Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T03:30:04.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of cross-border free route implementation: A case for Turkish and Ukrainian airspaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

I. A. Ozcan*
Affiliation:
Department of Air Traffic Control, Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir, Türkiye
F. Aybek Çetek
Affiliation:
Department of Air Traffic Control, Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author:I. A. Ozcan; Email: ilkeraozcan@gmail.com

Abstract

Free route airspace (FRA) are increasingly widespread in European countries. A step further, cross-border FRA aims to implement FRA in a seamless,defragmented airspace in Europe. This study aims to bring a different perspective by extending the scope of cross-border FRA applications beyond socioeconomic status (SES) countries. In the study, analyses were made using fast-time simulation outputs for one of the busiest days of Turkish airspace in 2022. The simulation models of four cases were created and compared in such a way that airspaces of Türkiye, South East Europe free route airspace (SEEFRA) countries and Ukraine combined under different border operations above FL285. Flight trajectories were assessed in terms of flight distance, fuel economy and environmental impact within the aforementioned airspaces. The participation of Turkish airspace in the cross-border region and opening of Ukrainian airspace are examined. Concluded, among all, cross-border FRA implemented through all aforementioned regions (Case 4) may constitute the best benefit for flight trajectories and related variables.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eurocontrol, EUROCONTROL predicts growth in aviation traffic over next 8 months. https://www.eurocontrol.int/news/eurocontrol-predicts-growth-aviationtraffic-over-next-8-months, April 2022.Google Scholar
Eurocontrol NMD/ACD. European Route Network Improvement Plan- Part 1 European Airspace Design Methodology Guidelines - General Principles And Technical Specifications For Airspace Design Ed: 2.7, 2023.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. Free Route Airspace (FRA) in ICAOEUR region-concept, publication, implementation, FAQs, Civil/Military Workshop, 2018.Google Scholar
Aksoy, H. Alçalma ve Tırmanma Profilindeki Verimsizliklerin Uçuş Verileri ve Hızlı Zamanlı Simülasyon Kullanılarak Yakıt Tüketimi ve Emisyon Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Analizi, 2022. Google Scholar
Cecen, R.K. and Cetek, C. A two-step approach for airborne delay minimization using pretactical conflict resolution in free-route airspace, Hindawi J. Adv. Transp., 2019, 2019, Article ID 4805613.Google Scholar
Aydoğan, E. Serbest Yol Yapısına Sahip Hava Sahaları İçin Rota Planlaması ve Optimizasyonu, 2020. Google Scholar
Özcan, İ.A. Türkiye Ve Komşu Uçuş Bilgi Bölgeleri İçin Bütünleşik Serbest Rota Hava Sahası Uygulaması Ve Etkileri, 2022. Google Scholar
Majka, A. and Pasich, A. Cross-border Free Route Airspace concept and its impact on flight efficiency improvement, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 1226, (1), p 012022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, P., Rohács, D., Papp, G. and Kling, F. The effects of the introduction of free route (HUFRA, Hungarian Free Route Airspace) in the Hungarian airspace, Eighth SESAR Innovation Days, 3rd – 7th December 2018.Google Scholar
Kudumija, D., Antulov-Fantulin, B., Andraši, P. and Rogošić, T. The effect of the Croatian Free Route Airspace implementation on the Air Traffic Complexity, Transp. Res. Procedia, 2022, 64, 356363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejovic, T., Lazarovski, A. and Pavlovic, G. (2022), Impact of free route airspace implementation on safety performance, 9th SESAR Innovation Days, 2-5 December 2019, ISSN 0770-1268.Google Scholar
Antulov-Fantulin, B., Rogosic, T., Juricic, B. and Andrasi, P. Air traffic controller assessment of the free route airspace implementation within zagreb area control centre, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Science and Traffic Development” (ZIRP 2018), Opatija, Crotia, 2018.Google Scholar
Petrović, M. Simulation of Merging Airspaces of Macedonia, Albania and Kosovo with South East Common Sky Initiative Free Route Airspace, 2018.Google Scholar
Pejovic, T., Crnogorac, D. and Netjasov, F., Influence of FRA implementation on traffic, safety, complexity and workload in MUAC airspace. 10, SESAR Innovation Days 2020, 2020.Google Scholar
Eurocontrol. NEST User Manual, 2020. Google Scholar
Pavlova, S. and Zadorozhnia, A. Analysis of free route airspace and performance based navigation implementation in the European air navigation system, Proc. National Aviat. Univ., 2014, 61, (4), pp 2835, ISSN 1813-1166 print/ISSN 2306-1472 online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurocontrol. FRATURK Simulations Final Report, 2022. Google Scholar