Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Photodynamic and Rhamnolipid Inhibition on the Dermatophyte Biofilm

  • Original research article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The failure to successfully treat dermatophyte-related diseases is often due to the formation of biofilms, which makes dermatophytes resistant to antifungals. Here, an attempt has been made to assess inhibition of dermatophyte biofilm production using photodynamic therapy and rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Two methods were used to inhibit biofilm formation by dermophytes Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton verrucosum, Microsporum canis and Microsporum gypseum. The first method was the use of rhamnolipid with concentrations of 39 to 1000 ppm and the second was the use of photodynamic method with concentrations of 8, 16 and 32 µg/ml of methylene blue. In addition, these two methods were evaluated simultaneously. The biofilm formation was evaluated using spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy. Biosurfactant has been shown to have an improved ability to inhibit the formation of biofilm by the strains. Although photodynamic therapy has not been successful, but in combination with biosurfactant, it may have a synergistic effect. By investigating the effect of rhamnolipid on the formation of biofilm, it was found that Microsporum species has a relatively stronger attachment to the surfaces of the wells compared to trichophyton species. The biofilms were evaluated with electron microscope in the simultaneous treatment of rhamnolipid and photodynamics. The results showed that after the treatment, the biofilms became discrete and their structural integrity was reduced. Even in Microsporum species, which were among the most resistant dermatophytes, the changes in the fungal biofilm after treatment were significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Algburi A, Comito N, Kashtanov D, Dicks LM, Chikindas ML (2017) Control of biofilm formation: antibiotics and beyond. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02508–e02516

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X, Wu B, Chen H, Nan K, Jin Y, Sun L, Wang B (2018) Recent developments in smart antibacterial surfaces to inhibit biofilm formation and bacterial Infections. J Mater Chem b 6:4274–4292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez-Jorge C, Arenas M-A, Conde A, Hernández-Lopez J-M, de Damborenea J-J, Fisher S, Hunt AMA, Esteban J, James G (2017) Bacterial and fungal biofilm formation on anodized titanium alloys with fluorine. J Mater Sci Mater Med 28:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cepas V, López Y, Gabasa Y, Martins CB, Ferreira JD, Correia MJ, Santos LM, Oliveira F, Ramos V, Reis M (2019) Inhibition of bacterial and fungal biofilm formation by 675 extracts from microalgae and cyanobacteria. Antibiotics 8:77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lan M, Zhao S, Liu W, Lee CS, Zhang W, Wang P (2019) Photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 8:1900132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almeida A (2020) Photodynamic therapy in the inactivation of microorganisms. MDPI, p 138

  7. Singh P, Patil Y, Rale V (2019) Biosurfactant production: emerging trends and promising strategies. J Appl Microbiol 126:2–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varjani SJ, Upasani VN (2017) Critical review on biosurfactant analysis, purification and characterization using rhamnolipid as a model biosurfactant. Bioresour Technol 232:389–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Araújo J, Rocha J, Oliveira Filho M, Matias S, Júnior SO, Padilha C (2018) Rhamnolipids biosurfactants from Pseudomonas aeruginosa—a review. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 15:767–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaskatepe B, Yildiz S (2016) Rhamnolipid biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas species. Braz Arch Biol Technol 59:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khurana A, Sardana K, Chowdhary A (2019) Antifungal resistance in dermatophytes: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Fungal Genet Biol 132:103255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nitta CY, Daniel AGT, Taborda CP, Santana AE, Larsson CE (2016) Isolation of dermatophytes from the hair coat of healthy persian cats without skin lesions from commercial catteries located in São Paulo metropolitan area, Brazil. Acta Sci Veterinariae 44:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chanu KV, Thakuria D, Pant V, Bisht S, Tandel RS (2022) Development of multiplex PCR assay for species-specific detection and identification of Saprolegnia parasitica. Biotechnol Rep 35:e00758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sen S, Borah SN, Bora A, Deka S (2020) Rhamnolipid exhibits anti-biofilm activity against the dermatophytic fungi Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Biotechnol Rep 27:e00516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen B, Sun Y, Zhang J, Chen R, Zhong X, Wu X, Zheng L, Zhao J (2019) In vitro evaluation of photodynamic effects against biofilms of dermatophytes involved in onychomycosis. Front Microbiol 10:1228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Koga H (2014) Antifungal susceptibility testing method for dermatophytes-determination of MIC and MFC values. Med Mycol J 55:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sen S, Borah SN, Kandimalla R, Bora A, Deka S (2019) Efficacy of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant to inhibit Trichophyton rubrum in vitro and in a mice model of dermatophytosis. Exp Dermatol 28:601–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smijs TG, Schuitmaker HJ (2003) Photodynamic inactivation of the Dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum¶. Photochem Photobiol 77:556–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smijs TG, van der Haas RN, Lugtenburg J, Liu Y, de Jong RL, Schuitmaker HJ (2004) Photodynamic treatment of the Dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum and its Microconidia with Porphyrin Photosensitizers¶. Photochem Photobiol 80:197–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrigues GB, Ferreira LK, Wainwright M, Braga GU (2012) Susceptibilities of the dermatophytes Trichophyton mentagrophytes and T. rubrum microconidia to photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy with novel phenothiazinium photosensitizers and red light. J Photochem Photobiol B 116:89–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim J-H, Han C-S, Chun S-N, Lee M-Y (2014) Photodynamic inactivation of chlorin e6 with halogen light against dermatophytes. Toxicol Environ Health Sci 6:170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Zaboli.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Askari, R., Zaboli, F., Pordeli, H. et al. Investigation of Photodynamic and Rhamnolipid Inhibition on the Dermatophyte Biofilm. Indian J Microbiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-023-01139-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-023-01139-9

Keywords

Navigation