Kepler-1625b-I and Kepler-1708b-I are the most noteworthy exomoon candidates to date. A new analysis of the available data comes to a different conclusion.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Peale, S. J. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 37, 533–602 (1999).
Teachey, A. & Kipping, D. M. Sci. Adv. 4, eaav1784 (2018).
Kipping, D. M. et al. Nat. Astron. 6, 367–380 (2022).
Heller, R. & Hippke, M. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02148-w (2023).
Teachey A. & Kipping, D. M. In 233rd Meeting of the American Astronomical Society 404.03 (AAS, 2019).
Vanderburg, A. et al. Astron. J. 156, 184 (2018).
Kreidberg, L. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 877, L15 (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grziwa, S. Existence is disputable. Nat Astron 8, 155–156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02174-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02174-8