Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of past fundraising experiences on the fundraising performance of equity crowdfunding projects

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have been the mainstay of technological innovation. Given the paucity of financial support, equity crowdfunding has become a popular way for SMEs to obtain project funds in recent years. Based on all successful crowdfunding projects on Seedrs, an equity crowdfunding platform, we delved into the impact of the content not displayed on project’s presentation page, particularly past fundraising experiences, on fundraising performance. Additionally, we empirically explored the influence of three dimensions, namely whether there was past fundraising experience, the number of past fundraising experience(s), and the amount of the last fundraising, on the fundraising ratio and the number of investors. The research results indicate that (1) the fundraising ratio is not significantly related to whether there was past fundraising experience and the number of past fundraising experience(s), but positively related to the amount of the last fundraising; (2) the number of investors is not significantly related to whether there was past fundraising experience, but positively related to the number of past fundraising experience(s) and negatively related to the amount of the last fundraising. Theoretically, we explored the relations between the information not displayed and fundraising performance from the perspective of past fundraising experience, supplementing and enriching the related research. Practically, we revealed the information searching behaviors of investors and guided the crowdfunding platforms in the information display.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang L. (2010). Research on growth mechanism and vulnerability Assessment of S&T SMEs’ independent property [J] (p. 133). University of Science and Technology of China.

  2. Mollick E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlers G K, Cumming, D., Günther, C., et al. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giudici, G., Nava, R., Rossi Lamastra, C. (2012). Crowdfunding: The new frontier for financing entrepreneurship? [J]. Available at SSRN 2157429.

  5. Hemer J. (2011). A snapshot on crowdfunding [R]. Arbeitspapiere Unternehmen und Region.

  6. Parker, S. C. (2014). Crowdfunding, cascades and informed investors [J]. Economics Letters, 125(3), 432–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Colombo M G, Franzoni, C., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhiying Liu L S A C M, E. T. A. L. (2016). The factors of Crowdfunding Financing performance: In perspective of Literature Review [J] (Vol. 37, p. 10). Science of Science and Management of S&T. 11.

  9. Best, J., & Neiss, S. (2012). JONES D. How crowdfund investing helps solve three pressing socioeconomic challenges [J]. Crowdfund Capital Advisors, : 3–5.

  10. Ziegler T, Shneor R, Wenzlaff K, et al. The 4th European alternative finance benchmarking report [J]. Available at SSRN 3772260, 2021.

  11. Ziegler T, Shneor R, Wenzlaff K, et al. Shifting Paradigms—The 4th European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report [Z]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. 2019

  12. Bradford C S (2012). Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws [J]. Colum Bus L Rev, : 1.

  13. Wenqing Wu M F, L. I. M. I. N. G. Z. H. A. O. (2016). Successful factors and Herding Phenomenon of crowdfunding [J]. Soft Science, 2, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mollick E R (2013). Swept away by the crowd? Crowdfunding, venture capital, and the selection of entrepreneurs [J]. Venture Capital, and the selection of entrepreneurs (March 25, 2013).

  15. Yongming Pan T S. Project Attributes. (2018). Project Team and Performance of Store Crowdfunding [J]. Soft Science, 09(4), 133.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bessière, V., & Stéphany, E. (2020). Crowdfunding, business angels, and venture capital: An exploratory study of the concept of the funding trajectory [J]. Venture Capital, 22(2), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ziegler, T., Johanson, D., King, M., et al. (2018). Reaching New heights: The 3rd americas Alternative Finance Industry Report [J]. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.

  18. Jianghong Zeng H W A X G, etal. (2018). An Empirical Research on the Effects of the Pre-experienced Supporters on the Success of Crowdfunding Projects [J]. Soft Science, 2018, 32(3): 4.

  19. Kim, K. & Viswanathan S. (2018). The’Experts’ in the crowd: The role of experienced investors in a crowdfunding market [J]. Mis Quarterly.

  20. Collins, L., & Pierrakis, Y. (2012). The venture crowd: crowdfunding equity investments into business [J].

  21. Bretschneider U, Leimeister, J. M. (2017). Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers’ motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding [J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, C., Han, R., Xu, Q., et al. (2020). The impact of soft information extracted from descriptive text on crowdfunding performance [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, 101002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shneor R, Vik A A. Crowdfunding success: a systematic literature review 2010–2017 [J]. Baltic Journal of Management, 2020, 15(2): 149–82.

  24. Leland H E, Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation [J]. The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spence M (1978). Job market signaling [M]. Uncertainty in economics. Elsevier. : 281–306.

  26. Phelps E S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism [J]. The American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bhattacharya, R., Devinney T M, & Pillutla M M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes [J]. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway C, L. (2003). Expectation states theory [M]. Handbook of social psychology. Springer. : 29–51.

  29. Connelly B L, Certo S T, Ireland R D, et al. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment [J]. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ryu, S., Kim, K., & Hahn, J. (2022). Crowdfunding success effects on financing outcomes for startups: A signaling theory perspective [J]. MIS Quarterly (Accepted).

  31. Busenitz L W, & Fiet J O (2005). MOESEL D D. Signaling in venture capitalist—new venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long–term venture outcomes? [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hsu D H. (2004). What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? [J]. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1805–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lukkarinen A. Equity crowdfunding: Principles and investor behaviour [J]. Advances in Crowdfunding: Research and Practice (2020). : 93–118.

  34. Lafontaine, F., & Shaw, K. (2016). Serial entrepreneurship: Learning by doing? [J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(S2), S217–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Toft-Kehler, R., Wennberg, K., & Kim, P. H. (2014). Practice makes perfect: Entrepreneurial-experience curves and venture performance [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (72272075, 71872086), Nanjing University Special Program for Middle and Long Term Outstanding Research in New Era Humanities and Social Sciences (14914220) Guangdong Province Characteristic Innovation Projects in Ordinary Universities (2022WTSCX266) and Doctoral Research Start-up Program (SZIIT2021KJ034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiling Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Wang, H. & Li, F. The impact of past fundraising experiences on the fundraising performance of equity crowdfunding projects. Electron Commer Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09815-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09815-8

Keywords

Navigation