Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-effectiveness of latent tuberculosis infection testing and treatment with 6-week regimen among key population in rural communities in China: a decision analysis study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Several model studies suggested the implementation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) testing and treatment could greatly reduce the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) and achieve the 2035 target of the “End TB” Strategy in China. The present study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI testing and TB preventive treatment among key population (≥ 50 years old) susceptible to TB at community level in China.

Methods

A Markov model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI testing using interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and subsequent treatment with 6-month daily isoniazid regimen (6H) (as a standard regimen for comparison) or 6-week twice-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid regimen (6-week H2P2) in a cohort of 10,000 adults with an average initial age of 50 years.

Results

In the base-case analysis, LTBI testing and treatment with 6H was dominated (i.e., more expensive with a lower quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) by LTBI testing and treatment with 6-week H2P2. LTBI testing and treatment with 6-week H2P2 was more effective than no intervention at a cost of $20,943.81 per QALY gained, which was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $24,211.84 per QALY gained in China. The one-way sensitivity analysis showed the change of LTBI prevalence was the parameter that most influenced the results of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Conclusion

As estimated by a Markov model, LTBI testing and treatment with 6-week H2P2 was cost-saving compared with LTBI testing and treatment with 6H, and it was considered to be a cost-effective option for TB control in rural China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used for this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report (2023) Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023.

  2. Houben RM, Dodd PJ (2016) The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: a re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS Med 13(10):e1002152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (2020) WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: tuberculosis preventive treatment: module 1: prevention. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gao L, Li X, Liu J, Wang X, Lu W, Bai L et al (2017) Incidence of active tuberculosis in individuals with latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: follow-up results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 17(10):1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30402-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao L, Zhang H, Xin H, Liu J, Pan S, Li X et al (2018) Short-course regimens of rifapentine plus isoniazid to treat latent tuberculosis infection in older Chinese patients: a randomised controlled study. Eur Respir J 52(6):1801470. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01470-2018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liping Ma (2003) Study on the incidence and prevention of tuberculosis infection among close contacts in families of infectious pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Clinical Focus 18(16):920–922

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu YQ, Tu DH, An YS, Zhang LX (2005) Tuberculosis control in college students in Beijing: preventive therapy for tuberculosis-infected persons. Chin J Antitubercul 27:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gao L, Lu W, Bai L, Wang X, Xu J, Catanzaro A et al (2015) Latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: baseline results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 15(3):310–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71085-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao L, Bai L, Liu J, Lu W, Wang X, Li X et al (2016) Annual risk of tuberculosis infection in rural China: a population-based prospective study. Eur Respir J 48(1):168–178. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00235-2016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xin H, Cao X, Zhang H, Feng B, Du Y, Zhang B et al (2022) Protective efficacy of 6-week regimen for latent tuberculosis infection treatment in rural China: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 60(1):2102359. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02359-2021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chien JY, Chiang HT, Lu MC, Ko WC, Yu CJ, Chen YH et al (2018) QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus is a more sensitive screening tool than QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube for latent tuberculosis infection among older adults in long-term care facilities. J Clin Microbiol 56(8):e00427-e518. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00427-18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Munsiff SS, Tarantino T, Dorsinville M (2010) Adherence to treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in a clinical population in New York City. Int J Infect Dis 14(4):e292–e297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xin H, Zhang H, Liu J, Pan S, Li X, Cao X et al (2019) Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among the elderly in 20 486 rural residents aged 50–70 years in Zhongmu County China. Clin Microbiol Infect 25(9):1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.01.021

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Comstock GW, Baum C, Snider DE Jr (1979) Isoniazid prophylaxis among Alaskan Eskimos: a final report of the bethel isoniazid studies. Am Rev Respir Dis 119(5):827–30. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1979.119.5.827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao L, Zhang H, Hu MG, Xu CD, Xia YY, Li T et al (2022) Estimation of the national burden on latent tuberculosis infection based a multi-center epidemiological survey and the space statistics mode. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis 44(1):54–59. https://doi.org/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20210661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A (2010) Evidence-based comparison of commercial interferon-γ release assays for detecting active TB: a meta analysis. Chest 137(4):952–968. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh CE, Ortiz-Brizuela E, Bastos ML, Menzies D (2021) Comparing the diagnostic performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus to other tests of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 73(5):e1116–e1125. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Menzies D, Al Jahdali H, Al Otaibi B (2011) Recent developments in treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Indian J Med Res 133:257–266

