Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Being in a Crowd Shifts People’s Attitudes Toward Humanoids

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humanoid store staff is increasingly common. Many retailers rely on automation to address the mounting pressure for cost savings. Meanwhile, humanoid store staff can influence customer experience negatively. People feel stressed and eerie about interacting with humanoids. In this article, I investigate one way to improve people’s attitudes toward humanoids. People’s negative attitudes towards humanoids, such as fear or a sense of eeriness, can be substantially mitigated when they are in a crowded environment. People in a crowded environment do not fear robots or find robots uncanny while people in a relatively uncrowded environment do. I refer to this phenomenon as the “crowd effect.” Being in a crowded environment substantially changes how people evaluate and respond to humanoids. The effect is mediated by risk aversion tendency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Begley S, Hancock B, Kilroy T, Kohli S (2019). Automation in retail: an executive overview for getting ready. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/automation-in-retail-an-executive-overview-for-getting-ready#

  2. PwC (2018) Will robots really steal our jobs? An international analysis of the potential long-term impact of automation. PwC, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green D (2019) A googly-eyed robot is coming to 172 grocery stores across America, Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/giant-food-stores-bringing-robots-to-stores-2019-1

  4. Kimmorley S (2014) Nestle has hired a robot to sell its coffee machines in Japan. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/nestle-has-hired-a-robot-to-sell-its-coffee-machines-in-japan-2014-10

  5. Petro G (2020) Robots take retail. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregpetro/2020/01/10/robots-take-retail/?sh=78728e451720

  6. Forgan B (2020) What robots can do for retail. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/10/what-robots-can-do-for-retail

  7. Kim RY (2024) Anthropomorphism and human–robot interaction. Commun ACM 67(2):80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lussier B, Grégoire Y, Vachon M (2017) The role of humor usage on creativity, trust and performance in business relationships: an analysis of the salesperson-customer dyad. J Bus Res 65:168–181

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mende M, Scott ML, Doorn J, Grewal D, Shanks I (2019) Service robots rising: how humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. J Mark Res 56(4):535–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith A, Anderson M (2017) Americans’ attitudes toward a future in which robots and computers can do many human jobs. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/10/04/americans-attitudes-toward-a-future-in-which-robots-and-computers-can-do-many-human-jobs/

  11. Choi S, Mattila AS, Bolton LE (2021) To err is human(-oid): How do consumers react to robot service failure and recovery? J Serv Res 24(3):354–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pixteren MMEv et al (2019) Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing. J Serv Mark 33(4):507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SY, Schmitt BH, Thalmann NM (2019) Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking. Mark Lett 30:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chita-Tegmark M, Lohani M, Scheutz M (2019) Gender effects in perceptions of robots and humans with varying emotional intelligence. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), Daegu, South Korea, pp 230–238

  15. Harling KS, Watanabe K, Mougenot C (2013) The influence of robot appearance on assessment. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, Tokyo, Japan, pp 131–132

  16. Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley (from the field). IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19(2):98–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Longoni C, Cian L (2022) Artificial intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: the “Word-of-Machine” effect. J Mark 86(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao L, Kumar V (2021) Robotics for customer service: a useful complement or an ultimate substitute? J Serv Res 24(1):9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahneman D, Tverksy A (1982) The psychology of preferences. Sci Am 246(1):160–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chetty R (2006) A new method of estimating risk aversion. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1821–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rangaswami A, Gupta S (2000) Innovation adoption and diffusion in the digital environments: some research opportunities. In: Mahajan V, Muller E, Wind Y (eds) New product diffusion models. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suttie I (1922) Critique of the theory of “Herd Instinct.” J Meteorol Soc Jpn 68(282):245–254

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palley T (1995) Safety in numbers: a model of managerial herd behavior. J Econ Behav Organ 28(3):443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiller RJ (1995) Conversation, information, and herd behavior. Am Econ Rev 85(2):181–185

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stallen M, De Dreu CKW, Shalvi S, Smidts A, Sanfey A (2012) The herding hormone: oxytocin stimulates in-group conformity. Psychol Sci 23(11):1288–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lynn SK, Hoge EA, Fischer LE, Barrett LF, Simon NM (2014) Gender differences in oxytocin-associated disruption of decision bias during emotion perception. Psychiatry Res 219(1):198–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bicchieri C, Fukui Y (1999) The great illusion: ignorance, informational cascades, and the persistence of unpopular norms. In: Galavotti MC, Pagnini A (eds) Experience, reality, and scientific explanation, vol 61. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Gioia F (2017) Peer effects on risk behaviour: the importance of group identity. Exp Econ 20:100–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scholer A, Zou X, Fujita K, Stroessner S, Higgins E (2010) When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. J Pers Soc Psychol 99(2):215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Viscusi WK, Phillips OR, Kroll S (2011) Risky investment decisions: How are individuals influenced by their groups? J Risk Uncertain 43:81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shim S, Drakes MF (1990) Consumer intention to utilize electronic shopping. The Fishbein behavioral intention model. J Direct Mark 4(3):22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z, Huang Z, He R, Feng Y (2022) Cryptocurrency and herd behavior, applied mathematics, modelling, and computer simulation. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2010) Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? Am Econ Rev 100(3):1238–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Deck C, Jahedi S (2015) The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: a survey and new experiments. Eur Econ Rev 78:97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Drichoutis A, Rodolfo N (2020) Economic rationality under cognitive load. Econ J 130(632):2382–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heilman RM, Crişan LG, Houser D, Miclea M, Miu AC (2010) Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion 10(2):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bruner GC, Hensel PJ, James KE (2005) Marketing scales handbook: a compilation of multi-item measures for consumer behavior & advertising, vol 4. AMA and Thomson/South-Western, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  38. Disatnik D, Steinhart Y (2015) Need for cognitive closure, risk aversion, uncertainty changes, and their effects on investment decisions. J Mark Res 52(3):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Person Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ellingrud K (2018) The upside of automation: new jobs, increased productivity and changing roles for workers. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kweilinellingrud/2018/10/23/the-upside-of-automation-new-jobs-increased-productivity-and-changing-roles-for-workers/

  41. Harling KS, Mougenot C, Ono F, Watanabe K (2014) Cultural differences in perception and attitude towards robots. Int J Affect Eng 13(3):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montclair, NJ, USA

    Rae Yule Kim

Authors
  1. Rae Yule Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rae Yule Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

IRB: IRB-FY21-22-2301.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, R.Y. Being in a Crowd Shifts People’s Attitudes Toward Humanoids. Int J of Soc Robotics 16, 569–577 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01108-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01108-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation