Skip to main content
Log in

Use of a Humate–Sapropelic Suspension When Growing Sunn Hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) in Protected Soil Conditions (Greenhouse)

  • GEOBIOLOGY
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the species of the genus Crotalaria L., Crotalaria juncea is the only cover crop cultivated for its fiber. The quality of the latter depends on the nutritional conditions, accumulation of biophilic elements in the biomass, and synthesis of proteinogenic amino acids. Thus, the purpose of this study was a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the green harvest at the active flowering stage, before the bean formation phase, when the entire biochemical cycle of the plant is reconfigured, and the biochemical indicators are maximum. The plants were grown for 140 days (from April 22 to September 9, 2023) in protected soil conditions. The experimental design consisted of two units of 50 plants each: in the first (control) unit, plants were grown in a soil mixture without any additives; in the second one, they were treated three times during the growing season with an organic suspension of humic acids (1000 ppm) obtained from sapropel (Pskov oblast, UDHSS) by applying it when watering at the root. The soil substrate in both cases was typical chernozem (Kamennaya Steppe Nature Reserve, Voronezh oblast, 51°01′41.6″ N, 40°43′39.3″ E) with a 20% addition of volcanic zeolite. Over the course of every 14 days, morphometric trends of the crop growth (height and dry biomass) were systematically recorded with the removal of five cultivars from each unit of options. After 140 days, the remaining five replicates per option were subjected to biochemical analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the 7500 and LC 1200 devices (Agilent Technologies, United States) according to the manufacturer’s method. Treatment with UDHSS increased productivity and shoot height by 51.1% and 11.3%, respectively. The microelement concentration order in the dry biomass was as follows: Na > K > Ca > S > P > Mg in the control option and Na > K > Ca > Mg > P > S in the UDHSS option, while the microelement export was observed as Fe > Mn > Zn > Ba > B > Cu > Mo and Fe > Mn > B > Zn > Ba > Cu > Mo. In total, the increase was more evident in the microelement accumulation due to a twofold increase in the concentration of iron ions. As for amino acids, L-lysine, L-glycine, L-glutamine, and L-tyrosine became higher. The first three are structural components of biological tissues indirectly indicative of an increase in the fiber strength of the plant culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. H. R. Bhandari, M. K. Tripathi, C. Babira, and S. K. Sarker, Indian J. Agric. Sci. 86, 1391–1398 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Sinbuathong, R. Khun-Anake, and S. Sawanon, Int. J. Global Warming 19 (1/2), 24–36 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. E. Al-Snafi, IOSR J. Pharm. 6 (6), 77–86 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Borisov, O. N. Uspenskaya, N. V. Grenaderov, and I. Yu. Vasyuchkov, Agrokhimiya, No. 8, 51–55 (2014).

  5. T. Yu. Anisimova, Probl. Agrokhim. Ekol., No. 1, 51–58 (2022).

  6. A. N. Aref’ev, E. E. Kuzina, and E. N. Kuzin, Niva Povolzh’ya, No. 1(38), 2–9 (2016).

  7. K. V. Jitendra Mohan and G. Prakash, Indian J. Agric. Sci. 4 (4), 378–381 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. P. Abros’kin, M. Fuentes, J. M. Garcia-Mina, O. I. Klyain, S. V. Senik, D. S. Volkov, I. V. Perminova, and N. A. Kulikova, Eur. Soil Sci. 49 (10), 1099–1108 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Zanin, N. Tomasi, S. Cesco, Z. Varanini, and R. Pinton, Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 675 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Mohammadipour and M. K. Souri, Acta Agrobot. 72 (1), 1–9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Wu, S. Chen, Y. Ruan, and W. Gao, Sustainability 15 (19), 14122 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Zargar Shooshtari, M. K. Souri, M. R. Hasandokht, and S. K. Jari, Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 7 (19) (2020).

  13. S. Khan, H. Yu, Q. Li, Y. Gao, B. N. Sallam, H. Wang, P. Liu, and W. Jiang, Agronomy 9 (5), 1–17 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. A. Noroozlo, M. K. Souri, and M. Delshad, Open Agric. 4, 164–172 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. I. Leinonen, P. P. M. Iannetta, R. M. Rees, W. Russell, C. Watson, and A. P. Barnes, Front. Sust. Food Syst. 3, 27 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.-J. Xu, X. Fang, C.-Y. Li, L. Yang, and X.-Y. Chen,, aBIOTEC 1 (2), 1–9 (2019).

  17. C. A. Schenck and H. A. Maeda, Phytochemistry 149, 82–102 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. H. S. A.-M. Maher and K.A.-T. Duraid, Res. Crops 20 (1), 116–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Ghasemi, A. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh, H. Hadadzadeh, and M. Jafari, J. Plant. Growth Regul. 31, 498–508 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Hertrampf and M. Olivares, Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 74 (6), 435–443 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out under scientific topic no. FMNG-2019-0002 “Innovative Approaches to the Use and Regulation of Aquatic Ecosystem Resources.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. A. Rumyantsev or Ya. V. Pukhalskii.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This work does not contain any studies involving human or animal subjects.

Additional information

Translated by E. Maslennikova

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rumyantsev, V.A., Pukhalskii, Y.V., Loskutov, S.I. et al. Use of a Humate–Sapropelic Suspension When Growing Sunn Hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) in Protected Soil Conditions (Greenhouse). Dokl. Earth Sc. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X24600865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X24600865

Keywords:

Navigation