Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid Lattice-discrete element method for ballast modeling

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Railway ballast modeling can be performed by different approaches, through continuous or discrete models, which have their comparative advantages and disadvantages, such as excessive volumes of material for testing and calibration steps. This paper aims to adapt and propose the use of the Hybrid Lattice-Discrete Element Method for modeling railway ballast aggregates. The advantages of using this technique for this purpose are: (i) one-step calibration of the rock material from laboratory test results; (ii) simulation of fractures in rock materials; (iii) visualization of micromechanical phenomena, such as particle slippage and fracture modes; (iv) realistic representation of various geometries compared to the conventional use of the Discrete Element Method. First, parameter calibration was performed from laboratory test results on granite rock obtained from the literature. Then, particle generation, Voronoi discretization and packing algorithms were used to build models of railway ballast samples. These models were used to simulate mechanical tests, namely single particle compression, confined uniaxial compression, monotonic triaxial compression and cyclic triaxial compression. There was consistency between the results and the empirical observations reported in the literature. In addition, variations in particle size distribution were observed during the simulations, as well as the causes of failure in each specimen, either by shear or particle breakage, in addition to the fracture modes of the ballast aggregates. By analyzing these elements together, knowledge is obtained about the phenomena occurring inside the railway ballast under different loading conditions, in addition to the results of strength, failure and deformation. Finally, it is concluded that the proposed method is effective for modeling railway ballast, besides being versatile, allowing to simulate the material for different loading configurations and boundary conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Indraratna B, Salim W (2005) Mechanics of Ballasted Rail Tracks: A Geotechnical Perspective. Taylor & Francis/Balkema, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tutumluer E, Huang H, Hashash YMA, Ghaboussi J (2009) AREMA gradation affecting ballast performance using discrete element modeling (DEM) approach. In: Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association Annual Conference. Chicago, IL

  3. Chow LC, Mishra D, Tutumluer E (2014) Framework for development of an improved unbound aggregate base rutting model for mechanistic-empirical pavement design. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.3141/2401-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishikawa T, Lin T, Yang J et al (2019) Application of the UIUC model for predicting ballast settlement to unsaturated ballasts under moving wheel loads. Transportation Geotech 18:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SS, Fu ZZ, Han HQ, Peng C (2011) An elastoplastic model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage. Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chin J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Indraratna B, Thakur PK, Vinod JS, Salim W (2012) Semiempirical cyclic densification model for ballast incorporating particle breakage. Int J Geomech 12:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao J, Zhang D, Wei K, Luo Z (2017) Shakedown behaviors of railway ballast under cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater 155:1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Desai CS (2007) Unified DSC constitutive model for pavement materials with numerical implementation. Int J Geomech 7:83–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(83)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ergenzinger C, Seifried R, Eberhard P (2012) A discrete element approach to model breakable railway ballast. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn doi 10(1115/1):4006731

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmoud E, Papagiannakis AT, Renteria D (2016) discrete element analysis of railway ballast under cycling loading. Procedia Eng 143:1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thakur PK, Indraratna B, Vinod JS (2009) DEM simulation of effect of confining pressure on ballast behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering: the academia and practice of geotechnical engineering

  13. Tutumluer E, Qian Y, Hashash YMA et al (2013) Discrete element modelling of ballasted track deformation behaviour. Int J Rail Transp 1:57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2013.788361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eliáš J (2014) Simulation of railway ballast using crushable polyhedral particles. Powder Technol 264:458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.05.052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gladkyy A, Kuna M (2017) DEM simulation of polyhedral particle cracking using a combined Mohr–Coulomb–Weibull failure criterion. Granul Matter 19:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-017-0731-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui XH, Xiao H, Ling X (2022) Analysis of ballast breakage in ballast bed when using under sleeper pads. Geomech Geoeng 17:677–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2020.1864030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hossain Z, Indraratna B, Darve F, Thakur PK (2007) DEM analysis of angular ballast breakage under cyclic loading. Geomech Geoeng 2:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020701474962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu G-Y, Xu W-J, Sun Q-C, Govender N (2020) Study on the particle breakage of ballast based on a GPU accelerated discrete element method. Geosci Front 11:461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.06.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan Y, Zhao J, Ji S (2015) Discrete element analysis of breakage of irregularly shaped railway ballast. Geomech Geoeng 10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2014.933891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmussen LL (2021) Hybrid lattice/discrete element method for bonded block modeling of rocks. Comput Geotech 130:103907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolander J, Yoshitake K, Thomure J (1999) STRESS ANALYSIS USING ELASTICALLY HOMOGENEOUS RIGID-BODY-SPRING NETWORKS. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu 16:25–32. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1999.633_25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yip M, Mohle J, Bolander JE (2005) Automated modeling of three-dimensional structural components using irregular lattices. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 20:393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00407.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasmussen LL, de Farias MM, de Assis AP (2018) Extended Rigid Body Spring Network method for the simulation of brittle rocks. Comput Geotech 99:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Camanho P, Davila C (2002) Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for the Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials. Langley

