No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Wounded Animals and Where to Find Them. The Symbolism of Hunting in Palaeolithic Art
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2024
Abstract
Representations of wounded animals and humans in European Upper Palaeolithic art have traditionally been conceived as figures related to the hunting activities of hunter-gatherer societies. In this paper, we propose an analysis of Franco-Cantabrian figurative representations showing signs of violence between 35,000 and 13,000 cal. bp to qualify the interpretations of hunting and death in Palaeolithic art. To this end, both multivariate statistical analyses and hypothesis tests have been used to highlight the formal, thematic, chronological and regional similarities and differences in these types of artistic representations. The results show that wounded graphic units are mythograms coded by different variables that do not seem to reflect the actual hunting of the animal, but rather a more complex meaning. It was also discovered that, in early times, the artist preferred to wound secondary or less frequent animals, like deer. This changed in more recent times, when the main animals, such as bison, are wounded under greater normativity and homogeneity in the Pyrenees or the Cantabrian region.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
References
Alcalde del Río, H., Breuil, H. & Sierra, L., 1911. Les cavernes de la région cantabrique (Espagne) [The caves of the Cantabrian region (Spain)]. Monaco: Imprimerie Vve A. Chêne.Google Scholar
Altuna, J., 1983. On the relationship between archaeofaunas and parietal art in the Cantabrian region, in Animals and Archaeology: 1. Hunters and their prey, eds Clutton-Brock, J. & Grigson, C.. (BAR International series S163.) Oxford: Archaeopress, 227–38.Google Scholar
Altuna, J., 1984. Relación entre la fauna cazada por los pobladores del yacimiento y las figuras representadas en el santuario [Relationship between the fauna hunted by the site's settlers and the figures represented in the sanctuary], in El yacimiento prehistorico de la Cueva de Ekain (Deba, Guipuzcoa) [The prehistoric site of Ekain Cave (Deba, Guipuzcoa)], eds Altuna, J. & Merino, J.M.. San Sebastian: Eusko Ikaskuntza, 281–6.Google Scholar
Altuna, J., 1994. La relación fauna consumida-fauna representada en el Paleolítico Superior Cantábrico [The relationship fauna consumed-fauna represented in the Upper Palaeolithic of Cantabria]. Complutum 5, 303–11.Google Scholar
Altuna, J., 1995. Faunas de mamíferos y cambios ambientales durante el Tardiglaciar cantábrico [Mammalian faunas and environmental changes during the Cantabrian Late Glacial period], in El Final del Paleolítico Cantábrico: transformaciones ambientales y culturales durante el Tardiglacial y comienzos del Holoceno en la Región Cantábrica [The end of the Cantabrian Palaeolithic: environmental and cultural transformations during the Late Glacial and early Holocene periods in the Cantabrian region], eds Moure, A. & González-Sainz, C.. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria, 77–117.Google Scholar
Aubert, M., Lebe, R., Oktaviana, A.A., et al., 2019. Earliest hunting scene in prehistoric art. Nature 576, 442–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baffier, D., 1990. Lecture technologique des représentations paléolithiques liées à la chasse et au gibier [Technological interpretation of Palaeolithic representations of hunting and game]. Paléo 2, 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbín, R. de & Alcolea, J.J., 1999. Vie quotidienne et vie religieuse: les sanctuaires dans l'art paléolithique [Daily life and religious life: sanctuaries in Palaeolithic art]. L'Anthropologie 103(1), 23–50.Google Scholar
Barandiarán, I., 1984. Signos asociados a hocicos animales en el Arte Paleolítico [Signs associated with animal muzzles in Palaeolithic Art]. Veleia 1, 7–24.Google Scholar
Bégouën, H., 1939. Les bases magiques de l'art préhistorique [The magical foundations of prehistoric art]. Scientia 33(65), 202–16.Google Scholar