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadatsafavi M, Marra C, Marra F, Moran O, FitzGerald JM, Lynd L (2013) A quantitative benefit-risk analysis of isoniazid for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection using incremental benefit framework. Value Health 16(1):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (2015) Global tuberculosis report. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abuaku B, Tan H, Li X, Chen M, Huang X (2010) Treatment default and death among tuberculosis patients in Hunan. China Scand J Infect Dis 42(4):281–287. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365540903493723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Quaife M, Houben RMGJ, Allwood B, Cohen T, Coussens AK, Harries AD et al (2020) Post-tuberculosis mortality and morbidity: valuing the hidden epidemic. Lancet Respir Med 8(4):332–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30039-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang N, Ma Y, Liu YH, DU J, Zhang H, Xie SH, et al (2016) Risk of treatment failure in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis in China. Biomed Environ Sci 29(8):612–617. https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2016.083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang L, Meng Q, Chen S, Zhang M, Chen B, Wu B et al (2018) Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Zhejiang, China, 2009–2013. Clin Microbiol Infect 24(4):381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruan QL, Yang QL, Sun F, Liu W, Shen YJ, Wu J et al (2022) Recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis after treatment success: a population-based retrospective study in China. Clin Microbiol Infect 28(5):684–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Q, Qiu B, Li G, Yang T, Tao B, Martinez L et al (2022) Tuberculosis reinfection and relapse in eastern China: a prospective study using whole-genome sequencing. Clin Microbiol Infect 28(11):1458–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zu Xiaowen (2021) Cost-effectiveness of preventive treatment for close contacts of tuberculosis patients. China Center for Disease Control and Prevention. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=1021001822.nh&DbName=CMFD2021.

  28. Xu CH, Jeyashree K, Shewade HD, Xia YY, Wang LX, Liu Y et al (2019) Inequity in catastrophic costs among tuberculosis-affected households in China. Infect Dis Poverty 8(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0564-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kittikraisak W, Kingkaew P, Teerawattananon Y, Yothasamut J, Natesuwan S, Manosuthi W et al (2012) Health related quality of life among patients with tuberculosis and HIV in Thailand. PLoS ONE 7(1):e29775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029775

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Holland DP, Sanders GD, Hamilton CD, Stout JE (2009) Costs and cost-effectiveness of four treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179(11):1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200901-0153OC

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ilaiwy G, Dowdy DW (2021) Cost effectiveness of three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis in Syrian refugees. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis 24:100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctube.2021.100262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Doan TN, Fox GJ, Meehan MT, Scott N, Ragonnet R, Viney K et al (2009) Cost-effectiveness of 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid compared with other standard treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a decision analysis study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179(11):1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wen Z, Li T, Zhu W, Chen W, Zhang H, Wang W (2022) Effect of different interventions for latent tuberculosis infections in China: a model-based study. BMC Infect Dis 22(1):488. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07465-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Huynh GH, Klein DJ, Chin DP, Wagner BG, Eckhoff PA, Liu R, Wang L (2015) Tuberculosis control strategies to reach the 2035 global targets in China: the role of changing demographics and reactivation disease. BMC Med 13:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0341-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Xin H, Zhang H, Yang S, Liu J, Lu W, Bai L et al (2020) 5-year follow-up of active tuberculosis development from latent infection in rural China. Clin Infect Dis 70(5):947–950. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang H, Xin H, Du Y, Cao X, Pan S, Liu J et al (2023) Tuberculosis preventive treatment among individuals with inactive tuberculosis suggested by untreated radiographic abnormalities: a community-based randomized controlled trial. Emerg Microbes Infect 12(1):e2169195. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2169195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wingate LT, Coleman MS, de la Motte HC, Semple M, Zhou W, Cetron MS et al (2015) A cost-benefit analysis of a proposed overseas refugee latent tuberculosis infection screening and treatment program. BMC Public Health 15:1201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2530-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Deuffic-Burban S, Atsou K, Viget N, Melliez H, Bouvet E, Yazdanpanah Y (2010) Cost effectiveness of QuantiFERON-TB test vs. tuberculin skin test in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 14(4):471–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pooran A, Booth H, Miller RF, Scott G, Badri M, Huggett JF et al (2010) Different screening strategies (single or dual) for the diagnosis of suspected latent tuberculosis: a cost effectiveness analysis. BMC Pulm Med 22(10):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-10-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rapid communication: TB antigen-based skin tests for the diagnosis of TB infection (2022) Geneva: World Health Organization.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2303202) and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1–037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LG and LW were responsible for study conception. XFC, TLG, LG, and LW planned and designed the study. XFC, TLG, HNX, JD, CLY, BXF, YJH, LYS, YZD, ZHL, YXC, JGL, QJ, LW, and LG contributed to the data acquisition. XFC conducted the analysis with TLG and CLY support. XFC drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript for scientific content and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Wang or Lei Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

As human subjects were not involved, ethics approval was not required for this study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xuefang Cao and Tonglei Guo contributed equally to the article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4336 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, X., Guo, T., Xin, H. et al. Cost-effectiveness of latent tuberculosis infection testing and treatment with 6-week regimen among key population in rural communities in China: a decision analysis study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04777-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04777-z

Keywords

Navigation