Skip to main content
Log in

Theory of mind, empathy, and prosocial behavior in children and adolescent: a meta-analysis

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM) and empathy are two major influencers of prosocial behavior (PsB). Some scholars hold that children with advanced ToM and high capacity for empathy are more likely to act prosocially, but the empirical findings are mixed. To clarify the relation between ToM/empathy and PsB, we conducted two meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that met appropriate inclusion criteria. In study 1, a total of 24 studies including 16, 265 participants aged 2 ~ 19 years were identified as eligible for inclusion, and 88 effect sizes for ToM-PsB were yielded. The results showed that there was a significant positive correlation between PsB and ToM (r = 0.24, 95%CI [0.18, 0.31]). Age, PsB measurement method and the cultural background had no significant moderating effect on the relationship between ToM and PsB. The ToM measurement method played a borderline significant role in moderating the relationship between ToM and PsB. In study 2, a total of 29 studies including 23, 304 participants aged 2 ~ 19 years were identified as eligible for inclusion, and 89 effect sizes for empathy-PsB were yielded. The results showed that there was a significant positive correlation between PsB and empathy (r = 0.36, 95%CI [0.30, 0.41]). Age, the measurement methods of PsB and the cultural background moderated the relationship between empathy and PsB. In conclusion, the studies integrate previous researches on the correlations between ToM/empathy and PsB, explores the causes of inconsistency (i.e., the test of moderating variables), and verifies the important role of social understanding (ToM/empathy) in PsB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the supplementary materials (Table S1, S2 and Code in Meta-analysis).

References

References marked with an asterisk (*) indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Research Department of Shihezi University in China (Grant Nos. CXFZSK202205) and Chinese Young Pioneers Research Project 2022 (Grant Nos. 2022YB16).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xin Qiu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing;

Man Gao: Conceptualization, Methodology;

Wenlong Li: Retrieving, screening, and coding literature;

Rong Jiang: Retrieving, screening, and coding literature;

Haidong Zhu: Supervision, Editing. Funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haidong Zhu.

Ethics declarations

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain studies involving human participants performed by any of the authors.

Consent to Participate

It is not the case, this is a review article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 20.8 KB)

ESM 2

(XLSX 19.5 KB)

ESM 3

(XLSX 20.2 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, X., Gao, M., Zhu, H. et al. Theory of mind, empathy, and prosocial behavior in children and adolescent: a meta-analysis. Curr Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05762-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05762-7

Keywords

Navigation