Bégouën, H. & Breuil, H., 1958. Les Cavernes du Volp. Trois Frères, Tuc d'Audoubert à Montesquieu-Avantès (Ariège) [The Volp caves. Trois Frères, Tuc d'Audoubert at Montesquieu-Avantès (Ariège)]. Paris: Arts et Métiers Graphiques.Google Scholar
Beltrán, A., 1982. De cazadores a pastores. El arte rupestre del Levante español [From hunters to shepherds. Cave art in the Spanish Levant region]. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro.Google Scholar
Blasco Bosqued, M.C., 1974. La caza en el arte rupestre del levante español [Hunting in the rock art of eastern Spain]. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología 1, 29–55.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., Obermaier, H. & Verner, W., 1915. La Pileta a Benaoján (Málaga) [La Pileta to Benaoján (Málaga)]. Mónaco: Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Fondation Albert-I Prince de Monaco.Google Scholar
Brøgger, A.W., 1925. Det norske folk i oldtiden [The Norwegian people in ancient times]. Oslo: Instituttet for sammenlignende kulturforskning.Google Scholar
Brusgaard, N.Ø., 2019. Carving Interactions: Rock art in the nomadic landscape of the Black Desert, north-eastern Jordan. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Brusgaard, N.Ø. & Akkermans, K.A., 2021. Hunting and havoc: narrative scenes in the Black Desert rock art of Jebel Qurma, Jordan, in Making Scenes: Global perspectives on scenes in rock art, eds Davidson, I. & Nowell, A.. New York (NY): Berghahn, 134–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartailhac, E. & Breuil, H., 1906. La Caverne d´Altamira à Santillana près Santander (Espagne) [The Altamira cave in Santillana near Santander (Spain)]. Monaco: Imprimerie de Monaco.Google Scholar
Cazals, N., 2005. Le début du Magdalénien de part et d'autre des Pyrénées. Quelques réflexions au travers des techniques de taille et des modes d'exploitation des ressources [The early Magdalenian on either side of the Pyrenees. A few thoughts on cutting techniques and ways of exploiting resources], in Territoires, déplacements, mobilité, échanges durant la Préhistoire. Actes du 126ème congrès national des sociétés historiques et scientifiques [Territories, movements, mobility, exchanges during prehistory. Proceedings of the 126th National Congress of Historical and Scientific societies], eds Barbaza, M. & Jaubert, J.. Paris: CTHS, 295–309.Google Scholar
Chenorkian, P., 1996. Pratique archéologique, statistique et graphique [Archaeological, statistical and graphic practice]. Paris: Errance & Adam.Google Scholar
Clottes, J., 2010. Les cavernes de Niaux: Art préhistorique en Ariège-Pyrénées [The Niaux caves: prehistoric art in the Ariège-Pyrénées region]. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. & Delporte, H., 2003. La grotte de La Vache (Ariège) [La Vache Cave (Ariège)]. Paris: Éditions de la Reunión des Musées Nationaux.Google Scholar
D'Huy, J. & Le Quellec, J.L., 2010. Les animaux «fléchés» à Lascaux: nouvelle proposition d'interprétation [The ‘arrowed’ animals at Lascaux: a new interpretation proposal]. Bulletin Préhistoire du Sud-Ouest 18(2), 161–70.Google Scholar
Delannoy, J.-J. & Geneste, J.-M. (eds), 2020. Monographie de la grotte Chauvet-Pont d'Arc 1: Atlas de la grotte Chauvet-Pont d'Arc. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.Google Scholar
Delluc, B. & Delluc, G., 1989. Le sang, la souffrance et la mort dans l'art paléolithique [Blood, suffering and death in Palaeolithic art]. L'Anthropologie 93, 389–406.Google Scholar
Dodge, Y., 2006: The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortea, J., 2005. Los grabados exteriores de Santo Adriano (Tuñón. Santo Adriano. Asturias) [The exterior engravings of Santo Adriano (Tuñón. Santo Adriano. Asturias)]. Munibe 57, 23–52.Google Scholar
García Guinea, M. & Puente, M.Á., 1982. El arte rupestre de la cueva de Micolón (Riclones, Santander) [The rock art of the Micolón cave (Riclones, Santander)]. Sautuola 3, 131–9.Google Scholar
