2569–2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00548-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., & Mitchell, T. M. (1984). Machine learning an artificial intelligence approach. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, E., Aslani, H., & Taghavi, S. (2004). Assessment of seismic performance in terms of economic losses. Proceedings, International Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design: Concepts and Implementation,

  • Mohamed Noor, N., Razak, S. M., Kong, T. C., Zainol, N. Z., Adnan, A., Azimi, M., & Azhari, A. W. (2018). A review of influence of various types of structural bracing to the structural performance of buildings. E3S Web of Conferences, 34, 85. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183401010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsenzadeh, V. (2020). System-level seismic performance of concentrically braced frames with replaceable brace modules

  • Mohsenzadeh, V., & Wiebe, L. (2018). Effect of beam-column connection fixity and gravity framing on the seismic collapse risk of special concentrically braced frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 115, 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momenzadeh, S., & Shen, J. (2018). Seismic demand on columns in special concentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures, 168, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. D., LaFave, J. M., Lee, Y.-J., & Shin, M. (2022). Rapid seismic damage-state assessment of steel moment frames using machine learning. Engineering Structures, 252, 113737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, T. (1996). Lessons learned for lifeline engineering from major urban earthquakes. In Proceedings, eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering,

  • Pal, J., Sikdar, S., & Banerjee, S. (2022). A deep-learning approach for health monitoring of a steel frame structure with bolted connections. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 29(2), e2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, K. D. (2012). Concentric X-braced Frames with HSS bracing. In: International Journal of Steel Structures.

  • Palmer, K., Roeder, C., & Lehman, D. (2012). A new balanced design procedure for gusset plate connections in SCBF. Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (pp. 845–852). USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, K. D., Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., Okazaki, T., Shield, C. K., & Powell, J. (2012b). Concentric X-braced frames with HSS bracing. International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(3), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-3012-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, F., Giannini, R., & De Angelis, M. (2013). Seismic response mitigation of chemical plant components by passive control techniques. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(5), 924–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathirage, C. S. N., Li, J., Li, L., Hao, H., Liu, W., & Ni, P. (2018). Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Engineering Structures, 172, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109

  • Phan, H. N., Paolacci, F., Nguyen, V. M., & Hoang, P. H. (2021). Ground motion intensity measures for seismic vulnerability assessment of steel storage tanks with unanchored support conditions. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 143(6).

  • Porter, K. A. (2003). An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Proceedings of ninth international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering,

  • Powell, J. A. (2010). Evaluation of special concentrically braced frames for improved seismic performance and constructability University of Washington].

  • Rafiei, M. H., & Adeli, H. (2017). A novel machine learning-based algorithm to detect damage in high-rise building structures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 26(18), e1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnama, M., & Morrow, G. (2000). Performance of industrial facilities in the August 17, 1999, Izmit earthquake. Proceedings of the 12WCEE, Paper(2851).

  • Ramirez, C. M. (2009). Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Stanford University.

  • Ramirez, C., Liel, A., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Haselton, C., Spear, A., Steiner, J., Deierlein, G., & Miranda, E. (2012). Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(11), 1455–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J., Koboevic, S., & Tremblay, R. (2012). Seismic response of irregular industrial steel buildings. In Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures (pp. 73–85). Springer.

  • Rinaldin, G., Fasan, M., Sancin, L., & Amadio, C. (2020). On the behaviour of steel CBF for industrial buildings subjected to seismic sequences. Structures, 28, 2175–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., Johnson, S., Herman, D., & Yoo, J. H. (2006). Seismic performance of SCBF braced frame gusset plate connections. 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering,

  • Roeder, C. W., Lumpkin, E. J., & Lehman, D. E. (2011). A balanced design procedure for special concentrically braced frame connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(11), 1760–1772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, C. W., Lumpkin, E. J., & Lehman, D. E. (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames. Earthquake Spectra, 28(2), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., Norvig, P., Canny, J., Malik, J., & Edwards, D. (2003). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. vol. 2 Prentice hall. Upper Saddle River.

  • Sabelli, R. (2001). Research on improving the design and analysis of earthquake-resistant steel-braced frames. EERI Oakland, CA, USA.

  • Salari, N., Konstantinidis, D., Mohsenzadeh, V., & Wiebe, L. (2022). Demands on acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components in special concentrically braced frame and special moment frame buildings. Engineering Structures, 260, 114031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114031

  • Salehi, H., & Burgueño, R. (2018). Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering. Engineering Structures, 171, 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salkhordeh, M., Mirtaheri, M., & Soroushian, S. (2021). A decision-tree-based algorithm for identifying the extent of structural damage in braced-frame buildings. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 28(11), e2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., Reddy, K. K., & Giering, M. (2016). Deep learning for structural health monitoring: A damage characterization application. Annual Conference of the PHM Society,

  • Sen, A. D., Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., & Berman, J. W. (2019). Nonlinear modeling of concentrically braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 157, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharbati, R., Hayati, Y., & Hadianfard, M. (2019). Numerical investigation on the cyclic behavior of post-tensioned steel moment connections with bolted angles. International Journal of Steel Structures, 19, 1840–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi, Z., Hameed, R., & Akmal, U. (2014). Comparison of different bracing systems for tall buildings. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences.

