Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:45:27.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply: Citational Politics and the Future of Posthumanist Archaeologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2024

Matthew C. Greer Open the ORCID record for Matthew C. Greer [Opens in a new window]
Matthew C. Greer*
Affiliation:
Archaeometry Laboratory University of Missouri Research Reactor Columbia, MO 65211 USA Email: mcg5s@virginia.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I want to begin by thanking Craig Cipolla, Lindsay Montgomery, Susan Pollock, Kathleen Sterling and Christopher Witmore for their responses. I am honoured to be in conversation with such thoughtful and insightful scholars. In my reading, two main themes emerged from their comments—citational politics and what the future of posthumanist archaeologies might look like. To conclude our discussion of archaeology, Black studies and posthumanism, I will address each in turn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2024 , pp. 24 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cipolla, C.N., 2021. Posthuman potentials: considering collaborative Indigenous archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 31(3), 509–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, C., 2021. Teaching antiracist citational politics as a project of transformation: lessons from the Cite Black Women movement for white feminist anthropologists. Feminist Anthropology 2(1), 120–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D.-A. & Mulla, S., 2023. The unbearable whiteness of citational practice in US medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 37(3), 182–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasco, G., 2023. Not all citations are equal: reflections from medical anthropology in the Philippines. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 37(3), 217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marín-Aguilera, B., 2021. Ceci n'est pas un subalterne. A comment on Indigenous erasure in ontology-related archaeologies. Archaeological Dialogues 28(2), 133–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenscroft, A., 2018. Strange weather: Indigenous materialisms, new materialism, and colonialism. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry 5(3), 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosiek, J.L. & Adkins-Cartee, M., 2023. Diffracting structure/agency dichotomies, wave/particle dualities, and the citational politics of settler colonial scholars engaging Indigenous studies literature. Cultural Studies↔︎Critical Methodologies 23(2), 157–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosiek, J.L., Snyder, J. & Pratt, S.L., 2020. The new materialisms and indigenous theories of non-human agency: making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry 26(3–4), 331–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.A., Williams, E.L., Wadud, I.A., Pirtle, W.N.L. & The Cite Black Women Collective, 2021. Cite Black women: a critical praxis (a statement). Feminist Anthropology 2(1), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Z., 2016. An Indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn: ‘ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, R.J., 2020. An alter(ed)Native perspective on historical bioarchaeology. Historical Archaeology 54(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, V., 2013. Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). DIES: Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education and Society 2(1), 20–34.Google Scholar