Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental study on nonlinear flow behavior in smooth and rough sandstone fractures subjected to various injection pressure and normal compressive stress

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of fracture roughness and the occurrence of nonlinear flow complicate the fracture flow process. In the present study, water flow tests were conducted to comparatively study the flow behavior in smooth (Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) = 0–2) and rough (JRC = 18–19) fractures. The confining stress is in the range of 2–60 MPa and the injection pressure is in the range of 0.1–12 MPa to ensure obtaining a wide range of experimental data points. Surface roughness parameters (Rp, Z2, JRC) based on a single fracture surface and aperture distribution based on both surfaces were calculated and their effect on the flow behavior was explored. Transmissivity, flow regimes and the Forchheimer coefficient β were analysed in detail. The results show that the mean aperture size of tensile fracture is lightly smaller than that of cut fracture, with a much smaller standard deviation. Tensile fracture also has a higher peak frequency, indicating that the two fracture surfaces match more perfectly. The intrinsic transmissivity ratio of cut to tensile fracture increases from 1.6 under 2 MPa to 9740.7 under 60 MPa, which may be attributed to the fact that cut fracture has an about \(1/30\) stress-dependence coefficient λ of the tensile fracture. Flow data for cut fracture scatter in transition and turbulent flow regions while scatter in laminar and transition flow regions in tensile fracture, and it is supposed to be quite difficult for flow in tensile facture to enter into turbulent flow. For tensile fracture, a linear relationship exists between Forchheimer coefficient β and mean aperture size η (\(\beta = a_{1} \eta + b_{1}\)) and the correlation coefficients is up to 0.988, while for cut fracture, an exponential model relating β with both confining stress and mean aperture size η was proposed (\(\beta = a_{2} e^{{\left( {b_{2} - c_{2} \eta } \right)^{\sigma } }}\)) and the correlation coefficients is up to 0.978.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availabiltiy

All data that support the fifindings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Amadei B, Illangasekare T (1994) A mathematical model for flow and solute transport in non-homogeneous rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31(6):719–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech Rock Eng 10(1):1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B (2002) Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: a review. Adv Water Resour 25(8):861–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SR, Kranz RL, Bonner BP (1986) Correlation between the surfaces of natural rock joints. Geophys Res Lett 13(13):1430–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1987) Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. J Geophys Res 92:1337–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YF, Zhou JQ, Hu SH, Hu R, Zhou CB (2015) Evaluation of Forchheimer equation coefficients for non-Darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures. J Hydrol 529:993–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YD, Lian HJ, Liang WG, Yang JF, Nguyen VP, Bordas SPA (2019) The influence of fracture geometry variation on non-Darcy flow in fractures under confining stresses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 113:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Develi K, Babadagli T (2015) Experimental and visual analysis of single-phase flow through rough fracture replicas. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 73:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakherdavood MJN, Ramezanzadeh A, Jenabi H (2019) Laboratory investigation of nonlinear flow characteristics through natural rock fractures. Q J Eng Geol Hydroge 52(4):519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao C, Xie LZ, Xie HP, He B, Li CB, Wang J, Luo Y (2016) Coupling between the statistical damage model and permeability variation in reservoir sandstone: theoretical analysis and verification. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 37:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Wang M, He M, Wang Y, Gao K, Gong W (2020) Experimental investigation on macroscopic behavior and microfluidic field of nonlinear flow in rough-walled artificial fracture models. Adv Water Resour 142:103637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang HS, Kang SS, Jang BA (2014) Determination of joint roughness coefficients using roughness parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(6):2061–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Park JY, Balasingam P, Morgan R (2008) Quantification of aperture and relations between aperture, normal stress and fluid flow for natural single rock fractures. Geotech Geol Eng 26(3):269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HL, Lu YY, Zhou L, Tang JR, Han SB, Ao X (2018) Experimental and model studies on loading path-dependent and nonlinear gas flow behavior in shale fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(1):227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu RC, Huang N, Jiang YJ, Han GS, Jing HW (2020) Effect of Shear Direction Change on Shear-Flow-Transport Processes in Single Rough-Walled Rock Fractures. Transp Porous Med 133:373–395

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Wang ZC, Qiao LP, Li W, Yang JJ (2021) Transition from linear to nonlinear flow in single rough fractures: effect of fracture roughness. Hydrogeol J 29:1343–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomize GM (1951) Flow in fractured rocks. Gosenergoizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis C (1969) A study of groundwater flow in jointed rock and its influence on the stability of rock masses. Rock Mechanics Research Report 10:1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Zhang ZY, Wang YK, Nemcik J, Wang JH (2022) On fluid flow regime transition in rough rock fractures: Insights from experiment and fluid dynamic computation. J Hydrol 607:127558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maerz NH, Franklin JA, Bennett CP (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27(5):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masciopinto C (1999) Particles’ transport in a single fracture under variable flow regimes. Adv Eng Softw 30(5):327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCraw C, Edlmann K, Miocic J, Gilfllan S, Haszeldine RS, McDermott CI (2016) Experimental investigation and hybrid numerical analytical hydraulic mechanical simulation of supercritical CO2 flowing through a natural fracture in caprock. Int J Greenh Gas Con 48(1):120–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medici G, West LJ, Banwart SA (2019) Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: Implications for contaminant transport. J Contam Hydrol 222:1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motiur Rahman M, Khalilur Rahman M (2012) Optimizing hydraulic fracture to manage sand production by predicting critical drawdown pressure in gas well. J Energy Resour-ASME 134(1):013101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers NO (1962) Characterization of surface roughness. Wear 5(3):182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasvi MCM, Ranjith PG, Sanjayan J, Haque A (2013) Sub- and super-critical carbon dioxide permeability of wellbore materials under geological sequestration conditions: an experimental study. Energy 54(2):231–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto K, Watanabe N, Hirano N, Tsuchiya N (2009) Direct measurement of contact area and stress dependence of anisotropic flow through rock fracture with heterogeneous aperture distribution. Earth Planet Sci Lett 281(1–2):81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noiriel C, Gouze P, Made B (2013) 3D analysis of geometry and flow changes in a limestone fracture during dissolution. J Hydrol 486:211–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian JZ, Chen Z, Zhan HB, Guan HC (2011a) Experimental study of the effect of roughness and Reynolds number on fluid flow in rough walled single fractures: a check of local cubic law. Hydrol Process 25(4):614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian JZ, Zhan HB, Chen Z, Ye H (2011b) Experimental study of solute transport under non-Darcian flow in a single fracture. J Hydrol 399(3):246–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren XY, Zhou L, Zhou JP, Lu ZH, Su XP (2020) Numerical analysis of heat extraction efficiency in a multilateral-well enhanced geothermal system considering hydraulic fracture propagation and configuration. Geothermics 87:101834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong G, Yang J, Cheng L, Zhou CB (2016) Laboratory investigation of nonlinear flow characteristics in rough fractures during shear process. J Hydrol 541:1385–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Stephansson O (2003) The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeol J 11:7–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmittbuhl J, Steyer A, Jouniaux L, Toussaint R (2008) Fracture morphology and viscous transport. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:422–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifzadeh M, Mitani Y, Esaki T (2008) Rock joint surfaces measurement and analysis of aperture distribution under different normal and shear loading using GIS. Rock Mech Rock Eng 41:299–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZH, Zhou L, Li HL, Lu ZH, Cai JC (2020) Experimental and numerical study on the anisotropic and nonlinear gas flow behavior of a single coal fracture under loading. Energ Fuel 34(4):4230–4242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su XP, Zhou L, Li HL, Lu YY, Shen ZH, Song X (2020) Effect of mesoscopic structure on hydro-mechanical properties of fractures. Environ Earth Sci 79:146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su XP, Liu JL, Liu HJ, Zhou L, Li HL, Chen JC (2021) Comparison of shear and tensile fracture permeability in granite under loading-unloading stress condition. J Porous Media 24(12):93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su XP, Li HL, Liu JL, Shen ZH, Ren XY, Zhou L (2022) Experimental study on nonlinear flow in granite tensile and shear fractures. Int J Geomech 22(12):04022241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan YL, Pan ZJ, Liu JS, Wu YT, Haque A, Connell LD (2017) Experimental study of permeability and its anisotropy for shale fracture supported with proppant. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 44:250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang CF, Neretnieks I, Tsang Y (2015) Hydrologic issues associated with nuclear waste repositories. Water Resour Res 51(9):6923–6972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tzelepis V, Moutsopoulos KN, Papaspyros JNE, Tsihrintzis VA (2015) Experimental investigation of flow behavior in smooth and rough artificial fractures. J Hydrol 521:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CS, Jiang YJ, Liu RC, Wang C, Zhang ZY, Sugimoto S (2020) Experimental study of the nonlinear flow characteristics of fluid in 3D rough-walled fractures during shear process. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:2581–2604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16(6):1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JY, Yin Q, Jing HW (2020) Surface roughness and boundary load effect on nonlinear flow behavior of fluid in real rock fractures. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:4917–4932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia CC, Qian X, Lin P, Xiao WM, Gui Y (2017) Experimental investigation of nonlinear flow characteristics of real rock joints under different contact conditions. J Hydraul Eng 143(3):04016090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie J, Gao MZ, Zhang R, Peng GY, Lu T, Wang F (2020) Experimental investigation on the anisotropic fractal characteristics of the rock fracture surface and its application on the fluid flow description. J Petrol Sci Eng 191:107190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong F, Jiang QH, Ye ZY, Zhang XB (2018) Nonlinear flow behaviour through rough-walled rock fractures: The effect of contact area. Comput Geotech 102:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye ZY, Liu HH, Jiang QH, Liu YZ, Cheng AP (2017) Two-phase flow properties in aperture-based fractures under normal deformation conditions: analytical approach and numerical simulation. J Hydrol 545:72–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Q, Ma GW, Jing HW, Wang HD, Su HJ, Wang YC, Liu RC (2017) Hydraulic properties of 3D rough-walled fractures during shearing: An experimental study. J Hydrol 555:169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu LY, Liu RC, Jiang YJ (2017) A review of critical conditions for the onset of nonlinear fluid flow in rock fractures. Geofluids 2017:2176932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z, Grigg R (2006) A criterion for non-Darcy flow in porous media. Transp Porous Media 63(1):57–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZY, Nemcik J (2013) Fluid flow regimes and nonlinear flow characteristics in deformable rock fractures. J Hydrol 477:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XM, Shi WZ, Hu QH, Zhai GY, Wang R, Xu XF, Xu Z, Meng FL, Liu YZ (2019) Pressure-dependent fracture permeability of marine shales in the northeast Yunnan area. Southern China Int J Coal Geol 214:103237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JQ, Hu SH, Fang S, Chen YF, Zhou CB (2015) Nonlinear flow behavior at low Reynolds numbers through rough-walled fractures subjected to normal compressive loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:202–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JQ, Hu SH, Chen YF, Wang M, Zhou CB (2016) The friction factor in the Forchheimer equation for rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(8):3055–3068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Shen ZH, Wang JD, Li HL, Lu YY (2019) Numerical investigating the effect of nonuniform proppant distribution and unpropped fractures on well performance in a tight reservoir. J Petrol Sci Eng 177:634–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Al-Yaarubi AH, Pain CC, Grattoni CA (2004) Nonlinear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is jointly supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing (No. cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0929), the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (No. KJQN202100726), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U21A2030), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No. 2022NSFSC1169), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing (No. CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0429), the Science Foundation of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Grant No. 20JDKJC-B029). The authors wish to thank Junhui Mu for her help in conducting the flow experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiaopeng Su: Conceptualization, Methodology Tong Zhang: Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft Lei Zhou: Supervision and Funding acquisition Junchao Chen: Writing - Review & Editing Xu Wei: Investigation Wentao Yang: Resources

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaopeng Su or Tong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, X., Zhang, T., Zhou, L. et al. Experimental study on nonlinear flow behavior in smooth and rough sandstone fractures subjected to various injection pressure and normal compressive stress. Environ Earth Sci 83, 171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11415-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11415-y

Keywords

Navigation