Gjessing, G., 1936. Nordenfjelske Ristninger og Malinger av den Arktiske Gruppe [Nordenfjelske carvings and paintings of the Arctic Group]. Oslo: H. Aschehoug.Google Scholar
González Sainz, C., 2007. El tema del ‘ciervo herido’ en el arte parietal paleolítico de la región cantábrica. Evaluación iconográfica [The theme of the ‘wounded deer’ in Palaeolithic parietal art from the Cantabrian region. Iconographic evaluation]. Veleia 24–25, 305–27.Google Scholar
Helskog, K., 2012. Bears and meanings among hunter-fisher-gatherers in northern Fennoscandia 9000–2500 BC. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 22(2), 209–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helskog, K., 2014. Communicating with the World of Beings: The World Heritage rock art sites in Alta, Arctic Norway. Oxford: Oxbow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesjedal, A., 1992. Veideristninger i Nord-Norge; datering og tolkningsproblematikk [Road carvings in northern Norway; dating and interpretation problems]. Viking 55, 27–54.Google Scholar
Jordá, F., 1975. La sociedad en el arte rupestre levantino [Society in Levantine rock art]. Papeles del Laboratorio de Arqueología de Valencia 11, 159–84.Google Scholar
Langlais, M., Sécher, A., Caux, S., Delvigne, V., Gourc, L., Normand, C. & de La Torre, M.S., 2016. Lithic tool kits: a metronome of the evolution of the Magdalenian in southwest France (19,000–14,000 cal BP). Quaternary International 414, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A., Marín-Arroyo, A., Álvarez-Fernández, E., et al., 2021. Interconnected Magdalenian societies as revealed by the circulation of whale bone artefacts in the Pyreneo-Cantabrian region. Quaternary Science Reviews 25, 106692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, M., 2000. La chasse dans l'art préhistorique [Hunting in prehistoric art]. Anthropologie et Préhistoire 111, 410–15.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., [1965] 1971. Préhistoire de l´Art Occidental [Prehistory of western Art]. Paris: Éditions d'art Lucien Mazenod.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, Arl. & Allain, J., 1979. Lascaux Inconnu [Unknown Lascaux]. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, D.J., 2002. A Cosmos in Stone: Interpreting religion and society through rock art. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira.Google Scholar
López-Montalvo, E., 2018. Hunting scenes in Spanish Levantine rock art: an unequivocal chrono-cultural marker of Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Iberian societies? Quaternary International 472, 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 1995. Les grottes ornées de la préhistoire. Nouveaux regards [Decorated caves in prehistory. New perspectives]. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 2001. La grotte ornée de Pergouset (Saint Géry, Lot): un sanctuaire secret paléolithique [The decorated cave of Pergouset (Saint Géry, Lot): a secret Palaeolithic sanctuary]. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., 2010. Art pariétal. Grottes ornées du Quercy [Cave art. Ornate caves of Quercy]. Rodez: Rouergue.Google Scholar
Magnus, B. & Myhre, B., 1986. Forhistorien. Fra jegergrupper til høvdingesamfunn [Prehistory. From hunter groups to chieftain communities]. (Norges historie 1.) Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, E., 1977. Østnorske veideristninger—kronologi og økokulturelt miljø [East Norwegian road carvings – chronology and ecocultural environment]. Viking 41, 147–201.Google Scholar
Moure, A., 1990. Fauna y medio ambiente en el arte rupestre paleolítico [Fauna and environment in Palaeolithic rock art]. Boletín del Seminario de Estudios de Arte y Arqueología 56, 38–52.Google Scholar
Quiles, A., Valladas, H., Bocherens, H., et al., 2016. A high-precision chronological model for the decorated Upper Paleolithic cave of Chauvet-Pont d'Arc, Ardèche, France. PNAS 113(17), 4670–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranta, M., Skoglund, P., Persson, T. & Gjerde, J.M., 2020. Hunting stories in Scandinavian rock art: aspects of ‘tellability’ in the north versus the south. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 39(3), 228–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, S., 1903. L'art et la magie á propos des peintures et des gravures de l´âge du renne [Art and magic: paintings and engravings from the Reindeer Age]. L´Anthropologie 14, 257–66.Google Scholar
Rivero, O., 2010. La movilidad de los grupos humanos del Magdaleniense Medio de la Región Cantábrica y los Pirineos: una visión a través del arte [The mobility of Middle Magdalenian human groups in the Cantabrian region and the Pyrenees: a view through art]. PhD dissertation, Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Rivero, O., 2020. El arte prehistórico [Prehistoric art], in Prehistoria de la península ibérica [Prehistory of the Iberian peninsula], eds Álvarez-Fernández, E., Blanco, A. & Rivero, O.. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, 211–323.Google Scholar
Ruiz López, J.F., 2009. Cazadores y presas: simbolismo e interpretación social de las actividades cinegéticas en el arte levantino [Hunters and prey: symbolism and social interpretation of hunting activities in Levantine art]. Archaeobios 3, 104–26.Google Scholar
Sauvet, G., 2019. The hierarchy of animals in the Paleolithic iconography. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 28, 102025.Google Scholar
Sauvet, G., Fortea, J., Fritz, C. & Tosello, G., 2008. Echanges culturels entre groupes humains paléolithiques entre 20.000 et 12.000 BP [Cultural exchanges between Palaeolithic human groups between 20,000 and 12,000 BP]. Préhistoire, Art et Sociétés 63, 73–92.Google Scholar
Sauvet, G., Fritz, C., Fortea, J. & Tosello, G., 2014. Fluctuations des échanges symboliques au Paléolithique supérieur en France et dans le Nord de l'Espagne [Fluctuations in symbolic exchanges during the Upper Palaeolithic in France and northern Spain], in Transitions, ruptures et continuités en Préhistoire [Transitions, ruptures and continuities in prehistory], eds Jaubert, J., Fourment, N. & Depaepe, P.. Paris: Société préhistorique française, 403–15.Google Scholar
Sauvet, G. & Wlodarczyk, A., 2000–2001. L'art pariétal, miroir des sociétés paléolithiques [Cave art, a mirror of Palaeolithic societies]. Zephyrus 53–54, 217–40.Google Scholar
Sieveking, A., 1979. Style and regional grouping in Magdalenian cave art. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 16, 95–109.Google Scholar
Simonsen, P., 1979. Veidemenn på Nordkalotten, vol. 3: Yngre steinalder og overgang til metall tid [Roadmen on the North Calotte, vol. 3: Neolithic and transition to metal age]. (Stensilserie B, Historie 17.) Tromsø: Institutt for Samfunnsvitenskap, Universitetet i Tromsø.Google Scholar
Skoglund, P., Ranta, M., Persson, T. & Rédei, A., 2022. Narrative aspects of images of spear use in Scandinavian rock carvings. European Journal of Archaeology 25(2), 176–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosello, G., 2003. Pierres gravées du Périgord magdalénien. Art, symboles, territoires [Engraved stones from the Magdalenian Périgord. Art, symbols, territories]. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Trombe, F. & Dubuc, G., 1947. Le centre préhistorique de Ganties-Montespan (Haute-Garonne) [The Ganties-Montespan prehistoric centre (Haute-Garonne)]. (Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine 22.) Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Utrilla, P. & Martínez-Bea, M., 2005. La captura del ciervo vivo en el arte prehistórico [The capture of live deer in prehistoric art]. Munibe 57, 161–78.Google Scholar
Valladas, H., 2003. Direct radiocarbon dating of prehistoric cave paintings by accelerator mass spectrometry. Measurement Science and Technology 14, 1487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vialou, D., 1986. L'art des grottes en Ariège magdalénienne [Cave art in Magdalenian Ariège]. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Rivero et al. supplementary material
Rivero et al. supplementary material
File
2.6 MB