  25. Asahina D, Ito K, Houseworth JE et al (2015) Simulating the Poisson effect in lattice models of elastic continua. Comput Geotech 70:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zang A, Wagner FC, Stanchits S et al (2000) Fracture process zone in granite. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105:23651–23661. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M (1996) Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol 56:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson R, Gorski B, Gyenge M (1995) Geotechnical properties of rock. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, ON (Canada), Canada

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hoek E, Carranza C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-brown failure criterion – 2002 edition. In: Proc. NARMS-TAC Conference. Toronto, pp 267–273

  30. Diógenes DF (2021) Avaliação multiescala de propriedades (petrográficas, físicas e morfológicas) de agregados e empacotamento de partículas para composição de lastros ferroviários. PhD Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Ceará

  31. Recarey C, Pérez I, Roselló R et al (2019) Advances in particle packing algorithms for generating the medium in the discrete element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:336–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.011

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Recarey C, Cortés LA, de Farias MM et al (2018) Systemic characterization and evaluation of particle packings as initial sets for discrete element simulations. Comput Part Mech 5:319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-017-0171-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Valera RLR, González JI, de Oliveira JM et al (2023) Development and coupling of numerical techniques for modeling micromechanical discrete and continuous media using real particle morphologies. Comput Part Mech 10:121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-022-00481-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rasmussen LL, de Farias MM (2019) Lattice modelling of gravity and stress-driven failures of rock tunnels. Comput Geotech 116:103183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaeger JC (1967) Failure of rocks under tensile conditions. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 4:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(67)90046-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McDowell GR, Bolton MD, Robertson D (1996) The fractal crushing of granular materials. J Mech Phys Solids 44:2079–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00058-0

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McDowell GR, Bolton MD (1998) On the micromechanics of crushable aggregates. Géotechnique 48:667–679. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.5.667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakata AFL, Hyde M, Hyodo H, Murata, (1999) A probabilistic approach to sand particle crushing in the triaxial test. Géotechnique 49:567–583. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.5.567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiao Y, Meng M, Daouadji A et al (2020) Effects of particle size on crushing and deformation behaviors of rockfill materials. Geosci Front 11:375–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–297. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Indraratna B, Ionescu D, Christie D, Chowdhury R (1997) Compression and Degradation of Railway Ballast Under One-Dimensional Loading. Australian Geomechanics 48–61

  42. Marsal RJ (1975) Mechanical properties of rockfill. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 12:67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(75)90138-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Marschi ND, Chan CK, Seed HB (1972) Evaluation of Properties of Rockfill Materials. J Soil Mech Found Div 98:95–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Indraratna B, Wijewardena LSS, Balasubramaniam AS (1993) Large-scale triaxial testing of grey wacke rockfill. Géotechnique 43:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.1.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang J, Wang X, Yin Z-Y, Liang Z (2020) DEM modeling of large-scale triaxial test of rock clasts considering realistic particle shapes and flexible membrane boundary. Eng Geol 279:105871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Charles JA, Watts KS (1980) The influence of confining pressure on the shear strength of compacted rockfill. Geotechnique 30:353–367. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.4.353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Indraratna B, Ionescu D, Christie HD (1998) Shear behavior of railway ballast based on large-scale triaxial tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(439)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Werkmeister S, Dawson AR, Wellner F (2001) Permanent deformation behavior of granular materials and the shakedown concept. Transp Res Record 1757:75–81. https://doi.org/10.3141/1757-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun QD, Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S (2016) Deformation and degradation mechanisms of railway ballast under high frequency cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142:04015056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001375

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil

    Samuel de Almeida Torquato e Silva, Márcio Muniz de Farias & Leandro Lima Rasmussen

  2. Universidad de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba

    Carlos Alexander Recarey Morfa

  3. Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba

    Manuel Alejandro Castro Fuentes

Authors
  1. Samuel de Almeida Torquato e Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Márcio Muniz de Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leandro Lima Rasmussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Alexander Recarey Morfa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Manuel Alejandro Castro Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel de Almeida Torquato e Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Almeida Torquato e Silva, S., de Farias, M.M., Rasmussen, L.L. et al. Hybrid Lattice-discrete element method for ballast modeling. Comp. Part. Mech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00723-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00723-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation