Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon Accumulation in Peat Soils of Floodplain Mires in the Northeast of the Central Russian Upland

  • SOIL BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peat deposits of the Bol`sheberezovskoe and Podkos`movo floodplain mires formed during the Atlantic–Subboreal periods of the Holocene in the Nepryadva River valley in the northeastern part of the Central Russian Upland have been studied. Data on the botanical composition of peat indicate that the genesis of these mires was associated with eutrophic paleocenoses, which accumulated carbon at a rate of 21.8–95 g/m2 per year. The formed eutrophic peat was characterized by a high degree of decomposition (45–55%) and by a low rate of vertical growth (on average, 0.3–0.6 mm/year), which was due to the seasonal dynamics of the level of mire waters. The carbon content of peat is 14% for the Podkos`movo mire and 31% for the Bol`sheberezovskoe mire. The differences are due to the specific water–mineral nutrition of the mires: the high carbonate and ash contents of the Podkos`movo mire. Carbon stocks in peat soils of floodplain mires vary from 51.5 up to 125 kg/m2 for 10-cm-thick horizons. This parameter is determined by the degree of decomposition of plant residues, which depends on the composition and structure of microbial complexes. The microbial complex of Bol`sheberezovskoe and Podkos`movo mires is dominated by the fungal and bacterial components, respectively. This is the reason for the differences in the microbial biomass of the mires: 222 g/m2 for the Podkos`movo mire and 898 g/m2 for the Bol`sheberezovskoe mire. The differences between the two floodplain mires are related to the degree of variation in the level of mire waters during the growing season, which is more considerable at the Bol`sheberezovskoe mire because of its artificial drainage. Floodplain mires are important depots of atmospheric carbon, and the intensity of its accumulation is determined by a combination of factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. A. Arlyapov, I. A. Nechaeva, L. S. Skvortsova, and E. M. Volkova, “Comprehensive environmental assessment of the state of water bodies in the Tula oblast,” Voda: Khim. Ekol., No. 6, 9–21 (2016).

  2. I. A. Arkhipchenko, “Microbiological peculiarities of peat substrates,” Gavrish, No. 2, 5–9 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. V. Babikov and K. I. Kobak, “Absorption of atmospheric carbon dioxide by marsh ecosystems in Russia in the Holocene. Waterlogging problems,” Izv. VUZov. Lesn. Zh., No. 1, 9–36 (2016).

  4. K. S. Balezina, “Analysis of greenhouse gas fluxes in wetland ecosystems of Western Siberia,” Internauka, No. 21-1(150), 54–55 (2020).

  5. O. N. Biryukova and D. S. Orlov, “Stocks of organic carbon compounds in soils of the Russian Federation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 21–32 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. V. Vasil’ev, “Rate of peat accumulation in Western Siberia,” in Dynamics of Wetland Ecosystems in Northern Eurasia in the Holocene (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2000), pp. 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. M. Volkova, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (St. Petersburg, 2018).

  8. E. M. Volkova, “Woody, tree–moss, and shrub vegetation of bogs of the Central Russian Upland,” Raznoobrazie Rastitel’nogo Mira, No. 2 (13), 5–29 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. M. Volkova, Methods for Studying Wetland Ecosystems (Grif i K, Tula, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Volkova, “Floodplain swamps of the northeast of the Central Russian Upland,” Bot. Zh. 96 (4), 503–514 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. M. Volkova, M. M. Kalinina, and A. V. Dorogova, “Peculiarities of the genesis of watershed and floodplain swamps in the Tula oblast,” Izv. Tul. Gos. Univ. Estestv. Nauki 4, 118–131 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. M. Volkova, O. A. Leonova, and V. V. Mironov, “Paleoenvironmental conditions and carbon accumulation in the genesis of floodplain mire in the Central Russian Upland,” Sib. J. Life Sci. Agric., No. 6, 70–91 (2022).

  13. E. M. Volkova, E. Yu. Novenko, and T. K. Yurkovskaya, “Age of mires of the Central Russian Upland,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Geogr. 84 (4), 551–561 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. A. Golovatskaya, Modeling the Carbon Balance of Mire Ecosystems in the Southern Taiga under Different Scenarios of Climate Change (Tomsk, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. A. Golovatskaya, E. A. Dyukarev, E. E. Veretennikova, L. G. Nikonova, and S. V. Smirnov, “Estimation of the dynamics of carbon balance in swamps of the southern taiga subzone of Western Siberia (Tomsk oblast),” Pochvy Okruzh. Sreda 5 (4), e194 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31251/pos.v5i4.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. V. Golovchenko and E. M. Volkova, “Microbial biomass and its structure in karst peats of Tula oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52 (3), 333–338 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319030049

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. V. Golovchenko and E. M. Volkova, “Number, reserves and structure of microbial complexes of lowland peatlands of the Tula oblast,” in Proc. 5th Scientific School “Mires and the Biosphere” (Tsentr Nauchno-Tech. Inf., Tomsk, 2006), pp. 158–162.

  18. A. V. Golovchenko, T. A. Gracheva, T. A. Semenova, A. A. Morozov, S. R. Samigullina, T. V. Glukhova, and L. I. Inisheva, “The mycelial component of eutrophic peat soils in the zone of active organic detritus decomposition,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 56 (5), 545–557 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323600057

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. V. Golovchenko, Yu. D. Dmitrienko, A. A. Morozov, L. A. Pozdnyakov, T. V. Glukhova, and L. I. Inisheva, “Microbial biomass in eutrophic peatlands: stock, structure, and activity,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 54 (7), 1068–1077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321050094

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. V. Golovchenko, E. Yu. Tikhonova, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Abundance, biomass, structure, and activity of the microbial complexes of minerotrophic and ombrotrophic peatlands,” Microbiology 76 (5), 630–637 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. GOST (State Standard) 23740-2016: Grounds. Methods for determining the content of organic substances.

  22. GOST (State Standard) 34467-2018: Grounds. Methods of laboratory determination of carbonate content.

  23. T. G. Dobrovol’skaya, A. V. Golovchenko, O. S. Kukharenko, A. V. Yakushev, T. A. Semenova, and L. A. Inisheva, “The structure of the microbial communities in low-moor and high-moor peat bogs of Tomsk oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45 (3), 273–281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229312030039

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. V. Dombrovskaya, Atlas of Plant Residues Found in Peat (Gosenergoizdat, Moscow, 1959) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. T. Efremova, A. F. Avrova, and S. P. Efremov, “Calculation method for determining carbon in peat and moss litter of forest swamps based on the ash content of the plant substrate,” Sib. Lesn. Zh., No. 6, 73–83 (2016).

  26. D. V. Zatsarinnaya, E. M. Volkova, and O. A. Leonova, “Diversity of vegetation of floodplain swamps in the southeastern part of the Tula oblast,” Izv. Tul. Gos. Univ. Estestv. Nauki 1, 28–36 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. I. Inisheva, M. A. Sergeeva, and O. N. Smirnov, “Carbon sequestration and emission by swamps of Western Siberia,” Nauchn. Dialog. Estestvozn. Ekol., No. 7, 61–74 (2012).

  28. N. Ya. Kats, Swamps of the Globe (Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. A. Kutenkov, “Computer program for constructing stratigraphic diagrams of peat composition “Korpi”,” in Proceedings of Karelian Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences. No. 6. Series Ecological Studies (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2013), pp. 171–176.

  30. S. A. Lapin, “Comparative estimation of the hydrological and hydrochemical state of reservoirs in the Novomoskovsky district of the Tula oblast in the autumn,” Vopr. Rybolov. 18 (3), 328–335 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. D. Lapshina, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Tomsk, 2004).

  32. I. I. Lishtvan and N. T. Korol’, Basic Properties of Peat and Methods for Their Determination (Minsk, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Methods of Soil Biochemistry and Microbiology (Mosk. Univ., Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

  34. E. Yu. Novenko, M. P. Glasko, and O. V. Burova, “Climate dynamics and landscape evolution of the northern forest-steppe in the late Holocene (according to palynological data of the Kulikovo Field region),” in Collection of Scientific Articles “Problems of Studying and Restoring Landscapes of the Forest-Steppe Zone” (Tula, 2010), pp. 24–34.

  35. L. M. Polyanskaya, A. V. Golovchenko, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Microbial biomass in soils,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 344 (6), 846‒848 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. E. V. Porokhina, L. I. Inisheva, and V. A. Dyrin, “Biological activity and seasonal changes in CO2 and CH4 in peat deposits of a eutrophic bog,” Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ. Biol., No. 3, 157–176 (2015).

  37. N. I. P’yavchenko, “On the types of swamps and peat in swamp science,” in Basic Principles of Studying Swamp Biogeocenoses (Leningrad, 1972), pp. 35–43.

  38. N. I. P’yavchenko, Peatlands of Russian Forest–Steppe (Moscow, 1958) [in Russian].

  39. K. F. Khmelev, Patterns of Development of Swamp Ecosystems in the Central Chernozem Region (Izd. Voronezh. Univ., Voronezh, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  40. G. Chambers Lisa, Yu. Ping Chin, M. F. Gabriel, B. G. Christopher, E. M. Herndon, D. T. Long, W. B. Lyons, et al., “Developing the scientific framework for urban geochemistry,” Appl. Geochem. 67, 1–20 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. T. W. Crowther, “Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming,” Nature 540, 104–108 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Garsetiasih, N. M. Heriyanto, W. C. Adinugroho, H. Gunawan, I. W. S. Dharmawan, R. Sawitri, I. Yeny, N. Mindawati, and Denny, “Connectivity of vegetation diversity, carbon stock, and peat depth in peatland ecosystems,” Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage. 8, 369–388 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. D. G. Ivanov, I. P. Kotlov, T. Yu. Minayeva, and Ju. A. Kurbatova, “Estimation of carbon dioxide fluxes on a ridge-hollow bog complex using a high resolution orthophotoplan,” Nat. Conserv. Res. 6, 16–28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. G. Magnan, M. Garneau, E. Stum-Boivin, P. Grondin, and Y. Bergeron, “Long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forested peatlands in Eastern Canada,” Ecosystems 23, 1481–1493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-020-00483-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. E. Yu. Novenko and E. M. Volkova, “The Middle and Late Holocene vegetation and climate history of the forest-steppe ecotone area in the central part of European Russia,” Geogr. Rev. Japan Ser. B. 87, 91–98 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. E. Yu. Novenko, E. M. Volkova, M. P. Glasko, and I. S. Zuganova, “Paleoecological evidence for the middle and late Holocene vegetation, climate and land use in the upper Don River basin (Russia),” Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 21, 337–352 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. J. Ratcliffe and R. J. Payne, “Palaeoecological studies as a source of peat depth data: A discussion and data compilation for Scotland,” Mires Peat 18, 1–7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. P. J. Reimer, E. Bard, A. Bayliss, J. W. Beck, P. G. Blackwell, RamseyC. Bronk, C. E. Buck, et al., “IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0-50.000 Years cal BP,” Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Turunen, K. Tolonen, S. Tolvanen, M. Remes, J. Ronkainen, and H. Jungner, “Carbon accumulation in the mineral subsoil of boreal mires,” Global Biogeochem Cycles 13, 71–79 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 23-24-10054 “Assessment of the role of different types of mires of the Central Russian Upland in carbon exchange with the atmosphere as the basis for creating a carbon polygon (by the example of the Tula oblast)”; it was performed in agreement with the Tula oblast Committee on Science and Innovation (no. 10, April 11, 2023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Volkova.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This work does not contain any studies involving human and animal subjects.

Additional information

Translated by V. Klyueva

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volkova, E.M., Leonova, O.A. & Golovchenko, A.V. Carbon Accumulation in Peat Soils of Floodplain Mires in the Northeast of the Central Russian Upland. Eurasian Soil Sc. 57, 419–429 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323603049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323603049

Keywords:

Navigation