Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the Association Between Citizenship and Ethnicity on Identity Theft Risk: Findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies examining citizenship, ethnicity, and victimization risk have offered mixed findings. Despite this, works have largely focused upon direct-contact victimization, and do not offer insights into how this risk may vary across these dimensions for other crimes not characterized by direct contact, such as identity theft. This lack of understanding undermines abilities to tailor policies to effectively support vulnerable persons, and may potentially elevate risk of this costly crime among marginalized groups. Given this, the study aims to examine the associations between citizenship status, ethnicity and identity theft risk. Using a sample from the 2018 National Crime Victimization Survey’s Identity Theft Supplement (n = 71,984), logistic regression analyses examined the odds of identity theft. Lacking citizenship was associated with decreased odds of identity theft victimization, as was Hispanic ethnicity. However, Hispanic noncitizens faced higher relative risk than either noncitizens or Hispanic persons individually. Noncitizens’ decreased relative risk may stem from avoidance behaviors which reduce their suitability or exposure through a lifestyle-routine activities perspective. Hispanic noncitizens’ increased risk relative to others may stem from their doubly marginalized status. Future work is needed considering avoidance behaviors and citizenship status, to more clearly understand how these factors influence relative risk of victimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Importantly, the NCVS questionnaire may be administered in Spanish if requested by the respondent. Any supplemental surveys, such as the NCVS-ITS are similarly administered in the language requested by the subject (Bureau of Justice Statistics, n.d.).

  2. Items were not disaggregated within the present analysis given limited victimization experience across individual forms of identity theft. For instance, only 0.78% of the analytic sample experienced new accounts-based identity theft victimization (n = 560).

  3. Unfortunately, the NCVS-ITS did not delineate between other ethnic identities, thus precluding a more nuanced analysis of relative risk across the intersection of citizenship status and other ethnicities. Given this, generalization of findings is limited to a US context and to those identifying as either Hispanic or not Hispanic.

  4. Given the nature and scope of the NCVS-ITS, several other potentially relevant factors relating to victimization risk, such as lifestyles and routine activities and self-control could not be included within the assessment. Despite this, risk and protective factors considered herein are consistent with prior works examining identity theft (Burnes et al., 2020; Reyns, 2013; Reyns & Henson, 2016), and reflect factors which may insulate or expose one to risk of identity theft.

  5. In total, 15 persons identifying as transgender and 37 persons identifying as “none of these” were removed from the sample in this way.

References

Download references

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this manuscript, and indicates no competing interests relating to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cooper A. Maher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maher, C.A. Examining the Association Between Citizenship and Ethnicity on Identity Theft Risk: Findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Am J Crim Just (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09759-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-024-09759-7

Keywords

Navigation