Skip to main content
Log in

On the Flexibility of a Sliding Vertical Support of a Flat Design

  • Published:
Mechanics of Solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A flat body on hinged supports is considered. One of the supports is connected to the body by means of a sliding attachment. The flexibility of the support rods is modeled by a hinge with a helical spring of sufficient stiffness to prevent relative rotation. It is shown that the linearization of the equilibrium equations makes it impossible to estimate the equilibrium position. The equilibrium position is sought in the form of a series in terms of the reciprocal of the helical spring stiffness coefficient. It is shown that as the helical spring stiffness coefficient tends to infinity and the helical spring moment, which models the internal bending forces in the rods, tends to infinity. For the case of vertical equilibrium, an estimate is given of the tangential reaction in the support hinge, which occurs when additional loads are introduced and in the case of small oscillations. In all the cases considered, the reaction that occurs in the supports is much greater than the body’s weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

REFERENCES

  1. Y. Q. Liu, F. Liang, and T. K. Au Francis, “Experimental study of durable low-friction concrete contacts for precast segmental columns with resettable sliding joints,” Constr. Build. Mater. 318, 126192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126192

  2. Yu.-F. Jiang, Z.-X. Guo, S. H. Basha, and Z.-L. Chai, “Sliding bed joint for seismic response control of ashlar stone masonry structures,” Eng. Struct. 244, 112734 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112734

  3. F. Di Trapani, V. Bolis, F. Basone, L. Cavaleri, and M. Preti, “Traditional vs. sliding-joint masonry infilled frames: seismic reliability and EAL,” Proc. Struct. Integrity 26, 383–392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Morandi, R. R. Milanesi, and G. Magenes, “Innovative solution for seismic-resistant masonry infills with sliding joints: in-plane experimental performance,” Eng. Struct. 176, 719–733 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Min, N. Li, Y. Zhang, Q. Lu, and X. Liu, “A novel wind resistance sliding support with large sliding displacement and high tensile strength for metal roof system,” Eng. Struct. 243, 112670 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112670

  6. B. Atashfaraz, F. Taiyari, H. Hayati Raad, and A. Formisano, “Efficiency investigation of hybrid aliding rocking columns as elevated reservoirs supporting systems,” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 136, 106222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106222

  7. X. Zhao and Y. L. Xu, “Finite element-based force identification of sliding support systems: part I – theory,” Finite Elem. Anal. Design 42 (4), 229–248 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2005.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. L. Xu and X. Zhao, “Finite element-based force identification of sliding support systems: part II – numerical investigation,” Finite Elem. Anal. Design 42 (4), 249–282 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2005.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Zhao, R. Chen, Z. Wang, and Y. Pan, “Sliding corner gusset connections for improved buckling-restrained braced steel frame seismic performance: subassemblage tests,” Eng. Struct. 172, 644–664 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Zhao, Y. Li, C. Wang, R. Chen, L. Yan, and C. Gong, “Sliding corner gusset connections in concentrically braced frames using BRBs: numerical analysis and practical design,” Eng. Struct. 246, 113055 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113055

  11. M. Z. Dosaev and V. A. Samsonov, “Peculiarities of body balance on hinged supports and sliding closure,” Mech. Solids (2023) (in press). Mech. Solids 58 (4), 1045–1053 (2023)

  12. L. A. Klimina, “Method for finding periodic trajectories of centrally symmetric dynamical systems on the plane,” Differ. Equations 55, 159–168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266119020022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. D. Selyutskiy, “On dynamics of an aeroelastic system with two degrees of freedom,” Appl. Math. Model 67, 449–455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Z. Dosaev and V. A. Samsonov, “Singularities in dynamic systems involving elastic elements and dry friction,” Mech. Solids 56 (8), 1473–1481 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. I. Trush and A. K. Lomunov, Procedure for Calculating of Stone Structures Elements for Multi-Storey Industrial Buildings (Nizhny Novgorod State Univ. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Nizhny Novgorod, 2017) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-21-00303.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Z. Dosaev.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Selikhanovich

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dosaev, M.Z. On the Flexibility of a Sliding Vertical Support of a Flat Design. Mech. Solids 58, 2563–2573 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423070075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423070075

Keywords:

Navigation