Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T18:47:27.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teachers as Housewives and the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Teacher's Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2024

Áila KK O'Loughlin*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, and Department of Philosophy, North Hennepin Community College, Brooklyn Park, MN, USA

Abstract

The 1970s Wages Against Housework (WAH) movement has much to offer as we form a “new normal” for life and work within the Covid-19 pandemic. WAH feminist philosophers Mariarosa Dalla Costa, Selma James, and Silvia Federici, as well as WAH critic Angela Davis outline the ways in which the housewife functions as a laborer within capitalist accumulation, as her duties to care for the home and rear the children generate the possibility of the husband to labor outside the home. This role of the housewife in Dalla Costa and James’ “social factory” parallels the work of teachers and the chorus of demands to “return to the classroom” that were placed on teachers in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. Highlighting these parallels, the argument of this essay is simple: Covid-19 has visibilized the underpaid and unpaid labor of teachers. We ought to engage this moment of visibilization to demand transformative change to the teaching profession. Due to the parallels between WAH's “housewife” and teachers, we have much to learn from WAH theorizing as we demand those transformative changes, especially now as we solidify our “new normal” more than two years since the Covid-19 pandemic began.

Type
Musing
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhattacharya, Tithi. 2017. Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capper, Beth, and Austin, Arlen. 2018. Wages for housework means wages against heterosexuality: On the archives of black women for wages for housework and wages due lesbians. Lesbian and Gay Studies 24 (4): 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Mariaosa Dalla, and James, Selma. 1972. Women and the subversion of the community; and, A woman's place. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela. 1985. The approaching obsolescence of housework: A working-class perspective. In Women, race and class. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia. 1975. Wages against housework. London: Power of Women Collective.Google Scholar
Meiners, Erica. 2002. Disengaging from the legacy of lady bountiful in teacher education classrooms. Gender and Education 14 (1): 8594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronti, Mario. 1962. Factory and society. In Workers and Capital, trans. Broder, David. New York: Verso.Google Scholar