  • Sizemore, J. G., Fahnestock, L. A., Hines, E. M., & Bradley, C. R. (2017). Parametric Study of Low-Ductility Concentrically Braced Frames under Cyclic Static Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(6), 04017032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speicher, M. S., & Harris, J. L. (2016). Collapse prevention seismic performance assessment of new special concentrically braced frames using ASCE 41. Engineering Structures, 126, 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Burton, H. V., & Huang, H. (2021). Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, K. (2008). Earthquake damage to industrial facilities and development of seismic and vibration control technology. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 2(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taffese, W. Z., & Sistonen, E. (2017). Machine learning for durability and service-life assessment of reinforced concrete structures: Recent advances and future directions. Automation in Construction, 77, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Q., Lehman, D. E., Roeder, C. W., Berman, J. W., Sen, A. D., & Wu, B. (2021). Design-parameter study on seismic performance of chevron-configured SCBFs with yielding beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 179, 106561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tefera, B., Zekaria, A., & Gebre, A. (2023). Challenges in applying vibration-based damage detection to highway bridge structures. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(6), 1875–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00594-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., Archambault, M.-H., & Filiatrault, A. (2003). Seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames made with rectangular hollow bracing members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(12), 1626–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., Filiatrault, A., Timler, P., & Bruneau, M. (1995). Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), 338–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., & Robert, N. (2001). Seismic performance of low-and medium-rise chevron braced steel frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(4), 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriz, P. (2005). Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures. University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriz, P., Filippou, F. C., & Mahin, S. A. (2008). Model for cyclic inelastic buckling of steel braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(619)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vemuri, V. K. (2019). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 21(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2019.1632410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Dai, K., Li, B., Li, B., Liu, Y., Mei, Z., Yin, Y., & Li, J. (2020). Seismic retrofit design and risk assessment of an irregular thermal power plant building. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1719

  • Wang, J., Burton, H. V., & Dai, K. (2021). Reliability-based assessment of percentage combination rules considering the collapse performance of special concentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures, 226, 111370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Dai, K., Yin, Y., & Tesfamariam, S. (2018a). Seismic performance-based design and risk analysis of thermal power plant building with consideration of vertical and mass irregularities. Engineering Structures, 164, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Pedroni, N., Zentner, I., & Zio, E. (2018b). Seismic fragility analysis with artificial neural networks: Application to nuclear power plant equipment. Engineering Structures, 162, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P., Robins, P., & Hare, J. (2010). Preliminary observations of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquakes. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 43(4), i–iv.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Ebad Sichani, M., Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2020). The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 36(4), 1769–1801. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R., & Zadeh, L. A. (2012). An introduction to fuzzy logic applications in intelligent systems Vol. 165. Springer, USA

  • Yoo, J. H. (2006). Analytical investigation on the seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames. University of Washington.

  • Yoo, J.-H., Lehman, D. E., & Roeder, C. W. (2008). Influence of connection design parameters on the seismic performance of braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64(6), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J.-H., Roeder, C. W., & Lehman, D. E. (2009). Simulated behavior of multi-story X-braced frames. Engineering Structures, 31(1), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., Balluz, L., & Malilay, J. (2004). Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 322(1–3), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X., Ji, T., & Zheng, T. (2015). Relationships between internal forces, bracing patterns and lateral stiffnesses of a simple frame. Engineering Structures, 89, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., Zhang, W., & Ding, Y. (2019). Representative strain-based fatigue and fracture evaluation of I-shaped steel bracing members using the fiber model. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 160, 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.05.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., Zhang, W., & Li, H. (2021). Low-cycle fatigue life prediction of I-shaped steel brace components and braced frames. Thin-Walled Structures, 163, 107711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentner, I., Nadjarian, A., Humbert, N., & Viallet, E. (2008). Numerical calculation of fragility curves for probabilistic seismic risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering

  • Zhao, O., Gardner, L., & Young, B. (2016). Structural performance of stainless steel circular hollow sections under combined axial load and bending–Part 1: Experiments and numerical modelling. Thin-Walled Structures, 101, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y.-G., Qin, M.-J., Lu, Z.-H., & Zhang, L.-W. (2021). Seismic fragility analysis of nuclear power plants considering structural parameter uncertainty. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216, 107970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0113600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278512), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2022NSFSC0988 & 2022NSFSC0432), International Collaboration Program of Sichuan Province (2023JDGD0042), Sichuan University Postdoctoral Interdisciplinary Innovation Fund (JCXK2240), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M700096). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency or affiliated institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MOE Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Science and Engineering and Department of Civil Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China

    Adane Demeke Wasse, Kaoshan Dai & Jianze Wang

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Reza Sharbati

Authors
  1. Adane Demeke Wasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaoshan Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianze Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reza Sharbati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianze Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wasse, A.D., Dai, K., Wang, J. et al. State-of-the-Art Review: Seismic Design and Performance Assessment of Special Concentrically Braced Frames Developed for Complex Industrial Building Structures. Int J Steel Struct 24, 280–295 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-024-00815-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-024-00815-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation