Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric ERCP: Evolving into an Outpatient Procedure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Invited Commentary to this article was published on 28 February 2024

Abstract

Background

While most adult ERCPs are performed on an outpatient basis, pediatric ERCPs are typically performed on an inpatient basis, or with ERCP followed by at least one night inpatient admission. We have begun performing a substantial proportion of our pediatric ERCPs on an outpatient basis, using our clinical judgment to guide the decision process. In the present study, we compare patient characteristics, indications, and adverse events associated with outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP.

Methods

Using our endoscopy database, we identified patients 18 years of age and under who underwent ERCP from 2019 to 2021. Demographics, hospitalization status, indications, findings, interventions, as well as available adverse event and clinical outcomes data were analyzed.

Results

147 ERCP procedures were performed during the study period by one of two interventional endoscopists. A subset of 51 (34.7%) patients underwent outpatient ERCP. Comparison of the two groups (outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP) was notable for no statistically significant difference in patient age, range of indications, or proportion of index vs. subsequent ERCP. Overall rates of ERCP-associated adverse events were low and there was no statistically significant difference between adverse events in patients who underwent outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP.

Conclusion

We analyzed outpatient and inpatient pediatric ERCP patient demographics and ERCP characteristics to identify factors that guide decision to determine whether pediatric ERCPs are performed on an outpatient vs. inpatient basis. There was no significant difference in adverse events associated with outpatient vs. inpatient pediatric ERCPs, attesting to the safety of outpatient ERCP for this subset of patients in the studied context. This is an area worthy of future prospective and multi-center study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERCP:

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

US:

United States

References

  1. Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE et al. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:1–8.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cotton PB. Cannulation of the papilla of Vater by endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Gut 1972;13:1014–1025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotton PB, Beales JS. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with jaundice. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1973;36:689–692.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang RJ, Thosani NC, Barakat MT et al. Evolution in the utilization of biliary interventions in the United States: results of a nationwide longitudinal study from 1998 to 2013. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:319–326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barakat MT, Cholankeril G, Gugig R, Berquist WE. Nationwide evolution of pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography indications, utilization, and readmissions over time. J Pediatr 2021;232:159–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeurnink SM, Poley JW, Steyerberg EW et al. ERCP as an outpatient treatment: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:118–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sherman S. Outpatient therapeutic ERCP: has the time come? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:326–328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehta SN, Pavone E, Barkun AN. Outpatient therapeutic ERCP: a series of 262 consecutive cases. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:443–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J et al. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:868–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Committee ASoP, Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2020;52:127–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dumonceau JM, Deprez PH, Jenssen C et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017. Endoscopy 2017;49:695–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barakat MT, Triadafilopoulos G, Berquist WE. Pediatric endoscopy practice patterns in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019;69:24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cote GA, Lynch S, Easler JJ et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for admission after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:2323–2332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed M, Kanotra R, Savani GT et al. Utilization trends in inpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a cross-sectional US experience. Endosc Int Open 2017;5:E261–E271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Avitsland TL, Aabakken L. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in infants and children. Endosc Int Open 2021;9:E292–E296.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tringali A, Balassone V, De Angelis P, Landi R. Complications in pediatric endoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016;30:825–839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giefer MJ, Kozarek RA. Technical outcomes and complications of pediatric ERCP. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3543–3550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was secured for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MTB and RG conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, analyzed the data, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. AY-JL critically reviewed the manuscript and data analysis/presentation and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Gugig.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest pertaining to the study to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

An invited commentary on this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08327-7

Most pediatric ERCPs in the US are performed on an inpatient basis. We recently shifted our interventional endoscopy practice toward performing a subset of pediatric ERCPs on an outpatient basis. The present study attests to the safety of outpatient ERCP for this subset of patients in this context.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barakat, M.T., Liman, A.YJ. & Gugig, R. Pediatric ERCP: Evolving into an Outpatient Procedure. Dig Dis Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08325-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08325-9

Keywords

Navigation